Name: 特朗普對華關稅能讓任何人在 2025 年成為百萬富翁（具體方法如下） (Trump’s China Tariffs Can Make Anyone a Millionaire in 2025 (Here's How))
Uploaded: 2025-08-07T18:22:16.000Z
Duration: 16 min 25 s

to 不定詞

The stock market is crushing and that leads a lot of people to ask the most important question, which stock should I buy in order to profit the most out of this crisis?

股市崩盤導致很多人提出了一個最重要的問題：我應該買哪隻股票才能在這場危機中獲利最多？

A transfer of wealth from one group of people to another.

財富從一個群體轉移到另一個群體。

So at the end of the tunnel, some people will get wealthier and a lot of people will get poorer.

是以，在隧道的盡頭，一些人會變得更富有，而很多人會變得更貧窮。

And that's why they say that, be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.

所以說，別人貪婪時要恐懼，別人恐懼時要貪婪。

The people who are scared right now are massively selling off their stocks.

現在害怕的人正在大量拋售股票。

And the people who will get rich out of this crisis are massively buying or waiting for the opportunity to buy massively stocks.

而那些將從這場危機中致富的人，正在大量購買或伺機大量購買股票。

So let me explain to you which stocks I believe are going to profit the most out of this trade war because they will suffer the most and at the end of the tunnel, they will profit the most.

是以，讓我向你們解釋一下，我認為哪些股票將從這場貿易戰中獲利最多，因為它們將遭受最大的損失，而在隧道的盡頭，它們將獲利最多。

It might not make sense at the beginning of this video but by the end of the video, you will be able to connect the dots.

在視頻開始時，您可能不明白其中的道理，但在視頻結束時，您就能把這些知識點聯繫起來。

So give this video a thumbs up and let's get right into it.

所以，請為這段視頻豎起大拇指，讓我們馬上進入正題。

The sector that has the best chance to profit out of this crisis is the tech sector.

最有機會從這場危機中獲利的行業是科技行業。

And technology companies right now are suffering the most.

而科技公司目前受到的影響最大。

Just take an example of apple, the stock is down by around 33%.

以蘋果公司為例，該公司股價下跌了約 33%。

Now this is such a huge crash that it is much bigger than the crash of 2020.

現在，這是一次巨大的暴跌，比 2020 年的暴跌要嚴重得多。

So if you are actually feeling that you missed the opportunity of 2020, right now you are in front of an opportunity that is much bigger than the crash of 2020.

是以，如果你真的覺得自己錯過了 2020 年的機會，那麼現在你正面臨著一個比 2020 年的崩潰要大得多的機會。

And this is just the beginning because it's going to get a lot worse.

而這僅僅是個開始，因為情況會變得更糟。

And if you look at the entire nasdaq, the place where most of the technology stocks are being traded in, it is down by around 20%.

如果你看看整個納斯達克指數，也就是大多數科技股的交易市場，它的跌幅約為 20%。

So name any technology company and it is down by 15%, 20%, 25% and in some cases, it's down by around 3%.

是以，隨便說出一家科技公司，它就會下跌 15%、20%、25%，有時甚至下跌 3%左右。

There are companies that used to worth 3 trillion dollars, 3.5 trillion dollars and everybody thought that they are about to hit a valuation of 4 trillion dollars are now being sold at 2.5 trillion dollars, 2.2 trillion dollars.

有些公司過去價值 3 萬億美元、3.5 萬億美元，大家都認為它們的估值將達到 4 萬億美元，但現在卻以 2.5 萬億美元、2.2 萬億美元的價格出售。

To understand that, we have to go to the root cause of the problem.

要理解這一點，我們必須找到問題的根源。

Prior to 1995, there was trade, but it was between two countries.

1995 年之前，雖然有貿易，但那是兩個國家之間的貿易。

So the United States would sign a trade agreement with Japan, Japan would sign a trade agreement with Vietnam and so on and so forth.

是以，美國將與日本簽署貿易協定，日本將與越南簽署貿易協定，如此等等。

But if we wanted the entire world to trade with each other and trade to be much more globalized so that we have the exact same rules for everybody, countries came together and they have established world trade organization.

但是，如果我們想讓全世界都能相互貿易，讓貿易更加全球化，讓每個人都有完全相同的規則，各國就會走到一起，成立世界貿易組織。

And the entire point of it was that we want to reduce trade barriers between all countries.

它的全部意義在於，我們希望減少所有國家之間的貿易壁壘。

And trade barriers are tariffs or government subsidies.

而貿易壁壘就是關稅或政府補貼。

Prior to 1995, countries had a lot of tariffs between themselves.

1995 年之前，各國之間有很多關稅。

So if you wanted to sell something in the US, you had to pay a tariff.

是以，如果你想在美國賣東西，就必須支付關稅。

If you want to sell something in Japan, you had to pay a tariff.

