Name: 川普籲盟友派遣軍艦至荷姆茲海峽 | DW 新聞 (Trump wants allies to send war ships to the Strait of Hormuz | DW News)
Uploaded: 2026-03-16T23:04:38.000Z
Duration: 8 min 8 s

分詞構句

US President Donald Trump is pushing for allies in the war against Iran, urging nations to send warships to secure the Strait of Hormuz.

美國總統唐納·川普正推動盟友加入對抗伊朗的戰爭，敦促各國派遣軍艦保護荷姆茲海峽。

Now, the UK And France have sent some military to the region to protect countries being attacked by Iran, but

現在，英國和法國已派遣部分軍隊到該區域，以保護受到伊朗攻擊的國家，但

they are not escorting commercial vessels through the strait.

他們並沒有護送商船通過海峽。

Meanwhile, Tehran says its fight is only with the US And Israel and nations hosting what it calls hostile forces.

同時，德黑蘭表示其衝突僅限於美國、以色列以及駐紮其所謂敵對勢力的國家。

Little or no movement on the Strait of Hormuz for another day as Iranian strikes whiz across the Gulf region.

荷姆茲海峽的局勢又一天沒有什麼進展，伊朗的攻擊飛越海灣地區。

But the US Wants to unblock the route with some help from their friends.

但美國希望在朋友的幫助下打通這條航線。

Writing on Truth Social, Donald Trump said countries of the world that receive oil through the Hormuz Strait must take care of that passage, and

唐納·川普在Truth Social上發文表示，透過荷姆茲海峽運送石油的各國必須自行確保該航道的安全，

The US Will also coordinate with those countries so that everything goes quickly, smoothly, and well.

美國也將與這些國家協調，讓一切都能快速、順暢、順利地進行。

This should have always been a team effort, and now it will be.

這本來就應該是團隊合作，現在也將如此。

But Washington's allies aren't convinced and have shown no willingness to sign up to help the US And Israel in their war on Iran.

但美國的盟友們並不買單，也沒表現出願意簽署協議來幫助美國和以色列對抗伊朗。

The UK And France have sent military to the Middle east, but

英國和法國已派遣軍隊前往中東，但

have stressed they are not taking part in the war.

他們強調自己不會參與這場戰爭。

Both London and Paris remain critical of the conflict, and

倫敦和巴黎都對這場衝突持批評態度，而

Iran remains defiant, making it clear whose ships can safely pass through the narrow waterway connecting the Persian Gulf with the rest of the world.

伊朗依然強硬，明確表示哪些國家的船隻可以安全通過連接波斯灣與世界其他地區的狹窄水道。

Speaking to US Media, Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Aranchi said the key transport route in the Persian Gulf remained open for international shipping, except for vessels belonging to the United States, Israel and their allies.

伊朗外交部長阿巴斯·阿拉奇奇在接受美國媒體採訪時表示，波斯灣的關鍵運輸航線對國際航運仍然開放，但美國、以色列及其盟友的船隻除外。

So with Tehran drawing a hard line on who gets passage and Washington struggling to garner support, the rest of the world looks on with growing fear this conflict could spot, spiral out of control and push prices up even further.

是以，德黑蘭在誰能通過的問題上劃下了紅線，而華盛頓卻在努力爭取支持，世界上其他國家則越來越擔心這場衝突可能會失控並進一步推高物價。

Right, so for more on this, let's bring in Alex Fatanka.

好的，關於這件事，我們請到 Alex Fatanka。

He is a founding director of the Iran Program at the Middle East Institute in Washington, D.C.

他是華盛頓特區中東研究所伊朗計畫的創始主任。

So Washington wants its allies to help secure shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

所以華盛頓希望盟友們協助確保荷姆茲海峽的航運安全。

Look, it's too early to say because we have a couple of things to point out here.

看看，現在說還太早，因為我們有幾點要提出來。

One is the Iranian Foreign Minister, Abbasar Rokchy was just a few hours ago telling American television that the Strait of Hormuz is open.

一點是伊朗外交部長阿巴斯·阿拉奇奇幾個小時前才告訴美國電視臺，荷姆茲海峽是開放的。

There's no blanket closure, that only vessels that are linked to United States and Israel are not allowed to go through the Strait.

