Name: 川普已準備好本週末前攻打伊朗！消息人士透露 (Trump prepared to strike Iran by this weekend: Sources)
Uploaded: 2026-02-19T17:25:07.000Z
Duration: 8 min 4 s

進階形容詞比較級句型

The US Military is prepared to strike Iran as early as this weekend, sources are telling cnn.

消息人士告訴CNN，美國軍方最快可能在本週末就會準備好攻擊伊朗。

情態副詞

But President Trump, who has privately argued for and against strikes, has yet to make a final decision on what to do.

不過，川普總統私下曾主張和反對發動襲擊，目前尚未做出最終決定。

This comes amid a significant US Military buildup in the region with another aircraft carrier strike group on the way and Iran bracing for possible strikes as new satellite images show rapid fortification at several Iranian nuclear facilities with concrete and large amounts of soil being used to bury key sites out.

這是在美國軍方大幅增兵該區域的同時發生的，另一支航空母艦打擊群也正在路上，伊朗則在為可能的襲擊做準備，新的衛星圖像顯示伊朗的幾處核設施正在快速強化工事，使用混凝土和大量的土壤來掩埋關鍵地點。

Now, Seth Jones, former adviser to the commanding General of U.S. special Operations Forces in Afghanistan.

接下來，我們請到前美國特種作戰部隊在阿富汗的指揮將軍顧問Seth Jones。

So, Seth, the military is ready to go, clearly, or they're very close to being so there are significant assets in the region.

Seth，軍方顯然已經準備好出發了，或者說他們非常接近了，該區域有許多重要的軍事資產。

With this other aircraft carrier strike group on the way, do you think it is more likely than not that the US Will attack Iran?

隨著另一支航空母艦打擊群即將抵達，你認為美國攻擊伊朗的可能性大於不大？

Well, Brianna, the fact that we've got now two carrier strike groups that will be available in the region, and

嗯，Brianna，事實是我們現在將有兩支航空母艦打擊群在該區域待命，

And so I think with without a breakthrough in diplomatic negotiations, which we have not seen, that I do think there that we're seeing a higher risk of the US Conducting strikes.

所以我認為，在沒有外交談判取得突破的情況下，而我們確實還沒看到任何突破，我認為美國發動襲擊的風險正在升高。

And of course, that that then leads to this question about what's the US Objective here?

當然，這就引出了美國在這裡的目標是什麼這個問題。

I suspect that the US Objective is probably going to be limited to things like nuclear facilities, potentially Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps sites, rather than bigger objectives like regime change.

我猜美國的目標大概會僅限於核設施，還有可能伊朗伊斯蘭革命衛隊的據點，而不是像政權更迭這種比較大的目標。

It doesn't look like it's going to ever put any in.

So I think that's sort of where we sit right now.

所以我想我們現在大概就是這樣的情況。

So when you talk about what that looks like compared to the strikes that the US Conducted on Iran's nuclear facilities this last summer, are you talking about sites in Tehran or are you talking about sites well outside these nuclear facilities?

所以當你提到這和美國去年夏天對伊朗核設施發動的襲擊相比，你說的是德黑蘭的據點，還是指核設施以外的地方？

So I think it's important to go back to the Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz, who talks about war as being a continuation of politics or policy by other means.

所以我想回顧普魯士軍事理論家卡爾·馮·克勞塞維茨很重要，他說戰爭是政治或政策的延續。

So I think really the question here is what's the US Political objective with Iran right now?

所以我想這裡真正的問題是，美國現在對伊朗的政治目標是什麼？

If it is largely about about targeting Iran's nuclear sites, then I think we'll see something that's somewhat close to Operation Midnight Hammer.

如果主要目標是針對伊朗的核設施，那我想我們會看到類似「午夜之鎚行動」的狀況。

But the US Is probably also going to have to go after Iranian air defense capabilities, which the Israelis had already taken care of by the time those bombers conducted strikes.

但美國很可能也得對付伊朗的防空能力，這部分是以色列在那些轟炸機發動襲擊前就已經處理好了。

If the US Wants to go after Iran's missile capabilities or partner forces or even start targeting some of the forces that are cracking down on protesters, then you're going to see a bigger target set list.

