Name: 10 起引起巨大爭議的審判！ (10 Trials That Caused Massive Backlash)
Uploaded: 2026-01-31T17:15:51.000Z
Duration: 16 min 2 s

Nicolo Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti went to their death in the Massachusetts electric chair in 1927.

Nicolo Sacco 和 Bartolomeo Vanzetti 於 1927 年在麻薩諸塞州電椅上處以死刑。

關係子句

And today we're breaking down trials that, for better or worse, caused a public stir.

今天我們要來解析一些案件，這些案件不管好壞，都引起了公眾的騷動。

This case has been so divisive from the start, and the evidence file has something for everyone.

這個案子從一開始就充滿爭議，證據檔案裡有各種說法。

Amanda Knox, she gets a chance to make her case in Italian court tomorrow.

Amanda Knox，她明天有機會在義大利法庭上為自己辯護。

Knox has been at the center of a sensational murder trial there, where she's been in prison for the past 18 months, accused of killing her roommate.

Knox 一直是當地轟動一時的謀殺案審判的中心，她被指控殺害了她的室友，並在過去 18 個月裡一直被監禁。

The 2007 killing of British student Meredith Kercher in Perugia became a global spectacle when her American roommate, Amanda Knox and Knox's Italian boyfriend, Rafael Sollecito, were arrested.

2007 年，英國學生 Meredith Kercher 在 Perugia 被殺，當她的美國室友 Amanda Knox 和 Knox 的義大利男友 Rafael Sollecito 被捕時，這件事成了一個全球性的奇觀。

Their 2009 convictions sparked widespread outrage in the United States, where many viewed the case as a miscarriage of justice driven by character assassination.

他們在 2009 年的定罪在美國引發了廣泛的憤怒，許多人認為這是一場由人格謀殺驅動的司法不公。

This case has sparked international headlines and deep controversy over the evidence.

這個案子引發了國際頭條新聞，並就證據引發了深刻的爭議。

As the verdict was read, a crowd outside the courtroom burst into cheers.

宣讀判決時，法院外的人群爆發出歡呼聲。

Inside the courtroom, Amanda Knox and her family began to sob.

法庭內，Amanda Knox 和她的家人開始啜泣。

這場法律上的漫長審判只會更加激烈。

A 2011 appeals court overturned the convictions and ordered their release only for Italy's Supreme Court in 2013 to annul that acquittal and send the case back for retrial.

2011 年，上訴法院推翻了定罪並下令釋放他們，但義大利最高法院在 2013 年又撤銷了這項無罪判決，將案件發回重審。

When Italy's Supreme Court issued a final acquittal in 2015, the ordeal ended, but disagreement did not.

當義大利最高法院在 2015 年做出最終無罪判決時，這場磨難結束了，但爭議並未停止。

The case was a defining collision of media frenzy, public judgment and judicial uncertainty.

這起案件是媒體狂熱、公眾評判和司法不確定性之間一次決定性的碰撞。

而現在，她又回到了鎂光燈下。

Today, an Italian court sentencing her to three years in prison after finding Knox in a written statement in 2007 had wrongly accused an innocent man of killing 21 year old Meredith Kercher.

今天，義大利法院判處她三年徒刑，因為發現 Knox 在 2007 年的一份書面聲明中，錯誤地指控一名無辜男子殺害了 21 歲的 Meredith Kercher。

We were looking for having a dismissal and we don't know exactly what is the logic behind this decision.

我們原本希望能夠撤銷指控，但我們不確定這項決定的邏輯是什麼。

You know, I always tell people that this case is nothing out of the ordinary.

跟你說，我總是告訴大家，這起案件沒什麼特別的。

Stuff like this happens to people all the time in the judicial system.

這種事在司法體系裡，對很多人來說都很常見。

The only thing that made our case exceptional was they had cameras in the courtroom.

讓我們的案子變得特別的，只有一點，那就是法庭裡有攝影機。

他們稱之為「電影中的審判」。

If not for that, they would have killed me and this would have been swept under the rug and completely forgotten about.

如果沒有這些，他們早就把我幹掉了，這件事也會被掩蓋起來，完全被遺忘。

The 1993 murders of three young boys in West Memphis shattered the small Arkansas community and and ignited national panic.

1993年，三名年輕男孩在西曼菲斯的謀殺案，震驚了阿肯色州這個小社區，並引發了全國性的恐慌。

Teenagers Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jesse Misskelley Jr.

