Name: AI哈拉機器人將納入英國網路安全法規！BBC新聞報導 (AI chatbots to be included in online UK safety laws | BBC News)
Uploaded: 2026-02-16T23:05:41.000Z
Duration: 11 min 10 s

The UK is looking to regulate artificial intelligence to protect children using Internet services.

英國正尋求監管人工智慧，以保護使用網路服務的兒童。

情態副詞

The government is pledging to respond more quickly with legislation to close loopholes in existing laws.

政府承諾將更快地透過立法來回應，以堵塞現有法律的漏洞。

The Prime Minister says no online platform will get a free pass over the issue of children's online safety.

首相表示，沒有任何線上平臺能在此兒童網路安全議題上獲得豁免。

Campaigners and bereaved parents have welcomed the news.

倡議人士和痛失親人的父母都對此消息表示歡迎。

Our technology editor Zoe Kleinman reports.

我們的技術編輯 Zoe Kleinman 報導。

Ellen Room's son Jules was 14 when he died in 2022.

Ellen Room 的兒子 Jules 在 2022 年過世時年僅 14 歲。

She believes that he was trying an online challenge which went wrong, but

她認為他當時正在嘗試一個網路挑戰，結果出了差錯，但是

she's never been able to access his data to prove it.

她始終無法存取他的資料來證明這一點。

Under current rules, a child's data must be requested from tech companies within 12 months of their death by either a coroner or the police.

根據現行規定，兒童的資料必須在他們過世後的 12 個月內，由驗屍官或警方向科技公司提出請求。

But bereaved parents say often by the time that happens that you this record of what their child has been doing online has already been deleted.

但痛失親人的父母表示，通常等到這件事發生時，他們孩子在網路上做了什麼的紀錄都已經被刪除了。

Under new rules, coroners will have to tell Ofcom as soon as possible about the death of every child aged 5 to 17 so that the regulator can order tech companies to preserve their data if it might be relevant to how they died.

在新的規定下，驗屍官必須盡快通知 Ofcom 關於 5 到 17 歲兒童的死亡事件，以便監管機構可以命令科技公司保存相關資料，如果這些資料可能與他們的死因有關。

I always said that if I could try and make something positive about the loss of Jules life, then I would, and

我一直說，如果我能為 Jules 的離世做些有意義的事，我會去做，而且

this going forward will help other bereaved families.

這項措施未來將能幫助其他失去親人的家庭。

What we now need to do is stop the harm happening in the first place.

我們現在需要做的是從根本上阻止傷害的發生。

This is really relevant when a child dies, but

這在兒童死亡的案例中非常重要，但

we need to stop children dying in the first place.

我們更需要的是從根本上阻止兒童死亡。

The government's already announced that it's launching a public consultation in March.

政府已經宣佈將在三月啟動一項公眾諮詢。

It's seeking opinions about options like banning social media for under 16s, restricting their access to AI chatbots and limiting infinite scrolling for children, otherwise known as doom scrolling.

政府正在徵求意見，例如禁止 16 歲以下兒童使用社交媒體、限制他們使用 AI 哈拉機器人，以及限制兒童的無限滾動（也就是災難式滾動）。

It says it will act quickly on the results, but

政府表示將會迅速根據結果採取行動，但

critics are concerned this might mean the government giving itself powers to change laws without due process.

批評者擔心這可能意味著政府將在沒有正當程序的情況下，賦予自己修改法律的權力。

A newly enforced rule banning the creation of AI deepfakes was rushed into action 10 days ago following condemnation of Elon Musk's chatbot Grok, for creating and sharing explicit images of real women on the social network X.

針對 AI 深度偽造的新規定在 Elon Musk 的哈拉機器人 Grok 被譴責，因為它在社交網絡 X 上創建並分享真實女性的露骨圖像後，於 10 天前倉促實施。

AI chatbots like ChatGPT didn't exist when the Online Safety act was being written.

在撰寫線上安全法案時，像 ChatGPT 這樣的 AI 哈拉機器人還不存在。

The government says it intends to close loopholes so that the tech is now included.

