gomorrah
US
・UK
A1 初級
prop. n.專有名詞蛾摩拉
影片字幕
十大電影反派太過分的時候 (Top 10 Times Movie Villains Went Too Far)
12:48
- Gomorrah, Avengers, Infinity War.
哥莫拉，復仇者，無限戰爭。
- After kidnapping his daughter and guardians of the Galaxy member Gomorrah, Thantos learns that the soul stone is on the planet for me.
在綁架了自己的女兒和銀河系成員戈莫拉的守護者後，桑托斯得知靈魂石在這個星球上為我。
蝙蝠俠》中最愚蠢的10個錯誤 (Top 10 Dumbest Mistakes In The MCU)
13:57
- Iron Man and Spiderman were extremely close to removing the infinity gauntlet from the mad titan when the emotional guardians leader decided to ask the villain about Gomorrah.
鋼鐵俠和蜘蛛俠在極其接近從瘋狂泰坦身上取下無限之鎧的時候，情緒激動的守護者領袖決定向這個惡棍詢問戈摩拉的情況。
10大MCU第五和第六階段預測解讀 (Top 10 MCU Phase 5 And 6 Predictions Explained)
11:13
- Sure the guardians have plenty on their plate with Adam Warlock and Gomorrah but that doesn't mean they can't make a detour to recruit a new Avenger were too fast.
當然，守護者們有很多事情要做，有亞當-術士和哥摩拉，但這並不意味著他們不能繞道去招募一個新的復仇者，他們的速度太快了。
MCU第5和第6階段粉絲理論的解釋 (MCU Phase 5 and 6 Fan Theories Explained)
12:50
- He saw a vision of the departed Gomorrah.
他看到了離開的蛾摩拉的異象。
讓我們無言以對的10大驚奇時刻 (Top 10 Marvel Moments That Left Us Speechless)
15:41
- Gomorrah is first amused since she believes Thanos loves no one, but she has proven tragically wrong as Thanos cries for what he's about to do despite cameras attempts to deny him.
哥摩拉先是感到好笑，因為她認為薩諾斯不愛任何人，但事實證明她錯得很慘，因為薩諾斯為他即將要做的事情而哭泣，儘管攝影機試圖否認他。
魔鬼的代言人。為什麼擔心法西斯主義？| 傑森-斯坦利 | 大思考 (Devil’s Advocate: Why worry about fascism? | Jason Stanley | Big Think)
03:24
- Sodom and Gomorrah.
索多瑪和蛾摩拉。
10個最大的MCU重構者 (Top 10 Biggest MCU Retcons)
15:53
- Number four Gomorrah may not be the last of her kind guardians of the galaxy and Avengers infinity war.
四號人物哥摩拉可能不是她的最後一個同類銀河系守護者和復仇者聯盟無限戰爭。
- Gomorrah surgically modified and trained as a living weapon.
戈摩拉經過手術改造，被訓練成活體武器。
警方將目標鎖定在助長巴西COVID-19激增的各方身上。 (Police target parties fueling Brazil's COVID-19 surge)
01:57
- There were hundreds and hundreds of people in a place without a single window and with all the doors closed, who was Sodom and Gomorrah?
在一個沒有一扇窗戶、所有門都關著的地方，有成百上千的人，所多瑪和蛾摩拉是誰？
雷神之愛與雷霆》中得到解答的問題 (Questions That Got Answered in Thor Love and Thunder)
11:43
- This likely means thor will not be a principal player in volume three, although there's still no word on what happened to 2014, Gomorrah Star Lord mentions his lost love during a heart to heart with thor suggesting there might be only one Gomorrah for him.
這很可能意味著索爾不會成為第三卷中的主要角色，儘管仍然沒有關於2014年發生了什麼的消息，但哥摩拉星主在與索爾交心時提到了他失去的愛情，暗示他可能只有一個哥摩拉。
聖經是邪惡的 | 為什麼辯解者忽視這些經文？ (The Bible is EVIL | Why apologists IGNORE these verses)
25:59
- God as a loving father. It casts him as a cosmic tyrant, callously experimenting with human lives and souls. Another hurdle that this defence struggles to overcome is accounting for moral regressions in scripture. If divine revelation is truly progressive, how do we explain instances where later bible passages appear less ethically advanced than earlier ones? For instance, the book of Genesis, which precedes Deuteronomy, has Abraham boldly negotiating with God to spare the righteous in Sodom and Gomorrah. Fast forward to Deuteronomy, we find God commanding the utter destruction of entire civilisations. This isn't progress. But perhaps most damningly, this defence implicitly admits that our modern moral sensibilities are superior to those presented in parts of the bible. By suggesting that we've progressed beyond the brutality of Deuteronomy, believers inadvertently confess a truth they dare not speak out loud. The good book isn't, in fact, good. Progressive revelation is, at base, the attempt to reconcile the irreconcilable, to force ancient atrocious texts into alignment with contemporary ethical standards. It's a tacit admission that significant portions of scripture are ethically indefensible. This theological contortion not only fails to resolve the core issues, but introduces new logical inconsistencies and theological conundrums, further eroding the credibility of the very texts it aims to defend.
上帝是一位慈愛的父親。它把上帝塑造成一個宇宙暴君，冷酷無情地拿人的生命和靈魂做實驗。這種辯護難以克服的另一個障礙是解釋經文中的道德倒退。如果神的啟示真的是漸進的，那麼我們如何解釋《聖經》中後來的經文在道德上似乎不如先前的經文先進？例如，在《申命記》之前的《創世記》中，亞伯拉罕大膽地與上帝談判，要求饒恕所多瑪和蛾摩拉的義人。到了《申命記》，我們發現上帝命令徹底摧毀整個文明。這不是進步。但也許最令人震驚的是，這種辯護暗中承認我們的現代道德感優於《聖經》中的部分內容。通過暗示我們已經超越了《申命記》中的殘暴，信
- God specifies his targets, such as in the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, where specific cities are named, or in the command to utterly destroy the Amalekites, where a particular group is singled out. Even within Deuteronomy itself, we see specificity, like the command to destroy the cities of Sion. So, why are the conquest commands in Deuteronomy not similarly specified? Why is the criterion for destruction merely proximity to Israel, rather than specific peoples or places? This omission has led to millennia of misuse and abuse of these passages to justify colonialism, slavery, and genocide – entailments that an all-loving God would have anticipated. Lastly, proponents of this defence don't apply it consistently. When's the last time you heard a theist argue for a limited application of passages that they favour, such as love your neighbour as yourself? This selective application exposes the argument as a convenient escape hatch for difficult verses, rather than a consistent interpretive principle.
上帝指明瞭他的目標，比如在毀滅所多瑪和蛾摩拉時，上帝點出了具體的城市，或者在徹底毀滅亞瑪力人的命令中，上帝挑出了一個特定的群體。甚至在申命記本身，我們也能看到特殊性，比如毀滅錫安城的命令。那麼，為什麼申命記中的征服命令沒有類似的具體規定呢？為什麼摧毀的標準僅僅是靠近以色列，而不是具體的民族或地方？這一疏忽導致這些經文被誤用和濫用了數千年，為殖民主義、奴隸制和種族滅絕辯護，而這正是全愛的上帝所預料到的。最後，這種辯護的支持者並沒有始終如一地運用它。你上一次聽到有神論者主張有限度地應用他們所贊成的經文，比如