青少年 Damien Echols、Jason Baldwin 和 Jesse Misskelley Jr.

Were swept up in the investigation, targeted because of Misskelley's shaky confession and a community wide panic over satanic rituals.

被捲入了調查，因為 Misskelley 搖搖晃晃的自白，以及社區裡對撒旦儀式的恐慌，他們成了目標。

The way I dress, the music I listened to, the books I read, you know, as, as evidence at the trial, they actually introduced things like Stephen King novels.

我的穿著、我聽的音樂、我讀的書，你知道的，像是，像是庭審中的證據，他們竟然提出了像史蒂芬·金的小說。

They said that was proof that I was satanic.

他們說那是證明我是撒旦教徒的證據。

Physical evidence tying them to the crime scene was virtually non existent.

將他們與犯罪現場聯繫起來的物證幾乎不存在。

Yet Echols received a death sentence and the others life without parole.

然而，Echols 被判處死刑，其餘兩人則被判處無期徒刑。

As doubts grew, a movement formed amplified by filmmakers and celebrities who highlighted the corrosive influence of satanic panic.

隨著疑慮加深，一個由電影製作人和名人推波助瀾的運動開始形成，他們強調了撒旦恐慌的腐蝕性影響。

Subsequent DNA testing undermined the state's case, leading to the 2011 Alford plea.

後續的 DNA 檢測動搖了檢方的論點，促成了 2011 年的 Alford 認罪協商。

This rare legal maneuver allowed the men to maintain their innocence while while technically pleading guilty in exchange for time served.

這項罕見的法律操作，讓這幾位男士在技術上認罪的同時，得以維持清白，並以已服刑的時間換取自由。

Considering all the new evidence that's come forward, considering witnesses who've recanted their original accounts, it's very hard to believe that these prosecutors don't have very serious questions about what happened here.

考量到所有新出現的證據，以及那些撤回原始證詞的證人，很難相信這些檢察官對這裡發生的事情沒有嚴重的質疑。

Will be interesting to see if anyone else takes up the search.

看看是否有人會繼續追查，這會很有趣。

Amid protests and unrest following the police shooting of Jacob Blake In August 2020, 17 year old Kyle Rittenhouse traveled to Kenosha, Wisconsin stating he intended to protect property and offer first aid.

2020年8月，在警方槍擊 Jacob Blake 事件引發的抗議和騷亂中，17歲的 Kyle Rittenhouse 前往威斯康辛州的 Kenosha，聲稱他打算保護財產並提供急救。

During a series of confrontations, he shot three individuals, killing two and injuring another.

在一系列對峙中，他槍擊了三個人，造成兩人死亡，一人受傷。

Charged with multiple felony counts including first degree reckless homicide and first degree intentional homicide, Rittenhouse went to trial in November 2021.

Rittenhouse 被控多項重罪，包括一級魯莽殺人罪和一級故意殺人罪，並於2021年11月受審。

Prosecutors argued his presence was reckless and provocative, while the defense maintained he acted in lawful self defense.

檢方認為他的出現是魯莽且挑釁的，而辯方則堅持他是在合法自衛。

When the jury acquitted him on all charges, reactions split sharply.

當陪審團對所有指控都判他無罪時，反應出現了嚴重分歧。

Critics saw the verdict as an endorsement of armed civilian intervention, while supporters viewed it as a straightforward application of self defense law.

批評者認為這項判決是對武裝平民幹預的認可，而支持者則認為這是對自衛法律的簡單應用。

Members of the jury, are these your unanimous verdicts?

陪審團成員們，這些都是你們一致的裁決嗎？

Is there anyone who does not agree with the verdict as read?

有沒有人不同意剛才宣讀的裁決？

好的，好的各位，你們的任務完成了。

And we started just about three weeks ago.

我們大約是三個星期前開始的。

Casey Anthony, to your understanding, how did she die?

凱西·安東尼，依妳的理解，她是怎麼死的？

妳不知道關於溺水的任何事嗎？

And next to next thing you know, she's missing.

The disappearance of two year old Caylee Anthony in 2008 and the subsequent prosecution of her mother, Casey Anthony became a media obsession.

2008年，兩歲的Caylee Anthony失蹤，她的母親Casey Anthony隨後被起訴，這件事成了媒體的焦點。

Prosecutors asserted Anthony killed her daughter to escape parental responsibility.

