Name: 伊朗嗆聲「準備好了」！美軍登陸部隊抵達中東，更多海軍陸戰隊員湧入！| BBC News (Iran says its 'waiting' for US ground troops, as more American marines arrive in region | BBC News)
Uploaded: 2026-03-29T21:34:34.000Z
Duration: 10 min 11 s

The Speaker of Iran's Parliament has warned the US that Iran's military is "waiting" for a ground attack and ready to "rain fire" upon any troops that try to enter Iranian territory.

伊朗議長警告美國，伊朗軍隊正「嚴陣以待」地面攻擊，並準備好對任何試圖進入伊朗領土的部隊「降下砲火」。

He claimed Donald Trump is planning a ground operation in secret.

他聲稱川普正祕密策劃一場地面行動。

His comments come as fresh reports in The Washington Post suggest the Pentagon is preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran.

這些評論出現在《華盛頓郵報》的最新報導中，暗示五角大廈正為伊朗數週的地面行動做準備。

The Pentagon hasn't commented on the reports yet.

五角大廈尚未對這些報導發表評論。

More than 3,000 US troops arrived in the region on Friday, on board the USS Tripoli.

週五，超過 3000 名美軍搭乘美國海軍黎波里號抵達該區域。

But Donald Trump has claimed in recent days that talks with Iran have been going very well.

但川普近幾天聲稱，與伊朗的談判進展順利。

Meanwhile, Iran has threatened to target Israeli and American universities in the Middle East in retaliation for a strike on a university in Tehran.

同時，伊朗威脅將報復德黑蘭一所大學遭襲擊的事件，目標鎖定中東的以色列和美國的大學。

Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps warned staff and students, as well as nearby residents, to keep a distance of one kilometer from American universities in the region.

伊朗伊斯蘭革命衛隊警告教職員工、學生以及附近居民，要與該區域內的美國大學保持一公里距離。

It comes as the Houthis in Yemen say they'll keep targeting Israel in the coming days, after launching their first attacks since the war began.

這是在葉門胡塞武裝表示，在發動戰爭開始以來首次攻擊後，未來幾天將持續攻擊以色列之際發生的。

The group, which is backed by Iran, says it fired two waves of missiles and drones on Saturday.

該組織在伊朗支持下表示，週六發射了兩波飛彈和無人機。

This report from our World Affairs correspondent, Joe Inwood.

這是我們世界事務記者 Joe Inwood 的報導。

High above the Middle East, an Israeli jet refuels, ready for another operation.

在中東上空，一架以色列戰機正在加油，準備進行另一項任務。

This is the image the US and Israel want to project: of precision, of control.

這就是美國和以色列想要展現的形象：精準、掌控。

But on the ground, it appears very different.

但在地面上，情況似乎截然不同。

There are reports in the US that the use of ground troops is now being considered.

美國有報導指出，地面部隊的使用正在被考慮中。

數千名海軍陸戰隊員已在該區域。

The Washington Post says they may attempt to take either Carg Island or launch coastal raids.

華盛頓郵報表示，他們可能會試圖佔領卡格島或發動沿海突襲。

Responding on social media, the President simply said, "No, Trump is not losing his nerve on Iran." But the threat of ground forces is clearly being taken seriously.

總統在社群媒體上回應，僅表示「不，川普並沒有在伊朗問題上退縮。」但地面部隊的威脅顯然正被嚴肅看待。

The Speaker of Iran's Parliament told the state news agency, "The enemy openly sends messages of negotiation and secretly plans for a ground attack.

伊朗議長告訴國家通訊社：「敵人公開傳遞談判訊息，私下卻策劃地面攻擊。

Our men are waiting to set them on fire and punish their regional partners forever." And that punishment is already being felt.

我們的弟兄們正準備讓他們焚燒，並永遠懲罰他們的區域夥伴。」而這樣的懲罰已經感受到了。

This was Kuwait Airport yesterday, while the UAE said it suffered its heaviest attacks in weeks.

