Name: 伊朗飛彈轟炸英國、美國迪亞哥加西亞基地！BBC新聞獨家報導 (Iran fires missiles at UK-US Diego Garcia base, it is understood | BBC News)
Uploaded: 2026-03-21T21:34:28.000Z
Duration: 11 min 30 s

Iran has fired two missiles towards the joint British American base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.

伊朗朝印度洋上的迪亞哥加西亞英美聯合基地發射了兩枚飛彈。

基礎被動語態

The BBC understands the attack is thought to have been unsuccessful.

BBC獲悉，這次攻擊據信並未成功。

程度副詞

The island part of the chagos is nearly 2,400 miles from Iran and is beyond the range limit that Tehran's weapons are thought to be able to reach.

這個Chagos群島的一部分距離伊朗將近2,400英里，遠超過德黑蘭武器射程範圍。

Well, it's thought the missiles were launched before the UK announced that Americans could use the British bases for strikes in Iran aimed at stopping attacks on the Strait of Hormuz.

嗯，據信這些飛彈是在英國宣佈美國可以使用英國基地對伊朗進行打擊，以阻止荷姆茲海峽的襲擊之前發射的。

Meanwhile, President Trump has posted on social media that America is getting very close to meeting its objectives as it's considering winding down military efforts in the Middle East.

同時，川普總統在社交媒體上發文表示，美國正非常接近達成目標，因為他們正在考慮逐步減少在中東的軍事行動。

Although CBS News is reporting that military planners are working on the option of ground troops.

不過CBS News報導，軍事規劃者正在研究派遣地面部隊的選項。

World News correspondent Joe Inwood reports.

Donald Trump claims Iran's military has been all but obliterated, but it is still firing back.

唐納·川普聲稱伊朗軍隊幾乎被摧毀殆盡，但伊朗仍在反擊。

This was a US diplomatic facility in Baghdad after a drone struck last night.

這是昨天晚上無人機襲擊後，美國在巴格達的外交設施。

And it seems Tehran is expanding not just its targets but its range as well.

看起來德黑蘭不僅擴大了目標，也擴大了射程。

The BBC understands that Iran fired two missiles at the UK US base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, around 3,700 km from the Iranian coast.

BBC獲悉，伊朗向位於印度洋迪亞哥加西亞的英國美國基地發射了兩枚飛彈，距離伊朗海岸約3,700公里。

that is far further than their missiles were thought to be able to reach.

這遠遠超過了人們認為他們飛彈能夠到達的射程。

It's understood that the attack happened before Sir Keir Starmer agreed that US planes could now use UK bases, for example RAF Fairford, to attack targets that could threaten shipping going through the Straits of Hormuz.

據瞭解，這次襲擊發生在Keir Starmer爵士同意美國飛機可以使用英國基地（例如RAF Fairford）來攻擊可能威脅荷姆茲海峽航運的目標之前。

It is a shift from the British government some will see as subtle, others significant.

英國政府的這一轉變，有人認為是微妙的，也有人認為是重大的。

For Donald Trump in seems to be too little, too late.

對於唐納·川普來說，這似乎是太少、太遲了。

I was a little surprised at the uk, to be honest with you.

They should have acted a lot faster from Iran.

他們應該從伊朗那邊更快地採取行動。

The Foreign Minister warning that the shift in policy would have consequences.

外交部長警告說，政策的轉變將會帶來後果。

Mr. Starmer is putting British lives in danger, wrote Abasaraichi.

Starmer 先生將英國人的生命置於危險之中，Abasaraichi 寫道。

Iran will exercise its right to self defence.

Yesterday a missile fragment landed in Jerusalem's Old City, home to sites sacred to Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

昨天，一枚飛彈碎片落在耶路撒冷舊城，這裡是基督教、猶太教和伊斯蘭教的聖地。

Iran continues to strike targets across the region, including Gulf states, once its allies.

伊朗持續打擊該區域的目標，包括曾經是其盟友的海灣國家。

To Israel's north, the Iranian backed group Hezbollah are still firing rockets over the border, which continues to be met with a ferocious response.

在以色列的北方，伊朗支持的組織真主黨仍在越過邊界發射火箭，這持續遭到猛烈回擊。

Lebanese authorities say more than 1,000 people have now been killed by Israeli strikes, many of them civilians.

黎巴嫩當局表示，已有超過 1,000 人死於以色列的攻擊，其中許多是平民。

Donald Trump is nothing if not unpredictable.

唐納·川普的不可預測性是毋庸置疑的。

And shortly after saying this, I don't want to do a ceasefire.

在說了這番話後不久，我不想停火。

You know, you don't do a ceasefire when you're literally obliterating the other side.

你知道，當你正在徹底摧毀另一方時，你不會停火。

He took to social media to say the US Was getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great military efforts in the Middle East.

他透過社交媒體表示，美國正非常接近達成我們的目標，因為我們正考慮逐步結束在中東的重大軍事行動。

But ending conflicts is often harder than starting them.

