Name: 歐洲在保衛格陵蘭這件事上有多團結？| DW 新聞 (How unified is Europe when it comes to defending Greenland? | DW News)
Uploaded: 2026-01-05T17:21:41.000Z
Duration: 4 min 13 s

Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Fredriksen has told Donald Trump to stop the threats about the US Taking over Greenland.

丹麥總理梅特·弗雷德裡克森告訴唐納·川普，別再威脅說美國要接管格陵蘭了。

It follows a post by Katie Miller, the wife of one of Trump's top aides, Stephen Miller, showing Greenland in the colors of the American flag.

這是因為川普一位高級助手史蒂芬·米勒的妻子凱蒂·米勒發了一篇貼文，上面顯示格陵蘭被塗上了美國國旗的顏色。

She added the word soon alongside the picture on Air Force One.

她還在空軍一號上的圖片旁加上了「soon」這個詞。

On Sunday evening, the president once again reiterated his his desire to take over the Danish territory.

週日晚上，總統再次重申了他想接管這塊丹麥領土的意願。

Don't worry about Greenland in about two months.

大約兩個月後，關於格陵蘭的事就不用擔心了。

我們在20天後再談格陵蘭的事。

On Venezuela, we talk so much about energy.

關於委內瑞拉，我們談了很多關於能源的事。

By the way, I have to, I will say this about Greenland.

順帶一提，我必須說，關於格陵蘭，我得說一下。

We need Greenland from a national security situation.

我們從國家安全的角度來看，需要格陵蘭。

Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place.

格陵蘭到處都是俄羅斯和中國的船隻。

We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and

我們從國家安全的角度來看，需要格陵蘭，而且

Denmark is not going to be able to do it, I can tell you.

Let's now speak to Terry Schultz, DW correspondent in Brussels.

我們現在來連線 DW 的布魯塞爾記者 Terry Schultz。

Terry, I understand you've just been to the European Commission briefing where Venezuela and Greenland were the top issues discussed.

Terry，我聽說你剛參加了歐洲委員會的簡報會，會上委內瑞拉和格陵蘭是討論的重點。

Can you give us any more clarity about the EU positions?

你能給我們多一點關於歐盟立場的說明嗎？

It was a pretty rough start for the European Commission's spokesperson service beginning the new year with these issues, which obviously made them very uncomfortable, and

對歐洲委員會的發言人辦公室來說，新的一年以這些議題開頭，真是個艱難的開始，顯然讓他們非常尷尬，而且

they were absolutely not willing to go beyond this rather bland statement that was put out yesterday.

他們絕對不願意超出昨天發布的這份相當平淡的聲明。

Even 24 hours later, the only reference that they're making to the United States is to say that EU officials have been in touch with the US the rest of their statements, like the written statement yesterday, simply referred to unnamed actors, of which there aren't very many, saying that they hope that international law is upheld and the UN principles, which are things like refraining from the use of force and peaceful resolution of disputes.

即使過了 24 小時，他們對美國唯一的提及就是說歐盟官員已經和美國聯繫過了，至於他們其他的說法，就像昨天的書面聲明一樣，只是提到一些沒有具名的人士，而這樣的人士並不多，說他們希望國際法和聯合國原則能得到遵守，像是避免使用武力和和平解決爭端等原則。

The spokespeople would not say anything more about whether they believe the US Actions were justified, whether they were legal.

發言人沒有進一步說明他們是否認為美國的行動是正當的，是否合法。

They said it's too early to make those assessments and they wouldn't even use any new words to describe this, despite getting dozens of questions.

他們表示現在做這些評估還太早，儘管收到數十個問題，他們甚至不願使用任何新詞來形容。

Now, when it comes to Greenland, they're a bit more clear on what, what the EU position is, but

現在，關於格陵蘭，他們對歐盟的立場比較清楚，但

They in fact reiterated December 22nd position that says the EU obviously supports Denmark's territorial sovereignty and that any decisions made about Denmark or Greenland are for those people alone.

他們實際上重申了十二月二十二日的立場，該立場表示歐盟顯然支持丹麥的主權，任何關於丹麥或格陵蘭的決定都由他們自己決定。

It really has seems to have put the EU in another one of those uncomfortable positions where they feel like they can't criticize or even make any assessment about what the United States has done for fear of retaliation by the Trump administration.

這似乎真的讓歐盟又陷入了另一種尷尬的處境，他們覺得因為害怕川普政府的報復，而無法批評甚至評估美國的所作所為。

Well, a cautious approach to be sure, Trump seems to be renewing his push to annex Greenland.

嗯，可以肯定的是，這是一種謹慎的做法，川普似乎正在重啟他吞併格陵蘭的行動。

What is at least your sense how unified is Europe when it comes to defending Greenland?

至少你覺得歐洲在保衛格陵蘭方面有多團結？

This is not the same question as what to say about Venezuela.

這和如何評論委內瑞拉的問題不一樣。

This is a territory here in Europe and Denmark is a member of the European Union and perhaps more complex, a member of NATO.

這是歐洲的一個領土，丹麥是歐盟的成員，而且或許更複雜的是，也是北約的成員。

Now, there are questions about whether Denmark would declare, for example, Article 4 consultations at NATO when a which are used when a country feels that its territorial integrity is threatened.

現在，大家都在質疑丹麥是否會啟動北約的第四條協商，這種協商是在國家認為其領土完整受到威脅時使用的。

Does Denmark feel that the latest Trump statements have gone that far?

丹麥是否覺得川普最近的言論已經到了這個地步？

And I'm sure that there will be a lot of pressure on Denmark not to bring it to that level yet.

我很確定丹麥會承受很大的壓力，不讓事情發展到那個地步。

But with Trump reiterating this and even saying that the EU knows it needs the US to take over Greenland, this does indeed seem to be taking it a step further in terms of the US Rhetoric.

但隨著川普重申這一點，甚至說歐盟知道需要美國接管格陵蘭，這確實似乎讓美國的言論更進一步了。

And we'll just have to see if, if the European Union and or Naito come out with any statements about this.

我們只能拭目以待，看看歐盟或北約是否會對此發表任何聲明。

Terry Schultz, DW correspondent in Brussels.

DW駐布魯塞爾記者特里·舒爾茨。