這裡是昨天的科威特機場，同時阿聯酋表示，他們遭受了數週以來最嚴重的攻擊。

The news that the Houthis, an armed Yemeni faction aligned to Iran, have now joined the war opens a new front.

葉門胡塞武裝這個與伊朗結盟的葉門派系，現在加入戰爭的消息開啟了新的戰線。

Our armed forces carried out the second military operation using a barrage of cruise missiles and drones, targeting several vital and military sites of the Zionist enemy in southern occupied Palestine.

我國武裝部隊執行了第二次軍事行動，使用一連串的巡弋飛彈和無人機，目標是位於被佔領的巴勒斯坦南部的猶太復國主義敵人的數個重要軍事地點。

The Houthis could threaten the Bab al-Mandab Strait, which has provided an alternate route for some Saudi oil.

胡塞武裝可能會威脅到曼德布海峽，這條海峽為部分沙烏地阿拉伯的石油提供了替代路線。

If that were closed, the consequences for the global economy would be devastating.

如果那裡被封鎖，對全球經濟的影響將是毀滅性的。

Here in the UK, the government says this country can cope.

在英國這裡，政府表示我國能夠應對。

As you would expect, we will continue to keep under review all of the measures we currently have in place and if anything is needed in the future.

正如您所預期的，我們將持續審視所有目前已採取的措施，並在未來有任何需要時進行調整。

But your viewers should be reassured that where it comes to energy prices in terms of what they will be paying for domestic supplies, we are making sure that is capped until the end of June.

但您的觀眾應該放心，就能源價格而言，就他們為國內供應所支付的費用，我們確保在六月底之前都會有價格上限。

We've taken action to support consumers who require heating oil.

我們已經採取行動來支持需要燃油的消費者。

There are diplomatic efforts underway to bring this all to an end.

外交努力正在進行中，希望能讓這一切結束。

Talks are being held, but only involving Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey.

談判正在進行，但只涉及巴基斯坦、埃及和土耳其。

The US, Israel, and Iran are not taking part.

美國、以色列和伊朗並未參與。

They all claim they are now winning this war, and no one looks ready to compromise.

他們都聲稱自己現在正在贏得這場戰爭，而且沒有人準備好妥協。

Let's speak to Sasha Bruckmann, who's research fellow for defense and military analysis at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

讓我們來訪問國際戰略研究所（International Institute for Strategic Studies）國防與軍事分析研究員 Sasha Bruckmann。

Sasha Bruckmann, thank you for talking to us.

Sasha Bruckmann，謝謝您接受我們的訪問。

I wonder, first of all, what your thoughts are one month into this war with no real end in sight.

我想先聽聽您對這場戰爭一個月了卻看不到盡頭有什麼看法。

Well, yes, it seems we have settled into a bit of a phase of stalemate.

嗯，是的，看來我們已經進入了一個有點僵持的階段。

It's not no longer the first or second round of this boxing match where everybody's trying to gather information about how the ferocity of each other and the constitution of the enemy.

這已經不是這場拳擊賽的第一輪或第二輪了，當時每個人都在試圖收集關於對方凶猛程度和敵人構成的資訊。

But it now seems like both have kind of sized each other up, and

但現在看來，雙方似乎都已經互相摸清了底細，

we're getting into a phase that seems a bit more slow, as in continuous attacks by the United States and Israel.

我們正進入一個似乎比較緩慢的階段，像是美國和以色列持續的攻擊。

the Iranians have been able to retaliate or continue retaliation, albeit at a much lower level.

而伊朗人也能夠進行報復或持續報復，儘管規模小了很多。

So when the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff says Iran's retaliation has dropped by 90% in terms of missile and UAV attacks, I think I can see something similar in the data.

