Name: CBS高層緊張了！找喬羅根取代安德森庫柏，收視率卻暴跌！ (CBS Boss PANICS Over Network Plunge With Joe Rogan Replacement For Anderson Cooper)
Uploaded: 2026-03-13T21:46:57.000Z
Duration: 5 min 31 s

As CBS's ratings plummet and their stars flee the network, including earlier this week, Barry Weiss, who for some reason is in charge of it, has to figure out how do we reverse that trend and how do we get people to tune in?

隨著 CBS 的收視率暴跌，他們的明星紛紛離開電視網，包括這週稍早離開的 Barry Weiss，他不知道為什麼要負責這一切，他必須想辦法扭轉這個趨勢，以及如何讓大家收看？

程度副詞

So she's come up with one of the most, at least in my mind, nine nonsensical solutions of the problem, which is we need someone on 60 Minutes and we've just lost Anderson Cooper, who many Americans have a lot of respect for.

所以她想出了一個，至少在我腦海裡，九個荒謬的解決方案之一，那就是我們需要在 60 Minutes 節目中找一個人，而我們剛剛失去了 Anderson Cooper，許多美國人對他非常尊敬。

他數十年來一直是值得信賴的新聞來源。

So we need another trusted news source, Joe Rogan.

所以我們需要另一個值得信賴的新聞來源，Joe Rogan。

He'll be on 60 Minutes in this live remake of Idiocracy that we're living through.

他將會出現在 60 Minutes 節目中，在這個我們正在經歷的《白痴عندما》的現場重製版裡。

So, yeah, they're considering replacing Anderson Cooper with Joe Rogan.

所以，是的，他們正在考慮用 Joe Rogan 取代 Anderson Cooper。

And a television inside industry insider says this isn't stunt casting, it's strategy.

一位電視產業的內部人士說，這不是噱頭式選角，而是策略。

Rogan opens a direct pipeline to the massive MAGA audience CBS has struggled to reach for years.

Rogan 為 CBS 打開了直接接觸多年來難以觸及的大規模 MAGA 觀眾的管道。

Yet you bring in Rogan and you immediately gain a core connection to over 50% of the country.

然而，你引進 Rogan，就能立即與全國超過 50% 的人建立核心連結。

50% of the country, notably, does not listen to Joe Rogan.

值得注意的是，全國有 50% 的人根本不聽 Joe Rogan。

He speaks to viewers who feel ignored or mocked by legacy media.

他能與那些感覺被傳統媒體忽視或嘲笑的觀眾溝通。

That could solve the ratings and credibility problems of CBS overnight.

這能在一夜之間解決 CBS 的收視率和信譽問題。

Now, those are two very different claims there.

If you want to say that you think Joe Rogan on 60 Minutes would bring in new viewers, well, it probably would.

如果你想說，你認為 Joe Rogan 出現在 60 分鐘節目裡會帶來新觀眾，嗯，那應該是會的。

If you want to say that it would result in overall more viewers, you can try to make that case.

如果你想說，這會帶來整體上更多的觀眾，你可以試著論證。

But if you want to say that it's going to help their credibility issues, then that's fine.

但如果你想說這會幫助他們的信譽問題，那也沒關係。

As long as you don't mean by credibility what normal people mean when they say that.

只要你說的信譽，不是一般人在說信譽時的意思就好。

If you mean that people who think that CBS was fake news a year ago will suddenly like it.

如果你是說，那些一年前認為 CBS 是假新聞的人，會突然喜歡上它。

But also, have you considered what effect this would have on every one of the viewers of 60 Minutes now?

但你也有考慮過，這對《60 分鐘》現在的所有觀眾會有什麼影響嗎？

Like, what better possible way could you have to drive them away than to replace Anderson Cooper with Joe Rogan, who they almost certainly in massive numbers don't trust?

像是，有什麼比讓他們現在的觀眾，去取代安德森·庫柏，找來他們幾乎可以肯定、絕大多數都不信任的喬·羅根，更能把他們趕跑的方法呢？

這跟喬·羅根一點關係都沒有。

If you want to say they should give him a news show or whatever, do a version of his podcast on CBS News or something.

如果你是說他們應該給他一個新聞節目，或類似的東西，在 CBS 新聞頻道做一個他的播客版本之類的。

I think that's weird, but stuff like that has happened before.

我覺得這很奇怪，但這種事情以前也發生過。

But to put him specifically on 60 Minutes, which does, like, long term deep dives into the most serious news topics, that just doesn't make any sense.

