Name: 拆穿川普國情諮文的謊言！還有更多震驚時刻！ (Fact-checking Trump's State of the Union address and more on most shocking moments)
Uploaded: 2026-02-26T23:03:29.000Z
Duration: 8 min 18 s

But we began with President Trump's marathon speech on Capitol Hill last night.

不過，我們從川普總統昨晚在國會山的馬拉松式演講開始。

程度副詞

The president delivered a nearly two hour long State of the Union address in front of lawmakers where he focused on the economy and immigration policies.

總統在議員們面前發表了近兩小時的國情諮文，重點關注經濟和移民政策。

Trump says he inherited a national crisis with open borders, a stagnant economy and wars all over the world, but

川普說，他繼承了一個國家危機，包括開放邊境、停滯的經濟以及世界各地的戰爭，但是

touted changes in his first year back in the Oval Office after just one year.

在橢圓形辦公室僅一年後，他吹噓了第一年的轉變。

I can say with dignity and pride that we have achieved a transformation like no one has ever seen before.

我能有尊嚴和驕傲地說，我們實現了前所未有的轉變。

Okay, let's bring in CBS News White House reporter Erin Navarro.

好的，我們連線 CBS新聞白宮記者艾琳·納瓦羅。

Erin, what is the White House saying about how they felt last night's address went mugo?

艾琳，白宮方面怎麼看昨晚的演講？

Predictably, they feel that it went well specifically in creating the political framing the contrast that the Republican Party can lean on in the midterms, especially when it comes to the contrast between themselves and the Democratic Party.

可以預見的是，他們認為演講進行得很順利，特別是在塑造共和黨在中期選舉中可以依靠的政治框架和對比方面，尤其是與民主黨的對比。

You're seeing the White House Vice President Vance in a FOX News interview that just aired really lean on the moments where Democrats did not stand for some of President Trump's lines from his address, such as when he called on states to ban transgender care for minors or when he said the first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.

你看到白宮副總統萬斯在剛播出的 FOX 新聞專訪中，強力抨擊民主黨在川普總統國情諮文的某些論點上沒有站出來，像是川普呼籲各州禁止對未成年人進行跨性別照護，或是他說 美國政府的首要職責是保護美國公民，而非非法移民。

Vice President Vance Justice Hour said it was a quote, set sad commentary for the Democratic Party when they did not stand and said that President Trump's speech was used to, quote, drive home that we really do have a radical fringe in our country.

萬斯副總統說，民主黨沒有站出來，說川普總統的演講被用來「強調我們國家確實存在激進的邊緣群體」，這對民主黨來說是「引人悲傷的評論」。

So it's a two pronged approach for the White House and the president's party going into these months before November's elections?

所以，在 11 月選舉前的這幾個月，白宮和總統的政黨採取的是雙管齊下的策略嗎？

One, how do they follow through on some of the proposals President Trump had on the economy, the calls for legislation?

第一，他們要如何落實川普總統在經濟方面的一些提案，以及那些立法呼籲？

But the second bit is how they lean onto that contrast that they're trying to make between themselves and the Democratic Party.

但第二點是，他們要如何強調他們試圖在自己和民主黨之間做出的對比。

The president made several claims in his speech last night.

總統昨晚的演講中提出了幾項說法。

Can you walk us through some of the statements he made that were both true and also misleading?

你能帶我們看看他提出的哪些說法是真實的，哪些又是誤導人的嗎？

President Trump said that the murder rate saw the largest decline in recorded history.

川普總統說，謀殺率出現了有紀錄以來最大的跌幅。

Preliminary data from independent researchers found that homicides hit a 125 year low in in 2025, though we are still waiting on the official annual data when it comes to crime from the FBI, one partially true or misleading claim he made is when the president said that the price of eggs are down 60% and that the costs for chicken, butter, fruit and rent are lower today than when he took office, according to numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

根據獨立研究人員的初步數據，2025 年凶殺案創下 125 年來的最低點，不過我們還在等候 FBI 關於犯罪的官方年度數據；總統提到雞蛋價格下跌 60%，以及雞肉、奶油、水果和租金的成本比他上任時還低，根據勞工統計局的數據，這項說法部分屬實或有誤導成分。

They are down 59% from their peak in March 2025.

