Name: 川普真的會對格陵蘭出手嗎？ 德意志之聲新聞 (How likely is it that Trump will follow through on his threats regarding Greenland? | DW News)
Uploaded: 2026-01-06T08:34:14.000Z
Duration: 10 min 49 s

US President Trump has doubled down on his vow, as we heard, to bring Greenland under the United States control.

美國總統川普再次強調，我們聽到了，他要把格陵蘭納入美國掌控。

轉承詞

That's despite calls by Denmark's Mette Frederiksen to stop threatening the territory.

儘管丹麥的梅特·佛瑞德里克森呼籲停止威脅該地區。

反身代名詞

Her comments follow a post by Katie Miller, the wife of one of Trump's top aides and a former aide herself.

她的評論是繼凱蒂·米勒發文之後，凱蒂·米勒是川普一位高級助手的老婆，她自己也曾是助手。

You see it right here, showing Greenland in the colors of the American flag.

你看這張圖，格陵蘭被塗上了美國國旗的顏色。

She added the word soon alongside the picture on Air Force One.

她在空軍一號上的照片旁加上了「soon」這個詞。

On Sunday evening, Trump reiterated his desire to take over Greenland.

週日晚上，川普重申了他想接管格陵蘭的意願。

Don't worry about Greenland in about two months.

大約兩個月後，別擔心格陵蘭的事。

我覺得以色列，我們談了好多。

And by the way, I have to, I will say this about Greenland.

順帶一提，我必須說，關於格陵蘭，我會這樣說。

We need Greenland from a national security situation.

我們需要格陵蘭來處理國家安全問題。

Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place.

格陵蘭到處都是俄羅斯和中國的船隻。

We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security.

從國家安全的角度來看，我們需要格陵蘭。

And Denmark is not going to be able to do it, I can tell you.

我可以告訴你，丹麥將無法做到這一點。

Well, there has been reactions to that comment by the president.

嗯，總統的這番評論已經引起了反應。

The German Foreign Minister, Johann Vaniful, on a visit to Lithuania today, expressed his full support for Denmark.

德國外交部長約翰·凡尼富今天訪問立陶宛時，對丹麥表示了全力支持。

I can only say that Greenland, like the Faroe Islands, is part of the Danish Kingdom.

我只能說，格陵蘭和法羅群島一樣，都是丹麥王國的一部分。

And since Denmark belongs to NATO, Greenland will in principle also be defended by NATO.

既然丹麥屬於北約，原則上格陵蘭也會受到北約的保護。

If there are further requirements to strengthen defense efforts with regards to Greenland, then we will have to discuss this within the framework of the alliance.

如果在加強格陵蘭的國防方面有進一步的要求，我們將需要在聯盟框架內討論此事。

All right, I want to bring in now Boris Miotovic.

好的，現在我要請鮑里斯·米奧託維奇加入。

He's a member of the German Parliament for the opposition Green Party.

他是德國議會反對黨綠黨的成員。

You know, the statement we just heard there from the German foreign minister, it's rather vague.

你知道，剛才德國外交部長的聲明有點含糊不清。

What's your reaction to the position of Germany with what's happening right now regarding Greenland?

對於德國在目前格陵蘭事件上的立場，你有什麼看法？

First of all, I have to say this is a very dangerous moment for international order and security.

首先，我必須說，這是國際秩序和安全一個非常危險的時刻。

We have to make sure that it is, that we stand with the rules that we have given ourselves in order not to get in a chaotic world that we have experienced in the 20th century, especially my continent.

我們必須確保，我們堅持自己訂下的規則，以免陷入我們在二十世紀，尤其是我所在的洲所經歷過的混亂世界。

Europe has been experiencing a lot of suffering, and so did Asia.

歐洲經歷了很多苦難，亞洲也是。

And in that sense, we all stand with Denmark for sure because we don't want open threats and open imperialism again.

從這個角度來看，我們當然都支持丹麥，因為我們不希望再次出現公開的威脅和公開的帝國主義。

Well, you say we all stand with Denmark, but does your Chancellor stand with Denmark?

嗯，你說我們都支持丹麥，但你們的總理支持丹麥嗎？

You know, Chancellor Merz was asked about the situation, and

你知道，梅爾茲總理被問到這個情況時，

the statement that came from him was also rather vague.

And he did not condemn what the US did in Venezuela.

而且他並沒有譴責美國在委內瑞拉的行為。

He did not call that a violation of international law.

So is your Chancellor, is he speaking for you?

