Name: 英國與盟友譴責伊朗攻擊油氣設施！BBC新聞 (UK and allies condemn Iran attacks on oil and gas facilities | BBC News)
Uploaded: 2026-03-19T16:31:09.000Z
Duration: 8 min 27 s

In a joint statement, the leaders of the uk, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Japan have condemned in what they say are the strongest terms attacks by Iran on gas and oil installations.

英國、法國、德國、義大利、荷蘭和日本的領導人發表聯合聲明，以最強烈的措辭譴責伊朗攻擊油氣設施的行為。

After Israel struck the South Pause gas field on Wednesday, Iran responded with retaliatory attacks overnight throughout the Gulf and this has led to a sharp jump in global energy prices.

在以色列於週三襲擊南帕斯天然氣田後，伊朗連夜在波斯灣各地發動報復性攻擊，這導致全球能源價格急劇飆升。

情態副詞

Meanwhile, in a strongly worded post, Donald Trump warned Iran against further attacks in Qatar after extensive damage to energy facilities there.

同時，唐納·川普在強硬發文中警告伊朗，在卡達的能源設施遭受嚴重破壞後，不要再發動攻擊。

Posting on Truth Social, the president said the U.S.

在 Truth Social 上發文，總統表示美國

knew nothing about the Israeli strike on the South Paris gas field.

對以色列襲擊南帕斯天然氣田一無所知。

President Trump said if Iran attacks that hub again, the US would quote, massively blow up the entirety of the South Pars gas field at an amount of strength and power that Iran has has never seen before.

川普總統表示，如果伊朗再次攻擊該樞紐，美國將會「大規模炸毀整個南帕斯天然氣田，其強度和力量是伊朗前所未見的。」

Qatar's state energy company says that gas facilities at its main site Raslafan were hit again by rockets early on Thursday morning.

卡達國家能源公司表示，其主要基地 Raslafan 的天然氣設施在週四清晨再次遭到火箭襲擊。

It said they caused fires and further significant damage.

公司表示，這些襲擊造成火災和進一步的重大損害。

These are pictures of the aftermath of those initial strikes.

這些是最初襲擊後的現場畫面。

Huge fires could be seen from more than 30 kilometers away.

從 30 多公里外就能看到巨大的火勢。

Iran's South Parse is part of the biggest natural gas field in the world with which both Qatar and Iran operate.

伊朗的南帕斯（South Pars）是全球最大的天然氣田之一，由卡達和伊朗共同營運。

以色列方面的設施尚未對此發表評論。

Well, as we mentioned, the US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has been speaking in the last couple of hours talking about the wider conflict.

嗯，就像我們剛才提到的，美國國防部長 Pete Hegseth 在過去幾個小時一直在談論這場更廣泛的衝突。

He said Iran's ability to manufacture new ballistic missiles has probably taken the hardest hit after combined strikes by the US and Israel.

他說，伊朗製造新彈道飛彈的能力，在美國和以色列聯手打擊後，可能受到了最嚴重的打擊。

Our objectives unchanged on target and on plan.

我們的目標保持不變，命中目標並按計畫進行。

Destroy missiles, launchers and Iran's defense industrial base so they cannot rebuild.

摧毀飛彈、發射器以及伊朗的國防工業基礎，讓他們無法重建。

Destroy their navy and Iran never gets a nuclear weapon.

摧毀他們的軍隊，讓伊朗永遠無法獲得核武。

We've hit hundreds of their defense industrial bases directly.

我們直接打擊了數百個他們的國防工業基地。

Their ability to manufacture new ballistic missiles has probably taken the hardest hit of all Ballistic missile attacks against our forces, down 90% since the start of the conflict.

他們製造新彈道飛彈的能力，可能受到了最嚴重的打擊。自衝突開始以來，針對我們部隊的彈道飛彈攻擊減少了 90%。

The last job anyone in the world wants right now.

這大概是全世界現在最不想做的工作了。

Senior leader for the IRGC or besiege temp jobs, all of them.

伊斯蘭革命衛隊的資深領導人，或是圍攻臨時工作，全部都算。

And to borrow a page from Admiral Ernest King In World War II, we've decided to share the ocean with Iran.