但結束衝突往往比發動衝突更難。

And Iran has vowed to keep fighting, whatever the cost.

而伊朗已誓言無論付出什麼代價都要繼續戰鬥。

Correspondent Simi Jolla Osho told us more about what we've been hearing from the President.

特派記者 Simi Jolla Osho 告訴我們更多關於我們從總統那裡聽到的消息。

The US is considering winding down its military operations against Iran and that they are close to achieving their objectives, which seem to have expanded since the start of the war to now basically include decimating Iran's military.

美國正考慮逐步結束對伊朗的軍事行動，並表示他們已接近達成目標，這些目標自戰爭開始以來似乎已擴大，基本上包括摧毀伊朗的軍事力量。

It feels like he's sort of defining the parameters of a victory.

感覺他有點在定義勝利的參數。

And like you've said, Virginie, it slightly contradicts reports that we're hearing from US media, including CBS News, that firstly, the Department of Defense has made detailed preparations to deploy ground troops, although it's not clear under what circumstances the president would authorize that for.

而且就像妳說的，Virginie，這與我們從美國媒體（包括 CBS News）聽到的報導有些矛盾，首先是國防部已做好部署地面部隊的詳細準備，儘管尚不清楚總統會在什麼情況下授權。

And then you've got the other report that nearly 5,000 Marines and several warships, American Marines and warships are making their way to the Middle east from Japan and from the U.S.

然後還有另一則報導指出，近 5,000 名美國海軍陸戰隊和數艘軍艦正從日本和美國前往中東。

now, when he was asked about it, President Trump said he wouldn't deploy ground troops.

不過，當被問到這件事時，川普總統說他不會部署地面部隊。

The Pentagon also declined to comment, citing operational security.

國防部也以行動安全為由，拒絕評論。

But there have been sort of chatter around what circumstance those ground troops could be deployed.

但一直有些傳言在討論，在什麼情況下可能會部署這些地面部隊。

Could it be to increase military action on Hag island, which is a key hub for the Iranians?

會不會是為了增加在哈格島的軍事行動，那裡是伊朗人的重要據點？

Could it be to seize Iranian enriched uranium from Iran?

會不會是為了從伊朗奪取伊朗濃縮鈾？

But what is clear is that the Trump administration is expanding its military options, but

但清楚的是，川普政府正在擴大其軍事選項，但

not necessarily expanding its military operations if we're to go by what President Trump has just said.

如果照川普總統剛說的來看，不一定是在擴大軍事行動。

While Israel has contradicted President Trump's comments about the US Winding down their operations in the Middle East, Israel's Defense Minister, Israel Katz, released a video statement saying that the joint U.

以色列反駁了川普總統關於美國在中東縮減行動的說法，以色列國防部長 Israel Katz 發布了一段影片聲明，表示聯合的 U.

S. Israeli military operation against Iran Iran will intensify in the coming week.

伊朗軍方對伊朗的軍事行動將在本週加劇。

This week, the intensity of the attacks that the IDF and the US military will carry out against the Iranian terrorist regime and against the infrastructure on which it relies will increase significantly.

這週，以色列國防軍和美軍針對伊朗恐怖政權及其所依賴的基礎設施所進行的攻擊強度將會顯著增加。

And the campaign led by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will continue.

而由美國總統唐納·川普和以色列總理班傑明·納坦雅胡領導的這場戰役將會持續下去。

Well, as we've been saying, the UK government has now allowed the United States the use of its bases for what it calls defensive operations in the Strait of Hormuz.

嗯，正如我們一直說的，英國政府現在已經允許美國使用其基地進行所謂的荷姆茲海峽防禦行動。

I've been discussing that position with our political correspondent Jack Fenwick.

我一直在和我們的政治記者 Jack Fenwick 討論這個立場。

The principle behind the UK's approach has not changed and will not change they say that principle is about the UK only getting involved in what they call defensive operations.

英國做法背後的原則沒有改變也不會改變，他們說這個原則是英國只參與他們所謂的防禦行動。

But clearly there are conversations happening in Downing street about exactly what counts as a defensive operation.

但很明顯，唐寧街正在就什麼才算防禦行動進行討論。

A few days ago, it didn't sound like allowing US forces to use UK bases to strike Iranian sites that were targeting the Strait of Hormuz was within that definition.

幾天前，這聽起來似乎不包括允許美軍使用英國基地來打擊針對荷姆茲海峽的伊朗目標。

Now, I think that has caused some concern in Parliament.

我想這已經引起了國會的一些擔憂。

We know that there are a number of Labour backbenchers, probably quite a small number at the moment, who think that actually that definition of defensive has perhaps moved beyond what they might have first assumed.

我們知道，工黨裡有一些後座議員，目前可能人數不多，他們認為「防禦行動」的定義可能已經超出了他們最初的想像。

The Liberal Democrats and the Green Party have both said that there should be a vote in Parliament on the US use of UK bases.

