每日口說挑戰 【TED-Ed】死一個人還是五個人？你如何抉擇？(Would you sacrifice one person to save five? - Eleanor Nelsen)

今日挑戰句子

Our instincts tell us that deliberately causing someone's death is different that allowing them to die as collateral damage. It just feels wrong for reasons that are hard to explain. This intersection between ethics and psychology is what's so interesting about the trolley problem. The dilemma in its many variations reveal that what we think is right or wrong depends on factors other than a logical weighing of the pros and cons.

直覺告訴了我們，故意造就某些人死亡與間接造成他們死亡是兩回事。基於某些難以解釋的原因，這令人感到不對勁。而倫理學與心理學的交集正是電車難題如此有趣之處——在眾多版本裡的困境，顯示了我們思考對與錯的依據，除了邏輯上權衡它的利弊之外，還在於各種因素的考量。