沒有全面關閉，只有與美國和以色列有關的船隻不被允許通過海峽。

So, again, whatever that means, because, you know, companies that are linked to US And Israel could mean a lot, and

所以，再說一次，不管那代表什麼，因為你知道，與美國和以色列有關的公司可能意味著很多，而且

that maybe that vagueness, that uncertainty is exactly what Tehran is banking on.

也許這種含糊不清、這種不確定性正是德黑蘭所依仗的。

But we've seen the Indians just today, I believe had some tankers go through.

但我們今天才看到印度，我相信他們有一些油輪通過了。

So Iran is playing a selective game here as far as access to this trade is concerned.

所以伊朗在貿易通行這方面，玩的是一種選擇性的遊戲。

I think they're thinking in terms of diplomatic gains they can have by working with some nations and not others.

我想他們是從與某些國家合作、不與其他國家合作中，來爭取外交上的利益。

But also I think very important for them is to make sure that they don't help create more of a global front against Iran.

但我也認為對他們來說，非常重要的一點是，確保他們不會助長形成一個對抗伊朗的全球陣線。

So that's why I think they've been selective and they don't want to be seen as indiscriminate in terms of how they're closing the strait.

這就是為什麼我認為他們很挑剔，而且不希望在關閉海峽這件事上，被視為不分青紅皁白。

So if there is no support from allies, can the US And Israel fight this war alone or defend the Strait of Hormuz alone?

所以如果沒有盟友的支持，美國和以色列能單獨打這場戰爭，或單獨保護荷姆茲海峽嗎？

So look, there's no sign that US And Israel went into this war banking on support from allies, the Europeans or anybody else.

所以你看，沒有跡象顯示美國和以色列是靠著盟友、歐洲國家或其他人的支持，才打這場戰爭的。

The question is why didn't plan for this more carefully before they actually attacked Iran.

問題是，為什麼他們在實際攻擊伊朗之前，沒有更仔細地規劃？

And that's something that's been debated as of right now.

But I'll just point out historically, coalitions that have worked either in the Persian Gulf or in the Arabian Sea, places like Bab El Mandeb, when the Houthis were striking maritime traffic in the Red Sea, historically those coalitions have not really been that effective in providing full security for maritime traffic.

但我想指出的是，歷史上，無論是在波斯灣或阿拉伯海，像巴布·阿爾-曼德布這樣的地區，當胡塞武裝分子攻擊紅海的航運時，那些有效的聯盟在提供海上交通的全面安全方面，其實並沒有那麼有效。

So again, you know, the United States has the biggest naval force.

所以，再說一次，你知道，美國擁有最大的海軍力量。

It needs time to see if it can provide the type of security for maritime traffic through the strait.

它需要時間來看看是否能為海峽的航運提供安全保障。

But we've heard from senior American officials saying that could be an option, but

但我們聽美國高官說，那可能是一個選項，但

從歷史上看，伊朗是打長遠牌的。

From Tehran's perspective, what would a strategic when actually look like in this conflict?

從德黑蘭的角度來看，在這場衝突中，真正的戰略勝利會是什麼樣子？

Look, the minimum they're hoping for is to survive this war.

其實，他們最少希望的是撐過這場戰爭。

And for them that would be a major, major achievement because again, the way they look at it is they're attacked by two nuclear armed countries with formidable military capability.

對他們來說，這會是個重大的、重大的成就，因為從他們的角度來看，他們被兩個擁有強大軍事實力的核武國家攻擊。

So for them, just survival would be a major strategic victory, if you will.

所以對他們來說，如果可以說的話，光是生存就是一個重大的戰略勝利。

But in terms of if they could get more, some of the rhetoric coming from Tehran suggests that what they want is a new Middle east going forward.

但如果他們能爭取到更多，德黑蘭傳出的一些言論顯示，他們想要的是一個前進中的新中東。

And I think that's when they're engaging in more fantasy than reality.

我認為這時候他們就比較像在幻想，而不是面對現實了。

I mean, some of the points we've heard, sort of concepts such as United States military bases having to leave the region, neighboring states like the Gulf countries need to kick out American militaries.