如果你想在日本賣東西，就必須支付關稅。

So if we can convince the rest of the world, like every single country in the world to literally bring their tariffs down to 0%, suddenly prices across the globe are going to go down.

是以，如果我們能說服世界其他國家，比如世界上的每一個國家，把他們的關稅降到 0%，那麼全球的物價就會突然下降。

That will encourage more business between the countries and that will reduce prices globally and that will lift a lot of people out of poverty.

這將鼓勵各國之間開展更多的商業活動，從而降低全球價格，使許多人擺脫貧困。

Companies will make more money and consumers will be able to have much cheaper prices.

公司將賺到更多的錢，消費者也能享受到更便宜的價格。

And secondly, the more trade there is between the countries, the less conflict there is going to be.

其次，國家間的貿易越多，衝突就越少。

So, if there is a lot of trade between me and you, I have less incentive to go to war with you.

是以，如果我和你之間有很多貿易往來，我就沒有那麼多動力與你開戰。

But barriers aren't just tariffs between the countries, they are also government subsidies.

但壁壘不僅僅是國家間的關稅，也是政府補貼。

Usually, countries would subsidize a certain industry in order for that industry to win globally.

通常情況下，國家會對某一行業進行補貼，以使該行業在全球範圍內獲勝。

But that is unfair practices because if one country subsidizes their industry and another country does not subsidize their industry, over time, this company is going to win over this company.

但這是不公平的做法，因為如果一個國家對其產業提供補貼，而另一個國家不對其產業提供補貼，那麼隨著時間的推移，這家公司就會戰勝這家公司。

The second goal was that we need rules for everybody to follow.

第二個目標是，我們需要人人遵守的規則。

So if we have very clear rules that everybody agrees upon, then we have no problems.

是以，如果我們有非常明確的、大家都同意的規則，就不會有問題。

Because if somebody violates the rules, then there are going to be punishments and they have to change their behavior according to these rules.

因為如果有人違反了規則，就會受到懲罰，他們必須按照這些規則改變自己的行為。

So countries came together and they have set up rules that everybody agreed.

是以，各國走到一起，制定了大家都同意的規則。

Because if you are setting up one organization that is going to enforce the rules, then everybody should agree on those rules.

因為如果你要成立一個組織來執行規則，那麼每個人都應該同意這些規則。

The third goal was that we have to sort out all of our conflicts with diplomacy.

第三個目標是，我們必須通過外交手段解決所有衝突。

So if there is, for example, a trade problem between the two countries, then there is an international court system or the World Trade Organization where the two countries can come and solve that problem instead of stopping the trade between the two countries or starting shooting at each other.

是以，如果兩國之間存在貿易問題，那麼可以通過國際法院系統或世界貿易組織來解決這個問題，而不是停止兩國之間的貿易或開始相互射擊。

That's not how we want to solve the problem.

So the baseline or the foundation of the World Trade Organization was the prosperity of the world.

是以，世界貿易組織的基線或基礎是世界的繁榮。

And it actually lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.

它實際上使數億人擺脫了貧困。

A lot of countries today are extremely rich because of the World Trade Organization.

今天，很多國家都因為世界貿易組織而變得異常富裕。

Back in 1995, the world was very divided between very rich countries and very poor countries.

1995 年，世界上非常富裕的國家和非常貧窮的國家非常分化。

The United States in 1995 was the wealthiest country in the world.

1995 年的美國是世界上最富有的國家。

China was one of the poorest countries in the world.

中國是世界上最貧窮的國家之一。

So is that fair to have a free market between a very rich country and a very poor country?

那麼，在一個非常富裕的國家和一個非常貧窮的國家之間建立自由市場公平嗎？

Because this poor country doesn't have resources, they don't have enough intelligent and smart people and educated people, they don't have the capital to compete.

因為這個貧窮的國家沒有資源，他們沒有足夠的聰明才智和受過教育的人，他們沒有競爭的資本。

So if we open up the market for both of these countries between themselves, suddenly all the US companies will move to China and will dominate the entire market.

是以，如果我們開放這兩個國家之間的市場，突然之間，所有的美國公司都會遷往中國，並將主導整個市場。

Now you can take another example, compare United States or let's compare the United Kingdom and Vietnam.

現在你可以再舉一個例子，比較一下美國，或者讓我們比較一下英國和越南。

So it's not free trade, it's not fair trade between the two countries because wealthier countries have already an advantage and upper hand over the poor countries.

是以，這不是自由貿易，也不是兩國之間的公平貿易，因為較富裕的國家已經比貧窮的國家佔了優勢和上風。

So it doesn't work, which is why it was difficult to convince all of these poor countries to come and join the World Trade Organization.

