Name: 10 部最昂貴的票房炸彈 (10 Most Expensive Box Office Bombs of All Time)
Uploaded: 2025-05-23T04:49:01.000Z
Duration: 12 min 49 s

關係子句

Welcome to WatchMojo and today we're counting down our picks for those films that suffered the widest profit loss margins, taking into account things like budget and marketing costs.

歡迎來到 WatchMojo，今天我們將根據預算和營銷成本等因素，評選出利潤損失幅度最大的電影。

Number 10 Cutthroat Island – $217 Million

It's the film that allegedly threw Hollywood off of pirate-themed pictures for years.

據稱，正是這部電影讓好萊塢多年來不再拍攝海盜題材電影。

Yet Cutthroat Island had a lot going for it on paper.

然而，《割喉島》在紙面上卻有很多優點。

Director Rennie Harlan was an experienced hand at delivering exciting, action-focused films.

導演雷尼-哈倫（Rennie Harlan）在拍攝激動人心的動作片方面經驗豐富。

and Matthew Mody were marketable names for the marquee.

和馬修-莫迪（Matthew Mody）都是很有市場的名字。

So why did Cutthroat Island flounder at the box office to the tune of $217 million?

那麼，《割喉島》的票房為何只有 2.17 億美元？

This was supposed to be a way of saving Coralco Pictures from going under, but it ended up doing the exact opposite.

這本該是拯救 Coralco Pictures 公司免於倒閉的一種方式，但結果卻恰恰相反。

The casting was marred by tons of back and forth, crew members were fired, delays occurred, and overall chaos was the norm.

選角過程中出現了大量反反覆覆的問題，工作人員被解僱，工作出現延誤，整個過程混亂不堪。

It's sort of a shame because the end results, as troubled as they were, remain fun enough today.

這是一種遺憾，因為最終的結果雖然麻煩重重，但在今天看來仍然足夠有趣。

Number 9 King Arthur – Legend of the Sword – $144 to $197 Million

第 9 名 亞瑟王--寶劍傳奇--1.44 億至 1.97 億美元

The name of Guy Ritchie didn't mean what it used to mean back in 2017 when King Arthur

蓋-裡奇的名字在 2017 年的亞瑟王時代已不再意味著什麼。

The writer-slash-director had enjoyed hits like Snatch back in the 90s, but this adaptation of Arthurian legend arrived with a price tag between $144 and $197 million.

這位 "編劇-斜槓-導演 "在 90 年代曾推出過《抓捕》（Snatch）等佳作，但這部改編自亞瑟王傳說的影片標價在 1.44 億至 1.97 億美元之間。

The Guardian reported at the time how the screenplay stitched together elements of various other Arthur-adjacent scripts to create its story.

英國《衛報》當時報道了劇本是如何將其他各種與亞瑟有關的劇本元素拼接在一起創作故事的。

There was also allegedly an intention for multiple sequels, and a shared Arthurian cinematic universe.

據稱，該片還打算拍攝多部續集，以及一個亞瑟電影宇宙。

Alas, mixed reviews and low box office receipts put a kibosh on that plan.

可惜，褒貶不一的評價和低票房讓這一計劃泡湯了。

The film still hasn't broken even at the time of its writing.

截至撰稿時，影片仍未實現收支平衡。

第 8 名 Pan - 1.14 億至 1.99 億美元

Was 2015 the year where audiences were clamoring for a prequel to Peter Pan?

2015 年是否是觀眾對《彼得-潘》前傳呼聲最高的一年？

This film reportedly lost distributors Warner Bros. between $114 and $199 million.

據報道，該片的發行商華納兄弟公司損失了 1.14 億至 1.99 億美元。

This was despite actors such as Hugh Jackman, Rooney Mara, and Amanda Seyfried attached to the project.

儘管休-傑克曼（Hugh Jackman）、魯妮-瑪拉（Rooney Mara）和阿曼達-塞弗裡德（Amanda Seyfried）等演員已加入該項目。

Fans and critics were mixed at best to the final results.

影迷和影評人對最終結果褒貶不一。

A film that utilized a lot of CGI, but seemed to add little to the established lore of Peter

這部電影使用了大量的 CGI，但似乎沒有為《彼得》的既有傳說增添多少內容。

Unfortunately, the film's screenplay, which had initially earned praise on the Hollywood blacklist of potential features, didn't come across that way on screen.

遺憾的是，這部最初在好萊塢潛在電影黑名單上獲得好評的電影劇本，在銀幕上的表現卻並不盡如人意。

Pan does have some critical defenders, but that mattered little to the receipts of its theatrical release.

潘》確實得到了一些評論界人士的支持，但這對它在影院上映時的收入影響不大。

Number 7 Strange World – $193 to $212 Million

第 7 位 《奇異世界》--1.93 億至 2.12 億美元

Strange World was Walt Disney Animation's first feature to include a LGBTQIA plus character in the lead role.

奇異世界》是華特迪士尼動畫公司第一部以男女同志、雙性戀和變性者為主角的卡通片。

But some feel this decision may have contributed to its lackluster box office.

