Name: 澤倫斯基準備在確保安全的情況下舉行大選！烏克蘭總統最新回應｜DW新聞 (Ukraine's President Zelenskyy ready to hold elections if security can be ensured | DW News)
Uploaded: 2025-12-10T16:55:13.000Z
Duration: 5 min 22 s

Ukraine's president says that he is ready to hold elections if Kyiv's allies can ensure the poll's security.

烏克蘭總統表示，如果基輔的盟友能確保投票安全，他已準備好舉行選舉。

The presidential term of Volodymyr Zelensky, who has been meeting with European allies this week, expired in May 2024.

澤倫斯基的總統任期已於 2024 年 5 月到期，他本週一直在與歐洲盟友會面。

The Ukrainian parliament's mandate ended a few months later, in August.

烏克蘭議會的任期則在幾個月後，也就是八月結束。

The president, under the United States, under President Donald Trump, has voiced support for Ukraine to hold elections.

美國總統唐納·川普已表達支持烏克蘭舉行選舉。

But the country's constitution states that elections, whether presidential, parliamentary or local, cannot be held under martial law.

但是國家憲法規定，無論是總統、國會的還是地方的選舉，都不能在戒嚴期間舉行。

In a voice note to journalists, Zelensky said that he has asked Ukrainian lawmakers to draw proposals on how the election law could be amended.

澤倫斯基透過語音訊息告訴記者，他已要求烏克蘭議員們提出如何修改選舉法的建議。

I'm saying this openly, for the United States to help me, possibly together with our European colleagues, to ensure security for the elections.

我公開說，請美國，可能還有我們的歐洲同事，來幫我確保選舉的安全。

Then in the next 60 to 90 days, Ukraine will be ready to hold elections.

那麼在接下來的60到90天內，烏克蘭就會準備好舉行選舉了。

I personally have the will and the readiness to do so.

我個人有這個意願，也有這個準備。

Furthermore, since this is how things have turned out, I am asking the members of our faction, in principle, our parliamentarians, to prepare legislative proposals on the possibility of changing the legislative framework and the law on elections during martial law.

此外，既然事情演變成這樣，我正在請求我們黨團的成員，原則上是我們的國會議員，準備關於在戒嚴期間修改立法框架和選舉法的可能性之立法提案。

Let's bring in DW correspondent Nick Connolly, who's joining us from Kiev.

讓我們連線DW記者Nick Connolly，他正在基輔與我們會合。

So Nick Zelinsky says that he's willing to hold elections.

所以Nick，澤倫斯基說他願意舉行選舉。

And is that something that many Ukrainians want?

這也是許多烏克蘭人想要的嗎？

We heard Zelensky there saying that it would happen if security were provided and if parliamentarians want it to happen.

我們聽到澤倫斯基說，如果能確保安全，而且國會議員也希望如此，選舉就會舉行。

這兩個「如果」都非常、非常重大。

I can't really see it happening until there's at least some kind of cease fire.

我實在看不出來，除非至少有某種程度的停火。

Realistically, how are soldiers going to vote?

How are people near front lines where there are constant drone attacks going to vote?

前線附近不斷遭受無人機攻擊的人們又要怎麼投票？

That is all very difficult to see happening.

But equally, this is about Zelensky showing openness to what the Trump White House wants of him.

但同樣地，這也顯示了澤倫斯基願意對川普政府的要求展現開放態度。

We've had Trump recently in frustration at what Trump sees as Zelensky's unwillingness to sign a deal and basically end this problem in a hurry, as Trump wants, asking out loud about Zelensky's legitimacy, as you mentioned, that the Ukrainian constitution doesn't allow for elections during martial law.

最近川普對澤倫斯基不願簽署協議、迅速解決問題的態度感到沮喪，正如川普所期望的，他公開質疑澤倫斯基的合法性，正如你提到的，烏克蘭憲法不允許在戒嚴期間舉行選舉。

So I think for now, this is more about the kind of rhetorical, kind of optics about Zelensky showing some openness that.

所以我認為目前這更多是關於一種修辭上的、一種表面上的姿態，顯示澤倫斯基展現出一些開放性。

But whether it actually happens, whether those MPs sign off on that, I think is still unclear.

但這是否真的會發生，那些國會議員是否會簽署，我認為都還不清楚。

As for the kind of public opinion, even people who are very, very critical of Zelensky, of those corruption scandals we've seen around Zelensky in the last couple of weeks.

至於公眾輿論，即使是那些對澤倫斯基、對我們最近幾週看到的圍繞著澤倫斯基的腐敗醜聞非常、非常批評的人。

There's been basically consensus in this country since Russia invaded in 2022 to leave internal politics for the future, for the time after the war, and

自從俄羅斯在2022年入侵以來，這個國家基本上達成共識，將國內政治留待戰後處理，

to focus on basically surviving as a nation.

