Name: SPECIAL REPORT：最高法院宣佈川普大部分關稅無效！ (SPECIAL REPORT: Supreme Court invalidates most of Trump's tariffs)
Uploaded: 2026-02-20T23:04:13.000Z
Duration: 7 min 24 s

We're coming on the air because the Supreme Court has just released a major decision involving President Trump's tariff policies and whether the president exceeded his authority with sweeping reciprocal tariffs on other nations, the centerpiece of his economic agenda.

我們現在播出這個消息，因為最高法院剛剛公佈了一項重大裁決，這項裁決涉及川普總統的關稅政策，以及總統在對其他國家實施大規模互惠關稅這項經濟議程核心事務上，是否已經超越了他的權力。

Let's get right to ABC's senior Washington correspondent, Devin Dwyer, who covers the Supreme Court for us.

讓我們直接連線 ABC 的資深華盛頓特派員 Devin Dwyer，他負責報導最高法院的相關消息。

Kira, this is one of the most significant decisions on presidential power in decades.

Kira，這是數十年來關於總統權力最重要的裁決之一。

The Supreme Court just moments ago, in a 6 to 3 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, invalidated most of President Trump's tariffs.

最高法院在幾分鐘前，以 6 比 3 的票數，由首席大法官約翰·羅伯茨執筆，宣佈川普總統實施的大部分關稅無效。

70% of the tariffs he's imposed so far in his first and second term here have been under the law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

在他第一任期和第二任期至今實施的關稅中，有 70% 是依據一項稱為「國際緊急經濟權力法」的法律。

He claimed it gave him unlimited power to tariff any country at any level for as long as he wants.

他聲稱這賦予了他無限的權力，可以隨時對任何國家實施任何級別的關稅。

And Roberts said the law simply does not give him that authority.

羅伯茨表示，該法律根本沒有賦予他這項權力。

Congress, under the Constitution, has the power to tax Americans, collect tariffs.

根據憲法，國會擁有向美國人民徵稅、收取關稅的權力。

There's no mention of tariffs in that law.

And the Supreme Court said he cannot do what he's done.

最高法院表示，他不能這麼做。

Let's bring in our ABC News legal analyst and former Trump administration official, Sarah Isker.

讓我們請來我們的 ABC News 法律分析師兼前川普政府官員 Sarah Isker。

Sarah Isker, so, Sarah, you know your thoughts on the reasoning here.

Sarah Isker，那麼，Sarah，妳對這裡的理由有什麼看法？

This has been a Supreme Court that has really been shrinking down executive power.

這個最高法院一直在縮減行政權力。

We saw them do this during the Biden administration with his student loan debt forgiveness.

我們在拜登政府期間，看到他們對他的學生貸款債務減免也這樣做過。

The idea that presidents cannot look back to old vague statutes from Congress to expand their own power.

總統不能回頭引用國會過去模糊的法規來擴張自己權力的想法。

This, as Devin said, is a huge shift in presidential authority moving forward.

正如 Devin 所說，這對總統的權力未來將是個巨大的轉變。

And probably the most important case we've seen from the Supreme Court in decades really putting the ball in Congress's court.

這可能是我們幾十年來見過最高法院最重要的案子，真的把球踢給了國會。

If presidents want to have these big policy initiatives, they will need to work with Congress moving forward.

如果總統想要推動這些重大的政策倡議，他們未來將需要與國會合作。

Chief White House correspondent Mary Bruce is at the White House for us.

白宮首席特派員 Mary Bruce 在白宮為我們報導。

Mary, quite a devastating blow to the president's economic and foreign policy.

Mary，這對總統的經濟和外交政策可說是毀滅性的打擊。

This is a huge blow to this White House and to this.

這對這個白宮和對此是個巨大的打擊。

President Trump, in the lead up to this decision, had said that ruling against his terrorists would be, quote, devastating and a terrible blow to the U.S.

