Name: 這種毽子是羽毛球的未來嗎？ (Is This Shuttlecock The Future Of Badminton?)
Uploaded: 2025-09-24T09:12:55.000Z
Duration: 11 min 48 s

羽毛球運動有一個「羽毛球」問題。

程度副詞

Feather shuttles are getting increasingly expensive and depending on what you buy aren't very durable and plastic shuttles don't spin or fly anything like the real thing.

羽毛球越來越貴，而且並不耐用，塑膠球的旋轉和飛行也不像真的。

This is the Victor New Carbon Sonic Pro and in this video we're going to test to see if this new synthetic shuttle will be the future Okay, quick back story.

這是 Victor New Carbon Sonic Pro，在這段視頻中，我們將測試這種新型合成材料球是否會成為未來的趨勢。

Victor first launched this new type of shuttle made from synthetic materials back in 2017 called the Carbon Sonic No.1.

早在 2017 年，勝利就首次推出了這種由合成材料製成的新型球，名為碳音一號。

It was shortly followed by the Carbon Sonic 2 which we have here and whilst these were well okay, unfortunately they didn't come close to traditional feather shuttles so we and pretty much everyone else rejected them.

不久之後，我們又推出了碳音二號，雖然這些都還不錯，但遺憾的是，它們無法與傳統球相媲美，是以我們和幾乎所有其他人都拒絕了它們。

But Victor have had multiple patents on synthetic shuttles since 2016.

但自 2016 年以來，勝利已擁有多項合成球專利。

So what have they been doing for the last nine years?

那麼，在過去的九年裡，他們都在做些什麼呢？

Well in 2023 they launched the New Carbon Sonic which was a lot better than the originals but this year they launched the New Carbon Sonic Pro.

2023 年，他們推出了比原版更好的新碳音，但今年他們又推出了新碳音 Pro。

But are these upgrades enough for it to change the future of badminton?

但這些升級足以改變羽毛球運動的未來嗎？

Well before we put this shuttle to the test let's smash through some of the specifications.

在對這種球進行測試之前，我們先來了解一下它的一些規格。

So the feathers are made from something called an ADPE foam which has these air vents and small holes in to hopefully help the flight path.

羽毛是用一種叫做 ADPE 的泡沫塑料製成的，這種泡沫塑料上有通風口和小孔，希望能幫助飛行。

Coming down the feathers are then attached to the cork base which is the same cork as a feather shuttle by this composite carbon fiber stem and yes you heard that right carbon fiber the same stuff that's used in Formula One cars.

然後，羽毛通過碳纖維複合杆連接到軟木底座上，軟木底座與羽毛球的軟木相同。

All of these materials mean that the weight is really similar to a feather shuttle on our scales it weighed five grams compared to the feather shuttles weighing between 4.8 and 5.1 grams depending on the model and when squeezing it the structure feels a lot more sturdy than those original versions hopefully helping improve the durability which we're getting on to in just a minute.

所有這些材料意味著它的重量與羽毛球非常相似，在我們的天平上，它的重量為 5 克，而羽毛球的重量在 4.8 至 5.1 克之間，具體取決於型號。

But the most interesting specification detail of them all they're around 24 pounds for a tube of 12 and we'll put the conversion to euros and US dollars on the screen.

但最有趣的規格細節是，一管 12 支的價格約為 24 英鎊，我們會在螢幕上顯示歐元和美元的換算。

Now we'll come back to whether or not this is good value for money after we've tested them but for reference plastic shuttles are typically around 20 pounds for 12 and feather shuttles can now cost over 40 pounds.

至於是否物有所值，我們會在測試之後再來討論，但作為參考，塑膠球一般在 20 英鎊左右（12 個），而羽毛球現在的價格可能超過 40 英鎊。

Yeah but let's move on to the main question are these NCS Pro shuttles something we'd actually use and recommend?

是的，但讓我們繼續討論主要問題，這些 NCS Pro 穿梭機是我們真正會使用和推薦的嗎？

So for our testing we've got four different shuttles the NCS Pro, a plastic shuttle, a low to mid-range feather shuttle at 25 pounds per tube and a top of the range feather shuttle that's used in pro tournaments at 35 pounds per tube.

是以，在測試中，我們使用了四種不同的球：NCS Pro、塑膠球、中低階羽毛球（每桶 25 磅）以及職業比賽中使用的頂級羽毛球（每桶 35 磅）。

We're going to put each shuttle through four tests.

我們將對每種球進行四項測試。

A speed test, is the NCS Pro speed consistent and correct compared to the others?

速度測試，與其他測試相比，NCS Pro 的速度是否一致和正確？

A durability test, if we hit each shuttle 500 times in a variety of drills how will the NCS Pro last against the others?

耐久性測試，如果我們在各種練習中每架穿梭機穿梭 500 次，NCS Pro 的耐久性如何？

Then an accuracy test, will we be able to hit better and more accurate shots?

然後是精度測試，我們是否能打出更好、更準的球？

And finally a match play test, how does the NCS Pro compare to the others in a match?