政府表示，他們打算堵塞漏洞，讓這項技術現在也被包含在內。

Today's announcement is a clear sign from the government that children's online safety continues to be a top priority.

今天的公告清楚表明，政府將兒童的線上安全視為首要任務。

And while it may be based on wheels that were already in motion, it's been welcomed by campaigners and bereaved parents, some of whom have spent years tirelessly fighting for change.

雖然這可能是基於已經啟動的措施，但倡導者和失去孩子的父母們對此表示歡迎，他們中的一些人多年來一直在不懈地爭取改變。

Well, the Australian government social media ban for under 16s has been in place since December last year.

澳洲政府禁止 16 歲以下青少年使用社交媒體的禁令自去年 12 月起實施。

Let's speak to professor of Communications at Edith Cowan University in Perth, Layla Green, to get more on this.

我們來連線柏斯伊迪斯科文大學傳播學教授 Layla Green，聽聽她的看法。

您好，教授，很高興您能參與。

So how effective is this ban on social media for under 16 proving so far?

那麼，到目前為止，這項禁止 16 歲以下青少年使用社交媒體的禁令有多有效？

So far, the anecdotal evidence is that most teenagers have found workarounds.

到目前為止，大家口耳相傳的說法是，大多數青少年都找到了替代方法。

Certainly it is mainly anecdotal at this point.

So the social media platforms are telling us how many hundreds of thousands of accounts have been closed.

所以社交媒體平臺告訴我們，他們關閉了數十萬個帳號。

But the young people that I've spoken to, aged between 13 and 16, haven't noticed a difference.

但我訪談過的 13 到 16 歲年輕人，並沒有感覺到有什麼不同。

They had already prepared to move on to other platforms that weren't regulated, but those that.

他們已經準備好轉移到其他不受管制的平臺，但那些。

But they found that that's unnecessary because they managed to evade most of the age verification software so far.

但他們發現這根本沒必要，因為到目前為止，他們設法規避了大部分的年齡驗證軟體。

Because the onus is on the tech companies, isn't it, to take reasonable steps to keep kids off their platforms?

因為責任在科技公司，不是嗎？他們需要採取合理的措施來阻止孩子們使用他們的平臺？

But clearly, would you suggest that that's not working because they're not being strict enough?

但顯然，您會建議這項措施無效，因為他們不夠嚴格嗎？

I think that there's a lot of people trying to do a lot of things very quickly, but

我認為很多人都在試圖快速完成很多事情，但是

certainly there's no sign that the tech companies are particularly motivated to go out of their way in this respect.

當然，看不出科技公司在這方面有特別積極的意願。

It's good that it's a tech company responsibility.

這是科技公司的責任，這點很好。

We want parents and children to continue to be able to talk to each other because actually, a lot of the things that are regulated have less to do with outside influences and more to do with social circles that young people move in.

我們希望父母和孩子們能繼續互相溝通，因為實際上，很多被規範的事情與外界影響的關聯較小，反而更多是與年輕人所處的社交圈有關。

Which is why the social media has its strengths.

這也是為什麼社交媒體有它的優勢。

並不是因為這是技術層面的問題，而是

because it means you can't get away from your local social circle or something that's horrible about.

因為這意味著你無法擺脫你的在地社交圈，或是那些讓你感到不舒服的事情。

You could be posted to a whole social circle immediately and you don't know how to respond to that because everyone you've ever spoken to suddenly gets told either erroneous or information that you never intended to be made public.

你可能會立刻被發布到整個社交圈，而你不知道如何回應，因為你曾經說過話的每個人突然都被告知了錯誤的資訊，或是你從未打算公開的資訊。

So some of those things are really difficult.

Now, I was going to ask what, given the experience and just, it's just, you know, six weeks or so experience, it's not very long, is it?

好了，我想問的是，鑑於目前的經驗，而且你知道，這才大概六週的經驗，時間並不長，對吧？

But the lessons that Australia is learning as the UK and other countries look to move forward with their policies on social media and there's going to be a consultation coming into effect next month and the government wants to move quickly off the back of that, what do you think other countries can learn about perhaps how to be more effective?