如果美國想對付伊朗的飛彈能力、盟友部隊，甚至開始鎖定鎮壓抗議者的部隊，那目標清單就會變得很龐大。

And so again, this all comes back to the administration's political objectives here.

所以，這一切又回到了政府在這裡的政治目標。

You mentioned regime change in your expectation.

你提到你預期會發生政權更迭。

Is that a needle that is easily threaded?

I mean, is there a way that the US Objective could, in a way they could overachieve, for instance, what they may be trying to do?

我是說，美國的目標有沒有可能以某種方式達成超乎預期，例如他們可能正在嘗試做的事情？

How do they make sure they don't do that?

Well, I think partly it's going to be the target set list that the administration starts going after.

嗯，我認為部分原因將取決於政府開始鎖定的目標清單。

So if again, they're just nuclear sites like the ones you just showed on the satellite imagery, those are pretty limited objectives.

所以，如果再次強調，目標只是你剛才在衛星圖像上顯示的那些核子場址，那目標就相當有限了。

But if, if we see those Tomahawks, for example, going after Islamic Revolutionary Guard sites or basage sites or other key political targets, for example, decapitation strikes against Iranian political leaders, that starts to move up the escalatory ladder and starts to look much more like weakening the regime and potentially regime change.

但如果，如果我們看到像是戰斧飛彈，去攻擊伊朗伊斯蘭革命衛隊的基地或是其他重要的政治目標，例如，斬首行動攻擊伊朗的政治領導人，這就會開始升高局勢，並且看起來更像是削弱政權，甚至可能改變政權。

But again, there are huge risks if the administration goes down that road.

但再次強調，如果政府選擇這條路，會有巨大的風險。

Meanwhile, Iran's state media reports that Iran and Russia will stage a joint naval drill in the region beginning tomorrow.

同時，伊朗國家媒體報導，伊朗和俄羅斯將於明天開始在該區域舉行聯合海軍演習。

Joining us now is Democratic Congressman Jim Himes of Connecticut, ranking member on the Intelligence Committee.

現在加入我們的是來自康乃狄克州的民主黨眾議員吉姆·海姆斯，他是情報委員會的首席成員。

Yeah, look, I think the president has now conducted a military attack on Caracas, which went flawlessly.

是的，你看，我認為總統現在已經對加拉加斯發動了一次軍事攻擊，這次攻擊進行得非常順利。

And he's conducted a military attack on the tunnels, you know, the nuclear infrastructure in Iran that also went flawlessly.

而且他還對伊朗的核設施，那些道地，發動了軍事攻擊，這次攻擊也進行得非常順利。

So right now the president believes that he can do this stuff without much risk, which is, by the way, a very dangerous frame of mind because there's a lot of risk involved.

所以，目前總統認為他可以這樣做，而且風險不大，順帶一提，這是一種非常危險的心態，因為其中涉及很多風險。

I think that both the United States and the Israelis are aware of the fact that the Iranians are doing carefully what they can to sort of restore what was damaged in the initial attacks.

我認為美國和以色列人都意識到，伊朗人正在小心翼翼地做他們能做的事情，來修復最初襲擊中受損的部分。

所以，是的，他們正在這麼做。

They're doing what they can to restore it.

Yeah, yeah, look, they're clearing tunnels, they're restoring electricity.

是的，是的，你看，他們正在清理隧道，他們正在恢復電力。

They're doing stuff in tunnels that we can't see.

他們在我們看不到的隧道裡做事情。

So, I mean, I think they're probably doing everything they can to try to rebuild what was destroyed a number of months ago.

所以，我的意思是，我認為他們可能正在盡一切努力來試圖重建幾個月前被摧毀的東西。

So when you say imminent, is it this week?

所以當你說迫在眉睫，是指這週嗎？

The president, remember, the president, will be satisfied with something that is cinematic, that makes a big boom and destroys and breaks a lot of stuff.

總統，記住，總統會對一些電影化的東西感到滿意，那些能發出巨大聲響、摧毀和破壞很多東西的。

He doesn't care so much about the longer questions of regime change, which are much more challenging.

他不太關心政權更迭這些更長遠的問題，那些更具挑戰性。

So, which raises the question, what would be the objective of a US Action against Iran I mean, if it's not regime change.