川普總統在裁決出爐前曾說，若裁決不利於他的關稅政策，將會是「毀滅性的」，對美國經濟和國家安全是個可怕的打擊。

He has used these tariffs as the main leverage, not just for negotiating deals with other foreign countries, economic deals, but

他一直將這些關稅作為主要籌碼，不僅用於與其他國家協商經濟協議，

also as a pressure point in his foreign policy.

He has argued that these tariffs have brought great, great wealth and national security to the country.

他曾主張這些關稅為國家帶來了巨大的財富和國家安全。

The government has collected at least $89 billion in revenue from these tariffs.

政府已從這些關稅中收取了至少 890 億美元的收入。

They could now be asked to refund all of that.

他們現在可能會被要求退還所有這些款項。

There is a lot of questions about what happens to the money that has been collected so far and what happens deals that the president has been negotiating based off of these tariffs.

關於至今已收取的款項將如何處理，以及總統曾以此為基礎協商的協議將如何處理，都有很多疑問。

What happens to other issues like for instance, pharmaceutical prices for which he has used these tariffs as a point of leverage to argue new new deals to bring down pharmaceutical prices with other countries.

還有其他問題，例如藥品價格，他曾利用這些關稅作為協商新協議的籌碼，以降低與其他國家之間的藥品價格。

So it is the ripple effects of this will be tremendous.

所以這會產生巨大的連鎖效應。

What does it mean for the manufacturing here in the US as the president has argued, has been boosted by the threat of these tariffs.

這對美國國內的製造業有什麼影響？因為總統曾主張，這些關稅的威脅刺激了國內製造業的發展。

Now, it does seem the president perhaps maybe knew that this decision was coming in very uncharacteristic fash here at the White House just a very short time ago.

現在看來，總統或許早就知道這個裁決即將到來，他在白宮的舉動非常不像平常。

The president is actually currently meeting with governors here at the White House, normally something that the press would be allowed to cover.

總統目前正在白宮與各州州長會面，這通常是媒體可以採訪的場合。

Instead, the president brought in the cameras and quickly ushered the media out in a way that we don't normally see.

但這次總統卻讓攝影機進入，並迅速請媒體離開，這種做法很不尋常。

I can tell you this based off of the president's comments in the lead up to this.

我可以告訴你，根據總統在此之前發表的評論。

While we haven't gotten a reaction from him just yet, he certainly is likely to be deeply frustrated and angry about this decision.

雖然我們還沒收到他的回應，但他肯定會對這個裁決感到非常沮喪和憤怒。

Mary Bruce at the White House, thanks so much.

Well, we are definitely getting reaction if you take a look at the big board.

嗯，我們絕對有收到一些反應，如果你看看大螢幕。

Let's bring in our business core sponsor, Elizabeth Scholzley.

讓我們請出我們的商業核心贊助商 Elizabeth Scholzley。

Elizabeth, we're seeing the impact of this decision in real time.

Elizabeth，我們正即時看到這項裁決的影響。

We are here at the Dow now up positive on this news at last check up about 330 points.

我們現在就在道瓊指數，看到這個消息後上漲，上次檢查時上漲了約 330 點。

Businesses have been wanting these tariffs to go away.

企業一直希望這些關稅能夠消失。

We know that these tariffs, Kira, are a higher cost that businesses pay when they import their products from abroad.

我們知道，Kira，這些關稅是企業從國外進口產品時必須支付的較高成本。

And we have seen companies all the way from big box retailers like Costco down to small businesses sue the Trump administration in hopes that if this decision happens from the Supreme Court, they can get that money back.

我們看到從好市多（Costco）這樣的大型零售商到小型企業，紛紛起訴川普政府，希望如果最高法院做出這項裁決，他們就能拿回那些錢。

Now as this refund process could kick off, which is likely to be very messy and very complicated.

現在，隨著這個退款程序可能會啟動，這很可能會非常混亂且複雜。

One thing to keep in mind there is that while some businesses might get money back, that doesn't necessarily mean consumers will.

