Name: 義大利國會無異議通過將殺害女性列為犯罪！BBC新聞 (Italian parliament unanimously votes to make femicide a crime | BBC News)
Uploaded: 2025-11-26T16:52:59.000Z
Duration: 4 min 59 s

情態副詞

Now to Italy, where Parliament voted unanimously to introduce femicide as a specific crime in the country's penal code.

接下來我們看到義大利，國會全數通過，將殺害女性罪正式納入國家刑法典。

This is the moment parliamentarians approve the law.

這就是國會議員們準許這項法律的時刻。

Motivated by hatred, discrimination, domination or subjugation of a woman because of her gender.

出於對女性的仇恨、歧視、支配或壓迫。

The crime will now automatically trigger a life sentence.

這項罪行現在將自動觸發無期徒刑。

In a symbolic move, the vote marked the International Day for the Elimination of violence against November 25.

這項投票在具象徵意義的 11 月 25 日國際消除對婦女暴力日進行。

Latest figures show that in 2024, 116 women were killed in Italy.

最新數據顯示，2024 年有 116 名女性在義大利遇害。

106 of those are said to be motivated by gender.

其中據說有 106 起是出於性別因素。

In recent years, one of the most high profile cases was the murder of a student, brutally stabbed to death by her ex boyfriend in 2023 and later dumped by a lakeside.

近年來，其中一個備受矚目的案件是一名女學生，在 2023 年被她的前男友殘忍刺死，之後被棄屍湖邊。

The crime shocked the country, triggering a wider debate on violence against women.

這起罪行震驚全國，引發了更廣泛的關於對婦女暴力的辯論。

Well, let's speak now to freelance journalist Sylvia Bacardi in Milan who has been closely following the story.

好的，現在我們來連線在米蘭的自由記者 Sylvia Bacardi，她一直密切關注此事件。

Sylvia, thank you very much for joining us on BBC News.

Sylvia，非常感謝您接受 BBC 新聞的訪問。

Well, it really depends on how you consider the law.

嗯，這真的取決於您如何看待這項法律。

So this new law actually strengthens penalties for murders committed in the context of domestic or gender based violence.

所以這項新法律實際上加強了對在家庭暴力或性別暴力背景下犯下的謀殺案的懲罰。

And as you were saying, it introduces measurements such as life in jail for femicides.

而且正如您所說，它引入了諸如殺害女性罪判處無期徒刑等措施。

It is a bipartisan law which is significant in a country where usually gender issues are often politically divisive.

這是一項跨黨派的法律，這很重要，因為在這個國家，性別議題通常是政治上分裂的。

Some people see it as just symbolic because this law still focuses largely on reactive measures protecting women after violence has occurred rather than preventing it.

有些人認為這只是象徵性的，因為這項法律仍然主要側重於保護女性免受暴力侵害後的被動措施，而不是預防。

And Italy has historically seen opposition from especially the political right against comprehensive sex and relationship education in schools, meaning that preventive education on consent and respect is quite limited.

而且義大利歷來在學校的全面性教育和情感教育方面，尤其受到來自政治右翼的反對，這意味著關於同意和尊重的預防性教育相當有限。

There is also in this law a lack of clear systemic reforms to improve collaboration between social services and law enforcement and risk assessment before tragedies happen.

這項法律也缺乏明確的系統性改革，以改善社會服務與執法單位之間的協作，並在悲劇發生前進行風險評估。

So some people see it as symbolic just because they argue that its practical impact may be limited unless you know they will be accompanied by stronger preventive measures, which is a really important point to reflect.

所以有些人認為這只是象徵性的，因為他們認為除非有更強的預防措施伴隨，否則其實際影響可能有限，這是一個非常重要的反思點。

Tell us more about the wider context in which this law, which was brought by Prime Minister Giorgio Meloni, has been passed.

請告訴我們更多關於這項由總理喬治亞·梅洛尼提出的法律通過的更廣泛背景。

Well, femicides remains a very critical issue in Italy today.

嗯，殺害女性罪在今天的義大利仍然是一個非常嚴重的問題。

On average, a woman is killed every three days and nine times out of ten by a partner or ex partner or a member of the family.

平均而言，每三天就有一名女性被殺害，其中十次中有九次是她的伴侶、前伴侶或家人所為。

And many of these cases follow long term abuse that authorities failed to prevent.

而且許多案件都發生在長期虐待之後，而當局未能預防。

We have a staggering over 40% of women that were killed after they reported it to the police.

令人震驚的是，有超過 40% 的女性在報警後仍被殺害。

So cultural attitude and systemic gaps mean that women are often protected only after the violence has occurred.

是以，文化態度和系統性漏洞意味著女性往往在暴力發生後才受到保護。

And they are not empowered and educated beforehand.

而且她們事先沒有得到賦權和教育。

And cases like Julia Cheketins, the student that you were mentioning before.

還有像茱莉亞·切凱廷（Julia Cheketins）這樣你之前提到的那位學生。

That's why they have galvanized public debate about systemic misogyny in Italy, not just like on specific issues like this new law is addressing.

這也是為什麼她們激起了義大利社會對系統性厭女文化的公開辯論，而不僅僅是針對像這項新法律所處理的特定議題。

The Italian constitution guarantees equal protection under the law, whatever your gender.

義大利憲法保障所有人在法律上享有平等的保護，不論性別。

所以，這項法律真的合乎憲法嗎？

Well, some people argue that this law could clash with Article 3 of our Constitution, which states that all citizens have equal social dignity and are equal before the law.

嗯，有些人認為這項法律可能與我們憲法第三條有所牴觸，該條文規定所有公民都享有平等的社會尊嚴，並在法律面前人人平等。

The question here is whether giving special protections to women in case of gender based violence constitutes an unequal treatment towards a part of society.

這裡的問題在於，在性別暴力案件中給予女性特別保護，是否構成對社會一部分人的不平等對待。

And scholars, legal scholars generally, they defend the law because they argue that it does not give women more rights than men.

而且學者，一般來說是法律學者，他們支持這項法律，因為他們認為這並沒有給予女性比男性更多的權利。

It actually addresses a specific pattern of risk and violence that disproportionately affects women.

它實際上是針對一種不成比例地影響女性的特定風險和暴力模式。

In other words, the law is meant to ensure substantial equality, recognizing that equal treatment under the law sometimes requires targeted measures to protect those marginalized.

換句話說，這項法律旨在確保實質上的平等，承認法律上的平等對待有時需要有針對性的措施來保護那些被邊緣化的人。

Okay, Sylvia, very good to have you with us today.

好的，Sylvia，很高興妳今天能來。