Name: 美國盟友拒絕川普協助霍爾木茲海峽的請求！ (US allies reject Trump's call for help in Strait of Hormuz)
Uploaded: 2026-03-16T21:35:44.000Z
Duration: 9 min 55 s

程度副詞

The president is very dismayed with American allies.

總統對美國的盟友感到非常失望。

情態副詞

He wants help from them when it comes to the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran essentially has at a standstill to oil traffic going through there.

在荷姆茲海峽這件事上，他希望他們能幫忙，因為伊朗幾乎讓那裡的石油運輸停滯了。

Oil traffic that doesn't really pertain to the US but it does because that's how oil is priced.

石油運輸其實跟美國沒有直接關係，但卻有，因為這就是石油的定價方式。

It's a global pricing system, obviously, and it's affecting the US but he's frustrated with American allies.

顯然這是一個全球定價系統，它影響著美國，但總統卻對美國的盟友感到沮喪。

Numerous countries have told me they're on the way.

許多國家告訴我他們正在路上。

Some are very enthusiastic about it and some are.

有些國家對此非常熱情，有些則不然。

And some are countries that we've helped for many, many years.

有些國家是我們多年來一直幫助的。

We've protected them from horrible outside sources, and they weren't that enthusiastic.

我們保護他們免受可怕的外部威脅，但他們卻不是那麼熱情。

I just want the fake news media and everybody else to remember that that was said because when I've been a big critic of all of the protecting of countries because I know that we'll protect them and if ever needed, if we ever needed help, they won't be there for us.

我只想讓假新聞媒體和其他所有人記住這句話，因為我一直以來都嚴厲批評保護這些國家，因為我知道我們會保護他們，但如果我們需要幫助，他們卻不會在那裡支持我們。

All right, our reporters are at the White House, Tel Aviv and New York.

好的，我們的記者們現在在白宮、特拉維夫和紐約。

They've been listening to the president's remarks.

They're covering all different angles of this.

他們正從各個不同的角度進行報導。

I want to bring in CNN's Elena Treen first at the White House.

我想先請白宮的 CNN 記者艾蓮娜·崔恩。

Elena, what stood out to you based on what we heard there?

艾蓮娜，根據我們聽到的，你覺得最值得注意的是什麼？

Yeah, I think really touching on exactly what you just pointed played for the president was really the most notable to me, this idea of his disappointment.

是的，我認為總統剛剛提到的，關於他的失望感，這點對我來說最為突出。

And he used that word specifically Omar and Brianna, to describe the countries and particularly the NATO allies that he says are not coming to the United States aid here in trying to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

他特別用這個詞，Omar 和 Brianna，來形容那些他認為沒有向美國提供援助的國家，尤其是北約盟友，來幫助重開荷姆茲海峽。

I thought, you know, what we heard of him actually yesterday is very much the same kind of threat.

我認為，你知道的，我們昨天聽到的和他今天說的，是同一種威脅。

We're hearing today almost this ominous warning, two countries who do not get involved here to send warships to escort these tankers, which is very dangerous.

我們今天聽到的幾乎是個不祥的警告，給那些不介入此事的國家，不派軍艦護送這些油輪的國家，這其實非常危險。

We've heard that now from many top military, you know, commanders and whatnot.

我們也從很多頂尖軍事指揮官那裡聽到了類似的說法。

But this dangerous, you know, helping in this dangerous mission of trying to send these warships to escort these tankers through that very critical Strait of Hormuz.

參與這項危險任務，試圖派遣這些軍艦護送油輪通過那個極為重要的荷姆茲海峽。

At one point he said, I think we'd have some very good help.

他曾說過，我認為我們會得到一些很好的幫助。

And I think we're going to be disappointed with some countries again, getting back to that point.

我認為我們會再次對一些國家感到失望，回到剛才那個話題。

But one thing that very much was clear, and

it was a bit clear from that clip you played, is that he continued to talk about this idea of how he's always thought of the NATO alliance almost as being more beneficial for other members than it is for the United States.

從你播放的那段影片中也能稍微看出來，他持續談論著一個想法，那就是他一直認為北約盟友對其他成員國的益處，遠大於對美國。

At one point he said, I've said for years that why aren't we being reimbursed for what the United States is doing in the street of Hormuz?

他曾說過，我說了好幾年了，為什麼美國在荷姆茲海峽的付出沒有得到補償？

He's kept saying, I've been saying that for years.

他一直這麼說，我說了好幾年了。

He brought up this point that he believes that when these countries need help from the U.S.

他提出了這一點，他認為當這些國家需要美國的幫助時，

the U.S. is willing to help them, not necessarily other way around.

