Name: 為什麼德國選擇退出譴責以色列加沙行動的國際倡議？ (Why did Germany opt out of an international initiative condemning Israel's actions in Gaza?)
Uploaded: 2025-07-23T17:34:48.000Z
Duration: 4 min 56 s

Germany's coalition government appears divided over whether to join dozens of other Western nations in condemning Israel's actions in Gaza. 28 countries, including France, Britain, Italy, Austria and Canada, signed the statement calling for an end to the war.

德國聯合政府在是否加入其他數十個西方國家譴責以色列在加沙的行動的問題上似乎存在分歧。包括法國、英國、意大利、奧地利和加拿大在內的 28 個國家簽署了呼籲結束戰爭的聲明。

Lawmakers of the centre-left Social Democratic Party, the junior coalition partner, have called on the government to support the initiative.

中左翼社會民主黨作為聯盟的小夥伴，其立法者呼籲政府支持這一倡議。

International Development Minister Reem al-Bali Radovan said that he was unhappy with Germany's decision not to sign it.

國際發展部長 Reem al-Bali Radovan 表示，他對德國決定不簽署該協議感到不滿。

The German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has dismissed suggestions of a rift within the coalition.

德國總理弗里德里希-梅爾茨否認了聯盟內部出現裂痕的說法。

I want to strongly urge the Israeli government to stop the massive military intervention and to enable a ceasefire.

我強烈敦促以色列政府停止大規模軍事幹預，實現停火。

And above all, to allow humanitarian aid for the population there.

最重要的是，允許向當地居民提供人道主義援助。

There is no disagreement within the coalition on this matter.

聯盟內部在這一問題上沒有分歧。

在這個問題上，我們是完全一致的。

And again, what is expressed in this letter is not a European initiative, but an initiative by some member states and a few others.

再說一遍，這封信所表達的並不是歐洲的倡議，而是一些成員國和其他幾個國家的倡議。

We have already taken exactly this position earlier in the European Council.

我們早些時候在歐洲理事會上就已經表明了這一立場。

DW political correspondent Matthew Moore is following the story for us.

DW 政治記者馬修-摩爾（Matthew Moore）正在為我們追蹤報道。

So Matthew, I mean, why is Germany so reluctant to join this initiative?

馬修，我的意思是，為什麼德國如此不願意加入這一倡議？

Friedrich Merz basically has stressed in recent days that, you know, he's looking at himself, he's talking about himself as the Chancellor.

弗里德里希-梅爾茨最近幾天基本上都在強調，你知道，他在審視自己，他在談論自己作為總理的身份。

He says he's been one of the first people in Germany to really condemn Israel.

他說，他是德國最早真正譴責以色列的人之一。

And on Monday, you know, he said that the Israeli army's operations there were unacceptable.

週一，他說以色列軍隊在那裡的行動是不可接受的。

On Friday, he held a phone call with Benjamin Netanyahu, where he is reported to have told Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister, very clearly and unequivocally that he disagreed with his Gaza policy.

星期五，他與本雅明-內塔尼亞胡通了電話，據說他在電話中非常清楚明確地告訴以色列總理本雅明-內塔尼亞胡，他不同意他的加沙政策。

Germany is in a bit of a tricky situation.

Germany is closest ally to Israel after the United States.

德國是以色列僅次於美國的最親密盟友。

And it has in recent years adopted a policy of reason of state, which is a really close allyship with Israel and a commitment to protect Israel's right to exist.

近年來，它採取了一種理性國家政策，即與以色列結成真正的親密盟友關係，並承諾保護以色列的生存權。

And that's born out of the history of the Holocaust.

But Merz stressed this week that that does not mean that reason of state does not mean unconditional support.

但梅爾茲本週強調，這並不意味著國家的理由不意味著無條件的支持。

And I think there's a sense in Berlin and Germany is that there's a belief that private criticism is more effective than public criticism.

我認為，在柏林和德國，有一種觀點認為，私下責備比公開批評更有效。

But Merz, I mean, he talked to us about the big picture here, because Merz has said that what is expressed in this letter is not a European initiative.

但是默茨，我的意思是，他跟我們談到了這裡的大局，因為默茨說過，這封信所表達的並不是歐洲的倡議。

Why did he mean, why did he say that in particular?

Yeah, I mean, he alluded to it right at the end of that statement there.

是的，我的意思是，他在發言的最後暗示了這一點。

At the end of the statement that we heard from him, at the end of June, there was a European Council statement.

在我們聽到他的發言之後，6 月底，歐洲理事會發表了一份聲明。

But if you compare these two statements, the one from the European Council and the one that was issued on Monday, the tone is very different.

但是，如果比較一下這兩份聲明，即歐洲理事會的聲明和週一發表的聲明，語氣就會發現大相徑庭。

The tone from the European Council statement is much less harsh and much less critical of Israel.

歐洲理事會聲明的語氣沒有那麼嚴厲，對以色列的責備也少得多。

The European Council statement noted the dire humanitarian situation there and the levels of starvation.

歐洲理事會的聲明指出了當地嚴峻的人道主義局勢和飢餓程度。

And now this new statement that came out this week said Israeli aid model is dangerous, that it deprives Gazans of human dignity.

本週發表的新聲明稱，以色列的援助模式是危險的，它剝奪了加沙人的尊嚴。

So I think that's potentially one reason why the German government is not keen to sign that motion.

是以，我認為這可能是德國政府不願簽署該動議的原因之一。

Yet another possible reason is this line calling for an unconditional ceasefire.

另一個可能的原因是這句話呼籲無條件停火。

In the last, since October 7th, Hamas terror attack, German policy has been to support a ceasefire that guarantees the release of hostages.

自 10 月 7 日哈馬斯發動恐怖襲擊以來，德國的政策一直是支持保證人質獲釋的停火。

And so that could be another reason why the German government is unwilling to sign this particular statement.

是以，這可能是德國政府不願簽署這份聲明的另一個原因。

It was interesting that he also expressed that the German coalition remains united.

有趣的是，他還表示德國聯盟仍然團結一致。

But I mean, we've been hearing these different voices inside the SPD, the CEDU's made coalition partner.

但我的意思是，我們已經在社民黨內部聽到了這些不同的聲音，社民黨是CEDU的聯盟夥伴。

Just how united is the German government regarding this issue, really?

德國政府在這個問題上到底有多團結？

Well, I mean, Friedrich Merz, you could see it there.

我是說，弗里德里希-梅爾茲，你可以在那裡看到它。

And he appeared irritated by questions about a rift in his coalition yesterday when he addressed the media on this.

昨天，當他就此事向媒體發表講話時，他似乎對有關其聯盟出現裂痕的問題感到惱火。

It really does just show you the open debate that there is, that there is a difference of opinion.

這確實讓你看到了公開辯論的存在，看到了意見分歧。

And actually, that difference of opinion is reflected in German public polling.

實際上，這種意見分歧在德國的民意調查中也有所反映。

So I think if the situation continues to deteriorate in Gaza at the rate at which it is doing, that it is conceivable that these tensions won't simply disappear, Sarah.

是以，我認為，如果加沙局勢繼續以目前的速度惡化，可以想象，這些緊張局勢不會輕易消失，薩拉。

DW political correspondent Matthew Moore, thank you.

DW 政治記者 Matthew Moore，謝謝。

字幕列表影片播放

為什麼德國選擇退出譴責以色列加沙行動的國際倡議？ (Why did Germany opt out of an international initiative condemning Israel's actions in Gaza?)

relevant

commitment

situation

debate