Name: 美國會直接參與以色列針對伊朗的行動嗎？| DW 新聞 (Will the US directly participate in Israel's campaign against Iran? | DW News)
Uploaded: 2025-06-18T17:16:52.000Z
Duration: 6 min 49 s

情態副詞

President Donald Trump has been holding urgent talks with his national security team as the conflict between Israel and Iran escalates In a post online Trump threatened Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei We know exactly where the so-called supreme leader is hiding He is an easy target, but a safe is safe there.

隨著以色列和伊朗之間的衝突不斷升級，唐納德-特朗普總統一直在與他的國家安全團隊舉行緊急會談。特朗普在網上發帖威脅伊朗最高領導人阿亞圖拉-阿里-哈梅內伊。

We're not going to take him out at least not for now He went on to call for Tehran's Unconditional surrender warning u.s.

他繼續呼籲德黑蘭無條件投降，警告美國。

Patience is wearing thin Ricardo Alcaro joins us from Rome from the Instituto Afri Internationale when the conflict began Trump reportedly rejected an Israeli plan to kill Iran's supreme leader Now he calls how many an easy target?

裡卡多-阿爾卡羅（Ricardo Alcaro）從羅馬的非洲國際研究所與我們連線，衝突開始時，特朗普據說拒絕了以色列殺死伊朗最高領導人的計劃。

I I just think that Trump is trying to catch up with events.

我只是認為，特朗普正在努力趕上時代的步伐。

He cannot control I think Trump gave sort of what not really green light like an like an amber light to Netanyahu when they spoke before Israel launch launched its attack and the attack the attacks first victim was of course the next round of negotiation of nuclear talks that had been Already between American and Iranian officials in Oman that was supposed to take place on the 15th of June and From then on Trump has been seeing Israel scoring points after points so far the operation has been a dazzling success and He has been adapting.

他無法控制，我認為特朗普在以色列發動襲擊前與內塔尼亞胡通話時，給他開了一盞琥珀色的綠燈，而襲擊的第一個受害者當然是美國和伊朗官員已經在阿曼進行的下一輪核談判，該談判本應在6月15日舉行，從那時起，特朗普就看到以色列不斷得分，到目前為止，以色列的行動取得了令人眼花繚亂的成功，他一直在適應。

He wants probably to be part of the victory either by adding the threats against Iran and here is where the direct threat to Ali Khamenei comes that the United States may be involved and therefore force our non-conditional surrender has your set which basically mean the dismantlement of the nuclear program or he will actually join the the bombing and Attack the the last and most important of Iran's nuclear facilities We know of which is the Enrichment Center at Fodo Which is built deep underground and is generally assumed to be To be damageable only with u.s.

他可能希望成為勝利的一部分，要麼增加對伊朗的威脅，這裡是對阿里-哈梅內伊的直接威脅，即美國可能會參與進來，是以迫使我們無條件投降，這基本上意味著拆除核計劃，或者他將實際加入轟炸，並攻擊伊朗最後也是最重要的核設施，我們知道這是位於福多的濃縮中心。

So it's Sounding like he's nearing that green light by saying Khamenei easy target the u.s.

是以，他說哈梅內伊很容易將美國作為目標，這聽起來像是在為他開綠燈。

Is repositioning warships in the region and military aircraft Yeah, I mean I think we we clearly seeing An intimidation move, which is pretty which is pretty serious But I wouldn't be surprised if the United States eventually join in the fight Because basically it has been Netanyahu has been calling the shots here Netanyahu attacking Israel attacking Iran before Trump could actually say I have exhausted the diplomatic option because the last Nuclear talks round when really bad and now I can I can I have to follow up with my with my threat that There would be consequences military consequences to Iran's diplomatic rigidity by by eliminating this possibility for Trump Netanyahu has gotten control of the events and Trump can only follow so now he may want to join in the fight They might actually even go as far as to Assassinate the political leader of another country But look, it's not that it's not common days that that will put the end to the Islamic Republic Which is now being?

