Name: Intel強勢回歸！這絕對不是演習！- Core Ultra 270K Plus & 250K Plus CPU 評測 (Intel is BACK. THIS IS NOT A DRILL. - Core Ultra 270K Plus & 250K Plus CPU Review)
Uploaded: 2026-03-28T21:41:52.000Z
Duration: 11 min 27 s
Description: 【看影片學英語】數萬部 YouTube 影片，搭配英漢字典即點即查，輕鬆掌握單字發音與用法，長久累積看電影不必再看字幕。

情態助動詞 B1

You might think the Ryzen 7 9850X3D is the best gaming CPU on the market,

你可能會覺得 Ryzen 7 9850X3D 是市面上最強的電競 CPU，

but as of today that all does not change.

但到今天為止，這一切都沒變。

第二類條件句型

But what if I told you that you could get 95% of its performance for 60% of the price?

但如果我告訴你，你可以用一半的價格，換取它 95% 的效能呢？

That is what Intel has bequeathed upon the land with their Ultra 7 270K Plus.

這就是 Intel 用他們的 Ultra 7 270K Plus 帶給我們的。

天啊，是誰在命名這些東西的？

Anyways, take a look at this: in Cities: Skylines 2, Intel's Ultra 7 270K Plus outpaces both of their previous flagships and is nipping at the heels of the 9800X3D.

不管怎樣，看看這個：在 Cities: Skylines 2 裡，Intel 的 Ultra 7 270K Plus 超越了他們之前所有的旗艦產品，而且緊追著 9800X3D 的腳步。

And what's even crazier is that the second chip that they announced, the Ultra 5 250K Plus, is also a flagship killer.

更瘋狂的是，他們宣佈的第二款晶片，Ultra 5 250K Plus，也是一款旗艦殺手。

Oh, right, and I haven't even mentioned price.

喔，對了，我還沒提到價格呢。

The 270K and the 250K are dropping at a mere $300 and $200 respectively, prices that are actually lower than the launch prices of the CPUs they are meant to replace.

270K 和 250K 的售價僅為 300 美元和 200 美元，比它們要取代的 CPU 的上市價格還要低。

And moving into Cyberpunk, the winning streak continues.

接著來看 Cyberpunk，這贏家的氣勢持續不斷。

Intel's 270K Plus is on the podium, while the 250K Plus outperforms the 14900K and the Ryzen 9950X.

Intel 的 270K Plus 站上頒獎臺，而 250K Plus 的表現則超越了 14900K 和 Ryzen 9950X。

It just sits slightly underneath the 265K in 1% lows,

在 1% lows 的部分，它只稍微落後於 265K，

but it actually has an edge in average FPS.

但在平均 FPS 方面，它其實更有優勢。

But AMD's chips also have an edge in average frame rates, which is why I am again emphasizing the importance of 1% lows.

不過 AMD 的晶片在平均 frame rates 方面也有優勢，這就是為什麼我要再次強調 1% lows 的重要性。

Those are what indicates a smoother gaming experience.

這些才是能顯示出更流暢遊戲體驗的關鍵。

But what is good and also true is this in-depth review of Intel's newest CPUs and this segue to our sponsor.

不過，好消息而且真實的就是，這篇關於 Intel 最新 CPU 的深度評測，以及我們接下來要介紹的贊助商。

抱歉，這一切對我來說都太新鮮了。

Continuing with our 1080p gaming results, in F1 24 we see AMD's whole lineup faring pretty well, with the 9700X going above and beyond and overtaking the 270K Plus and the i9-14900K.

繼續看我們的 1080p 遊戲結果，在 F1 24 中，AMD 的整體表現相當不錯，9700X 更是超乎預期，超越了 270K Plus 和 i9-14900K。

The new 250K Plus trails the 9600X, although not by much.

新的 250K Plus 雖然差距不大，但還是落後於 9600X。

But Intel's dominance is seriously challenged in Counter-Strike 2, where their new high-end hotness only barely catches AMD's mid-range 9600X.

不過在 Counter-Strike 2 中，Intel 的主導地位受到嚴峻挑戰，他們新的高階熱門產品僅僅勉強追上 AMD 的中階 9600X。

At least Intel's new CPUs are outperforming their own team, except for the 14900K.

至少 Intel 的新 CPU 表現都超越了自家產品，除了 14900K。

When we take all of our gaming tests into consideration, it would seem that Intel has fulfilled their marketing claim.

當我們把所有的遊戲測試都考慮進去，看來 Intel 確實達到了他們的行銷宣傳。

The Ultra 7 270K Plus is the fastest gaming CPU Intel's ever built, even if it's not the fastest gaming CPU anyone's ever built, landing just 5% shy of AMD's 9800X3D in 1% lows and 10% behind an average frame rate.