所以，你們的總理，他是代表你們說話嗎？

Obviously I want my chancellor to be more clear and more stable in that sense that I just described.

顯然我希望我的總理能更清晰、更穩定，就像我剛才描述的那樣。

He's given your current president in the US Some time to act and to show that he has substantial proofs to his sayings about Venezuela and the act of aggression that he committed under UN Rules of the UN Charter.

他給了你們現任美國總統一些時間來行動，並證明他關於委內瑞拉以及在聯合國憲章規則下犯下的侵略行為的說法有實質證據。

There's only two cases where one country can be attacked.

一個國家只能在兩種情況下被攻擊。

One is a mandate from the security Channel, which is Security Council, which is obviously not given, and

一個是聯合國安理會的授權，這顯然沒有給予，

So if there's any kind of narco terrorists or anything like that, show us the proofs that you have and the chance.

所以，如果有任何毒梟恐怖分子或類似的東西，請拿出你們的證據和機會。

Tesla says I want to see that proofs and maybe he's giving your current president some time.

特斯拉說，我想看看那些證據，也許他是在給你們現任總統一些時間。

Well, obviously in my position as an opposition member, I don't need that time because I don't think that there are these proofs that there has been narcotic terrorism that has been endangering the entire U.S.

嗯，顯然，作為反對黨成員，我不需要那些時間，因為我不認為有什麼毒品恐怖主義正在危及整個美國的證據。

let me go back to the situation with Denmark and Greenland for a moment.

讓我回到丹麥和格陵蘭的狀況。

Do you think that Europe, the European Union, is it doing enough to help Denmark rebuff President Trump's ambitions?

你認為歐洲、歐盟，是否做了足夠的努力來幫助丹麥抵擋川普總統的野心？

Well, I don't want to go into speculations.

Obviously, Denmark is a close friend not only to the European Union, his partner, and

顯然，丹麥不僅是歐盟的親密朋友，也是他的夥伴，

working together a NATO alliance for more than 50, 60, 70 years.

並且在北約聯盟中合作了超過五、六、七十年。

So basically this kind of friendship shall not be ruined within one act of a president.

所以基本上，這種友誼不應該因為總統的一個行為就毀了。

My fears go for other regions of the world and for other bullies we have in the world.

我擔心的是世界上其他地區，以及我們世界上其他霸凌者。

This little island is very important for our semiconductors industry, is very important for our democracies in Asia.

這個小島對我們的半導體產業非常重要，對我們亞洲的民主國家也非常重要。

It is very, very close friend to all of us and having a scene scenario that is going on there on the same route that we have seen with Venezuela.

它跟我們大家都是非常非常要好的朋友，而現在這裡發生的情況，跟我們在委內瑞拉看到的劇本一樣。

And this is something we have to face together as a challenge to a standard that we see in the world.

而這是我們必須一起面對的挑戰，是我們在世界上看到的一種標準。

Let me ask you, some observers say that this should be a warning, maybe a wake up call for the European Union, that the United States under Donald Trump will act in its own interest and only its own interest, and

讓我問你，有些觀察家說，這應該是一個警告，也許是給歐盟的一個警鐘，美國在唐納·川普領導下，將會只顧自己的利益，而且只顧自己的利益，

is not going to see the eu, Europe, Germany as an equal partner.

而不會把歐盟、歐洲、德國視為平等的夥伴。

Do you envision then as a result of this, the countries of the European Union in the future working together more closely?

這樣一來，你認為未來的歐洲聯盟國家會更緊密地合作嗎？

Do you see the events by the US Pushing Europe into a more unified stance?

你覺得美國的這些舉動會讓歐洲採取更團結的立場嗎？

We have made decisions on our defence spending, on our capabilities countering cyber attacks, et cetera.

我們已經決定了國防開支、我們應對網路攻擊的能力等等。

Yes, we have been relying on American friendship for decades, and

是的，幾十年來我們一直依賴美國的友誼，

especially my home country is grateful to everything the Americans have granted us in the 50s with a Marshall Plan.

尤其是我的祖國，對於美國在 50 年代透過馬歇爾計畫給予我們的一切都非常感激。

We wouldn't have come out of this shit without having American friends.

如果沒有美國朋友，我們不可能走出這個困境。

但就目前而言，我們更加緊密了。

We have learned our lesson with the first administration of Mr.

我們從川普總統的第一任期學到了一課，

now we see that this administration has just been a prequel to what is going on now.

現在我們看到這一任期只是現在正在發生的事情的前奏。

But on the other hand, we have to see losing international order makes the world more chaotic.

