Name: 特朗普將查理-柯克遇刺事件歸咎於左翼，言論升級 | 每日秀 (Trump Blames the Left for Charlie Kirk's Assassination as Rhetoric Escalates | The Daily Show)
Uploaded: 2025-09-16T00:59:44.000Z
Duration: 9 min 54 s

By now, you guys all know about yesterday's assassination of Charlie Kirk.

現在，你們都知道昨天暗殺查理-柯克的事了吧。

情態副詞

And this probably goes without saying, but I feel like I have to say it,

這可能不用說，但我覺得我必須說出來、

I believe killing people is wrong. And I know that's a hot take.

我認為殺人是不對的。我知道這是個熱門話題。

但到目前為止，我們還不知道是誰幹的。

But Kash Patel's FBI is on the case, so we will never know who did it.

但卡什-帕特爾的聯邦調查局正在調查此案，所以我們永遠不會知道是誰幹的。

This is as good a time as any to say political violence is never acceptable and should be condemned.

政治暴力是絕對不能接受的，應該受到譴責。

And thankfully, many political leaders think the same.

值得慶幸的是，許多政治領導人也有同樣的想法。

All four former presidents are reacting to the death of Charlie Kirk.

四位前總統都對查理-柯克的死做出了反應。

Joe Biden posting on X, quote, there is no place in our country for this kind of violence.

喬-拜登（Joe Biden）在 X 上發帖稱，"我們的國家容不下這種暴力"。

Barack Obama shared a similar sentiment, writing, this kind of despicable violence has no place in our democracy.

巴拉克-奧巴馬也有類似的感慨，他寫道："這種卑鄙的暴力行為在我們的民主制度中沒有立足之地。

And a statement as well from George W. Bush, who said this, members of other political parties are not our enemies.

小布什也發表了聲明，他說，其他政黨的成員不是我們的敵人。

And a message from Bill Clinton, who says he hopes we all go through some serious introspection and redouble our efforts to engage in debate passionately, yet peacefully.

比爾-克林頓（Bill Clinton）希望我們都能認真反思，加倍努力，以和平的方式熱情參與辯論。

Yeah, and let's not get sidetracked by who may or may not have been friends with Jeffrey Epstein.

是啊，我們就不要再糾結誰和傑弗裡-愛潑斯坦是朋友了。

But yes, it was comforting to see our living past presidents and Joe Biden attempting to lower the country's temperature yesterday.

不過，看到我們在世的歷任總統和喬-拜登昨天試圖降低國家的溫度，我還是感到欣慰的。

But none of those guys are running this place right now.

但這些人現在都不是這裡的管理者。

So I want to hear from the current big guy.

所以，我想聽聽現任大佬的意見。

For years, those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world's worst mass murderers and criminals.

多年來，激進左派一直將查理這樣優秀的美國人與納粹以及世界上最惡劣的大屠殺凶手和罪犯相提並論。

This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we're seeing in our country today.

這種言論是我們今天在我國看到的恐怖主義的直接原因。

My fellow Americans, we must come together to destroy each other.

美國同胞們，我們必須團結起來，互相摧毀。

So yeah, Donald Trump came out with a partisan message blaming the left.

是的，唐納德-特朗普發出了指責左翼的黨派資訊。

The last time Trump delivered a thoughtful message was apparently when he sent a birthday card to Jeffrey Epstein.

特朗普上一次傳遞貼心資訊顯然是在給傑弗裡-愛潑斯坦（Jeffrey Epstein）寄生日賀卡的時候。

I realize that's two Epstein jokes in a row.

我意識到這已經是連續兩個愛潑斯坦的笑話了。

It's not my fault everyone was friends with this guy, okay?

大家都和這傢伙做朋友又不是我的錯，好嗎？

And by the way, I'm not singling Trump out.

順便說一句，我不是在挑剔特朗普。

這就是我們社會現在的行為方式。

Instead of digesting and trying to understand, everyone sets their feet and starts throwing punches immediately.

每個人都不去消化和理解，而是立刻站起來揮拳相向。

Like Nancy Mace, Republican congresswoman and somehow the scariest type of mace.

比如南希-梅斯，共和黨女議員，某種程度上是最可怕的梅斯。

She came out swinging, but apparently wasn't expecting a counter.

她揮拳相向，但顯然沒想到會遭到反擊。

今天發生的一切，都是民主黨人一手造成的。

By that logic, do Republicans own the shooting of the two Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota?

按照這種邏輯，明尼蘇達州兩名民主黨議員被槍殺是否也是共和黨人所為？

But is there a problem with political violence across the spectrum?

但是，政治暴力是否存在跨領域的問題？

Yeah, we're talking about Charlie Kirk right now.

是啊，我們現在說的是查理-柯克。

Not about things that make me look stupid, because if we did that, we'd be talking all day long, okay?

而不是那些讓我看起來很蠢的事情 因為如果我們那樣做了 我們就會整天喋喋不休，好嗎？

And now we're in very familiar territory.