借用美國海軍上將 Ernest King 在第二次世界大戰時的一句話，我們決定跟伊朗共享海洋。

We've damaged OR sunk over 120 of their navy ships.

我們已經損壞或擊沉了他們超過 120 艘海軍艦艇。

With battle damage assessments pending for many more.

See oftentimes we have to wait a few days on battle damage assessment to get the real number.

你看，很多時候我們得等幾天才有戰損評估，才能得到確切數字。

Their surface fleet is no longer a factor.

他們的水面艦隊已經不再是個威脅了。

Their submarines they once had 11 are gone.

他們原本有 11 艘潛艦，現在都沒了。

他們的海軍港口已經殘破不堪。

We wouldn't want to set a definitive time frame on that.

我們不太想為此設定一個確切的時間表。

But as we've said, we're on plan, so we're looking at those metrics very closely, relaying that to the president and the national security team.

但就像我們說的，我們正按計畫進行，所以我們會非常密切地關注這些指標，並將其傳達給總統和國家安全團隊。

Well, let's go live now to Washington and our State Department correspondent, Tom Bateman.

好的，現在我們連線到華盛頓，我們的國務院記者 Tom Bateman。

Beyond what Pete Hexath was talking about there in terms of military targets, what did we learn about US Objectives in this war?

除了 Pete Hegseth 剛才談到的軍事目標之外，我們還學到了哪些關於美國在這場戰爭中的目標？

Well, I think the main point, I mean, I was in the room there was that although this war has changed significantly since day one, the message from the Pentagon and from Pete Hegseth has not.

嗯，我認為主要重點是，我的意思是，我當時在場，雖然這場戰爭自第一天以來已經發生了重大變化，但五角大廈和 Pete Hegseth 的訊息卻沒有改變。

And I think, I mean, he was quite deliberate, you know, saying, you know, we keep our focus.

而且我認為，我的意思是，他相當謹慎，你知道，他說，你知道，我們保持專注。

The problem, I think, that the Americans have here now is that Iran is fighting a different war to the one the Americans started with, and

不過，我認為美國現在面臨的問題是，伊朗打的這場仗跟美國一開始打的很不一樣，

it's causing the US Significant problems.

這也給美國帶來了嚴重的問題。

And what we're not hearing in those briefings is how the Americans plan to deal with that.

而我們在那些簡報裡沒聽到的是，美國打算怎麼處理這件事。

So, you know, we heard again that the Americans say that they have been striking ballistic missile launches, launch sites, and

所以，你知道，我們又聽到了美國說他們一直在打擊彈道飛彈發射器、發射地點，還有

the missiles themselves continuing to strike Iran's navy and its naval fleet.

飛彈本身，持續打擊伊朗海軍和艦隊。

But, of course, the Iranians have been fighting largely with insurgent tactics that has allowed them to control the Strait of Hormuz, which has had this huge effect, of course, on global markets and the price of oil.

但當然，伊朗主要用的是叛亂戰術，這讓他們能夠控制荷姆茲海峽，這當然對全球市場和油價造成了巨大影響。

And we now have this sharply escalating war over the region's energy production infrastructure, which is really serious.

我們現在看到的是該地區能源生產基礎設施的戰爭急劇升級，這真的很嚴重。

And there was really very, very little in that briefing about tactically how the Americans plan to deal with either of those things.

而在那次簡報中，關於美國在戰術上打算如何處理這兩件事，真的非常、非常少。

So the message hasn't changed since day one.

We did hear a little bit from General Kaine about attacking Iranian fast boats, which is about trying to stop the attacks or the harassment of shipping.

我們確實有聽到凱恩將軍稍微提到攻擊伊朗的快艇，這是在試圖阻止對航運的攻擊或騷擾。

But generally, there was very, very little on, you know, the way that the Iranians sort of shifted the way they're fighting this war and what the Americans are actually doing in response to that.

但總體來說，關於伊朗如何改變他們的戰爭方式，以及美國實際如何應對，真的、真的很少。

And it was interesting to hear Peter Seth say that there was no definitive time frame for ending at the war.

聽到 Pete Hegseth 說戰爭沒有明確的結束時間，這點很有意思。

But at the same time, looking at my notes from earlier, he said, addressing the American people, the media here, not all of it wants you to think that we are spinning towards an endless abyss, a forever war.

