請輸入想查詢的單字或片語
insidious
US /ɪnˈsɪdiəs/
・UK /ɪnˈsɪdiəs/
C1 高級
adj.形容詞陰險的
This is a rare but insidious problem, and it is vital that it is checked out further
影片字幕
中國留英學生強姦10名女性被判有罪 警方稱受害者或多達50人- BBC News 中文 (中國留英學生強姦10名女性被判有罪 警方稱受害者或多達50人－ BBC News 中文)
- Such is the insidious nature of those offending, I think there is a possibility that many more victim survivors may not even know that he has in fact raped them.
我認為，這些犯罪行為的隱蔽性使得更多的受害者倖存者可能根本不知道他實際上強姦了她們。
肯爺(Ye)引起公憤的反猶太主義言論 (Ye's antisemitic comments spark outrage, fear | Nightline)
- The tricky thing about antisemitism for a lot of people is that it is subtle and insidious by design.
對於很多人而言，反猶太主義棘手之處在於，他是蓄意地隱晦且陰險。
Andor 的建築講述了一個故事：建築師評論 (Andor's Architecture Tells a Story: An Architect Reviews)
- If we dive a bit deeper, though, into the meaning of this, there's something more insidious here at work.
不過，如果我們深入探究一下其中的含義，就會發現有一些更隱蔽的東西在起作用。
滿意了｜|漢密爾頓動畫 (Satisfied || Hamilton Animatic)
- So I’m the oldest and the wittiest and the gossip in New York City is insidious
我是聰明伶俐的長女，然而在紐約流言蜚语橫行
傑弗裡-愛潑斯坦是以色列間諜"：塔克-卡爾森在 "無客戶名單 "風波中震驚美國|特朗普|邦迪 ('Jeffrey Epstein Was Israeli Spy': Tucker Carlson Stuns US Amid 'No Client List' Row| Trump| Bondi)
- They should lose their citizenship There's a lot of Americans who've served in Ukraine and they should lose their so you can't fight for another country and remain an American period Obviously, I mean, it's like not even it's so funny how all of us have been cowed into being like, oh, that's hate speech No, it's not you don't hear hate in my voice because there isn't any it's just an obvious wreck It's an obvious recognition of the truth But there's a more insidious thing and I say it's not just Israel I'm not just trying to like get myself cover I'm being honest.
他們應該失去國籍 很多美國人都在烏克蘭服過役 他們應該失去國籍 所以你不能為另一個國家戰鬥 而在此期間仍然是美國人 很顯然，我的意思是，這就像甚至沒有 這很有趣，我們怎麼都被嚇得像，哦，那是仇恨言論 不，那不是 你在我的聲音裡聽不到仇恨 因為我沒有仇恨 那只是一種明顯的破壞 那是一種對事實的明顯認識
你正在被編程。這就是如何掙脫束縛。 (You Are Being Programmed. This Is How to Break Free.)
- And from a behavioral science perspective, what's truly insidious isn't just what some creators communicate, but how they, well, weaponize human psychology itself.
從行為科學的角度來看，真正陰險的不僅僅是一些創作者所傳達的資訊，而是他們如何將人類心理本身武器化。
右翼經濟學家的觀點 | 灰色地帶 (A right wing economist makes his case | The Gray Area)
- Oh, thank you for having me I want to start with a quote from something you actually wrote in 2018 because I think it does sum up what's Motivating your whole political project you write our political economy has relied upon the insidious Metaphor of the economic pie which measures success by the amount of GDP available to every American for consumption But the things America thought she wanted have not made her happy So, let's start there, what does that mean what did we think we wanted and why hasn't it made us happy Well, I do you're very perceptive to start there it's funny we were just putting together this this new book called the new conservatives That's sort of an anthology of everything We've been doing at American compass over the last five years And I actually went back and grabbed that essay and made it a prologue to the book Because exactly as you said it it is sort of a starting point certainly for the way I think about a lot of this and You know, I think in my mind What we what we saw go wrong in in our economics and in our politics is That that we did come to think of sort of consumption as the end unto itself And you know to be clear like I I love consumption as much as the next guy I think I'm not saying we should we should go back and live in log cabins But I think we assume that as as long as we were increasing consumption as long as material living standards were rising Everybody would be happy and and we could declare success and and it's important to say in in in economics from a formal perspective That is in fact how our economic models operate economists will tell you their assumption is that the goal of the economic system is to maximize consumption and And so that's where that economic pie metaphor comes from and it's something that was so widely embraced across the political spectrum Across sort of the intellectual spectrum.
謝謝你邀請我，我想從你2018年寫的一段話開始，因為我覺得它確實總結了你整個政治項目的動機，你寫道，我們的政治經濟依賴於經濟餡餅這個陰險的隱喻，它以每個美國人可消費的GDP數量來衡量成功，但美國人認為她想要的東西並沒有讓她快樂，所以，讓我們從這裡開始、那是什麼意思？ 我們以為我們想要什麼？ 為什麼它沒有讓我們幸福？ 你很有洞察力，從這裡開始 很有趣，我們正在整理這本新書 叫做《新保守主義者》 那是我們過去五年在美國羅盤所做的一切的選集在我看來 我們的經濟學和政治學都出了問題 就是我們把消費本身當成了目的