所以，當參謀長聯席會議主席說，伊朗在飛彈和無人機攻擊方面的報復行動減少了 90%，我認為我在數據中也看到了類似的情況。

But this is kind of the stalemate, where we are hundreds of sorties per day on the US-Israeli side, and

但這就是一種僵持，美國和以色列方面每天有數百架次的飛行，而

20, 30, 40 missiles maybe by the Iranians in retaliation.

伊朗可能發射了二三十枚、甚至四五十枚飛彈進行報復。

So despite the bluster, despite the defiance I mean, absolute defiance that continues to come from Iran, the latest from the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament saying Iran is waiting for a ground attack by the US and will rain fire on any troops.

所以，儘管伊朗方面虛張聲勢、儘管他們持續地表現出絕對的挑釁，像是伊朗議長說伊朗正在等待美國的地面攻擊，並將對任何部隊降下砲火。

Despite all that, you think there is a military weakening of Iran behind that.

儘管如此，你認為這背後是伊朗的軍事實力正在減弱嗎？

I mean, we have to disentangle what the military weakening means.

我的意思是，我們必須釐清軍事實力減弱的意義。

The missile and the UAV sorties have definitely gone down.

飛彈和無人機的攻擊架次確實減少了。

The Iranian Navy no longer exists de facto.

伊朗海軍實際上已經不存在了。

But its ground forces have been much less affected by the war thus far.

但到目前為止，它的地面部隊受戰爭的影響要小得多。

所以，這是有一些值得考慮的地方。

Now, I would never want to be at the receiving end of a US Marine Corps attack, whether that's an ACTF, a Marine Assault Force, or whether it's a MEW, what they're sending now, the Marine Expeditionary Unit.

現在，我絕對不想成為美國海軍陸戰隊攻擊的對象，無論是 ACTF（海軍陸戰隊突擊部隊），還是他們現在派遣的 MEU（海軍陸戰隊遠徵部隊）。

The problem for the Iranians will be that an amphibious assault is hard to predict.

伊朗的問題在於，兩棲登陸作戰很難預測。

The Marines can come by a tilt-rotor helicopter they all space.

海軍陸戰隊可以搭乘他們擁有的傾轉旋翼直升機前來。

They can raid ashore with their amphibious vehicles or with small boats, or they could come into port.

他們可以開著兩棲載具或小艇進行登陸突襲，或者直接進入港口。

They are very specifically configured for these functions, for these amphibious assaults.

它們是為了這些功能、這些兩棲登陸作戰而特別配置的。

And with the USS Tripoli and her group, with two other ships, the San Diego and the New Orleans, they're mobile.

而美國海軍黎波里號及其編隊，還有聖地牙哥號和紐奧良號這兩艘船，它們是機動的。

So therefore, they hold an entire strip of coast at risk.

是以，它們讓整片海岸線都處於危險之中。

And on the other hand, you have the President or the establishment in Washington talking about Carg Island, but

另一方面，你看到美國總統或華盛頓的建制派在談論卡格島，但是

there are other islands that could be at risk in this entire Iranian coastline.

在這整片伊朗海岸線上，還有其他島嶼可能面臨風險。

So it's very hard for the Iranians actually to predict where the Americans will strike eventually.

所以，伊朗實際上很難預測美國最終會在哪裡發動攻擊。

And what do you read into that troop buildup that you have just described, that additional 3,000 or more troops arriving on the USS Tripoli just on Friday?

關於你剛才提到的，美國海軍黎波里號在週五又增加了三千多名部隊，你對此有什麼解讀？

So yeah, I think the group has about 3,500 combined sailors and marines, I think 2,000, 2,500.

所以，我認為這支隊伍大約有三千五百名海軍和海軍陸戰隊官兵，大概是兩千到兩千五百人。

Often, we read 2,200 as given as the number of marines.

我們經常看到數字是兩千兩百名海軍陸戰隊官兵。

So you have Carg Island, which is a small island, but

所以你有卡格島，它是一個小島，但是

it's strategically significant because the oil export infrastructure is located on the island.

