Name: 福斯新聞民調也顯示川普的伊朗戰爭不得人心！ (Enten: Even Fox News poll shows Trump’s Iran war is unpopular)
Uploaded: 2026-03-26T16:39:36.000Z
Duration: 10 min 46 s

情態副詞

The president's choice to enter into a war with Iran has not been widely popular with Congress, as Sarah was just discussing.

總統決定要跟伊朗開戰，國會那邊並沒有很支持，就像 Sarah 剛才說的。

It hasn't been popular with the American people either.

美國民眾這邊也一樣，不太支持。

So how is it impacting Trump's approval rating, Sarah?

那這對川普的支持率有什麼影響呢？Sarah？

As CNN's Harry Enten here now to run the numbers.

CNN 的 Harry Enten 現在就來幫我們分析一下數字。

So Harry, Fox was one of the initial polls, right, um, in terms of showing how the Iran war was sitting.

所以 Harry，福斯新聞是最初的民意調查之一，對吧？關於伊朗戰爭的民意狀況。

It didn't really show that there was a big issue with it initially.

一開始並沒有顯示出有什麼大問題。

Things are changing this morning in this latest poll that we have out.

不過今天早上，我們最新的這份民意調查顯示情況正在改變。

Look, when there was this slew of initial polls that came out, the Fox News poll was the one initial poll that did not show that the war was unpopular.

看看，當初有一連串的民意調查出來，福斯新聞的民調是唯一一個沒有顯示戰爭不受歡迎的。

Trump has lost his one good poll when it comes to the Iran war, because just take a look here: net approval rating of U.S.

川普在伊朗戰爭上的唯一一份好民調也沒了，因為看看這裡：美國的淨支持率。

三月初的時候，是持平的，對吧？

What that essentially means is 50% approved, 50% disapproved.

這基本上意味著有50%的人支持，50%的人反對。

Look at this now: the net approval rating for the U.S.

military action in Iran, negative 16 points, just 42% of the American public approve of it, 58% disapprove.

在伊朗的軍事行動，是負16點，只有42%的美國公眾支持，58%反對。

So now we're looking at basically every single poll in which the clear plurality or majority of Americans disapprove of the U.S.

所以現在我們看到基本上每一個民調都顯示，美國的。

軍事行動在伊朗，明確的多數或絕對多數的美國人表示反對。

Trump can no longer point to a poll that actually shows that among the general public at large, that the American public actually approve of this military action.

川普現在已經無法拿出任何一份民調顯示，廣大的公眾，美國民眾真的支持這項軍事行動。

So this is the overwhelming for the Iran war.

所以這對伊朗戰爭來說，是壓倒性的。

When it comes to how President Trump is handling Iran in general.

當談到川普總統處理伊朗事務的整體表現。

You think, "That's bad." But look at Trump's handling of it.

你會覺得「這很糟」。但看看川普的處理方式。

Look at this overall: 28 points underwater.

Very, very unpopular Donald Trump's actions are when it comes to Iran.

唐納·川普在伊朗問題上的做法，非常非常不受歡迎。

And look at those in the center of the electorate.

58 points underwater Donald Trump is when it comes to Iran.

唐納·川普在伊朗問題上是負58點。

And of course, this has been dominating, dominating politics over the last month.

當然，這一個月來一直主導著、主導著政治。

And so what we see here is the U.S. military action in Iran: not popular in a poll.

所以我們在這裡看到的是美國在伊朗的軍事行動：民意調查顯示不受歡迎。

And Donald Trump's handling of it: even worse.

而唐納·川普的處理方式：更糟。

And those in the center of the electorate, you can barely find any independents at this point who approve the U.S.

而在選民中間，你現在幾乎找不到任何中間選民支持美國

So earlier this week, the president's overall approval numbers were not great.

所以這週稍早，總統的整體支持率數字並不好。

I think they had you saying, "Yikes." Where do they stand in this Fox News poll?

我想他們讓你說：「哎呀。」在這次福斯新聞的民意調查中，他們表現如何？

You know, we have been talking about in poll after poll after poll.

你知道，我們一直在談論一個又一個的民意調查。

Look, you can look at one poll and you see, "Okay, Donald Trump's hit a new all-time low." And you go, "Okay, maybe an outlier." Then you see two.

看，你可以看一個民意調查，然後你會看到，「好的，唐納·川普創下新低點。」然後你會說，「好的，也許是個例外。」然後你看到第二個。

In March of 2025, according to Fox News, he was at minus 2 points.

根據福斯新聞，在 2025 年 3 月，他處於負 2 個百分點。

Look at where he is now: a term too low, 18 points underwater according to Fox News.

看看他現在的狀況：根據福斯新聞，他處於創紀錄的低點，落後 18 個百分點。

There is simply put no poll you can point to at this point at which Donald Trump is either at or near a record low.