但同時，看看我之前的筆記，他說，面對美國民眾、這裡的媒體，不是所有人都希望你們認為我們正走向一個無止盡的深淵，一場永遠的戰爭。

And that is a point that the administration is incredibly sensitive about, isn't it?

而這正是政府極度在意的一點，不是嗎？

It's really sensitive about that because, of course, President Trump stood twice on election, in elections that he won on a platform of not repeating the mistakes of the past, not getting bogged down into an Iraq style war that goes on for years, that involves nation building, that tries to spread American ideals to parts of the Middle East.

他們非常在意這一點，因為當然，川普總統在贏得的兩次選舉中，都以不重蹈覆轍、不陷入像伊拉克那樣曠日持久的戰爭、不涉及國家建設、不試圖在中東傳播美國理想的政綱勝出。

Pete Hegseth has been really clear about that.

But the problem they have is there's significant influential part of the maga, President Trump's MAGA base that is saying exactly the opposite, that is suggesting they've been betrayed by the administration that has launched exactly that.

但他們面臨的問題是，MAGA、川普總統的 MAGA 陣營中，有相當一部分有影響力的人，卻說著完全相反的話，他們認為政府發動了正如他們所說的戰爭，這讓他們感到被背叛。

So the administration is extremely sensitive about that.

He launched an attack on the media once again saying it was unpatriotic, that it wasn't supporting the American war.

他再次攻擊媒體，說媒體不愛國，沒有支持美國的戰爭。

In fact, that was the first thing he talked about, not the conflict itself, it was the culture war at home, really that was the focus of his attention.

事實上，他第一個談論的不是衝突本身，而是國內的文化戰爭，這才是他關注的焦點。

And also suggesting, again falsely, that it was the mainstream media that had run fake AI images that the Iranians had disseminated about the war and effectively accusing them to sort of rerunning Iranian propaganda.

而且還錯誤地暗示，是主流媒體散播了伊朗關於戰爭的假AI圖像，並有效地指控他們重播伊朗的宣傳。

And it's of course really been social media where this sort of torrent of AI images have proliferated.

當然，真正讓這些AI圖像氾濫的，其實是社群媒體。

And ironically, it is this administration that has loosened all of the regulations and rules on social media companies that allows them to run this material.

諷刺的是，正是這個政府放寬了對社群媒體公司的所有規定和規則，讓他們能夠散播這些內容。

But I think, you know, it takes you to the issue that I think the administration is really determined to try and get grip control of the narrative on this conflict.

但我想，這引導我們探討了一個問題，我認為政府真的下定決心要掌控關於這場衝突的敘事。

I just want to squeeze in one more question, very briefly if you would, with your response.

我想再問一個問題，如果可以的話，請你簡短回答。

Are we going to get any clarification on President Trump saying that he didn't know that Israel was planning to strike the Iranian part of the South Pas gas field when it's been widely reported that he did, or at least that the administration did?

我們是否會得到川普總統說他不知道以色列計畫攻擊伊朗的南帕斯天然氣田的任何澄清，因為有廣泛報導指出他知道，或者至少是政府知道？

Well, I think we will because President Trump, as you know, within I think the next hour or so is due the White House meeting the Japanese premier.

嗯，我想我們會的，因為你知道，川普總統預計在接下來一小時左右於白宮會見日本首相。

So I'm sure there'll be a question on that if the press are in there.

所以我想，如果媒體在場，一定會有相關問題。

Of course, you know, his claim that the Americans didn't know contradicts the briefings that the Israelis have been putting out after they struck oil depots earlier in the war.

當然，你知道，他聲稱美國人不知道，這與以色列在戰爭早期襲擊油庫後發布的簡報相矛盾。

The Americans were really unhappy about that.

So the Israelis have been saying that they're not doing anything without American consent or approval first.

所以以色列一直表示，他們在沒有美國事先同意或準許的情況下不會做任何事。

So there's clearly a difference of description over the run up to that attack on South Pause.

所以，在襲擊南帕斯天然氣田之前，顯然存在描述上的差異。

And I would assume, you know quite strongly the president's going to be asked that question.

我認為，總統肯定會被問到這個問題。

我們晚點可能會得到更多消息。