從 2025 年 3 月的最高點下跌了 59%。

But BLS data when it comes to other items show relatively flat change price when it comes to chicken or for new vehicles.

但勞工統計局關於其他項目的數據顯示，雞肉或新車的價格變動相對持平。

And one false claim that the president made is when he said that there was rampant cheating in America's elections caused by non citizens.

總統提出的其中一個不實說法是，他聲稱美國選舉中存在非公民造成的猖獗舞弊。

Noncitizens represent such a miniscule number of voter fraud cases, just 85 cases of this from 2003 to 2023, according to data from the conservative Heritage Foundation.

根據保守派組織 Heritage Foundation 的數據，從 2003 年到 2023 年，非公民的選民舞弊案件僅 85 件，佔極少數。

State audits have found that they're not even Approaching close to 1% of the registered voters on their voter rolls.

州審計發現，選民名冊中他們的比例甚至接近不到 1%。

This is part of a push from the president for the Save America act to require proof of citizenship in order to register the vote.

這是總統推動「拯救美國法案」的一部分，該法案要求登記投票時必須提供公民身份證明。

But his claims there are just not really founded in any facts.

但他的說法並沒有任何事實根據。

Okay, Erin Navarro outside the White House for us today.

好的，艾琳·納瓦羅在白宮為我們報導。

Now, the president's speech last night highlighted a stark political divide between Republican and Democratic lawmakers.

接著，總統昨晚的演說，凸顯了共和黨和民主黨議員之間明顯的政治分歧。

Keep in mind it is less than nine months ahead of the midterm elections.

請記得，這是在期中選舉前不到九個月。

你覺得這場演說怎麼樣，先生？

Was there any point in particular that really just shook you?

有沒有什麼特別的點讓你感到震驚？

It was a great review of the extraordinary work we've done.

這是一份關於我們所做的非凡工作的精彩回顧。

CBS News congressional correspondent Kaitlyn Hughey Burns is live on Capitol Hill for us today.

CBS新聞國會特派記者 Kaitlyn Hughey Burns 今天在國會山莊為我們現場報導。

So, Caitlin, what else are you hearing from lawmakers?

所以，Caitlin，你還聽到議員們說了些什麼？

Well, Mouko, essentially that's it in a nutshell.

嗯，Mouko，總的來說，這就是重點了。

Democrats came away from this speech, speech very critical of it.

民主黨人聽完這場演講，對演講的評價非常嚴厲。

Republicans came away very positive about it.

And this is, you know, a speech that's typically viewed through a partizan lens.

而這，你知道的，是一場通常會被黨派觀點影響的演講。

But was what was significant here, too, Mughal, was that a lot of Democrats decided not to attend it at all.

但Mughal，更重要的是，很多民主黨人決定根本不去參加。

They held a counter rally outside the Capitol.

他們在國會大廈外舉行了一場反對集會。

But I want to take a listen, want you to take a listen to a couple of reactions that we heard last night and specifically regarding this moment where Democratic Congressman Al Green, who is known to do these kinds of things, was kicked out of the chamber for holding a particular sign.

但我想讓大家聽聽，想讓你們聽聽我們昨晚聽到的一些反應，特別是關於民主黨國會議員 Al Green 的這一刻，他以做這類事聞名，因為舉著一個特定的標語而被趕出議場。

Take a listen to what he told our Nicole Killian.

聽聽他告訴我們的 Nicole Killian 說了什麼。

I wanted people to know that equating people of African ancestry to apes, to primates is a form of racism.

我希望大家知道，將非洲血統的人與猿猴、靈長類動物相提並論是一種種族主義。

如果你容忍它，你就等於助長了它。

我們不能讓這種情況繼續下去。

So there had to be this personal confrontation.

所以必須要有這種面對面的對質。

And I hope that people understand that the consequences are not nearly as important as the message in confronting the President face to face within three feet of each other, so that he knows that there are some times when you're not going to have the ability to just shoo people away.

我希望大家明白，後果遠不如當面與總統對質來得重要，近在咫尺，讓他知道有些時候你無法隨意將人趕走。

Now, you may remember Al Green has proposed multiple times to impeach the President.

現在，你可能還記得 Al Green 曾多次提議彈劾總統。

It's no surprise that he chose to kind of do what he did last night.

