Name: 能源部長髮現拜登政府掩蓋的氣候變化報告 (Energy Sec. Found a Climate Change Report that the Biden Admin Buried)
Uploaded: 2025-09-21T00:29:48.000Z
Duration: 9 min 56 s

分詞構句

America's small businesses rely on TikTok to succeed, helping them attract more customers and drive more growth.

美國的小企業依靠 TikTok 取得成功，幫助他們吸引更多客戶，推動更多增長。

74% of businesses on TikTok say it's helped them scale.

TikTok 上 74% 的企業表示，TikTok 幫助他們擴大了規模。

Like Coco Asante, who upgraded to a larger facility and brought on more staff, letting their handcrafted chocolates reach more customers.

比如 Coco Asante，他們升級到了更大的廠房，並增加了員工，讓他們的手工巧克力能接觸到更多的顧客。

You can learn more at TikTokEconomicImpact.com.

您可以在 TikTokEconomicImpact.com 上了解更多資訊。

♪ Bet you wanna peek, bet you wanna see something ♪ ♪ Bet you wanna see something ♪

打賭你想偷看，打賭你想看到的東西打賭你想看到的東西

Happy Tuesday here live from the Bitcoin.com studio.

週二快樂，這裡是 Bitcoin.com 工作室的現場直播。

很榮幸能一如既往地與你們在一起。

給我們發送電子郵件：charliekirk.com。

We are gonna start right out of the gate with a great man who's doing phenomenal work that deserves more praise and attention.

我們將從一位偉人開始，他的工作非常出色，值得更多的讚美和關注。

It's all about energy dominance and rejecting the green scam of the left.

這一切都關乎能源主導權和拒絕左翼的綠色騙局。

It is the Secretary of Energy, Chris Wright.

First, Mr. Secretary, you come from a very accomplished business career and now you are in government.

首先，國務卿先生，您的商界生涯成就斐然，而現在您又進入了政府部門。

How has that transition been and what have you learned now that you have to fight bureaucrats all day long and the environmental lobby?

現在您不得不整天與官僚和環保遊說團體作鬥爭，這種轉變是怎樣的？

I've always said I'm never gonna be in government.

我一直都說我永遠都不會去當官。

I wanna be hard driving and make stuff happen.

But in this government with President Trump, it is fast moving, it is business-like.

但在特朗普總統上司的政府中，一切都進展得很快，一切都在按部就班地進行。

If we wanna lean in and take a risk, we should fix this policy that President says, absolutely, find some more things to fix.

如果我們想冒險一試，我們就應該修正總統所說的這項政策，當然，我們還可以找到更多需要修正的地方。

So it isn't the slow moving bureaucratic thing I feared under President Trump's leadership and the rest of the cabinet.

是以，在特朗普總統和其他內閣成員的上司下，這並不是我所擔心的那種行動緩慢的官僚主義。

是以，這是一個天翻地覆的變化。

My powers or ability to do things are quite different in the government than they are in business.

在政府中，我的權力或辦事能力與在企業中截然不同。

But in this government, I'm highly confident we will make massive changes in these four years.

但在本屆政府中，我非常有信心我們將在這四年中做出巨大的改變。

And I'm proud and honored to be here to do it because it matters.

我很自豪也很榮幸能在這裡做這件事，因為這很重要。

We needlessly victimized Americans with expensive energy and pushed industries overseas.

我們不必要地用昂貴的能源使美國人受害，並將工業推向海外。

And with this president, we're gonna stop it.

有了這位總統，我們就能阻止這一切。

What was the Department of Energy doing before your leadership under Joe Biden?

在您上司喬-拜登之前，能源部在做什麼？

And how does your now daily grind contrast with the last administration?

您現在的日常工作與上屆政府相比有何不同？

You know, we talk a lot about, of course, the Ukraine-Russian war and ending that.

你知道，我們談了很多，當然，烏克蘭和俄羅斯的戰爭以及結束這場戰爭。

We talk about the border, we talk about the economy, but the energy is literally, in the most literal sense, not metaphorically, the life force of a civilization.

我們談論邊境，談論經濟，但從最直白的意義上說，能源是文明的生命力，而不是隱喻。

You cannot have people flying from New York to LA affordably if you do not have energy.

如果沒有能源，就無法讓人們經濟實惠地從紐約飛往洛杉磯。

Talk about what the previous Department of Energy was doing and then contrast that with your work.

談談以前的能源部在做什麼，然後與你的工作進行對比。

Yeah, so the previous Department of Energy, as you heard for those four years, and you didn't hear a lot for them.

是的，所以之前的能源部，就像你在那四年裡聽到的一樣，你並沒有聽到很多關於他們的消息。

They were kind of behind the scenes, but they were part of this all-of-government battle against climate change, as they would describe it.

他們是幕後推手，但他們是政府對抗氣候變化鬥爭的一部分，正如他們所描述的那樣。

So all of the money, all the focus, all the effort was on wind, solar, batteries, and electric vehicles.

是以，所有的資金、所有的焦點、所有的努力都集中在風能、太陽能、電池和電動汽車上。

Collectively, wind, solar, and batteries are 3% of United States energy, hundreds of billions of dollars.

