Name: 輝達絕不被AI搶走飯碗！黃仁勳：臺灣應投資核能 (CC 字幕) (輝達絕不被AI搶走飯碗！黃仁勳：台灣應投資核能 (CC Subtitles))
Uploaded: 2025-05-26T02:57:24.000Z
Duration: 4 min 39 s

動名詞

Nvidia was it's definitely not going to lose our jobs to AI.

Nvidia 表示，人工智能絕對不會讓我們失業。

現在進行式

None of our employees are going to lose jobs to AI.

我們的員工都不會因為人工智能而失業。

未來簡單式

They're going to lose their jobs to somebody who uses AI.

他們的工作會被使用人工智能的人搶走。

We're going to be at AGI probably next year.

And the reason for that is because the definition of AGI is either in forever, meaning we we don't know how when we get there, or there's a test.

其原因在於，AGI 的定義要麼是永遠存在的，也就是說，我們不知道如何才能達到目標，要麼就是存在一個測試。

We the industry has a large suite of benchmarks.

And by next year, you know, whether it's mid next year or late next year, those benchmarks will all be superhuman.

到明年，你知道，無論是明年年中還是明年年底，這些基準都將成為超人標準。

100% of them, you give it a test and it'll ace it.

100%，你給它做個測試，它就能搞定。

Sometimes I work with people, I'm not sure, you know?

有時我與人合作，我不確定，你知道嗎？

So, so the definition of intelligence is ambiguous, that's the reason.

所以，情報的定義是模糊的，這就是原因。

The only way to define what is AGI is a suite of tests, and I'm telling you that those tests will be beaten.

要定義什麼是 AGI，唯一的辦法就是進行一系列測試。

Our form of intelligence, the balance of all of the things that we somehow, it's much more than the ability to take tests.

我們的智力形式，我們在某種程度上的所有東西的平衡，它遠遠超過了考試的能力。

I know a lot of people who get straight A's, but quite frankly, not very successful.

我知道很多人都能拿到全 A，但坦率地說，他們並不是很成功。

And I know people who get straight C's and surprisingly successful.

我認識一些人，他們成績全 C，卻出奇地成功。

So apparently, apparently intelligence is not exactly those tests.

所以很顯然，智力並不完全是那些測試的結果。

Now, of course, I'm not suggesting go get straight C's.

當然，我並不是建議大家去拿全 C。

Just, you know, just out of an abundance of abundance of caution, get straight A's.

只是，你知道，只是出於謹慎，要拿到全 A。

You know, not too sure, just go get straight A's.

你知道的，不太確定，只要拿到全 A 就好了。

My direct my management team is about 50 people.

Every one of them, each one of them, each one of them individually in the work that they do is a superhuman compared to me.

他們中的每一個人，他們中的每一個人，他們中的每一個人在他們所做的工作中都是超人。

他們在各方面都是世界一流的。

我在管理它們方面沒有任何問題。

I have absolutely no trouble telling them what I want.

我完全可以告訴他們我想要什麼。

It's the same thing that an AI is going to get from me.

人工智能也會從我這裡得到同樣的東西。

Goal setting, inspiration, direction setting, predicting the unexpectable, all of those things that comes with leadership.

制定目標、激發靈感、確定方向、預測無法預料的事情，所有這些都與領導力息息相關。

I can tell AI one plan me plan me a vacation to Kyoto.

我可以告訴 AI，我計劃去京都度假。

The AI needs to know that I want to go to Kyoto.

人工智能需要知道我想去京都。

It's not going to say, I'm going to plan you a vacation to Kyoto, you will go.

它不會說，我給你安排一個去京都的假期，你一定要去。

It is very, very simple to put a form of touch sensor on a robot and poke it, and the robot knows it's been poked.

在機器人身上安裝一種觸摸傳感器，然後戳它一下，機器人就知道自己被戳了，這非常非常簡單。

And when you see the spike of of sensor information, it spikes up and it comes back down.

當你看到傳感器資訊的峰值時，它就會上升，然後又會下降。

But I have no idea whether it's conscious.

你甚至可以問人工智能：你快樂嗎？

And write me a story in a happy tone, take my email and make it happier.

用快樂的語氣給我寫一個故事，把我的郵件寫得更快樂。

事實上，人工智能就是這麼做的。

But it sure does a good job pretending, and that's good enough for me.

但它的偽裝效果確實不錯，這對我來說已經足夠了。

It is an AI I want to use to achieve my goals.

這是我想用來實現目標的人工智能。

Nvidia is not going to lose, we're not going to lose our jobs to an AI.

Nvidia 不會輸，我們也不會因為人工智能而失業。

Nvidia was it's definitely not going to lose our jobs to AI, none of our employees are going to lose jobs to AI.

Nvidia 表示，我們絕對不會因為人工智能而失業，我們的員工都不會因為人工智能而失業。

I said that like five years ago or something like that.

At first, everybody thought it was quite controversial.

起初，大家都認為這很有爭議。

Of course, because we're all going to have AI's.

當然，因為我們都將擁有人工智能。

So you're going to lose your job to somebody who uses it more than you.

所以，你的工作會被比你用得更多的人搶走。

Uh today I was in interview, I would I publicly said.

呃，今天我在接受採訪時，我會公開說。

I uh I encourage the the government of Taiwan to be supportive of energy policies.

我鼓勵臺灣政府支持能源政策。

We need energy from every single source, wind, solar, nuclear.

我們需要各種能源，風能、太陽能、核能。

Taiwan should should absolutely invest in nuclear.

And it shouldn't be a stigma to have energy.

精力充沛不應該成為一種恥辱。

Why should there be a social stigma to have energy?

為什麼擁有能量會成為一種社會恥辱？

Without the sun, how do we grow, none of us would be here without the sun, right?

沒有太陽，我們怎麼生長，沒有太陽，我們都不會在這裡，對嗎？

And so we need energy, every country needs energy, every region needs energy.

是以，我們需要能源，每個國家需要能源，每個地區都需要能源。

And so that's that's the limitation and there should be no social stigma.

是以，這就是限制，不應該有社會汙名。