美國願意幫助他們，而不一定是反過來。

One thing I do want to be clear on though, and

不過，有一點我確實想說清楚，

just some context to all of this is what has been so interesting about the president calling on these countries to send these warships to help reopen the strait is that this is the first time really that we've heard the president be so eager to involve other countries in this war.

關於總統呼籲這些國家派遣軍艦來協助重開海峽這件事，有趣的地方在於，這是我們第一次聽到總統如此積極地想讓其他國家介入這場戰爭。

I'd remind you that when the US first struck Iran, of course, with Israel as well, a lot of these countries said that they were surprised and that they were kind of caught off guard when that first happened.

我想提醒你，當美國最初打擊伊朗時，當然也包括以色列，許多國家都表示他們感到驚訝，而且在那件事發生時，他們有點措手不及。

But really, I think this enormous pressure, pressure we have seen from President Trump and I should note as well, someone who has repeatedly mused openly about this idea of withdrawing support from the Naito alliance, this pressure that continues to build.

但說真的，我認為這種巨大的壓力，也就是我們從川普總統那裡看到的壓力，我還應該提到，他曾多次公開思考過撤回對北約盟友支持的想法，這種壓力持續在累積。

Even so, we still haven't seen a lot of these allies who the president said he wouldn't name.

即使如此，我們還是沒有看到很多總統說不點名的盟友。

But a lot of these allies come out and say that they would actually send warships.

但許多盟友都站出來說，他們實際上會派遣軍艦。

You know, you look at Germany, the uk, Japan, who actually note who's prime minister will be here later at the White House later this week, all of them so far being very cautious about heating the the president's urges here.

你知道，看看德國、英國、日本，他們實際上注意到首相本週晚些時候將在這裡的白宮，到目前為止，他們都對響應總統的呼籲非常謹慎。

Right now, members of NATO are responding after President Trump warned that the alliance would face a quote, very bad future if it doesn't help secure the Strait of Hormuz.

目前，北約成員國正在回應川普總統的警告，他曾說過，如果北約不幫助確保荷姆茲海峽的安全，聯盟將面臨「非常糟糕的未來」。

Now, the EU's foreign policy chief appeared to agree with President Trump that it is in Europe's interest to keep the strait open, but

現在，歐盟外交政策負責人似乎同意川普總統的看法，認為維持海峽暢通符合歐洲的利益，但是

also added it's quote, out of NATO's area of action.

也補充說，這「不在北約的行動範圍內」。

And a spokesperson for German Chancellor Friedrich Mears struck a more defiant tone, saying it is not NATO's war.

而德國總理弗里德里希·梅爾斯的發言人則採取了更強硬的態度，表示這不是北約的戰爭。

Meanwhile, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer spoke about the situation earlier.

同時，英國首相基爾·斯塔默稍早也談到了這個情況。

We have to reopen the straight off Hormuz to ensure stability in the market.

我們必須重新開放荷姆茲海峽，以確保市場的穩定。

So we're working with all of our allies, including our European partners, to bring together a viable collective plan that can restore freedom of navigation in the region as quickly as possible at ease.

所以我們正與所有盟友，包括我們的歐洲夥伴合作，共同制定一個可行的集體計畫，以盡快恢復該區域的航行自由。

Let's talk about the dynamics Here I want to bring in Jim Townsend.

我們來談談這裡的動態，我想請吉姆·湯森德加入。

He served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for European and NATO policy.

他曾擔任歐洲和北約政策的國防部副助理部長。

I want to pick up with a little bit of what we heard from the president here in terms of the United States relationship with NATO on one hand, asking for help not just from NATO countries, but

我想延續總統剛才提到的，關於美國與北約的關係，一方面尋求不只是北約國家，

from those from the likes of China and Japan as well, but

還有像是中國和日本等國家的協助，但

also in the same breath, saying the United States doesn't need NATO.

And I just wonder, from the European perspective, where is the threshold for actual assistance here?

我想問，從歐洲的角度來看，實際援助的門檻在哪裡？

And what do you think it would take to actually get to that point?

你認為要達到那個點，還需要做些什麼？

Well, it's a great question, and I think there's a lot of confusion about NATO versus NATO allies.

嗯，這是個很棒的問題，我認為大家對北約和北約盟友之間有很多混淆。

NATO as an institution, if it wanted to go to the Straits, if this was something that NATO agreed, like going to Afghanistan was, NATO could do that.

北約這個組織，如果它想進入海峽，如果這是北約同意的事，就像當年進入阿富汗一樣，北約是可以做到的。

It would never get the votes within the alliance to make this an alliance operation.

在盟友內部，這永遠無法獲得足夠的票數來讓這成為一項盟友行動。

However, NATO nations can certainly come together in a coalition of the willingness and go in there and do what the Prime Minister Starmer was talking about, to go in there and to work with the US Navy and get the straits open.