最後是比賽測試，NCS Pro 在比賽中與其他產品相比如何？

And a quick disclaimer before we get started, we're not robots so these aren't scientific tests but we're going to do our best to test each shuttle fairly and consistently.

在我們開始之前，有一個簡單的免責聲明，我們不是機器人，所以這些測試並不科學，但我們會盡最大努力公平、一致地測試每種球。

So doesn't use the same speed scale and we're going to test three of each shuttle starting with the range feather.

是以，我們將從射程羽毛開始，測試每種球中的三種。

So as you can see the NCS Pros are very similar to the other feather shuttles.

是以，您可以看到 NCS Pros 與其他羽毛球非常相似。

Okay let's move on to the durability test and first up is the mid-range feather shuttle.

好了，讓我們繼續進行耐用性測試，首先是中檔羽毛梭。

For this we're doing 150 shots of rear mid, 100 shots of net tease, 150 shots of defence and 100 shots of drop push.

為此，我們要進行 150 次中後場進攻、100 次攔網進攻、150 次防守和 100 次下底傳中。

We are 290 shots in and two feathers have broken.

我們打了 290 發子彈，有兩根羽毛斷了。

After hitting the remaining 210 shuttles, the second mid-range feather hasn't broken and has held its shape but it's gone pretty fluffy which means it slows down and plays quite different to how a brand new shuttle would.

在擊打了剩餘的 210 顆梭子後，第二根中檔羽毛沒有斷裂，形狀也保持得很好，但它變得非常蓬鬆，這意味著它的速度變慢了，與全新的梭子相比，發揮的效果大不相同。

Now it's important to mention here that the durability of shuttles will typically depend on three things.

這裡有必要提一下，穿梭機的耐用性通常取決於三個方面。

One is your level, so for example if you're a beginner then you typically tend to miss hit the shuttle more which means that you'll break more feathers.

一個是你的水準，例如，如果你是初學者，那麼你通常會更容易打不中梭子，這意味著你會折斷更多羽毛。

Two is your style of play, so if you're a really aggressive player who likes to hit lots of smashes and drives then you might break more shuttles.

二是你的打球風格，如果你是一個非常有侵略性的球員，喜歡打出很多重擊和開球，那麼你可能會打壞更多的毽子。

And three is the storage conditions, so if you're storing them in a really dry space then the feathers can become more brittle which means they might break more.

第三是儲存條件，如果你把它們存放在非常乾燥的地方，那麼羽毛會變得更脆，這意味著它們可能會更容易折斷。

So after hitting 500 shots with the top range feather you can see that it's a little bit fluffed but it's still perfectly fine to play with.

是以，在使用最高射程的羽毛進行 500 次射擊後，你可以看到它有點鬆動，但仍完全可以使用。

So now on to the plastic and we quickly found out that these are a lot faster than feather shuttles.

我們很快就發現，這些塑膠梭比羽毛梭快多了。

Even though this was slow in the speed test, because it's so flimsy when you hit it hard it just goes really narrow and it goes fast.

儘管在速度測試中它的速度很慢，但由於它非常脆弱，當你用力撞擊它時，它就會變得非常窄，而且速度很快。

So after hitting 500 shots it looks the same and hasn't broken, but that's pretty much the only benefit of using plastics.

是以，打了 500 次球后，它看起來還是老樣子，也沒有破損，但這幾乎是使用塑膠的唯一好處。

We felt our shot quality was so much worse.

我們覺得自己的投籃品質差了很多。

As you can see after hitting 500 shots the NCS Pro has held its shape well, hasn't broken and obviously isn't fluffy thanks to the foam feathers.

如您所見，NCS Pro 在擊打 500 次後仍能保持良好的形狀，沒有破損，而且由於保麗龍羽毛的存在，它顯然並不蓬鬆。

But similar to the other three shuttles we hadn't mishit any shots during this test.

但與其他三架穿梭機類似，我們在這次測試中沒有出現任何射擊失誤。

It's going to be really interesting to see how the durability is when we play matches.

當我們進行比賽時，耐久性如何將非常有趣。

Okay let's move on to the accuracy test and to test this we're going to hit 20 lifts, 20 net shots, 20 serves and 20 smashes with each shuttle and see how the NCS Pro compares.

好了，讓我們繼續進行準確性測試，為了測試準確性，我們將用每種飛梭分別擊打 20 次舉球、20 次網前球、20 次發球和 20 次擊球，看看 NCS Pro 的表現如何。

Okay we've just finished the accuracy test.

好了，我們剛剛完成了準確度測試。

We found that the plastic shuttle bobbled a lot and it was really hard to play accurate and controlled shots, especially at the net.

我們發現塑膠飛梭經常晃動，很難打出準確而有控制的擊球，尤其是在網前。

However this was not the case for the NCS Pro and this was actually what we were most impressed by.

然而，NCS Pro 的情況並非如此，這也是我們印象最深刻的地方。

We could generate good spin and control on our net shots like we can with feathers.