但另一方面，我們必須看到失去國際秩序讓世界更加混亂。

That is bad for business, that is bad for globalization, that is bad for shipping, for anything that you have, that we have as a common interest in the markets, in the US in the eu, in South America and in Asia, definitely.

這對商業、全球化、運輸，以及我們在美國、歐盟、南美和亞洲市場中的共同利益都不利。

So basically, we have to protect our interest in international order.

所以基本上，我們必須保護我們在國際秩序中的利益。

We have to defend what we have earned so far, and

我們必須捍衛我們至今所獲得的一切，而且

all these economic relationships shall put together an interest in international ruling.

所有這些經濟關係都應該匯聚成對國際統治的利益。

If you overthrow this ruling, you cannot be a trustworthy friend any longer.

如果你推翻這個統治，你就不能再是個值得信賴的朋友了。

This is the risk we are in at the moment.

Boris Miyatovi, member of the opposition Green Party here in Germany's Parliament.

德國議會反對黨綠黨的成員鮑里斯·米奧託維奇。

We appreciate you sharing your thoughts with us.

Let's now speak to Terry Schultz, a DW correspondent in Brussels.

接下來我們連線在布魯塞爾的 DW 記者泰瑞·舒爾茨。

Terry, the European Union has released a joint statement on the situation in Venezuela, and

泰瑞，歐洲聯盟針對委內瑞拉的局勢發表了聯合聲明，

I understand you had the chance to ask for more details today at a briefing by the European Commission.

我知道今天在歐洲委員會的簡報會上，你有機會詢問更多細節。

What more do we know about the EU position now?

我們現在對歐盟的立場還有哪些瞭解？

Well, what we know is that the EU is definitely not starting off 2025 with any bold positions, nor risking any criticism of the United.

嗯，我們知道的是，歐盟在 2025 年的開局絕對沒有什麼大膽的立場，也沒有冒著任何批評聯合國的風險。

So that statement that was put out yesterday, as you mentioned, was really quite bland.

所以你剛才提到的，昨天發表的聲明，確實非常平淡。

It only mentioned the United States in terms of saying that EU officials had been in touch with the US and the other references in this statement were simply to unnamed actors hoping that they uphold international law and stick to UN principles.

聲明中只提到美國，說歐盟官員已與美國聯繫，其他提及的對象，僅是匿名人士，希望他們遵守國際法並堅持聯合國原則。

Those are things like refraining from the use of force and settling things peacefully, things that obviously weren't exactly done in Venezuela.

這些原則像是避免使用武力，以及和平解決紛爭，這些顯然在委內瑞拉並沒有做到。

But today, when we asked the European Commission spokespeople for more details on how they view what happened in Venezuela, they were simply unwilling to go any further.

但今天，當我們詢問歐洲委員會的發言人，他們如何看待委內瑞拉發生的事情時，他們就是不願多說。

In fact, it even was a bit more confusing because the spokesperson said that perhaps what she called the events of the weekend would actually open the way for a peaceful transition in Venezuela.

事實上，情況甚至更令人困惑，因為發言人說，她稱之為週末的事件，或許會為委內瑞拉的和平過渡鋪平道路。

Now, of course, when you come to Greenland, that's a completely different matter with Denmark as a member of the European Union, they're not so comfortable taking distance from Donald Trump's renewed threats of about wanting to take over Greenland.

當然，說到格陵蘭，那就是完全不同的情況了，丹麥作為歐盟成員國，他們對於與美國總統川普想要佔領格陵蘭的最新威脅保持距離，並沒有那麼自在。

But even there, Michael, they simply referred to previous statements saying that the EU backs Denmark's territorial sovereignty.

但即使在那裡，麥可，他們也只是引用先前的聲明，說歐盟支持丹麥的主權。

So really no one going out on a limb either on Venezuela or even on Greenland.

所以真的沒有人願意在這兩件事上冒險，無論是委內瑞拉還是格陵蘭。

字幕列表影片播放

川普真的會對格陵蘭出手嗎？德意志之聲新聞 (How likely is it that Trump will follow through on his threats regarding Greenland? | DW News)

situation

basically

vague

force

川普真的會對格陵蘭出手嗎？ 德意志之聲新聞 (How likely is it that Trump will follow through on his threats regarding Greenland? | DW News)

situation

basically

vague

force

川普真的會對格陵蘭出手嗎？德意志之聲新聞 (How likely is it that Trump will follow through on his threats regarding Greenland? | DW News)