是在該地區重新部署軍艦和軍用飛機 是的，我的意思是，我認為我們明顯看到了一種恐嚇舉動、但如果美國最終加入戰鬥，我也不會感到驚訝 因為基本上一直都是內塔尼亞胡在這裡發號施令 內塔尼亞胡攻擊以色列 攻擊伊朗，然後特朗普才會說 我已經用盡了外交途徑 因為上一輪核談判真的很糟糕 現在我可以了內塔尼亞胡已經控制了事態的發展，特朗普只能跟隨，所以現在他可能想加入這場戰鬥，他們甚至可能會去暗殺另一個國家的政治領導人、這並不是什麼不尋常的事情，這將終結伊斯蘭共和國。

Paralyzed by it is targeted assassinations of its leaders But the Islamic Republic is not is not a pyramidal It's not a pyramid.

但伊斯蘭共和國並不是一個金字塔。

It's not a regime Which is only centered on the top So it is a bit too early to assume that by eliminating the the heads The the body will die Ricardo as we both know this conflict has been a couple decades in the making and back in 2012 You warned any preventive Western supported Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities would work against the West's interests Is that still the case more than a decade on with the information we have today Well, it depends on I mean Iran does possess a vast civilian nuclear program Which has always been the source of legitimate concerns because of its potential because of its potential military diversion, but as far as we know and what we know is What the International Atomic Energy Agency says as well as the US intelligence community is that Iran?

這不是一個只以高層為中心的政權 所以認為消滅首腦就能消滅首腦還為時過早 裡卡多，我們都知道這場衝突已經持續了幾十年 早在2012年，你就警告過任何西方支持的 以色列對伊朗核設施的預防性攻擊 都會損害西方的利益，十多年過去了 根據我們今天掌握的資訊，情況是否依然如此？這取決於我的意思是，伊朗確實擁有一個龐大的民用核項目，由於其潛在的軍事用途，該項目一直是合理擔憂的來源，但據我們所知，國際原子能機構和美國情報界都認為伊朗沒有核設施。

Had not taken the decision to weaponize the program that in fact Iran has always Tried to use the nuclear program at least since 2003 when they put an end to what did it to an embryonic military nuclear program?

事實上，至少從 2003 年伊朗終止軍事核計劃雛形以來，伊朗就一直試圖將核計劃武器化。

So since 2003 Iran has always tried to use the nuclear program as leverage for Interacting with its enemies, especially with the United States rather than the base for deterrent So there wasn't any meaning threat to Israel.

是以，自 2003 年以來，伊朗一直試圖利用核項目作為與敵人互動的籌碼，尤其是與美國互動，而不是作為威懾的基礎。

This is a preventive not preemptive preventive action by Israel But the the thing Israel wanted to prevent was a nuclear deal that Trump could say Okay to and that Israel didn't like now are there risks for Western countries to join in the in the operation?

這是以色列的預防性行動，而不是先發制人的預防性行動，但以色列想要防止的是特朗普可以說 "好吧 "的核協議，而以色列現在不喜歡這樣的核協議。

Well, there is the risk of joining an aggression I mean, whatever you may think whether it is justified or not from the point of view of Israel This was an unprovoked attack against a sovereign country.

這是對一個主權國家的無端攻擊。

So it is a deep violation of international law so that's a risk in terms of reputation and coherence given that the the Western countries tend to be pretty supportive at work in words of International law and the other risk is we really don't know how this is going to unfold There is okay There is the the outcome of an Israeli victory But there is also an outcome of a protracted conflict and further instability in the region.

是以，這是嚴重違反國際法的行為，所以在聲譽和連貫性方面是有風險的，因為西方國家在國際法方面往往是相當支持的。

We'll have to leave it ever a carto A car or thank you very much for joining us Thank you for having me

我們將不得不離開它，永遠一輛車或一輛車，非常感謝你加入我們的行列，謝謝你邀請我。

字幕列表影片播放

美國會直接參與以色列針對伊朗的行動嗎？| DW 新聞 (Will the US directly participate in Israel's campaign against Iran? | DW News)

potential

assume

eliminate

vast