像是我們聽到的一些論點，像是美國軍隊必須撤離該區域，還有像波斯灣國家這樣的鄰國需要趕走美軍。

Again, this is more like wishful thinking as opposed to serious thinking on the part of Tehran.

這又回到了，這比較像是德黑蘭的一廂情願，而不是認真的考量。

But that's at least what the rhetoric is suggesting.

但至少，這就是那些言論所暗示的。

Surviving as a regime would be a strategic victory for the Islamic Republic.

對伊斯蘭共和國來說，政權的存續本身就是一場戰略勝利。

And, you know, you've been in touch with a lot of people on the ground.

而且，你也知道，你和很多當地的人都有接觸。

How is this war being received or perceived inside the country?

這場戰爭在國內是如何被看待或感受的？

So, as you can imagine, Iranians are going through a rollercoaster emotions.

所以，你可以想像，伊朗人民的情緒就像坐雲霄飛車一樣。

On the one hand, a majority of Iranians do not like the Islamic Republic, but

一方面，大多數伊朗人並不喜歡伊斯蘭共和國，但是

there had been a hope that any kind of foreign military intervention would result in a quick victory, if you will, and

他們曾抱持著任何形式的外國軍事幹預都能帶來速勝的希望，

And I would also say, clearly that's unlikely to happen in the short term.

而且我還要說，顯然短期內這不太可能發生。

It could happen in the medium to long term.

But in the next few days and weeks, the regime will be standing.

但在接下來的幾天和幾週內，這個政權將會屹立不搖。

And now Iranians, ordinary Iranians who do not like the regime, have to basically defend or fend for themselves in the midst of a war that very few Iranians have ever experienced, anything like this.

現在伊朗人民，那些不喜歡這個政權的普通伊朗人，在他們幾乎從未經歷過的戰爭中，基本上必須自保或獨力應對。

I mean, the nearest thing that you can point to is the Iran Iraq War, which was nothing like this conflict, because now the city of Tehran, 10 million people, bombs are dropping, missiles are dropping.

我的意思是，最接近的例子就是兩伊戰爭，但那跟現在的衝突完全不一樣，因為現在的德黑蘭市，一千萬人口，炸彈正在落下，飛彈正在落下。

So the capacity, the capacity to mobilize politically against the regime right now is not there simply because Iranians are just busy trying to survive this war.

所以，現在要動員起來反對這個政權的政治能量，根本不存在，因為伊朗人民只是忙著試圖在這場戰爭中生存下來。

所以，是的，情緒就像坐雲霄飛車。

And, you know, the outcome of this war, obviously, is something that they're watching very carefully.

而且，你知道，這場戰爭的結果，顯然是他們非常密切關注的事情。

But right now, the people of Iran don't seem to be in the driver's seat as far as the outcome of this war is concerned.

但目前來看，就這場戰爭的結果而言，伊朗人民似乎並沒有掌握主導權。

Right, Quick one on this, if you can, because, you know, the war is escalating, no doubt.

好的，關於這個，如果可以的話，快速說一下，因為你知道，戰爭正在升級，這點毫無疑問。

Do you see some sort of light at the end of the tunnel?

你覺得隧道盡頭會有一絲曙光嗎？

For some people, light at the end of the tunnel is regime change.

對某些人來說，隧道盡頭就是政權更迭。

For other people, light at the tunnel is a quick ceasefire tomorrow so we can go back to normality.

對另一些人來說，隧道盡頭就是明天能快速停火，這樣我們就能恢復正常生活。

So that's very much the subjective issue, but

所以，這很大程度上是個主觀的問題，但是

I think most likely what we can expect is this war will continue for at least a few more weeks.

我認為最有可能的是，這場戰爭至少會再持續幾週。

I think where we are right now, the President of the United States is the most important figure, has to make a decision together with the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu.

我認為我們現在的情況是，美國總統是最重要的人物，他必須和以色列總理班傑明·納坦雅胡一起做出決定。

And we know the Israelis want regime change.

而且我們知道，以色列人想要政權更迭。

The question is, can the Israelis convince Trump to stay in this war for more than weeks, perhaps months.

問題是，以色列人能不能說服川普繼續這場戰爭，不只幾週，而是幾個月。

That's a big question that we need to wait for and see the answer to, right?

這是一個很大的問題，我們需要等待並看看答案，對吧？