我們可以像使用羽毛一樣，在網前擊球時產生良好的旋轉和控制。

Yeah but sometimes in harder shots like lifts or smashes the NCS Pro didn't spin quite as much as feather shuttles, but this didn't actually impact the flight path or accuracy and on a whole we probably felt that the NCS Pro was most similar to a top of the range feather where we could play high quality and consistent shots.

是的，但有時在較高難度的擊球中，如抬杆或砸杆，NCS Pro 的旋轉不如羽毛梭那麼多，但這實際上並不影響飛行軌跡或準確性，總的來說，我們可能覺得 NCS Pro 與頂級羽毛梭最為相似，我們可以打出高質量且穩定的擊球。

We're back for day two of testing and on to our final test, the match play.

我們回來進行第二天的測試，最後一項測試是對抗賽。

We're going to play a game to 21 points with each of the four shuttles against Dan and Rich and let's see how the NCS Pro compares.

我們將用四架穿梭機分別與丹和裡奇進行一場 21 分的比賽，看看 NCS Pro 的表現如何。

So as you can see the plastic shuttle is still intact but that wasn't the best quality game.

是以，正如你所看到的，塑膠梭依然完好無損，但這並不是品質最好的遊戲。

We anyone got the attack they could win the point.

只要有人進攻，他們就能贏得賽點。

Next up is the mid-range feather shuttle.

This is already so much better and after playing the match we all agreed it was a lot better than the plastic.

這已經好多了，打完比賽後，我們都認為它比塑膠的好多了。

We had more touch and control and we could have a lot better rallies.

我們有了更多的觸覺和控制，我們可以有更好的反彈。

But we did use four shuttles, so let's see how the top range feather compares.

但我們確實使用了四架穿梭機，所以讓我們來看看最高航程的羽毛是如何比較的。

As we expected this was the best shuttle so far, both in terms of the touch and control we had and also the durability.

正如我們所預期的那樣，這是迄今為止最好的航天飛機，無論是在觸感和控制方面，還是在耐用性方面。

By the end of the match we'd only used two shuttles, one had only slightly broken and the second was still in perfect condition.

比賽結束時，我們只用了兩隻梭子，一隻只是輕微破損，另一隻仍然完好無損。

So in the matches we've used one plastic, four mid-range feathers and two top range feathers.

是以，在比賽中，我們使用了一根塑膠羽毛、四根中檔羽毛和兩根高級，上等羽毛。

We are so impressed, we only went through two and this one broke after a very long rally and the one we've been playing with is still fine.

我們印象非常深刻，我們只用了兩臺，這臺在長時間的拉力後就壞了，而我們一直在用的那臺還很好。

We also agreed that feeling-wise they were a lot better than the mid-range shuttles.

我們還一致認為，從感覺上來說，它們比中檔班車要好得多。

And considering the price of these is similar to the low to mid-range feather this makes this shuttle even more impressive and also the spin or lack of spin that we sometimes felt in the accuracy test we didn't notice at all in the match.

考慮到這些羽毛的價格與中低端羽毛相近，這讓這款穿梭機更加令人印象深刻，而且我們在精度測試中有時會感覺到的後旋或後旋不足，在比賽中也完全沒有發現。

The only thing that was noticeably different was the feeling of holding the foam feathers when we were serving.

唯一明顯不同的是上菜時拿著保麗龍羽毛的感覺。

So that's all of the testing complete, now for the main question.

測試工作已經完成，現在是主要問題。

Well with rising costs of feather shuttles, their sustainability becoming a bigger and bigger issue and the fact that these are actually really good we honestly think it will be.

隨著羽毛穿梭機成本的上升，其可持續性成為一個越來越大的問題，而且這些羽毛穿梭機確實非常不錯，我們真的認為它將會是一個不錯的選擇。

And it's worth saying here that whilst we are sponsored by Victor and they kindly sent us these shuttles for testing they didn't have any input into this video.

在此需要說明的是，雖然我們得到了維克多公司的贊助，他們也非常友好地將這些穿梭機寄給我們進行測試，但他們並沒有參與本視頻的製作。

If the NCS Pros aren't yet available where you live then they should be soon but in the meantime we'd recommend getting yourself ready for the future of badminton by getting some NCS's.

如果您居住的地方還沒有 NCS Pros，那麼很快就會有，但在此期間，我們建議您購買一些 NCS，為羽毛球運動的未來做好準備。

We think these will be great for a lot of club players, we've tested them and they're way better than plastics.

我們認為這對很多俱樂部球員來說都很好，我們已經測試過了，它們比塑膠好得多。

We'd say similar to a low to mid-range feather in terms of playability and durability.

就可玩性和耐用性而言，我們認為它與中低端羽毛類似。

To get these and the NCS Pros when they're out in Europe you can head to our long-term sponsors Sakura Sport.

如果您想在歐洲購買這些產品和 NCS Pros，請訪問我們的長期贊助商 Sakura Sport。

Lastly if you found this video useful please drop it a like, smash the subscribe button if you haven't already and we'll see you on another video very soon.

最後，如果您覺得本視頻有用，請點個贊；如果您還沒有訂閱，請點擊訂閱按鈕，我們很快會在下一個視頻中與您見面。