有一件事要記住，雖然有些企業可能會拿回錢，但這並不一定意味著消費者也會。

Consumers who have paid higher prices for goods that have been passed down because of those tariffs have already been paying, according to the Yale Budget Lab, seventeen hundred dollars in tariffs.

根據耶魯大學預算實驗室的數據，因為關稅而支付了較高商品價格的消費者，平均已經支付了十七百美元的關稅。

Unlikely that that goes right back into consumers POC.

這些錢不太可能直接回到消費者的手中。

All right, let's bring it all together with our Chief Washington correspondent Jonathan Carle listening to Elizabeth they're complicated, messy, even our Mary Bruce calling this a devastating blow to the president moving forward.

好的，讓我們請我們的資深華盛頓特派員強納森·卡爾來總結，聽聽伊莉莎白的說法，這件事很複雜、很混亂，甚至我們的瑪麗·布魯斯稱這對總統未來的施政是毀滅性的打擊。

The president did use tariffs to leverage many deals.

總統確實利用關稅來談判許多協議。

What do you think this means now going forward for the president, what he's been trying to accomplish?

妳認為這對總統接下來想達成的目標有什麼意義？

JOHN Kira, this is both a monumental decision and frankly, an obvious one.

約翰，Kira，這是一個劃時代的裁決，而且坦白說，也是一個顯而易見的裁決。

I mean, it seemed clear from the day that Donald Trump came out and announced his so called reciprocal tariffs on the rest of the world or most of the world, that he was doing something that was beyond his authority as president.

我的意思是，從唐納·川普出來宣佈他所謂的對全世界或大部分世界實施的互惠關稅的那天起，就很清楚他所做的已經超出了他身為總統的權力範圍。

The Constitution very clearly, as this decision cites, the Constitution very clearly gives the power of imposing duties tariffs on the Congress, not to the president.

這項裁決引用的憲法非常清楚地指出，實施關稅的權力在國會，而不是總統。

And monumental because Trump's not just economic policy, his foreign policy has been largely used in tariffs.

而且之所以劃時代，是因為川普不僅僅是經濟政策，他的外交政策很大程度上也是透過關稅來推動的。

He's negotiated more than a dozen different trade deals or frameworks for trade deals.

他談判了十幾個不同的貿易協議或貿易協議框架。

He often claims that he has achieved peace deals through the use of threatened tariffs, but

他經常聲稱透過威脅實施關稅達成和平協議，但

he has imposed these tariffs unilaterally without congressional authorization.

他單方面實施了這些關稅，未經國會授權。

The authorization that he was citing was a bill, a law that doesn't even include the word tariffs.

他引用的授權是一項法案，一項甚至沒有關稅一詞的法律。

I think it'll be interesting to see how he reacts going forward.

我認為觀察他接下來的反應會很有趣。

Kyra, Just yesterday in Georgia, he went off on this saying that he's been waiting forever, the Supreme Court's been keeping him waiting forever, that he clearly has the authority.

Kira，就在昨天，他在喬治亞州對此大發雷霆，說他等了很久，最高法院讓他等了很久，他顯然擁有權力。

Now what I'm looking for is the State of the Union address, Kyra, on Tuesday, when those Supreme Court justices, at least some of them, will likely be sitting right there in the front rows.

現在我期待的是週二的國情諮文，Kira，屆時那些最高法院的法官，至少其中一些人，可能會坐在前排。

What he is going to say in his Supreme Court address and will he directly address those justices that have now, in his view, have just defied him?

他會在最高法院演講中說什麼？他會直接對那些在他看來剛剛違抗他的法官說話嗎？

Well, no doubt he's reworking his speech right now.

嗯，毫無疑問，他現在正在修改他的演講稿。

John Carl, thank you and thanks to our entire team.

John Carl，謝謝你，也謝謝我們整個團隊。

Our coverage, of course, will continue on ABC News Live and ABCNews.com.

我們的報導，當然會在 ABC News Live 和 ABCNews.com 上持續播出。