不過，澳洲在英國和其他國家尋求推進社交媒體政策時正在學習的經驗，而且下個月將會有一個公眾諮詢生效，政府也想趁此機會快速推進，你認為其他國家可以從中學到什麼，關於如何做得更有效率？

Well, it seems to me that it would better if the countries got together and sorted out how they Want the social media companies to regulate themselves better.

嗯，在我看來，如果各國能聚在一起，決定好他們希望社交媒體公司如何更好地自我監管，那就更好了。

Not so much locking people out of the platforms, but

與其說鎖定人們無法使用平臺，不如

to make the platforms safer for young people to be on them.

And we don't want to close down those channels of communication because the parents are children's best response or best place of safety if something goes wrong.

我們也不想關閉這些溝通管道，因為如果發生了什麼事，父母是孩子最好的回應者，也是最安全的地方。

And they need to be able to keep talking to their parents about things that happen to them online and not risk having things done because they shouldn't have been online in the first place.

他們需要能夠繼續和父母談論他們在網路上遇到的事情，而不是因為他們一開始就不該上網而冒著事情被處理的風險。

So, you know, otherwise people tend to react to you shouldn't have been online rather than how can I support you through this?

所以，你知道，否則人們傾向於說你不該上網，而不是問我該如何支持你度過難關。

What do you think we should be doing about this particular challenge?

你認為我們應該如何應對這個特定的挑戰？

Yeah, what do you think safer we're doing is closing down conversations.

對，你認為我們做得更安全的方式是關閉對話。

What do you think safer looks like given that, you know, kids are taught about the dangers of posting inappropriate things on social media and that that stays with them forever?

考量到你知道，孩子們被教導在社交媒體上發布不當內容的危險，而且這些內容會永遠跟著他們，你認為更安全的方式是什麼？

But young people are realizing that actually a lot of people, well, as, as we now know with AI, what's real and what's pretend, what's fabricated and what's real is very difficult to know and very difficult to defend yourself against, very difficult to be authentic about.

但年輕人意識到，實際上很多人，嗯，就像我們現在知道的，有了人工智慧，真實與虛構、偽造與真實之間的界線變得非常難分辨，非常難保護自己，也很難保持真實。

So we are in a new area here, the sorts of things.

所以我們現在進入了一個新的領域，這些事情。

But taking young people off these platforms is just going to delay things and possibly make things worse because then they don't have channels of safety to talk to adults and trusted others about things that are going wrong.

但讓年輕人離開這些平臺只會延誤問題，甚至可能讓情況變得更糟，因為這樣他們就沒有管道向成人和信任的人尋求安全協助，談論那些出錯的事情。

And that is still a child's best response is to get support from people and be able to talk through the options and develop their own critical reasoning and response skills with support from those who care for them.

而且，孩子最好的應對方式仍然是從他人那裡獲得支持，並能夠與關心他們的人一起討論各種選項，培養自己的批判性思考和應對技巧。

Professor Edith Cowan, thanks very much for joining us and for telling us more about what's happening in Australia.

Edith Cowan 教授，非常感謝您加入我們，並告訴我們更多關於澳洲發生的事情。

Well, let's speak to our political correspondent Joe pike now, who is in Westminster.

好的，現在讓我們來聽聽在西敏寺的政治記者 Joe Pike。

So tell us more about what's on the table for the government when it comes to their social media strategy was about.

所以，政府在社交媒體策略方面有哪些考量？

The government have been accused by opposition parties of moving sluggishly.

Of course, the challenge for politicians across the world is the technology, especially AI technology is moving far faster than legislative bodies are.

當然，全世界政治人物面臨的挑戰是科技，特別是人工智慧的發展速度遠遠超過立法機構。

So what the government are now doing is announcing a consultation that will start next month on a social media ban and other sort of related issues.

所以政府現在正在做的是宣佈一項將於下個月開始的公眾諮詢，內容關於社交媒體禁令和其他相關議題。

And then before the summer, so maybe June or July, they will set out their plans.

