Name: CNN爆料！主持人驚人指控：伊朗根本不是美國的威脅？ (CNN exposed after host makes wild claim Iran wasn’t a threat to US)
Uploaded: 2026-03-06T21:41:27.000Z
Duration: 9 min 46 s

Now to the American media, where the war in Iran has exposed the radicals and activists running some of the biggest companies in the world.

接著看到美國媒體，伊朗的戰爭揭露了一些全球最大公司裡，那些激進分子和活動家的真面目。

First we have CNN's Abby Phillips, who followed a line that many news outfits fell for by asserting that the attack on Iran was illegal.

首先是 CNN 的 Abby Phillips，她跟隨許多新聞機構的論調，聲稱對伊朗的攻擊是非法的。

反身代名詞

Now countries have a right to defend themselves.

And this country, Iran, has orchestrated multiple attacks on Australian soil.

而這個國家，伊朗，已經在澳洲土地上策劃了多次攻擊。

The most evil acts imaginable and have been trying to build nuclear capability.

這些是你能想像到最邪惡的行為，而且他們一直在試圖發展核武能力。

And we know that because there is no functional reason to have uranium enriched up to 60% purity other than using it for a weapon.

我們知道這一點，是因為除了用來製造武器，沒有其他任何實際理由需要將鈾濃縮到 60% 的純度。

And of course, the threat of the ballistic missile program was real, even though these insane lefties refused to see the evidence before their own eyes.

當然，彈道飛彈計畫的威脅是真實存在的，儘管那些瘋狂的左派人士拒絕親眼看到證據。

Look, the bottom line is they don't want them to have ballistic missiles.

聽著，重點是他們不希望他們擁有彈道飛彈。

They don't want them to have a nuclear program.

他們不希望他們擁有核武計畫。

They don't like that their navy makes trouble for everybody.

他們不喜歡他們的軍隊到處惹事。

Gulf and that is the stated rationale you could throw on other things.

波斯灣，這就是他們提出的理由，你也可以加上其他事情。

For the last 47 years, they have killed American troops, they've maimed American personnel, they've exported and funded terror around the world and around the region.

在過去的 47 年裡，他們殺害了美國軍人，殘害了美國人員，他們向全球和區域輸出並資助恐怖主義。

And you seem to be suggesting we have no allies in this.

而你似乎在暗示我們沒有盟友。

I watched the President with the Chancellor of Germany today.

我今天看了總統和德國總理的會談。

他強烈支持我們正在做的事情。

But we have plenty of allies in the region and around the world who know we have done the right thing.

但我們在該區域和全世界有許多盟友，他們知道我們做了正確的事。

Just to be clear, I just want to just reiterate.

But Rena's question is actually ballistic missiles, Abby.

但 Rena 的問題其實是關於彈道飛彈，Abby。

What proof is there that there were ballistic missiles, that they actually had ballistic missiles that could reach the United States, reach U.S.

有什麼證據顯示有彈道飛彈，而且它們真的有能夠打到美國、打到美國的飛彈？

Joining me to discuss is founder of Wrong Speak Publishing, Adam B. Coleman.

和我一起討論的是 Wrong Speak Publishing 的創辦人 Adam B. Coleman。

This insistence by some in the media that this war is illegal, I cannot believe that has gained so much traction.

媒體上有些人堅持說這場戰爭是非法的，我真不敢相信這竟然能獲得這麼大的關注。

But I think CNN having Scott Jennings there almost to do these, these real time fact checks is rather humiliating for the host.

但我覺得 CNN 找來 Scott Jennings 在現場即時查證事實，對主持人來說相當難堪。

是啊，我是說，願上帝保佑 Scott Jennings。

You know, I sort of understand when the average American who is hesitant about this war or even is this exactly a war that is actually happening because even the conversation as far as what determines a war and the fight over war powers and what is the president allowed to do and what they're not allowed to do.

你知道，我有點能理解，當一般美國人對這場戰爭猶豫不決，甚至質疑這是否真的是一場戰爭，因為連關於什麼才算戰爭、戰爭權的爭論，以及總統被允許做什麼、不被允許做什麼的討論。

Sometimes it feels like a semantic game, but I understand somewhat where it comes from.

有時候感覺像是在玩文字遊戲，但我有點理解這種想法是怎麼來的。

Maybe not the disingenuous crowd of cnn, but

the American public is a bit split on this because of what has happened, at least in my lifetime, with Afghanistan and Iraq.

但美國民眾在這件事上有些分歧，因為在我有生之年，發生了阿富汗和伊拉克的事件。

We were promised that this is only going to take 10 days or it's going to be a little bit longer.

我們被告知這場戰爭只會持續 10 天，或者稍微長一點。

And then 20 years later, Joe Biden is messing up our withdrawal.

結果 20 年後，喬·拜登卻搞砸了我們的撤軍。

So I can understand where a lot of Americans are kind of clinging onto that idea.