Ultra 7 270K Plus 是 Intel 打造過最快的遊戲 CPU，即使它不是任何人打造過最快的遊戲 CPU，在 1% lows 上僅落後 AMD 的 9800X3D 5%，平均 frame rates 落後 10%。

It beats the 9600X by 5 to 10% or more depending on the game, whilst demanding a very small price premium.

在大多數遊戲中，它的表現都比 9600X 好上 5% 到 10% 或更多，而價格只稍微高一點。

But before you scream shill, let's address the elephant in the room and talk about why we didn't compare these new Intel chips to AMD's 9850X3D, their more recent fastest gaming CPU.

但在大家開罵之前，我們就來談談為什麼這次沒有把這些新的 Intel 處理器跟 AMD 最新最快的遊戲 CPU 9850X3D 進行比較。

Unfortunately, we can't test every CPU on the market, so we opted to represent the 9800X3D instead of the 9850X3D because more of you guys are currently running it,

很可惜，我們不可能測試市面上所有的 CPU，所以我們選擇用 9800X3D 來代表，因為你們現在有更多人使用它，

and it's also very close in performance to the 9850X3D.

而且它的效能也跟 9850X3D 非常接近。

And if we're being entirely honest, we did not expect Intel to compete at the very top of these performance charts.

說實話，我們真的沒想到 Intel 能在效能排行榜上衝到這麼前面。

But if you are looking for even more data, keep an eye on lttlabs.com, where we are always adding new tests to compare.

如果你們還想看更多數據，可以隨時關注 lttlabs.com，我們一直在上面新增新的測試比較。

So what changes under the hood did Intel make to refresh their Arrow Lake CPUs and get these impressive results?

那麼 Intel 到底做了什麼改動，讓他們的 Arrow Lake 處理器能有這麼亮眼的表現呢？

Well, first off, they bumped up the clocks all-core boost on the PE cores with the new processors.

首先，他們在新處理器上提升了 PE 核心的全核心超頻時脈。

They also tweaked uncore frequencies--uncore meaning everything that's not the cores--and they've improved die-to-die performance and I/O frequency, meaning faster communication to the parts within the CPU and to the other components in your system, which allowed them to support higher-speed memory.

他們也調整了 uncore 頻率——uncore 指的是 CPU 裡所有非核心的部分——並且提升了 die-to-die 效能和 I/O 頻率，這代表 CPU 內部零件以及與系統其他元件的溝通速度更快，讓他們能夠支援更高速度的記憶體。

Oh, right, and there's just plain more CPU.

喔對了，還有就是 CPU 本身也變多了。

Both of these new chips bring in extra four E-cores and some bonus shared cache along for the ride, which makes the naming of these CPUs really confusing.

這兩款新 CPU 都額外增加了四個 E-core 和一些額外的共享快取，這讓這些 CPU 的命名變得非常讓人困惑。

Why does the Ultra 7 270K Plus have the same number of cores as the Ultra 9 285K,

為什麼 Ultra 7 270K Plus 的核心數跟 Ultra 9 285K 一樣，

Shouldn't the higher number CPU be better?

數字比較高的 CPU 應該要比較好吧？

I mean, at least the 250K Plus actually has fewer cores than the 265K, so something makes sense there.

我是說，至少 250K Plus 的核心數確實比 265K 少，所以那邊還有點邏輯。

But even there, in terms of performance, the 250K Plus is looking more like a replacement for the 265K rather than the 245K.

但即使在那裡，就效能而言，250K Plus 看起來更像是 265K 的後繼款，而不是 245K。

So what are they thinking with these names?

所以他們到底在想什麼，取這些名字？

It's tough to say, but the main thing Intel wants you to focus on is the Plus.

真的有點難說，但 Intel 主要想讓大家注意的就是那個 Plus。

Apparently, this new convention is going to indicate that it's for enthusiasts.

聽起來這個新的命名規則是要表示它是給玩家用的。

Intel, whatever you're paying your marketing division, it is too much.

Intel，不管你們的行銷部門拿多少錢，都太多了。

And whatever you're paying your engineers, it ain't enough.

而你們付給工程師的薪水，絕對不夠。

Intel made some big claims in their announcement about multi-core performance, saying that the 250K Plus has a 103% lead over the 9600X.

Intel 在發表會上對多核心效能做了一些大膽的宣稱，說 250K Plus 比 9600X 快了 103%。

嗯，讓我們來看看是不是真的。

In Blender, the 250K Plus just pummels AMD's price competitors,

在 Blender 測試中，250K Plus 完虐 AMD 的同價位競爭對手，

and at the high end, the 270K Plus is neck and neck with the 9950X.

而在高階部分，270K Plus 和 9950X 更是難分軒輊。

In Cinebench, well, bow to your new multi-core king as the 270K Plus tops the charts with his brother Duke 250K Plus outperforming his counterparts.