風能、太陽能和電池總計佔美國能源的 3%，價值數千億美元。

It's 3% of our energy, and everywhere they've achieved meaningful penetration, you get more expensive electricity prices.

它佔我們能源的 3%，而在它們實現有意義滲透的地方，你會得到更貴的電價。

So just a train wreck that was not gonna change the energy system of the United States, and in fact, they actively stood in front of natural gas, our fastest-growing source of energy and our fastest-growing export.

是以，這只是一場不會改變美國能源體系的火車失事，事實上，他們積極地站在天然氣面前，而天然氣是我們增長最快的能源，也是我們增長最快的出口產品。

You heard about the LNG pause, and I don't know if I have time to go into that, but they actually did a whole report before the pause that showed economically it was positive for the United States, and it was gonna slightly lower greenhouse gas emissions, more LNG exports, and they hated that answer so much they buried the report, never spoke about it, although when I got in, we found it.

你們聽說了液化天然氣暫停的事，我不知道我是否有時間深入探討，但實際上，在暫停之前，他們做了一份完整的報告，表明從經濟上講，暫停對美國是有利的，而且會略微降低溫室氣體的排放，增加液化天然氣的出口，但他們非常討厭這個答案，他們埋葬了這份報告，從來沒有談論過它，儘管當我上任時，我們發現了它。

A much longer report than they ultimately released later.

這份報告比他們後來發佈的報告要長得多。

So again, they were against energy, the energy that powers our world.

是以，他們再次反對能源，反對為我們的世界提供動力的能源。

They were willing to be dishonest, and they thought all of the nonsense they were doing was somehow gonna stop climate change and make the world safer.

他們甘願做不誠實的人，他們認為他們所做的一切無稽之談會在某種程度上阻止氣候變化，讓世界變得更加安全。

Just again, also completely contrary to the facts and the data.

同樣，這也與事實和數據完全背道而馳。

Yeah, and you've taken on the entire kind of climate science world.

是啊，你已經把整個氣候科學界都搞糊塗了。

Energy Department attacks client assignments and contentious report.

能源部攻擊客戶任務和有爭議的報告。

順便說一句，你們在這裡很安全。

我們認為這一切都被政治化了。

This is driven towards a environmentalist agenda that is trying to weaken American energy dominance.

這是受環保主義議程的驅使，試圖削弱美國的能源主導地位。

The agency asked five client skeptics to write a report criticizing the consensus on global warming.

該機構要求五位客戶懷疑論者撰寫一份報告，責備全球變暖共識。

First of all, science does not have consensus.

這是一件非常重要的事情，對嗎？

This is a good thing that could apply to everything.

這是一件好事，可以適用於任何事情。

And scientists, like we learned during COVID, we learned during the lockdowns, learned during the vaccines can say a lot of different things with the data.

科學家們，就像我們在 COVID 期間學到的，我們在封鎖期間學到的，我們在疫苗期間學到的，可以用數據說出很多不同的東西。

Now, again, global warming does not have consensus like the second law of thermodynamics.

再說一遍，全球變暖並沒有像熱力學第二定律那樣達成共識。

Global warming does not have consensus like a object at rest will stay at rest.

全球變暖並沒有達成共識，就像靜止的物體會保持靜止一樣。

Your reaction, Mr. Secretary, and how you think about this because they, again, well, let me read this New York Times article.

國務卿先生，您的反應以及您對此的看法，因為他們，好吧，讓我讀一下《紐約時報》的這篇文章。

Yeah, I always give the contrast between the science, which is what the left likes, which is the opposite of science.

是的，我總是把左派喜歡的科學與科學的反面進行對比。

Science is a process of challenge and engagement and debate and wrestling with data.

科學是一個挑戰、參與、辯論和與數據搏鬥的過程。

And if the data doesn't agree with your model, your model is wrong.

如果數據與你的模型不符，那麼你的模型就是錯的。

Where the science is this top-down, authority-driven thing used with COVID, to me, was the climate movement.

在我看來，COVID 所使用的科學是一種自上而下、由權威驅動的東西，這就是氣候運動。

And fast forward, the science told you what to do.

But as you said, Charlie, look at those critics.

但正如你所說，查理，看看那些批評者。

They critique the authors, five skeptics.

他們責備了作者，即五位懷疑論者。

好吧，我對他們的介紹持懷疑態度。

These are five highly distinguished scientists.

One of them was undersecretary for science in the Obama administration, provost at Caltech, PhD from MIT.

其中一位曾任奧巴馬政府科學部副部長、加州理工學院教務長、麻省理工學院博士。

All of those scientists were accomplished scientists that are also tired of this censorship of the science, censoring real science and real process of engagement.

所有這些科學家都是有成就的科學家，他們也厭倦了這種對科學的審查，對真正的科學和真正的參與過程的審查。

But even on my CNN interview a couple of weeks ago,

但即使是在幾周前的 CNN 採訪中、

I went on to talk about the climate report.

There are zero questions about climate change, zero.

關於氣候變化的問題是零，零。

They wanna impugn the writers or impugn the way we reference people.

他們想指責編劇，或者指責我們提到人的方式。

字幕列表影片播放

能源部長髮現拜登政府掩蓋的氣候變化報告 (Energy Sec. Found a Climate Change Report that the Biden Admin Buried)

process

phenomenon

debate

scale