但要把他放進《60 分鐘》這個專門做長期深度報導、探討最嚴肅新聞議題的節目，這根本說不通。

And I will remind you that as they're bringing him in because he's popular.

而且我得提醒你，他們找他進來是因為他很受歡迎。

They're also getting rid of someone who is so popular, they poll better than the Pope, and

他們同時也趕走了某個受歡迎到民調比教宗還高的人，而且

that is Stephen Colbert, as you'll see right here.

那就是 Stephen Colbert，就像你這裡看到的。

New poll shows that he has Pope level popularity and much better than, like, Marco Rubio or something like that.

新的民調顯示，他的受歡迎程度堪比教宗，而且遠勝過像 Marco Rubio 這樣的人。

But anyway, Brett, what do you make of this?

不管怎樣，Brett，你怎麼看這件事？

I just would love to see those Joe Rogan bits or tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick.

我真想看看那些 Joe Rogan 的片段，或是滴、滴、滴、滴、滴、滴、滴、滴、滴、滴。

Today I wanted to ask, what are they hiding from us in the government?

今天我想問，政府到底在對我們隱瞞什麼？

So I asked a government official, what are you hiding from us?

所以我問了一位政府官員，你們在對我們隱瞞什麼？

Tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick.

滴、滴、滴、滴、滴、滴、滴、滴、滴、滴。

就像，我不知道是不是每個人。

I understand there's a generational issue with understanding what 60 Minutes is about, but

我明白有世代差異，對於理解《60分鐘》是什麼，但

60 Minutes is, like, widely has been held up over decades and decades and decades as the best investigative journalism on television.

《60分鐘》在數十年來一直被奉為電視上最頂尖的調查報導。

Them in Frontline, going in, spending time doing investigative journalism.

他們和《Frontline》一樣，深入投入時間進行調查報導。

Now, one of the upshots, if you're a piece of crap, if you're a big shot in.

現在，如果你是個爛人，如果你是個大人物。

One of the good things for you, if you're a piece of crap trying to hide stuff, is that just television news.

如果你是個想隱藏事情的爛人，電視新聞對你來說，有個好處是。

A budget for an actual investigative report done by people who are actually journalism, are actually journalists.

真正由新聞工作者、真正的新聞從業人員進行實際調查報導的預算。

And there used to be budgets for news departments to go out and lose money, and

以前新聞部門有預算可以出去賠錢，而且

then you'd make it back because everybody watched mash.

那你就能賺回來，因為大家都在看《M\*A\*S\*H》。

Literally, they designed news departments for news.

真的，他們設計新聞部門就是為了新聞。

Now there's a lot of manufacturing conceptual wars and stuff that happened in there, and

現在裡面有很多製造概念戰和各種事情，

But at the very least, there were many, many decades of 60 Minutes doing great investigative journalism and holding the powerful to account.

但至少，《60分鐘》節目有幾十年的時間都在做很棒的調查報導，並且讓權貴們為他們的行為負責。

To replace it with, like, to replace Andy Rooney with Joe Rogan is fine.

用 Joe Rogan 來取代 Andy Rooney 沒關係。

To replace Anderson Cooper with Joe Rogan is the death of journalism in America.

用 Joe Rogan 來取代 Anderson Cooper 就是美國新聞業的末日。

My final thought on this, because I don't even think that it's not gonna happen.

我對這件事的最後想法是，因為我甚至不認為這不會發生。

They would have to pay him so much money.

But also, like, in in depth, respected journalism.

但同時，也要有深入、受人尊敬的新聞報導。

There is nobody who does less fact checking on the stuff he says or accepts from his guests than Joe Rogan.

沒有人比 Joe Rogan 更不查證他說的話或接受他來賓說的內容了。

Like, if you want to give the position to that producer of his that, like, calls him out for just accepting that, you know, they're eating the cats and dogs or they're pooping in a litter box.

像是，如果你想把這個位置給他的製作人，就是那個會指正他隨便接受事情的製作人，你知道的，他們在吃貓狗，或者他們在貓砂盆裡大便。

You know how Joe Rogan just accepts literally anything his guest says?

你知道 Joe Rogan 根本就全盤接受他來賓說的任何話嗎？

Put the producer on in place of Anderson Cooper, but not Joe Rogan, the most gullible man in.

讓製作人來取代 Anderson Cooper，但不是 Joe Rogan，他是世界上最容易受騙的人。