檢方主張Anthony殺害女兒是為了逃避為人父母的責任。

Bolstered by circumstantial evidence and behavior the public found inexplicable, the defense countered with a theory of accidental drowning and family concealment.

在旁證和公眾認為難以理解的行為的支持下，辯方提出了意外溺水和家人隱瞞的理論。

Haley Anthony died on June 16, 2008 when she drowned in her family's swimming pool.

Haley Anthony於2008年6月16日，在家裡的游泳池溺斃。

It's a story prosecutors now think Casey stole from her former Jail cell neighbor.

這是一個檢方現在認為Casey從她以前的牢友那裡偷來的說法。

A citizen called the Orange County Sheriff's Office left some information about an inmate who may have had contact with Ms.

一位市民打電話給Orange County Sheriff's Office，提供了一些關於一位可能有與Ms.接觸過的獄友的資訊。

When the jury acquitted Anthony of murder and manslaughter in 2011, convicting her only for lying to police, the public reaction bordered on disbelief.

2011年陪審團判決Anthony謀殺和過失殺人罪名不成立，僅判決她對警方說謊罪名成立時，民眾的反應近乎難以置信。

Many cited her delay in reporting Caylee missing as a damning indicator.

許多人認為她延遲通報Caylee失蹤是個確鑿的證據。

But jurors later stated they did not find the forensic evidence sufficiently conclusive to prove how the child died.

但陪審員後來表示，他們認為法醫證據不足以證明孩子是如何死亡的。

Casey Anthony cried as the court clerk read the jury's verdict as to the charge of first degree murder.

當法庭書記官宣讀陪審團對一級謀殺罪的判決時，Casey Anthony哭了。

Verdict as to count one, we the jury find the defendant not guilty.

關於第一項指控，我們陪審團判定被告無罪。

The jury delivered not guilty verdicts on all counts of murder, manslaughter and child abuse.

陪審團對所有謀殺、過失殺人及虐待兒童的指控都判決無罪。

They handed down guilty verdicts on four lesser charges of lying to police officers.

他們對四項較輕的對警方說謊的指控判決有罪。

All of the defendants gave videotaped statements to police implicating themselves or others.

所有被告都提供了錄影的警詢筆錄，指控自己或他人。

But some of their attorneys charged today that police obtained the confessions by force.

不過，他們的一些律師今天指控警方是以武力取得這些供詞。

The first statement, he said he had nothing to do with it, and

第一份聲明，他說他跟這件事一點關係都沒有，而且

they put pressure on him, A lot of pressure.

In 1989, five black and Latino teenagers, Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Youssef Salaam, Raymond Santana and Corey Wise, were arrested for the brutal assault of a jogger in Central Park.

1989年，五名非裔及拉丁裔青少年，Antron McCray、Kevin Richardson、Youssef Salaam、Raymond Santana 和 Corey Wise，因為在中央公園殘忍攻擊一名慢跑者而被捕。

Their convictions hinged on confessions taken after high pressure interrogations without lawyers present.

他們的定罪取決於在沒有律師在場的高壓訊問下取得的供詞。

The trials unfolded amid intense racial anxiety and sensational press coverage.

審判在強烈的種族焦慮和聳動的媒體報導中展開。

你會向中央公園五人組道歉嗎？

There have been videos, movies shown about the case, and

關於這個案子已經有影片、電影播出了，而且

you came out with a full page ad saying that they should die, that they shared the death penalty.

你們刊登了全頁廣告，說他們應該死，說他們應該被判死刑。

你現在為什麼要提出這個問題？

這確實是個提出這個問題的有趣時機。

All five were convicted, with Wise serving the longest time behind bars.

五個人都被定罪，其中懷斯（Wise）是服刑最久的。

In 2002, serial offender Matias Reyes confessed and his DNA matched the crime, leading to the convictions being vacated.

2002年，連續犯案的馬提亞斯·雷耶斯（Matias Reyes）坦承犯行，他的DNA也與案發現場吻合，這使得定罪被撤銷。

Public fury shifted from the defendants to the system itself, resulting in a $41 million settlement with the City of New York in 2014.

公眾的憤怒從被告轉移到體制本身，最終在2014年與紐約市達成4100萬美元的和解。

Y' all don't really understand what we went through.

你們根本不瞭解我們經歷了什麼。

Y' all tried to dehumanize us as human beings.

字幕列表影片播放

10 起引起巨大爭議的審判！ (10 Trials That Caused Massive Backlash)

panic

evidence

bias

split