現在，我們來到了非常熟悉的領域。

Republican accuses Democrat, so Democrat accuses Republican.

共和黨指控民主黨，民主黨就指控共和黨。

不，這是共和黨人的花言巧語。

Has anyone considered that the problem of political violence in America might not just be the rhetoric, but instead something extraordinarily complex?

有沒有人想過，美國的政治暴力問題可能不僅僅是言論的問題，而是異常複雜的問題？

The problem might be a toxic mix of our gun laws, lack of mental health, collapse, social connection, probably a bunch of other things I haven't even thought of yet.

問題可能是我們的槍支法律、缺乏心理健康、崩潰、社會聯繫，可能還有其他一些我還沒有想到的因素造成的。

I'm sure la-boo-boos are somewhere in there to blame.

我敢肯定，這裡面肯定有 la-boo-boos 的影子。

I guess I just don't think rhetoric is the root cause of this thing.

我想我只是不認為修辭是這件事的根本原因。

Political violence isn't going to go away if the people on the other side say exactly the right words from now on.

政治暴力不會因為另一方的人從現在開始說正確的話而消失。

Now, that said, if you turned on the 24-7 news coverage yesterday, you probably saw some unhelpful rhetoric.

話雖如此，如果你打開昨天的全天候新聞報道，你可能會看到一些無益的言論。

He's been one of the most divisive, especially divisive younger figures in this, who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups.

他一直是最容易造成分裂的人物之一，尤其是年輕一代的分裂人物，不斷髮表仇恨言論或針對某些群體的言論。

And I always go back to hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions.

我總是回想，仇恨的想法會導致仇恨的言語，而仇恨的言語又會導致仇恨的行動。

And I think that's the environment we're in, that people just...

我認為這就是我們所處的環境，人們...

You can't stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place.

你不能停止你的這些可怕的想法，然後說出這些可怕的話，卻不指望會有可怕的行動發生。

The whole idea of free speech in America is you can say what you want and not expect to be shot.

在美國，言論自由的整個理念就是你可以暢所欲言，而不用擔心被槍斃。

Even though I think I was right that the cake f***ing sucked, Derek, all right?

儘管我覺得我是對的 蛋糕糟透了，德里克，好嗎？

Even some people who understood that a cycle of violence was not the answer, they still wanted to make sure you knew who'd be coming out on top.

即使有些人明白暴力循環不是解決問題的辦法，但他們仍然想確保你知道誰會勝出。

Like, I spent nine years in and out of war.

比如，我在戰爭中進進出出度過了九年。

But if these people keep pushing, they're going to radicalize a huge portion of America that they don't want.

但如果這些人繼續推動，他們將激化一大批他們不希望看到的美國人。

I want us to be able to debate like Charlie Kirk always did on every campus, gave the airtime to opposing views.

我希望我們能夠像查理-柯克（Charlie Kirk）一直以來在各個校園所做的那樣進行辯論，讓反對意見得到充分表達。

I want that as my America, not trading gunfire, because I'll win.

我希望這就是我的美國，而不是交火，因為我會贏。

You could have just stopped with, the last thing I want is violence.

你可以不說，我最不想要的就是暴力。

You don't have to add in, because I'll win.

But I guess it's like Jesus always said, turn the other cheek, but be ready to cut a mother****er.

但我想，這就像耶穌常說的，翻臉不認人，但也要準備好被母親****er。

No one knows who the shooter is, or what his motivation was.

沒有人知道槍手是誰，也沒有人知道他的動機是什麼。

And even if it was political, he doesn't represent half the country.

即使是政治原因，他也不能代表半個國家。

But some of these MAGA guys are acting like this is a liberal declaration of war.

但有些 MAGA 人卻表現得好像這是自由派的宣戰書。

If they can do this, they are capable of anything.

如果他們能做到這一點，他們就無所不能。

It's really hard to radicalize Republicans.

讓共和黨人變得激進真的很難。

You know, it's like, we're not the radical type.

你知道，我們不是那種激進的人。

I'm sorry, first off, it's not that hard to radicalize Republicans.

對不起，首先，激進化共和黨人並不難。

You guys almost burned down the country because Cracker Barrel changed its font.

就因為快餐店換了字體，你們差點燒了整個國家。

Second, far be it for me to tell anyone how to do their job, but you can lose the poop emoji mug for one day.

其次，我不想教別人如何工作，但你可以把大便表情杯丟一天。

When Walter Cronkite broke the news about the Kennedy assassination, he didn't come out in a wacky novelty bow tie.

當沃爾特-克朗凱特發佈肯尼迪遇刺的消息時，他並沒有戴著古怪新奇的領結出場。

字幕列表影片播放

特朗普將查理-柯克遇刺事件歸咎於左翼，言論升級 | 每日秀 (Trump Blames the Left for Charlie Kirk's Assassination as Rhetoric Escalates | The Daily Show)

sort

apparently

debate

audience