自由民主黨和綠黨都表示，國會應該對美國使用英國基地一事進行投票。

At this stage, that feels unlikely to me because the government are sticking to this idea that they haven't budged.

在這個階段，我覺得這不太可能，因為政府堅持他們沒有讓步的說法。

But clearly, the more the UK does get dragged into this, events like the Iranians targeting that base on Diego Garcia is inevitably going to lead to questions for ministers about where all this is going.

但顯然，英國越是被捲入其中，像伊朗攻擊迪亞哥加西亞基地這樣的事件，無可避免地會讓部長們質疑這一切到底會走向何方。

And there's a lot of pressure, I guess, from both sides on Sir Keir Starmer.

我猜，基爾·斯塔默爵士兩邊都承受著壓力。

You've got pressure from the US and President Trump, who said that the UK should have acted a lot faster.

你們有來自美國和川普總統的壓力，他說英國應該行動得更快一些。

And then you've got pressure from his own party and other politicians in Parliament.

然後你們也有來自他自己黨內和其他國會議員的壓力。

We know that Donald Trump has been critical of Sikhistama for not helping out more and more quickly.

我們知道唐納·川普曾批評施紀賢，說他沒有更積極、更快速地提供協助。

Now, I think one of the things which makes Downing street less nervous about that criticism is the fact that they think they are pretty much in lockstep with other allies, and

現在，我想讓唐寧街比較不擔心這些批評的原因之一，是他們覺得自己和其他盟友的步調一致，

I think they will want to try and maintain that.

而且我想他們會想維持這種狀態。

I don't think we're going to see the UK going off and doing something different to other countries.

我認為我們不會看到英國單獨行動，跟其他國家不一樣。

So that is certainly something in the forefront of his mind.

所以這絕對是他心中最在意的事之一。

Labour ministers keep reminding us that the public generally, when asked, seem to be in agreement with the sort of approach that the government has taken.

工黨部長不斷提醒我們，一般民眾被問到時，似乎都同意政府所採取的做法。

And the thing that they will be thinking about more than anything else is the impact of this conflict on the economy back home.

而他們最在意的事情，將是這場衝突對國內經濟的影響。

We know that ministers, senior ministers, are having an emergency meeting next week to discuss the impact on the cost of living.

我們知道部長們，資深部長們，下週將召開緊急會議，討論對生活成本的影響。

I guess it's going to be things like petrol prices, like household bills, like interest rates and mortgages, the cost of food.

我猜會是像汽油價格、家庭帳單、利率和房貸、食物的價格等等。

All of this stuff is what is really concerning ministers right now.

這些事情才是部長們現在真正關心的。

Well, Matthew Savile is the director of Military Sciences at rusi The Royal United Services Institute.

好的，Matthew Savile 是英國皇家聯合軍事研究所軍事科學的總監。

We've got personnel across the Middle east, in many cases co located with US personnel in places like Qatar and Bahrain.

我們在中東各地都有人員，很多時候和美國人員一起駐紮在卡達和巴林等地。

So we were always going to be in the firing line.

所以我們一直都會處於危險之中。

It really is this question about whether we start proactively engaging or whether, as it sounds, the UK government prefers us to remain, largely speaking, defence.

這真的就是一個問題，我們是否要開始主動參與，還是像聽起來那樣，英國政府希望我們主要保持防禦姿態。

So focusing on UK nationals in the region, but

所以專注於該地區的英國國民，但

also our regional partners and countries where we work with them.

也包括我們的區域夥伴以及我們合作的國家。

So Qatar, where we have a joint combat air squadron, it sounds like that is the government's preferred approach.

所以卡達，我們在那裡有一個聯合戰鬥機中隊，聽起來這就是政府偏好的做法。

And in terms of what we were hearing before that from the U.S.

至於我們之前從美國聽到的消息，

and those reports that the possibility of boots on the ground is being considered.

以及那些關於正在考慮地面部隊的可能性。

I mean, I spoke to someone an hour ago who said, look, this is all part of military planning.

我的意思是，我一個小時前和某人談過，他說，看，這一切都是軍事規劃的一部分。

But how much do you think this is a realistic option, given that many experts say the only way to really take back the Strait of Hormuz is by having boots on the ground on the Iranian sides in some form?

但你認為這有多大的可能性，因為許多專家說，真正奪回荷姆茲海峽的唯一方法，就是以某種形式派遣地面部隊進入伊朗方面？

Well, I'm not sure that that is the best way to.

嗯，我不確定那是不是最好的方法。

I mean, the solution to the Strait of Hormuz in the long term is some kind of political settlement that stops the fighting.

我的意思是，荷姆茲海峽的長期解決方案是某種政治解決，停止戰鬥。

Otherwise, you have committed either a ground force or a maritime force to effectively be running the gauntlet or holding the ground.

否則，你將會派遣地面部隊或海上部隊來有效率地衝過難關或守住陣地。