所以我能理解為什麼很多美國人會有點執著於這個想法。

Well, let's go to Rachel Maddow because we've got a grab to play where she's got a theory for why Trump has actually attacked Iran in the first place.

好吧，我們來看看 Rachel Maddow，因為我們有一個片段要播放，她有一個理論，解釋川普為什麼一開始就攻擊伊朗。

It's always useful to start that question in any country.

在任何國家，從這個問題開始思考總是很有幫助的。

誰希望伊朗被炸得從地圖上消失？

And for their own reasons, who are Iran's rivals and enemies?

那麼，基於各自的理由，伊朗的勁敵和仇家是誰呢？

Perennially, it's the Gulf Arab states, countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

長期以來，就是波斯灣的阿拉伯國家，像是沙烏地阿拉伯和阿拉伯聯合大公國。

You know Qatar, the country that just gave Donald Trump a really, really nice $400 million plane.

你知道卡達嗎？就是那個國家，最近送給唐納·川普一架非常非常棒的四億美元飛機。

Really a gilded flying palace for his own use, both during the presidency.

一架金碧輝煌的飛行宮殿，供他總統任內使用。

Trump plans to take that plane with him and keep using it after he leaves office, if he ever leaves office.

川普打算把那架飛機帶走，在他卸任後繼續使用，如果他真的會卸任的話。

Now, Adam, I can't believe that they actually put that to air.

現在，Adam，我真不敢相信他們竟然把這個節目播出來。

Essentially, what she is asserting is that Donald Trump attacked Qatar's enemy because they bribed him with a jet and he's going to get to use the jet.

基本上，她主張的是，唐納·川普攻擊了卡達的敵人，因為他們用一架噴射機賄賂了他，而且他之後還能用那架噴射機。

There's a little quip there about if he even leaves office, but

這裡有個小小的俏皮話，說的是他到底會不會卸任，但是

this network is so unhinged and unstable to be publishing that to.

這個電視網竟然如此瘋狂且不穩定，竟然會把這種內容發布出去。

Do you think that it was an act of bribery that got Donald Trump to do this?

你認為這是賄賂行為，讓唐納·川普這麼做的嗎？

How do you bribe a guy who's been extremely wealthy for his entire life?

要怎麼賄賂一個一輩子都非常富有的人？

He flies private planes and stuff like that.

The idea that he would risk the safety of American soldiers over a plane is ridiculous.

他會為了飛機而冒著美國阿兵哥的安全風險，這種想法太荒謬了。

But I honestly don't expect anything better.

但說實話，我也不期待會有什麼更好的。

Rachel Maddow, you know, years ago, they talked about QAnon and Trump supporters.

Rachel Maddow，你知道，很多年前，他們談論過 QAnon 和川普的支持者。

This is the same type of insane theories that they come up with.

這跟他們想出來的那些瘋狂理論是同一種。

She was part of the whole Russia hoax and even went as far as talking about our power grid and watching out.

她是整個俄羅斯騙局的一部分，甚至還談到我們的電網，要我們小心。

And her theories, once again, their theories are not based in reality.

而她的理論，再一次，他們的理論都不是基於事實的。

Strange text messages I get about how the power grid is going to go down in three days and it never happens.

我收到的奇怪簡訊，說電網三天後會斷電，但從來沒有發生過。

I've got a bit of sympathy for some of these networks and people who do think it's all a big conspiracy theory because you've got these mainstream platforms which are pushing this views and there's a certain percentage of society that I just think blindly adopts them.

我對一些這些電視臺和那些認為這一切都是陰謀論的人，其實有點同情，因為你看，這些主流平臺都在推廣這些觀點，然後社會上有一定比例的人，我認為他們就是盲目地接受了。

You might be at the pub and then somebody will say, oh, well, didn't Trump only do this because of the.

你可能在酒吧，然後有人會說，喔，川普做這件事是因為。

And there are some narratives that permeate that.

And the left, they never fact check themselves.

而左派，他們從來不會自己去查證。

It's always when conservative media gets it wrong, they talk about disinformation and misinformation.

總是當保守派媒體出錯時，他們就會談論假訊息和錯誤資訊。

Any logical analysis of that, it quickly falls apart.

But the great thing is that at cnn, we've got to talk about the reaction to the actual people in Iran.

但很棒的是，在 CNN，我們得談談伊朗人民的實際反應。

I'm nervous about where this all ends, obviously.

我當然也對這一切的結局感到緊張。

I'm nervous about how it's going to take.

Could it escalate into something that's much worse?

I think it's unlikely because it was pretty bad there.

我認為不太可能，因為那裡的情況已經很糟了。

字幕列表影片播放

CNN爆料！主持人驚人指控：伊朗根本不是美國的威脅？ (CNN exposed after host makes wild claim Iran wasn’t a threat to US)

insane

impact

audience

strike