Name: 影片曝光！疑是探員持槍畫面，就在明尼阿波利斯槍擊案發生前！ (Videos appear to show agent taking gun before Minneapolis shooting)
Uploaded: 2026-01-25T17:23:57.000Z
Duration: 10 min 37 s

CNN's Tom Forman is here to walk us through what we're hearing from federal officials, but

CNN 的 Tom Forman 在這裡為我們梳理聯邦官員的說法，

also what the videos show, including the new videos.

以及影片呈現的內容，包括最新的影片。

轉承詞

Because what they are saying and what the videos are showing are not always the same thing.

因為他們說的和影片顯示的並不總是相同。

I want to start with the very first statement made by the Trump administration in the aftermath of the shooting.

我想從川普政府在槍擊案後發表的聲明開始說起。

It was a tweet by the Department of Homeland Security showing a firearm on what appears to be the seat of a car.

這是國土安全部發布的一則推文，顯示一把槍械放在汽車座椅上。

the tweet reads, an individual approach US Border Patrol officers with a 9 millimeter semi automatic handgun.

這則推文寫著，一名男子持 9 毫米半自動手槍接近美國邊境巡邏隊官員。

Seen here, you see the picture behind it there.

這裡可以看到，你看到後面的圖片。

This looks like a situation where an individual wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.

這看起來像是有人想造成最大損害，並屠殺執法部門人員。

Now we have this new angle of the video that's just been cleared by cnn and it shows the lead up to this deadly altercation.

現在我們有了這段剛由 CNN 清晰化的新角度影片，顯示了這場致命衝突的前因。

This is what I want you to take a look at.

這就是我想讓大家一起來看看的。

當然，這是一段令人不安的影片。

Take some time, though, and watch this together.

不過，請花點時間，我們一起來看看。

You see pretty out there in the middle of the street.

You start seeing him and he is at one point using his camera.

你開始看到他，他有一度在使用他的攝影機。

There he is right there and he's pointing to traffic, sort of waving traffic through.

他就在那裡，然後他指向交通，好像在指揮交通通過。

At some moment here, you see that law enforcement approaches him and he backs away.

在某個時刻，你看到執法部門接近他，他就退開了。

Then you're going to see one of these officers approach a woman near him and really forcefully shove her to the ground right there.

然後你會看到其中一名警官接近他旁邊的一位女士，並用力將她推倒在地。

And Priddy starts rushing over toward her.

Now they're both getting pepper sprayed at this point.

現在他們兩個人都被噴灑胡椒噴霧了。

He gets grabbed and he's taken over to the ground here.

I'll point out this is about 15 seconds from when officers turned to him.

我要指出，這距離警官轉向他大約只有 15 秒。

He does not appear to have a weapon in his hand.

And then all of a sudden, you see one agent in the middle there.

然後突然間，你看到中間有一個幹員。

One shot followed by, in our analysis, nine other shots.

一槍接著，根據我們的分析，還有另外九槍。

Here we heard from Border Patrol Chief Greg Bovino.

在這裡，我們聽到了邊境巡邏隊主管 Greg Bovino 的說法。

He was asked at what point Priddy brandished a weapon in all of this.

他被問到，在所有這些情況下，Priddy 是在什麼時候揮舞武器的。

This is important because an important detail because concealed carry is legal.

這很重要，因為一個重要的細節是，隱蔽攜帶是合法的。

And law enforcement analysts here on CNN have raised questions as to why the picture of this gun that DHS shared online was, was shown on the seat of a car and not in the scene where Priddy was shot.

而 CNN 的執法分析師們質疑，國土安全部（DHS）在網上分享的這把槍的照片，為何會出現在車子的座位上，而不是在 Priddy 被槍擊的現場。

If you watch all those videos carefully, you see a federal agent right there who appears to be removing a gun.

如果你仔細看所有這些影片，你會看到一位聯邦探員就在那裡，他似乎在拿出一把槍。

This is very critical to remember that piece of video you're seeing right there is happening about a second or maybe slightly less than a second before the shooting begins.

這點非常關鍵，要記得你現在看到的這段影片，發生在槍擊開始前大約一秒，或甚至不到一秒的時間。

There will be a lot of questions here, but

that's the reason people say you have to have a truly impartial and fair investigation here.

這就是為什麼大家說，必須要有真正公正且公平的調查。

Because if he removed the gun before all this shooting broke out, then why is this man now dead?

因為如果他在所有槍擊爆發前就拿出了槍，那為什麼這個人現在卻死了？

It's really quite a remarkable series of events all coming together here, but

這真的可以說是一連串相當驚人的事件在此匯集，但是

almost all of them, Aaron, contradiction, the story that came out of the Trump administration early on today.

幾乎所有這些，Aaron，矛盾，川普政府今天早些時候說的故事。

And let's go now to our senior law enforcement analyst, Andrew McCabe, also the former deputy director of the FBI.

接下來我們連線到我們的資深執法分析師，也是前FBI副局長Andrew McCabe。

So, Director McCabe, what do you see in all of this so far from the information that we have from the video you've watched, from the responses we've gotten from DHS and from Mr.