但有些人認為，這一決定可能是該片票房不佳的原因之一。

Strange World was pulled in some markets due to this creative choice, despite critical appraisal of the film generally being positive.

由於這一創意選擇，《陌生世界》在一些市場被撤下，儘管評論界對該片的評價總體上是積極的。

Strange World's source material of pulpy adventure novels may not have been a good fit for its target audience, which may have contributed to its financial loss.

奇異世界》的素材是紙醉金迷的冒險小說，可能並不適合其目標閱聽人，這可能是造成其經濟損失的原因之一。

In addition, audiences had become accustomed to waiting for animated films to stream rather than going to theaters, thanks to the COVID pandemic.

此外，由於 COVID 的流行，觀眾已經習慣於等待動畫電影的流媒體播放，而不是去影院觀看。

This film was one of that year's biggest bombs, reportedly costing the studio between $193 to $212 Million.

這部電影是當年最大的炸彈之一，據說讓製片廠損失了 1.93 億至 2.12 億美元。

Number 6 Sinbad – Legend of the Seven Seas – $214 Million

第 6 位 辛巴達--七海傳奇 - 2.14 億美元

The stories of Sinbad the Sailor used to be the home of box office gold back in the 1950s, 60s, and 70s.

在上世紀 50、60 和 70 年代，水手辛巴達的故事曾是票房金礦。

Those were live-action productions, however, and Sinbad – Legend of the Seven Seas attempted to revitalize the brand via animation.

不過，這些都是真人制作，而《辛巴達-七海傳奇》則試圖通過動畫重振品牌。

The end results unfortunately blew up in the face of DreamWorks, to the tune of $214 Million.

不幸的是，最終的結果讓夢工廠大跌眼鏡，損失高達 2.14 億美元。

Critics were mixed at the time of the film's release, largely praising the visuals and music, but less so other important elements such as story.

影片上映時，影評人褒貶不一，大部分人對影片的視覺效果和音樂大加讚賞，但對故事等其他重要元素則不太滿意。

DreamWorks almost didn't recover from the loss, and Sinbad – Legend of the Seven Seas remains a black mark within the company's history.

夢工廠幾乎沒有從這次損失中恢復過來，《辛巴達-七海傳奇》仍然是公司歷史上的一個汙點。

第 5 名 《凡人修仙傳》 - 2.19 億美元

Could the steampunk subculture translate onto the silver screen?

蒸汽朋克亞文化能否被搬上銀幕？

Hollywood seemed to think so back in 2018 with Mortal Engines.

早在 2018 年的《凡人修仙傳》中，好萊塢似乎就這麼認為。

Peter Jackson co-wrote and co-produced the film, which was based upon a book series.

彼得-傑克遜與他人共同編劇並聯合製片了這部根據系列圖書改編的電影。

Audiences, however, didn't respond to Mortal Engines in quite the same way as Jackson's journeys to Middle Earth.

然而，觀眾對《凡人修仙傳》的反應與傑克遜的中土之旅並不相同。

The film ended up a $219 Million failure to Universal and its co-production companies, including Jackson's Wingnut Films.

環球公司及其聯合制片公司，包括傑克遜的 Wingnut Films 公司，最終以 2.19 億美元的票房失敗告終。

Mortal Engines, like many bombs, had its defenders, while also retaining some very familiar criticism.

凡人修真》和許多炸彈一樣，有它的捍衛者，同時也保留了一些我們非常熟悉的責備。

The picture was flashy to be sure, but didn't seem to have what it took in terms of world building or originality to translate into a new and successful franchise.

這部電影確實很華麗，但在世界構建或原創性方面似乎並不具備轉化為新的成功系列電影所需的條件。

Number 4 The 13th Warrior – $130-243 Million

第 4 位 《第 13 位勇士》--1.30 億至 2.43 億美元

Director John McTiernan was responsible for some of the most influential films in the pop culture zeitgeist, including Predator and Die Hard.

導演約翰-麥克提爾南曾執導過《掠食》和《虎膽龍威》等在流行文化中最具影響力的影片。

Author Michael Crichton was the man who brought us Jurassic Park, so why did this otherwise awesome film about a stranger in a strange land flop with such force?

作家邁克爾-克萊頓為我們帶來了《侏羅紀公園》，那麼這部講述異鄉異客的電影為何如此失敗？

Advertising for The 13th Warrior was everywhere back in 1999, resulting in a budget estimated between $100 and $160 Million.

早在 1999 年，《第 13 位勇士》的廣告就隨處可見，預算估計在 1 億至 1.6 億美元之間。

Yet, McTiernan's film only mustered a paltry $61.7 Million in receipts.

然而，麥克蒂爾南的影片僅獲得了 6 170 萬美元的微薄收入。

Today, The 13th Warrior possesses a cult following with movie fans.

如今，《第 13 位勇士》已成為影迷追捧的對象。

At the time, however, we're talking about a loss of between $130 and $243 Million.

然而，當時我們談論的是 1.3 億至 2.43 億美元的損失。

Even imagine Marvel coming up short at the box office.

甚至可以想象漫威電影票房不佳的情況。

Nothing good lasts forever, though, and audiences were definitely feeling tired of superhero fare by 2023.

