Name: 基督教其實是偷偷的同性戀嗎？！ (Is Christianity Secretly Gay?)
Uploaded: 2025-12-23T13:12:12.000Z
Duration: 27 min 43 s

情態副詞

But let's talk about what happens when a religion loses its aspect of the divine feminine.

但我們來聊聊，當一個宗教失去了神聖女性的面向時，會發生什麼事。

而且一旦你看到了，就再也無法視而不見。

所以我想從 bell hooks 開始談起。

When bell hooks wrote that patriarchy has no love for women, she wasn't being metaphorical.

bell hooks 寫說父權制對女性沒有愛，她並不是在說隱喻。

She meant that under patriarchy, in patriarchal religion, which we're going to talk about, men are not taught to love women.

她是說，在父權制下，在父權宗教裡，也就是我們接下來要談的，男性沒有被教導要去愛女性。

They're taught to possess women or manage women or take care of women.

他們被教導要去佔有女性、管理女性或照顧女性。

But love, emotional intimacy, devotion, loyalty, vulnerability is reserved for other men.

但是愛、情感親密、奉獻、忠誠、脆弱性，這些都是為其他男性保留的。

And we're going to see this in patriarchal religion.

我們會在父權宗教中看到這一點。

Christianity reserves its deepest love, its deepest loyalty, devotion for other men in the church, for Jesus and for God, who is male.

基督教將其最深的愛、最深的忠誠、奉獻保留給教會裡的其他男性，保留給耶穌和男性化的上帝。

So Christianity is not entirely gay in the sexual sense, but

是以，基督教在性方面並非完全是同性戀，但

it is homosocial in the emotional, relational and spiritual sense.

在情感、關係和精神層面上，它是同性社交的。

And then we'll talk about how homosocial environments actually create homophobia and why that happens.

然後我們會談談同性社交環境實際上如何造成恐同症，以及為什麼會這樣。

So patriarchal societies create male to male loyalty bonds.

所以父權社會會建立男性之間的忠誠連結。

And women exist to support those bonds, to produce heirs, to elevate men's spiritual status.

女性的存在是為了支持這些連結、生育繼承人、提升男性的精神地位。

But emotional intimacy, spiritual, sacrificial love, moral loyalty are exchanged between men or between men and their male dominated gods.

但情感親密、精神上的、犧牲的愛、道德上的忠誠是在男性之間，或在男性與他們男性主導的神祇之間交換的。

So when bell hooks says patriarchy is a love ethic between men, she means that men learn to see other men as the real subjects who matter.

所以當 bell hooks 說父權制是男性之間的愛的倫理時，她的意思是男性學會將其他男性視為真正重要的人物。

Women are background characters in a story written for men, about men, through men, by men.

女性在一個為男性、關於男性、透過男性、由男性編寫的故事裡，只是個背景角色。

And Christianity, especially American conservative Christianity, has reenacted that script for centuries.

而基督教，特別是美國保守基督教，數百年來都在重演這個劇本。

So here are the ways that I think Christianity funnels love towards men and how it overtly undermines women and then how it gets semi gay.

所以，我認為基督教將愛導向男性，以及它如何明顯地貶低女性，然後又如何變得「半同性戀」的幾種方式。

First of all, all the heroes are men, right?

首先，所有的英雄都是男性，對吧？

The central emotional attachments of Christianity are loving God the Father, loving Jesus the Son, following Paul the Apostle, obeying pastors, elders, bishops, overwhelmingly men submitting to husbands.

基督教裡核心的情感連結是愛天父、愛聖子耶穌、追隨使徒保羅、服從牧師、長老、主教，以及壓倒性地，男性順服丈夫。

亞伯拉罕、摩西、大衛、約瑟、彼得。

Where in that spiritual infrastructure does a woman receive, or even the divine feminine receive, devotion or admiration or reciprocal love or emotional recognition as a woman?

在那個精神架構裡，女性或神聖女性從何處獲得奉獻、崇拜、相互的愛，或作為女性的情感認可？

Help meets their servants, they are wombs, they are supporters, they are objects of purity, they are temptations, they are background labor.

幫助滿足她們的僕人，她們是子宮，她們是支持者，她們是純潔的對象，她們是誘惑，她們是背景勞力。

But they're never the subject of love in the Christian moral imagination.

但在基督教的道德想像中，她們從來不是愛的對象。

Even the most revered woman in the tradition, she's not honored As a woman, she is not there for her wisdom.

即使是傳統中最受尊敬的女性，她也不是作為一個女人受到尊敬，她不是因為她的智慧而存在。

She is not there for, you know, any opinion that she has.

她不是因為，你知道，她有任何意見而存在。

She's there as a vessel, a representation of virginity and obedience.

她作為一個容器而存在，代表著貞潔和順從。

She is not there for her autonomy or her perspective.

她不是因為她的自主性或她的觀點而存在。

她之所以存在，是因為她能承載什麼。

So take the standard sermon, you must love your brothers.

