Name: 紐森痛批川普關稅政策：他正在亂搞！ (‘He’s flailing’: Newsom denounces Trump’s tariff policy)
Uploaded: 2026-02-22T23:07:20.000Z
Duration: 10 min 16 s

The Supreme Court struck down most of President Trump's tariffs this week.

最高法院本週駁回了川普總統大部分的關稅。

程度副詞

He's already using different authorities to impose a 15% global tariff, vowing to forge ahead even without Congress.

他已經在動用不同的權力來實施15%的全球關稅，並誓言即使沒有國會也會繼續推動。

You're going to move your factory from overseas and onshore it with 150 days certainty on a 15% tax or tariff.

你會把工廠從海外移回來，在岸生產，並且有150天的確定性，面對15%的稅或關稅。

我的意思是，整件事根本是鬧劇。

It was 10% two days ago, maybe 20% tomorrow.

他就是在亂揮，就像個醉拳拳擊手。

He's just, you know, he's just trying to hit anything.

他就是，你知道的，他就是想打任何東西。

他像個影子，他已經不是他自己了。

他在 ieepa 下面慢了不止一兩步。

I was out there in the Central Valley talking about how this is going to impact ranchers and small businesses and farmers, the ag community, my state larger than any other state in the country.

我曾在中央谷地談論這將如何影響牧場主、小型企業、農民、農業社群，以及我的州，比美國任何其他州都嚴重。

And Justice Roberts, by the way, basically our arguments were literally laid out in detail in his response.

順帶一提，羅伯茨大法官基本上是，我們的論點在他的回應中被詳細闡述了。

所以這從一開始就是非法的行為。

He needs to refund that money with interest.

他需要連本帶利地退還那筆錢。

They have the tariff codes, they have the ability, they do refunds all the time.

他們有關稅代碼，他們有能力，他們一直都在退款。

The problem is for families, it's been about $1,701 a year.

對家庭來說，問題是每年大約要花 1,701 美元。

That's a different requirement that I think he has to pay the American people back.

這是另一項要求，我認為他必須還給美國人民。

我看到 Besant 在那裡幾乎是欣喜若狂。

He was gleeful that no, we won't be doing it.

他很高興，不，我們不會這樣做。

Trump and Bessant, they've wrecked this economy.

川普和 Bessant，他們毀了這個經濟。

The worst jobs market we've seen since 2013.

這是我們自 2013 年以來見過最糟的就業市場。

這根本是個破壞一切的總統任期。

His entire economic paradigm is mass deportations, tax cuts for billionaires and tariffs.

他整個經濟模式就是大規模驅逐、給億萬富翁減稅和關稅。

And by the way, the tariff, this is a self dealing operation.

而且順帶一提，關稅，這根本是個利益輸送的操作。

這一切都是為了他個人的投資組合。

You know exactly what he did in Vietnam with the tariffs.

你很清楚他在越南做了什麼關於關稅的事。

He used them to get a deal on his golf course to fast track his development.

他用關稅來讓他的高爾夫球場獲得優惠，加速他的開發案。

This is unprecedented grift happening in real time.

這是在真實世界裡前所未見的詐騙。

That's reflected in what just happened with the tariff decision in the Supreme Court.

這也反映在最高法院剛做出的關稅判決上。

It was a profound moment for this administration.

這對這個政府來說是個意義重大的時刻。

My panel is here now to discuss Congressman Lawler.

我的專家小組現在在這裡要討論 Lawler 議員。

You know, at first we thought maybe this was going to be a gift politically to Republicans in Congress.

你知道，一開始我們以為這在政治上可能會是共和黨國會議員的禮物。

But now it's going to fall squarely on you because there's going to be some form of a vote.

但現在這就得完全落在你身上了，因為會進行某種形式的投票。

Number one, it shows that our system of checks and balances works.

第一點，這顯示我們的權力分立制衡系統是有效的。

The Supreme Court weighed in on this issue, which what I've said for months was ultimately they were going to decide and they were going to make a determination.

最高法院對這個議題表態了，這正是我幾個月來一直說的，他們最終會做出決定並下定論。

Now they made a determination on a very specific subset.

現在他們對一個非常特定的子集做出了決定。

But as Scott Bessem pointed out in your interview, the administration is moving forward on a number of other avenues in which they believe they need to use tariffs.

但正如 Scott Bessem 在你的訪談中指出的，政府正在透過其他幾個管道推進，他們認為需要使用關稅。

The fact is, from my vantage point, as I've said from the very beginning, as a means by which to force trade renegotiations, I had no problem with it as a long term mechanism by which to keep in place.

事實上，從我的角度來看，正如我從一開始就說過的，作為強迫重新談判貿易的手段，我對此沒有意見，作為一個長期的機制來維持。

And so the question will be now, how does Congress, which frankly has abdicated its responsibility on tariffs for almost 100 years.

所以現在的問題是，國會，坦白說，在關稅問題上已經放棄了近百年的責任，他們將如何應對？

It has been going on for over 100 years where Congress has basically given the executive a lot of authority on tariffs.

這已經持續了超過一百年，國會基本上把關稅的權力都給了行政部門。

Now you have the Supreme Court weighing in and saying, no, Congress has a role.

現在最高法院介入了，說不行，國會也有份。

And so we are going to be working through that process as we move forward.

所以我們在往前走的過程中，會一起處理這個過程。

And I think it's going to be incumbent on the administration to sit down with Congress to determine the best path forward.

我認為現在輪到行政部門坐下來和國會討論，決定最好的前進方向。

The president is already withdrawing his support for colleagues because he defied the president on tariffs.

總統已經在撤回對同事們的支持，因為他們在關稅問題上違背了總統。

Does that make you think twice about voting against tariffs?

這會讓你對投票反對關稅三思嗎？

I'm focused on the substance of the issue and we will work through it.

我專注於議題的實質內容，我們會一起處理。

Rebecca, I mean, Congressman, didn't you vote for tariffs?

Rebecca，我是說，議員，你不是投票支持關稅嗎？

I think this is the whole problem is you're making life harder for people in your district.

我認為這就是整個問題所在，你讓你們選區的人生活更艱難。

Like costs are going up and you say Congress should be a check, but you're not.

像是成本在不斷上漲，你說國會應該是個制衡，但你並沒有。

You haven't checked the president's power.

You haven't let him like moderate at all.

你根本沒有讓他稍微有所緩和。

And the only Republicans who ever go at him are people who are either retiring or who have lifetime appointments.

而共和黨裡唯一敢挑戰他的，不是即將退休，就是已經獲得終身職位的人。

I think this is the problem with the Republican Party today.

我認為這就是現今共和黨的問題所在。

He's Making life harder for everyday Americans.

他讓一般美國人的生活變得更艱難。

Costs are going up and no one in his party will stand up to him.

成本不斷上漲，而他黨內沒有人敢站出來反對他。

Respectfully, I've pushed back on numerous things.

說真的，我已經反對過很多事情了。

Part of the reason that I was able to deliver salt.

我之所以能成功爭取到鹽（指減稅）的部分原因。

New York State is going to see an average of $4,000 tax cut because I fought back against my own party.

紐約州將平均減稅 4,000 美元，因為我反抗了自己的黨。

I have pushed back against the president.

I'm the one who just discharged the bill so that we actually got it passed the House.

我才是那個讓法案通過的人，所以我們真的讓它在眾議院通過了。

字幕列表影片播放

紐森痛批川普關稅政策：他正在亂搞！ (‘He’s flailing’: Newsom denounces Trump’s tariff policy)

specific

entire

equivalent

profound