不過，沒有什麼好事是永恆的，到 2023 年，觀眾肯定已經對超級英雄電影感到厭倦了。

Marvel's increasingly divisive creative decisions didn't help the Marvels when it was released at this time, despite containing a script that brought Captain and Ms. Marvel to the big screen.

儘管《驚奇隊長》和《驚奇女士》的劇本將《驚奇隊長》和《驚奇女士》搬上了大銀幕，但漫威公司日益分裂的創意決策並沒有在此時幫助《驚奇隊長》上映。

Some blamed a culture of fandom that rejected the Marvels' female-led story and creative team, while still others just called it a bad movie with a bad script and questionable CGI.

有些人將其歸咎於粉絲文化，認為《驚奇世界》的故事和創作團隊都是由女性主導的，還有人認為這是一部劇本糟糕、CGI 有問題的爛片。

Whatever the case, the glory days of Marvel Studios certainly seemed to be in the rearview in 2023, and several subsequent Marvel films have also fallen short at the box office.

無論如何，漫威影業的輝煌時代似乎在 2023 年就已經過去了，而隨後的幾部漫威電影也都票房慘淡。

Number 2 The Lone Ranger – $216 to $256 Million

第 2 名 《獨行俠》--2.16 億至 2.56 億美元

Some characters retain their historical place within pop culture, while others fade away into that great cinematic sunset.

一些角色在流行文化中保留了自己的歷史地位，而另一些則逐漸消失在偉大的電影夕陽中。

The Lone Ranger from 2013 seemed to follow in the footsteps of its equally infamous forebear from 1981 with its historic box office flop.

2013 年的《獨行俠》似乎步了 1981 年同樣聲名狼藉的前輩的後塵，票房慘敗。

Sources alleged at the time of the former's release that it was going to take Disney a $650 million return in order to break even on their investment.

有消息稱，在前者上映時，迪士尼需要 6.5 億美元的回報才能實現投資收支平衡。

This all takes into account the huge marketing budget, combined with the production totals.

這一切都考慮到了鉅額的營銷預算，以及生產總額。

When all was said and done, however, The Lone Ranger lost Disney between $216 and $256 million.

然而，最終《獨行俠》還是讓迪斯尼損失了 2.16 億至 2.56 億美元。

Before we unveil our top pick, here are a few honorable mentions.

在揭曉我們的首選之前，我們先介紹幾款值得推薦的產品。

The Adventures of Pluto Nash – $168 Million

冥王星納什歷險記》--1.68 億美元

Joker Fully Adept – $125 to $200 Million

小丑完全精通 - 1.25 億至 2 億美元

Some sour notes for this musical disaster.

為這場音樂災難寫下一些辛酸的音符。

即使是 "巨石 "也無法扭轉局面。

火星需要媽媽》--1.4 億至 2.01 億美元

Hi-ho, hi-ho! On a sad walk to the bank we go.

嗨嗬，嗨嗬！我們悲傷地走向銀行

Before we continue, be sure to subscribe to our channel and ring the bell to get notified about our latest videos. You have the option to be notified for occasional videos or all of them.

在我們繼續之前，請務必訂閱我們的頻道，並按鈴接收我們最新視頻的通知。您可以選擇偶爾收到通知，也可以選擇全部收到通知。

If you're on your phone, make sure you go into your settings and switch on notifications.

如果您正在使用手機，請確保進入設置並打開通知。

約翰-卡特》--1.53 億至 2.74 億美元

We'll probably never know whether or not Edgar Rice Burroughs' character,

我們可能永遠都不會知道埃德加-賴斯-巴勒斯筆下的人物到底是不是這樣、

John Carter of Mars, could have carried a movie franchise.

約翰-卡特的火星》本可以成為一部系列電影。

The source material certainly remains fascinating, and the story of John Carter is another one where some have revisited it and come back with a more sympathetic view.

當然，原始素材依然引人入勝，《約翰-卡特》的故事也讓一些人重新審視，並對其抱有更多的同情。

However, the extra money afforded to John Carter for both production and marketing once again created a gap that proved insurmountable by Disney.

然而，《約翰-卡特》在製作和營銷方面獲得的額外資金再次造成了迪士尼無法逾越的鴻溝。

A $600 plus million dollar gross was allegedly needed for the House of Mouse to make a profit on their investment. This predictably didn't occur, and John Carter wound up costing Disney between $153 and $274 million dollars by the time everything was all said and done. Did critics and audiences get any of these wrong? Let us know in the comments down below. Did you enjoy this video? Check out these other clips from WatchMojo, and be sure to subscribe and ring the bell to be notified about our latest videos.

據稱，"老鼠之家 "需要 6 億多美元的總票房才能從投資中獲利。可想而知，《約翰-卡特》並沒有實現這一目標，當一切都結束時，迪斯尼最終損失了 1.53 億至 2.74 億美元。影評人和觀眾有沒有搞錯？請在下面的評論中告訴我們。喜歡這段視頻嗎？請查看來自 WatchMojo 的其他剪輯，並確保訂閱和按鈴以獲得我們的最新視頻通知。