它具有戰略意義，因為石油出口基礎設施就設在島上。

And I think, as I said, Washington has floated this idea.

我認為，就像我說的，華盛頓已經提出了這個想法。

I'm not certain I cannot understand what the strategic advantage is to taking the oil export infrastructure because the Iranian ships have to pass the Strait of Hormuz and then go into the Indian Ocean.

我不確定，我無法理解佔領石油出口基礎設施的戰略優勢在哪裡，因為伊朗的船隻必須經過荷姆茲海峽，然後進入印度洋。

They have to pass, literally, the American ships, for example, the Washington and its destroyers.

他們必須經過，字面上來說，美國的船隻，例如華盛頓號及其驅逐艦。

So if US wanted to seize, destroy, or stop Iranian oil exports, it could do so by attacking those ships in many ways, whether that's destroying or just halting them or sending teams on to board those ships.

所以，如果美國想扣押、摧毀或阻止伊朗的石油出口，它可以透過多種方式攻擊這些船隻來做到，無論是摧毀它們，還是隻是阻止它們，或是派遣隊伍登上這些船隻。

So Carg Island is a bit of a question mark for me.

所以卡格島對我來說有點令人費解。

Not tactically, it's perfectly viable, but strategically.

並非戰術上，而是戰略上，這完全可行。

I find the islands near the narrowest point of the Strait of Hormuz more interesting from a tactical point of view.

我覺得，從戰術角度來看，荷姆茲海峽最窄處附近的島嶼更有趣。

So to the west, you have Abu Musa and the greater Nassotunbe Islands, which are claimed by the United Arab Emirates, which could serve as observation posts to sort and filter because the Iranian troops stationed there could hail Bandar Abbas or Tehran and say, "This tanker is approaching.

所以往西邊，你們有阿布穆薩島和納索通貝島，這兩個島由阿聯酋聲稱擁有，它們可以作為觀察站來篩選，因為駐紮在那裡的伊朗部隊可以呼叫班達爾阿巴斯或德黑蘭說：「這艘油輪正在靠近。

Do we have an agreement with this country or with this shipping line?" And then further east, at the more narrow point, is Kisham Island and the island of Hormuz, after which the strait is named, which are military posts from which UAVs, for example, are fired.

我們是否與這個國家或這家航運公司有協議？」然後再往東邊，在更窄的地方，有基什姆島和荷姆茲島，海峽就是以它命名的，這些是發射無人機的軍事基地。

So you have the observation, let's say, the intelligence and reconnaissance side, or the effectors from where the UAVs are being launched.

所以你們有觀察，假設是情報和偵察方面，或是發射無人機的效應器。

Those are, together with Hormuz, three strategic options.

這些，再加上荷姆茲島，是三個戰略選項。

And the fourth one is you could just sail the Tripoli up and down the coastline and see how the Iranians react.

第四個選項是，你們可以直接讓黎波里號在海岸線上航行，看看伊朗人有什麼反應。

Every bit of decision is intelligence, right?

All of that is being soaked up by US and Israeli intelligence and could then inform whatever course of action will be taken in the end.

所有這些情報都被美國和以色列情報機構吸收了，然後可以為最終採取的任何行動提供資訊。

你們在波斯灣，在那裡，在杜哈。

Just give us, in a few words, if you like.

簡單跟我們說一下就好，如果你願意的話。

How effective do you think Iran's tactic, Iran's strategy of targeting its Gulf neighbours is proving to be in this war?

你認為伊朗針對其波斯灣鄰國的策略，在這次戰爭中有多有效？

So effective on a strategic sense, it is not because I think it's actually influenced decision-making in the Gulf to distance themselves more from Iran, understandably so.

在戰略層面上，它並非如此有效，因為我認為這實際上促使海灣國家更加疏遠伊朗，這也是可以理解的。

Tactically, operationally, it has not brought down any of the Gulf states, right?

在戰術和行動層面上，它並沒有擊垮任何一個海灣國家，對吧？