Name: 獨家內幕！CBS竟動手腳！《60分鐘》節目訪談大動作剪輯，替換掉了關於Hegseth的關鍵提問！ (EXCLUSIVE: CBS Caught Making Key EDIT To 60 Minutes Interview with Hegseth Replacing the Question)
Uploaded: 2026-03-10T21:41:22.000Z
Duration: 10 min 51 s

反身代名詞

We have got to begin this hour with what happened on 60 Minutes last night who just cannot seem to help themselves making deceptive edits.

我們要從今晚 60 Minutes 發生的事開始，他們就是無法剋制自己做欺騙性的剪輯。

Yesterday, 60 Minutes aired major Garrett, my old pal from Fox News.

昨天，60 Minutes 播出了 major Garrett，我以前在 Fox News 的老朋友。

This does not appear to have been his sin, though.

I don't know whether he signed off on this or not.

我不知道他有沒有簽署同意，或者沒有。

This would have been an editorial call by the network, but

這應該是電視臺的編輯決定，但是

they aired his interview with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth about what's happening in Iran.

他們播出了他對戰爭部長 Pete Hegseth 關於伊朗正在發生的事情的採訪。

Here is part okay, about this is what actually aired, right.

這裡有一段，好的，關於這就是實際播出的內容，對吧。

About Israel possibly dragging the United States into war.

關於以色列可能將美國拖入戰爭。

This is what was presented to the CBS audience.

Some normally enthusiastic supporters of the president have criticized him suggesting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pulled the US Into a war that to their minds, did not put American interests first.

有些總統一向熱情支持者批評他，認為以色列總理班傑明·納坦雅胡將美國拖入了他們認為並未將美國利益擺在第一位的戰爭。

All I know is I'm in the room every day and I see how President Trump operates and what he's putting first.

我只知道我每天都在房間裡，我看到川普總統如何運作，以及他把什麼放在第一位。

So there you see Pete Hegseth defending Bibi Netanyahu charges about Israel's interference in the war.

所以你看到 Pete Hegseth 在為畢比·納坦雅胡關於以色列幹預戰爭的指控辯護。

Well, thanks to President Trump's complaint about 60 Minutes edits of Kamala Harris's interview and how deceptive they were, CBS now posts the unedited interviews of newsmakers as well.

嗯，多虧川普總統抱怨 60 Minutes 剪輯了賀錦麗的採訪，以及它們有多麼具誤導性，CBS 現在也會發布新聞人物的未經編輯的採訪。

And let me tell you, the question asked was very different.

讓我告訴你，問的問題很不一樣。

That was not the question that Major Garrett asked.

He did not ask anything about Bibi Netanyahu or Israel, nor did then Pete go on to rehabilitate anything in response to Israel.

他沒有問任何關於畢比·納坦雅胡或以色列的問題，Pete 也沒有是以為以色列辯護。

We took a look at the Hegseth interview in full.

我們完整看了一下 Hegseth 的訪談。

It's notable how the Q and A you saw never mentioned Israel at all.

值得注意的是，你看到的問答完全沒有提到以色列。

Only someone at CBS tried to go back and change the question to make it about Israel such that the answer would then rehabilitate Israel, which isn't what actually happened.

只有 CBS 的人試圖回頭修改問題，讓它變成關於以色列，以便答案能為以色列辯護，但這並非事實。

Some who identify with that movement, Megan Kelly, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Marjorie Taylor Greene, have said from their perspective, this isn't an America first campaign.

一些認同這個運動的人，像是 Megan Kelly、Tucker Carlson、Candace Owens、Marjorie Taylor Greene，從他們的角度來看，這不是一個美國優先的運動。

我所知道的是，我每天都在總統身邊，我看到川普總統的運作方式以及他優先考慮的事項。

And it's America, Americans and American interests at every level.

在各個層級，都是美國、美國人以及美國的利益。

How long should our bases be tolerating thousands of short range ballistic missiles and one way attack drones pointing at our bases and our people?

我們的基地應該要容忍多少年，才能承受成千上萬的短程彈道飛彈和單向攻擊無人機對準我們的基地和人民？

After 47 years of Americans being targeted and killed, the men I served with in combat in Iraq and Coming home with no arms and no legs.

在美國人遭到鎖定和殺害 47 年後，我在伊拉克戰場上服役的弟兄們，回家時失去了雙臂和雙腿。

I mean, the regime itself is premised on death to America.

我的意思是，這個政權本身就是建立在「美國去死」的基礎上的。

Thousands of missiles and an unrelenting pursuit of nuclear ambitions.

數千枚飛彈，以及他們對核武野心的不懈追求。

I mean, President Trump's right when he says we obliterated their nuclear program.

我的意思是，川普總統說得對，我們摧毀了他們的核武計畫。

We dropped those bombs exactly where they needed to be, set them back.

我們把炸彈精準地投在該投的地方，讓他們退回原點。

But that doesn't mean they've stopped their pursuit.

但這並不代表他們就停止追求了。

Doesn't mean in the back of their mind they're thinking, well, maybe we'll wait it out and keep.