是以，這並不奏效，這也是為什麼很難說服所有這些窮國加入世界貿易組織的原因。

Which is why we decided to tweak the rules slightly in order to incentivize the poorest countries and give them an incentive to join the World Trade Organization.

是以，我們決定對規則稍作調整，以激勵最貧窮的國家加入世界貿易組織。

Because we want the entire world to trade with each other.

因為我們希望全世界都能相互貿易。

And the United States was at the forefront of it.

So we slightly changed the rules for the poor countries.

是以，我們為窮國稍微修改了一下規則。

First of all, we gave them more time to actually establish those rules.

首先，我們給了他們更多的時間來實際制定這些規則。

United States had to immediately follow the rules of the World Trade Organization and drop the tariffs as much as possible.

美國必須立即遵守世界貿易組織的規則，儘可能降低關稅。

But China could have much longer than that because China was extremely poor.

但中國可以比這更長，因為中國當時非常貧窮。

And at the same time, we gave them access to our markets which will speed up their process of getting rich.

與此同時，我們還為他們提供了進入我們市場的機會，這將加快他們致富的進程。

So if China suddenly had full access to the US market, while the US does not have full access to the China market, and China over time grows, that will give them an incentive to join the World Trade Organization.

是以，如果中國突然可以完全進入美國市場，而美國卻不能完全進入中國市場，隨著時間的推移，中國的發展，這將促使他們加入世界貿易組織。

And when they will get as rich as the United States, they will also have to drop their tariffs to zero as the United States.

當他們像美國一樣富裕時，他們也必須像美國一樣把關稅降到零。

And it was a pretty successful project because tariffs were at an all-time high back in 1995.

這是一個相當成功的項目，因為 1995 年關稅達到了歷史最高點。

But over time, tariffs started going down all across the globe.

但隨著時間的推移，關稅開始在全球範圍內下降。

The US, European Union, Middle East, Asian countries.

美國、歐盟、中東、亞洲國家。

Nobody expected that a country such as China in 30 years is going to become as developed as the United States.

沒有人想到，中國這樣一個國家會在 30 年內變得像美國一樣發達。

It took the United States 200 years to achieve that.

美國花了 200 年才做到這一點。

And it took China like 30 years to achieve that.

中國花了大約 30 年的時間才做到這一點。

South Korea became as rich as any European country.

韓國變得與任何歐洲國家一樣富裕。

And that poses a major threat to the United States.

Because if China is going to become as rich as the United States, China has 5 times the population of the United States.

因為如果中國要變得和美國一樣富裕，中國的人口是美國的 5 倍。

Which means that if China is going to have a GDP per capita as much as the United States, even half of the United States, China will become the world's largest economy and the United States will lose its position as the world's largest economy.

這意味著，如果中國的人均國內生產總值與美國相當，甚至是美國的一半，中國將成為世界最大的經濟體，而美國將失去世界最大經濟體的地位。

United States has a little over 320 million people.

And that is why if you look at the trend, those countries started getting significantly wealthier.

這就是為什麼從趨勢上看，這些國家開始變得越來越富裕。

While wealthier countries such as the United States, the European Union suddenly had a very serious demographic problem where their population started going dramatically down.

美國、歐盟等富裕國家突然出現了非常嚴重的人口問題，人口開始急劇下降。

So if we look at the long term trend, then it's a matter of time before those countries will overtake the entire western societies and they will become the dominant forces in the world.

是以，從長遠趨勢來看，這些國家超越整個西方社會，成為世界主導力量只是時間問題。

而中國仍然是一個開發中國家。

China's GDP per capita is still around 15 thousand dollars, while the US GDP per capita is around 90 thousand dollars.

中國的人均 GDP 仍在 1.5 萬美元左右，而美國的人均 GDP 約為 9 萬美元。

So China can still benefit from the rules for the poor countries.

是以，中國仍然可以從針對窮國的規則中受益。

That's what the United States does not like to.

Apple, for example, is one of the most successful companies that has ever existed in history.

例如，蘋果公司是歷史上最成功的公司之一。

And it became so successful not because of the US government.

它之所以如此成功，並不是因為美國政府。

It did not become so successful because the government of the United States suddenly called Steve Jobs and told him, listen, Steve, do you want like maybe 5 billion dollars to develop the iPhone?

它之所以如此成功，並不是因為美國政府突然打電話給史蒂夫-喬布斯，告訴他："聽著，史蒂夫，你想要 50 億美元來開發 iPhone 嗎？

Even when Apple became successful, the government of the United States did not intervene and helped Apple to become even more successful.

即使蘋果公司取得了成功，美國政府也沒有進行干預，而是幫助蘋果公司取得更大的成功。

It was Steve Jobs who started Apple in his garage and he started building teams.

喬布斯在自己的車庫裡創辦了蘋果公司，並開始組建團隊。

He started convincing investors to invest in his business.

他開始說服投資者投資他的企業。