不過，北約國家當然可以組成一個「意願聯盟」，然後像史達墨首相說的那樣，進去和美國海軍合作，讓海峽暢通無阻。

So as far as Europeans are concerned, they realize that this is going to be in their interest because of the price of energy and other economic ramifications.

所以就歐洲國家而言，他們意識到這會符合他們的利益，因為能源價格和其他經濟影響。

But they're still stung by how they have been addressed by Trump and how the alliance has been addressed in terms of NATO.

但他們仍然對川普的言論以及北約的處境感到受傷。

So there's not a lot of good feelings towards the United States right now, particularly because they were not part of the process in the run up to this war.

所以現在他們對美國並沒有太多好感，特別是因為他們沒有參與這場戰爭之前的過程。

And that's one of the major contrasts here, that in the past, we may have seen the United States sort of feel out that support that may be there from allies before taking action.

這也是這裡一個主要的對比，過去我們可能會看到美國在採取行動前，會先試探盟友是否支持。

就像我們在這裡看到的這麼重要。

But in terms of assistance, the president is asking for whatever it takes to quote him, including minesweepers, for example.

但在援助方面，總統要求不計一切代價，引述他的話，例如包括掃雷艦。

What help could NATO countries actually offer here that would help in the United States efforts?

北約國家在這裡實際能提供什麼幫助，來支持美國的努力？

Well, one thing that a lot of the NATO nations who are seafaring nations like Denmark, UK and others, they do minesweeping.

嗯，很多像丹麥、英國等都是航海國家的北約國家，他們都有掃雷的能力。

NATO has a very capable minesweeping capability among the nations.

北約國家之間擁有非常強大的掃雷能力。

So it doesn't have to be a NATO maritime operation there.

所以不一定要是北約的聯合海上行動。

It can be the nations themselves who can bring their minesweeping capability to the Gulf.

而是各個國家自己可以將他們的掃雷能力帶到波斯灣。

So I think what's important here is that the allies, the NATO nations themselves, that this might not be a NATO operation, but

所以我認為這裡重要的是，盟友、北約國家本身，這可能不是一個北約的行動，但是

the European nations know that this has got to be done.

歐洲國家知道這件事必須完成。

And I think they need to hold their nose and get this done.

我認為他們需要忍耐一下，把這件事做好。

一場德國的戰爭，不是德國的戰爭。

一場北約的戰爭，不是北約的戰爭。

And these nations can bring not just their minesweeping, but

而這些國家不僅能出動掃雷艦，還能

they've got frigates, they can do escorting, they can do a lot of things, leaving the combat activities to the US if that's the way they want to do it.

派出巡防艦，執行護航任務，他們能做很多事，如果他們想這麼做的話，就把戰鬥任務交給美國。

We're joined now by CNN military analyst retired Army Lieutenant General Mark Schwartz.

我們現在 joins by CNN military analyst retired Army Lieutenant General Mark Schwartz。

General, thank you so much for being with us here.

And in response to Trump's calls to assist with keeping shipping lanes open, there was a spokesperson for the German chancellor who said this war has nothing to do with NATO.

而且針對川普要求協助維持航道暢通的呼籲，德國總理的發言人表示，這場戰爭跟北約無關。

So, you know, maybe you can sort of dissect the president's request here.

所以，你知道，也許你可以試著分析一下總統的要求。

I think there's a lot of folks who look at it and think there are flaws.

我想很多人看到這個都會覺得有點瑕疵。

But also can NATO really wash their hands of this?

I think NATO collectively is an alliance.

Maybe it's not a NATO Alliance Article 5 scenario.

也許這不是北約第五條款規定的情況。

But certainly there's many European countries that have provided littoral combat ship like vessels, frigates, other mine counter mine capabilities to many of us led coalition maritime efforts.

但肯定有很多歐洲國家已經提供了像濱海戰鬥艦、巡防艦、其他掃雷能力給我們領導的許多聯盟海上行動。

So I suspect we'll see several countries eventually agree to come in the United Kingdom, as you know, you heard the prime minister speak earlier about hey, let's come together and put together a task force, a coalition to support freedom of navigation.

所以我猜測最終會有幾個國家同意加入，像是英國，你知道的，你剛才聽到首相發言，說「嘿，讓我們團結起來，組成一個特遣隊，一個聯盟來支持航行自由」。

So, you know, I just, I wish this wasn't playing out in public.

所以，你知道，我只是，我希望這件事沒有在公開場合上演。

It's not healthy, I don't think with long standing alliances that are kind of tit for tat that's going on.

我認為這樣長期以來聯盟之間這種你來我往的關係，對大家來說並不健康。