所以，以標準的講道來說，你們必須愛你們的弟兄。

所有的這些聖歌都有這種戰爭的意涵。

Like kind of hymns, like the Battle Hymn for the Republic, we're fighting for Jesus.

就像那種聖歌，像是《共和國戰歌》，我們為耶穌而戰。

If you go on Instagram today, especially after the death of Charlie Kirk, you see men at the gym saying, we're building an army of brothers for Jesus.

如果你今天去看 Instagram，特別是 Charlie Kirk 過世後，你會看到一些男人在健身房說，我們要為耶穌建立一個弟兄軍隊。

And women, again, are not appearing in the moral imagination except as wives to be led, daughters to be protected, temptresses to avoid, and

而女性，再次強調，在道德想像中並未出現，除非是作為被引導的妻子、被保護的女兒、需要避開的誘惑者，

But they are not the objects of devotional love.

And when a man in the church is disloyal to his wife, men help other men cover that up, to lie for him, to tell the wife that men stray, that she needs to forgive and she needs to stay with her husband.

當教會裡的男人對妻子不忠時，其他男人會幫忙掩蓋，為他撒謊，告訴妻子男人會犯錯，她需要原諒並留在丈夫身邊。

The church does forgive man's disloyalty to his wife.

教會確實原諒男人對妻子的不忠。

The church historically does not forgive women for deciding not to be loyal to their husbands or to the institution.

但歷史上，教會並不原諒女性決定不忠於丈夫或教會制度。

So the emotional energy of Christianity is male bonding and male obedience to other men and a male God.

所以基督教的情感能量是男性之間的連結，以及男性對其他男性和男性神的順從。

And so I want to talk now about Nick Fuentes, because he is the perfect contemporary example, because he says the quiet part out loud.

所以我想現在來談談 Nick Fuentes，因為他是完美的當代範例，因為他把心裡話說了出來。

So he openly mocks heterosexual relationships.

He frames women as distractions, degenerates, gold diggers, threats to, you know, male political cohesion.

他將女性描繪成幹擾、墮落、拜金女，以及對男性政治凝聚力的威脅。

He's the most explicit version of something baked into Christian national from the beginning, that the fantasy of this world of men is strong, men loyal to other men, ordering society to together.

他是從一開始就根植於基督教國家裡某種東西的最直白版本：一個男性強大、男性忠於男性、共同規劃社會的幻想世界。

They are roles, and they are support systems.

And so it's hilarious when Tucker Carlson asks him, hey, why aren't young men getting married?

所以當 Tucker Carlson 問他，嘿，為什麼年輕男性不結婚時，這實在太好笑了。

And so Nick Fuentes is the perfect kind of caricature of Christianity because it shows us that he doesn't see women as people.

所以 Nick Fuentes 根本就是基督教的完美諷刺，因為這顯示出他根本不把女性當人看。

And so recently, Piers Morgan asked him, are you attracted to women?

所以最近 Piers Morgan 問他，你對女人有感覺嗎？

And that because it's so clear, like Piers Morgan is asking this, because it's so clear that Nick Fuentes loves men.

而且因為這太明顯了，就像 Piers Morgan 這樣問，因為這太明顯了，Nick Fuentes 是愛男人的。

And you know, Nick Fuentes says, yes, I'm attracted to women.

而且你知道，Nick Fuentes 說，是的，我對女人有感覺。

然後 Piers Morgan 就問，你是同性戀嗎？

And there's this long pause, this long awkward pause.

然後就有一段很長的停頓，一段很尷尬的停頓。

And he looks to the side, he goes, no, I'm not gay, but

他看著旁邊，說，不是，我不是同性戀，但是

I do find women to be difficult to be around.

This is kind of sometimes subtle in Christianity.

這在基督教裡有時候是比較微妙的。

You don't see this at first, but he's saying these things out loud.

你一開始不會注意到，但他竟然就這樣說出來了。

That he sees women as objects that need to submit to a man and that her job is to worship him.

他說他認為女人是需要順服男人的物品，而她的工作就是崇拜他。

And it was to the point that even Tucker Carlson, who is not known for his liberal values, was like Jesus.

甚至連以價值觀保守著稱的 Tucker Carlson 都說，天啊。

Like, I don't think men with big egos need women to worship them at home.

我覺得，男人如果自負，並不需要女人在家裡崇拜他們。

Like, you need a woman who can kind of call you out on your bullshit sometimes, like Nick Fuentes.

你需要一個女人，有時候能點破你的胡說八道，就像 Nick Fuentes 那樣。

Like, this was too much even for Tucker Carlson.

這連 Tucker Carlson 都覺得太超過了。

And so what Fuentes is articulating, he's articulating the emotional subtext that patriarchal men feel, but

所以 Fuentes 所表達的，是他表達了父權男性內心深處的情感潛臺詞，但

never articulate that I feel safer with men.

他們從來不會說出口，我跟男人在一起更自在。

真正重要的互動是在男性之間。

字幕列表影片播放

基督教其實是偷偷的同性戀嗎？！ (Is Christianity Secretly Gay?)

articulate

vulnerability

intimacy

average