他選擇昨晚做他所做的事，這並不令人意外。

But this is significant because Democrats were debating on how to handle this speech in the first place.

但這很重要，因為民主黨人首先就在爭論如何處理這次演講。

As I mentioned, many of them decided to boycott it all together.

就像我說的，他們很多人決定完全抵制。

Others wanted to send a message inside, as you saw the Congressman do there.

其他人則想在內部傳達訊息，就像你看到那位議員那樣。

And then, of course, you had the rebuttal to this presidential address from Democratic Governor Abigail Spanberger in Virginia.

然後，當然，你看到了維吉尼亞州民主黨州長艾碧蓋兒·史班柏格對這次總統演講的反駁。

That is what kind of the Democratic establishment hoped to be their message going forward, which was to laser focus on economic issues.

這就是民主黨建制派希望傳達的訊息，也就是要聚焦經濟議題。

Did the President introduce any legislation that Congress will eventually have to tackle?

總統有提出任何國會最終必須處理的法案嗎？

Yeah, a few different things that he wants Congress to do.

是的，他希望國會處理幾件不同的事情。

Aaron in the previous segment mentioned the SAVE act requiring U.S. citizenship to vote.

上一段的 Aaron 提到了 SAVE 法案，要求必須是美國公民才能投票。

That's something that the President has been trying to push for.

It faces a very uphill climb, to say the least, up here on Capitol Hill, particularly on the Senate side.

至少可以說，在國會山莊，尤其是在參議院這邊，這面臨著非常艱難的挑戰。

He also wanted to codify, he wants Congress to codify his health care plan.

他也希望將他的健保計畫法制化，讓國會將其法制化。

that is also an extremely upset Hill climb here and unlikely to be done.

這在國會這邊也是個非常艱難的挑戰，不太可能完成。

I mean, we talk a lot more ago about the President, how he pushes the limits of executive power.

我的意思是，我們之前討論過很多次，總統如何挑戰行政權力的極限。

But on the congressional side, they have ceded a lot of power to him, especially when it comes to tariffs, especially when it comes to war powers and other things.

但在國會方面，他們已經讓渡了許多權力給他，尤其是在關稅方面，還有戰爭權力等等。

I should also note that we're still in a government partial government shutdown.

我也應該提到，我們還處於部分政府關門的狀態。

The two sides can't agree on funding for that.

雙方對於這筆資金無法達成共識。

And so these, that remains at a standstill.

所以這些事情仍然處於停滯狀態。

So a lot of what the President does through executive order is because he wants to go it alone, because Congress is such an uphill climb.

所以總統透過行政命令做的很多事情，是因為他想獨自行動，因為國會的阻力實在太大了。

I mean, Republicans have such a narrow margin in the House, getting narrower really by the day.

我的意思是，共和黨人在眾議院的席位本來就很有限，而且一天比一天少。

And so getting legislation passed up here is very difficult, especially in a midterm election year where it's going to be difficult to get anything through given the politics involved.

所以在這裡通過法案會非常困難，尤其是在期中選舉年，考量到政治因素，任何事情都很難通過。

So you'll likely see a lot of messaging bills over the next several months.

所以未來幾個月，你可能會看到很多傳達訊息的法案。

What we're watching for is how this Congress handles the President's tariff policy.

我們正在關注的是，這個國會將如何處理總統的關稅政策。

They had, you know, been waiting for the Supreme Court decision.

他們，你知道，一直在等待最高法院的判決。

You heard the President last night, still defending his policy, but

你昨晚聽總統說，他仍在為他的政策辯護，但是

there isn't a clear appetite up here on Capitol Hill, especially among Republicans who don't traditionally like the idea of tariffs to codify anything into law.

在這裡國會山莊，特別是共和黨人，他們傳統上不喜歡關稅這個概念，並沒有明確的意願將任何東西編入法律。

Okay, Kaitlin Hughey Burns on Capitol Hill for us today.

好的，凱特琳·休吉·伯恩斯今天在國會山莊為我們報導。

字幕列表影片播放

拆穿川普國情諮文的謊言！還有更多震驚時刻！ (Fact-checking Trump's State of the Union address and more on most shocking moments)

significant

debate

specifically

executive