這不代表他們心裡在想，嗯，也許我們可以等一等，然後繼續。

They've miscalculated the resolve of President Trump.

去問，你知道的，葉門的胡塞武裝。

你看看那些販毒集團和運毒的船。

When President Trump says he'll take care of something, he's going to take care of it.

川普總統說他會處理某件事，他就會把它處理好。

There was nothing, nothing about Netanyahu and nothing about Israel in the Q or the A.

在問答環節裡，完全沒有提到納坦雅胡，也沒有提到以色列。

Only CBS decided to style it in that fashion.

只有CBS決定用那種方式來呈現。

They do not give a shit about misleading you over at cbs.

他們根本不在乎在CBS那邊誤導你。

The old CBS or the new cbs, which has a brand new agenda, the left will tell you that it's pro maga.

舊的CBS還是新的CBS，有個全新的議程，左派會跟你說它是親MAGA的。

Watch two minutes of the evening news or the morning news.

看兩分鐘的晚間新聞或晨間新聞。

It is not pro maga at all, but it is pro Israel.

它一點都不親MAGA，但它親以色列。

Bari Weiss has finally achieved her dream of running a news network that will be entirely pro Israel.

Bari Weiss終於實現了她經營一個完全親以色列新聞網的夢想。

Everybody all over the Internet has been watching.

CBS is noting how unfair their coverage is on this.

CBS注意到他們的報導有多麼不公平。

So not only did CBS reframe the whole thing unfairly to be about Bibi Netanyahu, which was not a majors question and was not in Pete's answer.

所以CBS不只不公平地將整件事重塑成關於畢比·納坦雅胡，這不是major Garrett的問題，也不是Pete Hegseth答案的一部分。

He was not answering a question about Israel.

他並不是在回答一個關於以色列的問題。

But they also then jumped two and a half minutes in the interview after Hegseth's answer to then a question about Netanyahu providing intel to the US in the war.

但他們接著在Hegseth回答後，跳過了兩分半鐘的訪問，接著問了一個關於納坦雅胡在戰爭中向美國提供情報的問題。

But that moment, an example of inserting Israel into a Q and A that never mentioned it in the first place.

但那個時刻，就是一個例子，把以色列插入了一個從一開始就沒提過它的問答中。

Okay, so here again, they are trying to shove Israel into the debate and Israel's in the debate.

好的，所以這裡又來了，他們試圖把以色列硬塞進辯論，而以色列確實也在辯論中。

But you can't make a question that wasn't about it about it later with an anchor track.

但你不能用一個主持人引導，去把一個原本不是關於它的問題，變成後來是關於它。

They took Major's question out and they relayed in anchor track to make it about Netanyahu in Israel.

他們拿掉了Major的問題，然後用主持人的引導來把它變成關於納坦雅胡和以色列。

So that Pete's answer would be rehabilitative of that.

Honestly, like forget, obviously we've got a lot of questions about this war.

說真的，就像算了，顯然我們對這場戰爭有很多疑問。

As I made clear last week, we're still supporters of President Trump entirely.

我上週已經說得很清楚了，我們仍然完全支持川普總統。

Doesn't mean you have to agree with every decision the man makes.

這不代表你必須同意他做的每一個決定。

And we support our troops and we support success in this mission now that it has been started.

我們支持我們的軍隊，也支持這項任務既然已經開始了，就要成功。

But we have a lot of questions about this war.

但我們對這場戰爭有很多疑問。

有些當然是關於以色列的角色。

Some are about gas prices as we mentioned a minute ago.

有些就像我們剛才提到的，是關於油價。

Many are about whether this is good for the American people.

很多疑問是關於這對美國人民是不是好事。

Whether, as we mentioned on this show, we voiced our objections last Monday, were now subjecting the homeland to more potential terrorism attacks.

就像我們在這節目上提到的，我們上週一表達了反對意見，現在是不是讓國家暴露在更多潛在的恐怖攻擊之下。

Remember, that was one of the main things I said that I was very worried, having been at fox News for 20 years in the war on terror, that we were now going to start to see more domestic terror attacks which we had tamped down, which we'd been doing rather well on.

記得，這是我說的，我非常擔心的一件事，我在Fox News待了20年，經歷了反恐戰爭，我擔心我們現在會開始看到更多國內的恐怖攻擊，而這些攻擊我們本來已經壓制住了，而且做得還不錯。

Okay, among other things, she mentioned Israel.

好的，她提到了以色列，還有其他事情。

But here is her list of what she was concerned about in Sat ii.

但這是她列出的，她在週六 II 擔心的事。

Most Americans are completely against this war because like you said, the President has made no case for it.

大部分美國人完全反對這場戰爭，因為就像你說的，總統沒有提出任何理由。

We live our ordinary lives and we don't feel threatened by Iran.

我們過著平凡的生活，我們並不覺得伊朗對我們構成威脅。

We don't walk around thinking that in any moment an Iranian ballistic missile is going to land on our head.

我們不會整天擔心伊朗的彈道飛彈隨時會擊中我們。

Here's what Americans and I want to read off this list.

這是美國人想讀的，也是我想讀的清單。