那麼，McCabe局長，根據您看過的影片、我們從國土安全部和Mr.

Bevino那裡得到的資訊，到目前為止，您看到了什麼？

Well, I mean, obviously, Aaron, at the core of it, you have an unbelievable tragedy where it appears that a potentially unarmed person was essentially assassinated by horrible law enforcement tactics that dramatically escalated the situation.

嗯，Aaron，很明顯，核心是一個難以置信的悲劇，看起來一個可能沒有武器的人，被糟糕的執法手段給暗殺了，這些手段讓情況急劇惡化。

But, you know, there are so many questions here at the absolute core of lethal force training in the FBI academy, in the academy at Glynco, Georgia, where DHS agents, ICE agents, border patrol folks go through, you are taught from the very beginning that if you are in, if you use your weapon, you have to be able to, after the fact, articulate exactly why you perceived an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury.

但是，你知道，FBI學院、喬治亞州Glynco學院，也就是國土安全部、移民及海關執法局、邊境巡邏隊人員受訓的地方，從一開始就教導我們，如果你使用了武器，事後你必須能夠清楚地說明，為什麼你認為自己面臨迫在眉睫的死亡或嚴重身體傷害的威脅。

And so the question now is, when are we going to hear that articulation?

所以現在的問題是，我們什麼時候才能聽到這樣的說明？

What is the reason that these officers, or a single officer, we don't know how many people shot, believed they were in imminent threat of death by this person who was, by all, every video we've seen on the ground with anywhere from four to five officers on top of him at the same time.

這些警官，或是一位警官，我們不知道有多少人開槍，他們相信自己面臨著這個人迫在眉睫的死亡威脅，而根據我們看到的地面所有影片，有四到五名警官同時壓制著他，理由是什麼？

Nowhere in these videos do you see a weapon in this man's hand.

在這些影片中，沒有任何地方看到這個人手中握有武器。

And so while Commander Bevino's statement was very artfully written, yes, they encountered someone who had a gun.

所以，雖然Bevino指揮官的聲明寫得很巧妙，是的，他們遇到了一個持有槍枝的人。

It is not clear that that man ever presented the gun, brandished the gun pointed the gun at anyone, threatened to, you know, to harm any of these officers.

我們不清楚那個人到底有沒有拿出槍、揮舞槍，或是把槍指向任何人，威脅要傷害任何一位警官。

So what's the excuse for having to use lethal force here?

那為什麼這裡需要動用致命武力，有什麼理由？

And in fact, you know, they were quick to post a picture of the gun which they removed from the crime scene.

事實上，你知道，他們很快就貼出了一張從犯罪現場搜出的槍的照片，後來又撤掉了。

They put in a car, they said, look at these extra magazines.

他們把它放進車裡，說，看看這些額外的彈匣。

There was some deplorable act that he was prepared to commit, but

他似乎準備要做一些令人髮指的事情，但是

they've never actually even said that he did brandish it.

他們甚至從來沒有說過他有揮舞武器。

And obviously there's no video evidence that he did any such thing.

顯然沒有任何影片證據顯示他做過任何這樣的事情。

We hear all the whistles on that one video.

我們在那段影片裡聽到了所有的哨聲。

The whistles people do when they're warning of ice.

那是人們在警告有冰時吹的哨聲。

He was there trying to protect, it appears, a woman that they pushed over.

他當時在那裡，似乎是想保護一個被他們推倒的女人。

所以麥坎博士，我只是好奇，如果沒有調查，以目前來看，似乎不會有任何跡象。

McCabe, I'm just curious though, if there is no investigation, which at this point doesn't appear that there are going to be any indications.

他們說案件已經結案並封存了。

They are, they're saying case closed and sealed.

而且他們不讓州政府介入調查，這再次說，如果他們這樣做，那會很令人驚訝。

And they don't give access to the state for an investigation, which again, that would be surprising if they did.

They didn't do it with Renee Nicole Goode, then what happens here?

如果他們沒有對 Renee Nicole Goode 這樣做，那這裡會發生什麼？

Just like nothing happened after the killing of Renee Goode, in fact.

事實上，就像 Renee Goode 被殺後什麼都沒發生一樣。

所以我們看到的是，Aaron，一個非常。

Now we have a very common set of circumstances.

現在我們看到了一套非常常見的情況。

We know what the game plan is for the White House and dhs.

我們知道白宮和國土安全部的計畫是什麼。

Immediately after the event, they go to the media and they put out a version of events that paints the victim as a domestic terrorist.

事件發生後，他們立刻去找媒體，並發布一個版本的說法，將受害者描繪成國內恐怖分子。

They then said Renee Goode's wife was also a domestic terrorist, which of course neither of them are.

然後他們說 Renee Goode 的妻子也是國內恐怖分子，當然他們都不是。

字幕列表影片播放

影片曝光！疑是探員持槍畫面，就在明尼阿波利斯槍擊案發生前！ (Videos appear to show agent taking gun before Minneapolis shooting)

perceive

essentially

absolutely

approach