說實在的，現在沒有任何一個民意調查顯示唐納·川普的表現是創紀錄的低點或接近低點。

And this is yet another one, and he is just struggling mightily.

這又是一個，他真的非常掙扎。

This Iran war is simply put at this point, a few weeks in, not popular, and

說實在的，這場伊朗戰爭，開打幾週後，並不受到歡迎，

it is becoming less popular the longer it goes on.

而且隨著時間的推移，越來越不受歡迎。

Would you support troops on the ground in, in Iran on this point?

你會支持在這場伊朗戰爭中，在這點上派兵進入伊朗嗎？

I've been asked 100%, crystal clear from the beginning, no.

我百分之百確定，從一開始就很清楚，不行。

This war is now in its, uh, third, going into its fourth week.

這場戰爭現在已經進入第三週，快要第四週了。

Um, there are more questions than answers.

We're not getting we're not getting answers from the administration on the end game.

我們沒有從政府那裡得到關於最終目標的答案。

Coming out of this briefing today, I don't have any confidence whatsoever that they have a plan, a strategy, even very clear goals for what they want to do next.

從今天的簡報來看，我一點信心都沒有，他們根本沒有計畫、策略，甚至連下一步想做什麼的明確目標都沒有。

Everyone needs to get the same briefing we received today and make that decision: is it right to go into a protracted, elongated war where soldiers are going to die?

每個人都應該接受和我們一樣的簡報，然後做出決定：投入一場漫長、曠日持久、阿兵哥會犧牲的戰爭，這樣對嗎？

And right now, I am adamantly opposed to boots on the ground, based on the information that I have.

而現在，根據我所掌握的資訊，我堅決反對派兵進入伊朗。

Joining me now in the group chat, we have Congressman Corey Mills.

現在加入我們群組哈拉的是國會議員 Corey Mills。

He's a Republican from Florida, member of the House Armed Services Committee.

他是佛羅裡達州的共和黨籍眾議員，也是眾議院軍事委員會的成員。

Um, I wanted to talk to you because obviously you are a military man, but

嗯，我想跟你聊聊，因為你顯然是軍人出身，

Answer the question from Nancy Mace: do you see a plan, or do you see a protracted war?

回答 Nancy Mace 的問題：你看到計畫了嗎？還是看到一場曠日持久的戰爭？

That's not what the president's objective has been from the very beginning.

這從一開始就不是總統的目標。

I mean, if you think back, for example, to 2011 in Libya, one of the primary reasons that we went in and we didn't declare the war as but as hostility, as the Department of Justice had clarified under UN regulations, is that there was no boots on the ground.

我的意思是，如果你回想一下，比方說 2011 年的利比亞，我們介入但沒有宣戰，而是稱之為敵對行動，正如司法部根據聯合國規定所澄清的，主要原因之一是沒有地面部隊。

It was about trying to protect innocent lives of civilians there.

那是為了保護那裡的無辜平民生命。

And I think with 40,000-plus people being completely just massacred within the streets by trying to do what we would call the First Amendments, I think that the president looked at this, looked at the, uh, overall nuclear threat.

我認為，有超過 4 萬人因為試圖行使我們所說的第一修正案權利，而在街頭被完全屠殺，總統看到了這一點，看到了整體的核威脅。

And I think that when we saw the fact that recently they were even launching hypersonic ballistic missiles that.

我認為，當我們看到他們最近甚至還發射了高超音速彈道導彈時。

Because you're calling it a war when it's not actually a war.

因為你把它稱為戰爭，但它實際上並不是戰爭。

I think by most average people's understanding of seeing bombings every day.

我認為，以一般大眾的理解來看，每天看到轟炸。

他們認為他們看到的是一場戰爭。

但為什麼在利比亞就不是戰爭呢？

Lindsey Graham has talked about taking Karg Island and compared it to Iwo Jima.

林賽·格雷厄姆曾談到攻佔卡爾格島，並將其比作硫磺島。

So here that here's what I tell President Trump: keep it up for a few more weeks, take Karg Island where all of the resources they have to produce oil, control that island, let this regime down a vine.

所以，這就是我告訴總統川普的：再這樣幾週，拿下卡爾格島，那裡有所有生產石油的資源，控制那個島，讓這個政權垮臺。

We got two marine expeditionary units sailing to this island.

我們有兩個海軍陸戰隊遠徵部隊正在駛向這個島。

Then I had Mike Herodopoulos on this show, Republican, also from Florida, and

然後我請了共和黨籍的麥克·赫羅多波羅斯上這個節目，他也是來自佛羅裡達州，

字幕列表影片播放

福斯新聞民調也顯示川普的伊朗戰爭不得人心！ (Enten: Even Fox News poll shows Trump’s Iran war is unpopular)

essentially

majority

basically

presence