And I think that is going to be a real danger for Ukraine.

我認為這對烏克蘭來說將是一個真正的危險。

If internal politics are reactivated and you get all those kind of different parties trying to jockey for influen, then Ukraine stops paying attention to the front lines and gets more occupied with itself.

如果國內政治重新活躍起來，各種不同政黨為了爭取影響力而互相較勁，那麼烏克蘭就會停止關注前線，轉而關注自身。

And that is obviously something that the Russian side really wants, wants Russia, Ukraine to have, you know, big internal divisions, potentially street protests, different political parties fighting each other rather than focusing on the front lines.

這顯然是俄羅斯方面非常希望看到的，他們希望烏克蘭出現嚴重的內部紛爭，可能會有街頭抗議，不同的政黨互相爭鬥，而不是專注於前線。

So it is a real dangerous kind of prospect.

所以這是一個非常危險的前景。

And lots of people here are very worried about the idea of elections during wartime.

很多人在這裡都非常擔心戰時舉行選舉的想法。

Nick, Kiev has been under immense US Pressure.

尼克，基輔一直承受著美國巨大的壓力。

What else are the Trump administration's demands?

Well, the big thing for now seems to be the demand that Ukraine sign off on basically giving up Donetsk region, even the bits of Donetsk region that Ukraine still controls, withdrawing without a fight.

嗯，目前最主要的要求，似乎是讓烏克蘭簽字同意，基本上放棄頓內茨克地區，即使是烏克蘭仍控制的頓內茨克地區，也要無條件撤兵。

That is obviously something that the Russians have been asking for, but

這顯然是俄羅斯方面一直在要求的，但是

that is basically political poison for President Zelensky.

這對澤倫斯基總統來說，簡直是政治毒藥。

You can imagine soldiers coming back from the front lines asking, why were we in those trenches for so many years if we were just going to hand it over without a shot fired?

你可以想像一下，前線的阿兵哥回來問，我們在戰壕裡待了這麼多年，結果卻要無條件交出去，是為什麼？

So that is something that is basically a kind of political time bomb for Zelensky if he were to agree to it.

所以，如果他同意的話，這基本上就是一顆針對澤倫斯基的政治定時炸彈。

And you can't really see him signing off on that.

而且你實在看不出來他會簽字同意。

He's already said that he doesn't have the legal or moral right to do that.

他已經說過，他沒有法律或道德上的權利這麼做。

但這就是俄羅斯方面提出的要求。

Again, people here in Ukraine think that's about destabilizing Ukraine in the future so that Russia can come back and take more territory.

再說一次，這裡的烏克蘭人民認為，這是在為將來讓俄羅斯回來奪取更多領土做準備，以擾亂烏克蘭的穩定。

And I think from the Ukrainian side, the big kind of unclear, unresolved issue is security guarantees.

所以，從烏克蘭這邊來看，還有一個很大的、不明確、未解決的問題，那就是安全保障。

NATO's seemingly off the table for now, but

北約目前看來似乎不太可能，但是

some kind of hard and fast, legally binding security guarantees, not just from the Europeans, but

某種堅定、具法律約束力的安全保障，不只是來自歐洲國家，還有

And there's no real sign that the Trump team, let alone his negotiators, Witkoff and Kushner, are offering anything that comes close.

而且看不出川普團隊，更不用說他的談判代表 Witkoff 和 Kushner，有提出任何接近的方案。

And, Nick, new data is showing that Ukraine faces a military aid shortfall as its European allies struggle to plug the US Gap.

而且，Nick，新的數據顯示，由於歐洲盟友在努力彌補美國的缺口，烏克蘭面臨軍事援助短缺。

What sort of impact is that now potentially having on the battlefield?

這現在可能對戰場產生什麼樣的影響？

I think, Sarah, we haven't seen it yet because there's always a significant lag Right.

我認為，Sarah，我們還沒看到，因為總會有顯著的延遲，對吧。

Between the money arriving and then those deliveries coming.

But I think the only obvious source of that money is the Russian assets held in Belgium.

但我認為，唯一的顯著資金來源就是比利時持有的俄羅斯資產。

And for now, the Belgians are worried about confiscating rather than freezing that money because of legal repercussions in the future.

而目前，比利時方面擔心的是沒收而非凍結這筆資金，因為未來可能會產生法律後果。

But that is basically the only game in town, and

the Europeans now have to work on that to provide Ukraine with more money next year.

歐洲人現在必須為此努力，以便明年能提供更多資金給烏克蘭。