然後在夏天之前，也就是可能六月或七月，他們會提出他們的計畫。

They also want to close a couple of loopholes, one on AI chat bots, where young people can have, in some cases, some pretty concerning conversations with these chat bots in cases that have led prominently to suicide.

他們也想堵住一些漏洞，其中一個是關於AI哈拉機器人，在某些情況下，年輕人可能會與這些哈拉機器人進行令人擔憂的對話，甚至導致了自殺。

The government want to ensure that tech companies are far more responsible there.

政府希望確保科技公司在此方面負起更多責任。

And also another change around maintaining the right data when a child has died.

另外一個改變是關於在孩童死亡時，維護正確的資料。

So a coroner in England, Wales, will now need to contact one of these social media companies to notify them of a child's death to preserve data.

是以，英格蘭和威爾斯的驗屍官現在需要聯繫這些社交媒體公司之一，通知他們孩童的死亡情況，以保存資料。

If a family potentially would like to look into that and work out whether it has contributed to their death and how quickly could all of this happen.

如果家屬可能想深入調查，找出是否導致了他們的死亡，以及這一切會有多快發生。

The government want to create new powers to try and push it through.

政府希望創建新的權力來推動此事。

That's controversial because they want the powers to allow them to use little bits of secondary legislation to bring in rules.

這之所以有爭議，是因為他們希望透過一些次級立法來制定規則。

So it's effectively like having the power to without the input of MPs, then being able to tweak things.

所以這實際上就像有權力在未經國會議員同意的情況下進行調整。

The argument for the government is, look, this is moving so fast, it's changing so fast.

政府的論點是，這一切變化太快了。

We need the power to close loopholes and not wait for long legislative, legislative processes.

我們需要有權力堵塞漏洞，而不是等待漫長的立法程序。

However, of course that does change the sort of democratic role of MPs and peers.

然而，這當然也改變了國會議員和貴族的民主角色。

The argument from Australia seems to be, some argue, pretty strong.

來自澳洲的論點，有些人認為，相當有力。

But it's also worth pointing out there are other prominent campaigners who argue against a ban.

但值得一提的是，也有其他知名的倡議者反對禁令。

Some in particular worried about a possible cliff edge at 16, when suddenly 16 year olds would have access to so many different social media platforms.

有些人特別擔心在16歲時可能會出現一個斷崖式的變化，屆時16歲的青少年突然就能接觸到這麼多不同的社交媒體平臺。

Criticism too from the Lib Dems and the Conservatives here in the UK about the pace of change.

英國的自由民主黨和保守黨也對變化的速度提出批評。

The Tories saying the government has chosen inaction.

保守黨表示政府選擇了不作為。

Meanwhile, Samantha, the Liberal Democrats have have accused the government of continuing to kick the can down the road.

同時，自由民主黨指控政府繼續推諉塞責。

Yeah, I'm just hearing that from one expert in Australia saying their social media ban anecdotally doesn't necessarily seem to be working.

是的，我剛聽到一位澳洲專家說，他們的社交媒體禁令從軼事上看來似乎並未奏效。

Kids are finding their ways around it and calling more for a coalition of countries to come together to work out how to talk to the tech companies.

孩子們找到了繞過禁令的方法，並且更呼籲各國聯合起來，共同商討如何與科技公司溝通。

Is that something that the government is looking at?

I think they're certainly communicating with other ministers and trying to learn lessons from other countries.

我認為他們肯定有與其他部長溝通，並試圖從其他國家學習經驗。

I think part of what Keir Starmer realizes is that people really, really care about this.

我認為基爾·斯塔默意識到人們非常非常關心這件事。

So he needs to be seen to be taking it seriously and empathizing.

所以他需要被看見正在認真對待此事並感同身受。

That's why he'll be speaking in the next few hours alongside the Mayor of London in particular, highlighting that he understands or arguing that he understands because he has two teenagers himself.

這就是為什麼他將在接下來幾個小時內，與倫敦市長一起發表演講，特別強調他理解，或者說他認為他理解，因為他自己有兩個青少年。