在 Cinebench 裡，270K Plus 帶著他的兄弟 250K Plus 稱霸多核心效能排行榜，表現遠超同級對手。

On the other hand, in single-core performance, the higher boost on the 285K and 265K keep them positioned above their Plus-named heirs.

另一方面，在單核心效能上，285K 和 265K 的較高時脈讓它們的表現略勝於 Plus 系列的後繼者。

If you're looking to decompress, you can relax knowing that these new chips also perform well in 7-Zip, even if they are a step below royalty.

如果你想放鬆一下，可以放心，這些新 CPU 在 7-Zip 測試中表現也很不錯，雖然離頂級還有點距離。

But in pretty much every workload, the Plus CPUs are either fighting for the top spot or absolutely dominating in price to performance.

但在幾乎所有的工作負載中，Plus 系列 CPU 要嘛在爭奪第一名，要嘛在性價比上絕對領先。

Except in Photoshop, where there is a clear platform preference for AMD.

除了 Photoshop 之外，AMD 在這方面有明顯的平臺優勢。

But outside of that, Intel has stolen back the productivity crowd, especially considering price to performance.

但除此之外，Intel 奪回了生產力使用者的青睞，尤其是在考慮性價比的情況下。

So don't ignore them if you're doing any sort of productivity work in addition to your gaming.

所以如果你除了玩遊戲，還有做任何生產力相關的工作，千萬別忽略它們。

Let's say this in a way Twitch streamers can understand.

用 Twitch 直播主聽得懂的方式來說。

Intel is value-maxing and absolutely price-mogging AMD.

Intel 正在最大化價值，絕對在價格上碾壓 AMD。

After several generations of power-hungry CPUs, Intel slayed the power efficiency dragon with Arrow Lake.

不過在經歷了好幾代的 power-hungry CPU 後，Intel 終於用 Arrow Lake 擊敗了功耗的巨龍。

But CPU refreshes often result in power consumption increases.

但 CPU 更新通常也會導致功耗增加。

Well, in gaming, power usage on the 250K Plus and 270K Plus has increased by 10% or more compared to their non-Plus brethren,

嗯，在遊戲方面，250K Plus 和 270K Plus 的功耗比它們的非 Plus 版本增加了 10% 或更多，

but on the whole have a lower average and max power consumption than AMD's chips in F1 24.

但在 F1 24 中，它們的平均功耗和最高功耗都比 AMD 的處理器低。

And Intel's doing this while being pretty competitive in performance too.

而且 Intel 在性能上也很有競爭力。

In Cinebench, we can see that Intel is still happy to let their chips let loose with power to really maximize performance, even if it comes at the cost of efficiency.

在 Cinebench 中，我們可以看到 Intel 仍然樂於讓他們的處理器盡情釋放功耗來最大化性能，即使這會犧牲效率。

But still, Intel might make up the difference by having quite good idle power draw, especially compared to AMD.

但 Intel 可能會透過不錯的閒置功耗來彌補差距，尤其與 AMD 相比。

And this well-managed power curve on the new chips translates to well-managed thermals on our Arctic Liquid Freezer 3 360mm CLAD test benches.

而新處理器上這種管理良好的功耗曲線，也意味著我們的 Arctic Liquid Freezer 3 360mm CLAD 測試平臺上的散熱表現也很不錯。

And even when drawing full power, they perform well under their rated max temp.

即使在滿載功耗下，它們的表現也低於額定的最高溫度。

Remember, the TJ Maxx for these CPUs is 105 degrees compared to AMD's 95.

記得，這些 CPU 的 TJ Maxx 是 105 度，而 AMD 是 95 度。

And the crazy thing is that if you really want to push your chip or if you're just heinously thermally constrained, Intel will let you set your temperature budget to 115 degrees Celsius and still honor the warranty.

最瘋狂的是，如果你真的想榨乾你的 CPU，或者你真的受限於散熱，Intel 允許你將溫度上限設到 115 度，而且還會保固。

It sounds great so far, yeah, but there's still more to talk about.

聽起來到目前為止都很不錯，對吧，但還有更多要說的。

Intel has a few tricks up their sleeves, and it's in the form of software enhancements.

Intel 手上還有幾張王牌，那就是軟體優化。

The Intel Binary Optimization Tool, or iBOT, is part of their application optimizer software,

Intel Binary Optimization Tool，簡稱 iBOT，是他們應用程式優化軟體的一部分，

and Intel considers this to be a core part of their long-term performance strategy.

而 Intel 認為這是他們長期效能策略的核心。

Basically, what it does is analyze the functions being called by an application and redirects the call to a function that's better optimized for Intel hardware.

基本上，它的作用是分析應用程式正在呼叫的函式，並將呼叫重新導向到一個為 Intel 硬體優化得更好的函式。