所以，這就引出了問題，美國對伊朗的行動目標會是什麼？我的意思是，如果不是政權更迭的話。

Well, remember, this is President Trump, so his objective would be to do something which thrills people cinematically, right?

嗯，請記得，這是川普總統，所以他的目標會是做一些在電影裡看起來很刺激的事情，對吧？

I mean, this is what the president does, right?

我的意思是，這就是總統會做的事，對吧？

He appoints people to his cabinet who look good, who play the part.

他會任命一些看起來不錯、能扮演好角色的內閣成員。

So, you know, he will be very satisfied with a lot of explosions and a lot of broken stuff in Iran that doesn't lead to regime change.

所以，你知道，他會對伊朗境內很多爆炸、很多東西被破壞的景象感到非常滿意，但這卻不會導致政權更迭。

And in fact, you know, I have a lot of Iranian diaspora folks in my district, and

事實上，你知道，在我選區有很多伊朗裔僑民，

they say, you know, we really hope, especially since Donald Trump told the protesters that we would be there, that he is there.

他們說，你知道，我們真的很希望，特別是自從唐納·川普告訴抗議者我們會在那裡，他現在就在那裡。

The question is, what does it mean to be there?

Regime change can't happen just from the air.

政權更迭不可能只靠空襲發生。

我是說，你可能會幸運一點，對吧？

You might break enough stuff that the regime collapses.

你可能會破壞足夠多的東西，讓政權垮臺。

The probability of that is pretty low, though.

So when you start talking about regime change, you start looking at Iraq, you start looking at Afghanistan, where we actually had a lot of troops on the ground.

所以當你開始談論政權更迭時，你會想到伊拉克，你會想到阿富汗，那裡我們真的有派駐很多部隊。

And that's a place where the President has never gone.

I mean, he was telling protesters to take over government facilities, to get the names of people who were attacking them.

我是說，他要抗議者佔領政府設施，要那些攻擊他們的人的名字。

我是說，當那件事發生時，簡直是。

we've done this, we did this in Iraq, right, when a US President sort of said, you know, rebel to the Shiites under Saddam Hussein.

我們也做過，我們在伊拉克也這樣做過，對吧，當一位美國總統有點像是說，你知道，薩達姆·海珊統治下的什葉派叛亂。

And they did, and they got brutally murdered, and we did not show up for them.

他們也這樣做了，然後他們被殘酷地殺害了，而我們卻沒有去支援他們。

And there's a long and ugly history of this.

So, you know, again, presumably the President, when he said that, he didn't appreciate the fact that they believed that we would be there in force, not just dropping bombs on battleships, because we can do that really easily without a lot of risk.

所以，你知道，再說一次，想必總統說那話時，他沒有意識到他們相信我們會大舉支援，而不僅僅是轟炸戰艦，因為這對我們來說很容易做到，風險很小。

But anyway, when the President said that, it really worried me because a lot of people could wind up dead in terms of an operation over in the skies over Iran.

但總之，當總統說那話時，我真的很擔心，因為在伊朗上空的行動中，很多人可能會喪命。

I mean, Israel, the US had pretty much, by the time the US Struck, they had freedom of movement in the skies over Iran.

我的意思是，以色列，美國在美國發動襲擊之前，他們在伊朗上空的行動幾乎是自由的。

As you might imagine, in a matter of months, the Iranians have worked pretty hard to rebuild their air defenses.

就像你可能想像的那樣，幾個月內，伊朗人已經努力重建他們的防空系統。

this is why your question about, is an attack imminent, is, you know, the clock is ticking, right?

這也是你問的，攻擊迫在眉睫嗎？時間正在流逝，對吧？

Every day that goes by, the Iranians improve their air defenses and make a raid that much more dangerous.

每一天過去，伊朗人就改善他們的防空系統，讓突襲更加危險。

And again, the president has gotten lucky, right?

He's done these military actions without significant casualties on the US Side.

他進行了這些軍事行動，而美國這邊沒有重大的傷亡。

所以，是的，這裡確實有時間在流逝。

And even if Donald Trump doesn't appreciate all of this sort of, you know, chessboard stuff, the Israelis sure do.

即使唐納·川普不欣賞這種像棋局一樣的策略，以色列人卻很清楚。

Congressman, Jim, hobbies, it's always good to talk to you.

國會議員吉姆·霍比，很高興能和你聊。