Name: CNN 因刪除紐約恐怖分子嫌疑人貼文而遭嚴厲抨擊！ (CNN TORCHED over now-deleted post about NYC terror suspects)
Uploaded: 2026-03-11T23:03:33.000Z
Duration: 4 min 22 s

CNN facing backlash over a now deleted post about the two New York City terror suspects who threw those IEDs outside of Gracie Mansion.

CNN 因為一篇已刪除的貼文而面臨批評，該貼文是關於兩名紐約市的恐怖嫌犯，他們在 Gracie Mansion 外投擲了 IEDs。

情態副詞

Here's the original post, CNN writing, quote, two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed into New York City Saturday morning for what could have been a normal day, enjoying the city during abnormally warm weather.

這是原始貼文，CNN 寫道：「兩名賓夕法尼亞州的青少年週六早上進入紐約市，原本可能是一個平常的日子，在異常溫暖的天氣裡享受這座城市。」

But in less than an hour, their lives would drastically change as the pair would be arrested for throwing homemade bombs during an anti Muslim protest outside Mayor Zorramdani's home.

但不到一小時，他們的生活就發生了劇變，這兩人因在索拉姆達尼市長家外反穆斯林抗議活動中投擲自製炸彈而被捕。

But after facing fierce criticism, CNN put out a statement saying the post, quote, failed to reflect the gravity of the incident, thereby breaching the editorial standards we require for all our reporting here to react.

但在遭受嚴厲批評後，CNN 發布聲明表示，該貼文「未能反映事件的嚴重性，是以違反了我們對所有報導要求的編輯標準。」

Fox News contributor and Washington examiner senior writer Joe Concha.

Fox News 的撰稿人兼 Washington Examiner 的資深作家 Joe Concha。

Joe, how does someone who has managed to get a job at the national news level, you know, understanding what the lead of a story is and what's the supplemental information in a story, ever think to write that story like it's a feature in travel section?

Joe，一個能在國家級新聞機構工作的人，你知道，理解一個故事的重點是什麼，以及故事中的補充資訊是什麼，怎麼會覺得可以把這個故事寫得像旅遊版的報導一樣？

Great question and great framing there, Todd.

這是個很棒的問題，Todd，你的提問也很到位。

Yeah, not only did they bury the lead, they put it like 10ft under, picked it up and buried it again.

是啊，他們不只埋沒了重點，還把它埋了大概十英尺深，又挖出來重新埋了一次。

I mean, this is not something that you could take seriously in any way, shape or form.

我的意思是，這根本就不是一件可以認真看待的事情，無論從哪個角度來看。

I mean, imagine if CNN covering the Pearl harbor attacks of 1941.

我是說，想像一下 CNN 在報導 1941 年的珍珠港事件。

You know, two Japanese sailors were in the Pacific in search of mermaids like in that Tom Hanks movie Splash, when suddenly they stumbled upon this thing called Hawaii and the US Military port called Pearl harbor, when suddenly they were unwittingly engaged in these attacks on US Naval operations.

你知道，有兩名日本水手在太平洋裡尋找美人魚，就像湯姆漢克斯演的那部《美人魚》電影一樣，結果他們突然發現了夏威夷這個地方，還有一個叫做珍珠港的美國軍事港口，然後他們就無意間捲入了這些針對美國海軍行動的攻擊。

It's really no different in terms of what we're seeing here, what happened in New York over the weekend.

這跟我們現在看到的，紐約週末發生的事，真的沒什麼兩樣。

If these IEDs went off, Todd, it would be like the Boston bombing all over again.

如果這些 IEDs 爆炸了，Todd，那就像波士頓爆炸案重演一樣。

We more than a decade ago and we remember what happened there.

我們十幾年前就發生過，我們還記得那時候發生的事。

A 10 year old boy was blown up, three people were killed, 500 injured.

一個 10 歲的小男孩被炸飛，三個人死亡，500 人受傷。

Look, these are the suspects are Islamic extremists who sought to take out and maim Americans that they disagreed with.

聽著，這些嫌犯是伊斯蘭極端分子，他們試圖殺害和傷害他們不同意的美國人。

And the mayor, Zoram and Donnie, like we just heard from our last guest in his statements afterwards, prioritized the protesters who were protesting against him or at least, you know, against these people that were really upset that the Ayatollah was blown up.

而索拉姆達尼市長，就像我們剛才從上一位來賓那裡聽到的，在他之後的聲明中，優先處理了抗議他的人，或者至少，你知道，那些對「阿亞圖拉被炸飛」感到非常不滿的人。

He actually prioritized talking about them over the terrorists who tried to kill them.

他實際上優先處理了和他們談話，而不是和那些試圖殺害他們的人談話。

But thank God the NYPD did their job and made sure that no one was hurt here because this could have been very, very bad time.

但謝天謝地，紐約市警局做了他們的工作，確保這裡沒有人受傷，因為這本來可能會是個非常、非常糟糕的時刻。

And thank goodness these things were failures and didn't go off.

謝天謝地，這些東西都失敗了，沒有爆炸。

What will it take for the media to acknowledge that Islamic extremism is a scourge on society?

媒體要到什麼時候才肯承認伊斯蘭極端主義是社會的禍害？

Because in all of these articles they seem to gloss over that key part.

因為在所有這些文章裡，他們似乎都輕描淡寫了那個關鍵部分。

Joe I think that in CNN's case, for example, we just want to isolate this to cnn.

Joe，我認為以 CNN 為例，我們只想把這件事侷限在 CNN。

You have to change leadership, which will be happening after, after the sale.

你們得要更換領導層，這會在交易之後發生。

Bring it to Bari Weiss or, you know, somebody who understands what journalism is.

找 Bari Weiss，或是你知道的，懂什麼是新聞工作的人來。

You have to basically like Indiana football, Todd, because we can relate to this.

你們基本上得像印第安納大學的橄欖球隊一樣，Todd，因為我們能體會這種感覺。

But just to let everybody know, Indiana University had the worst record of any Division 1 football program in the country.

不過讓大家知道一下，印第安納大學是全國所有第一級大學足球隊裡戰績最差的。

And then suddenly they bought in new coaching, they bought in new players and suddenly changed the culture and they won the national championship last year.

然後突然他們換了新教練、找來新球員，徹底改變了球隊文化，去年就贏得了全國冠軍。

You have to change everything if you want to actually get journalism, in this case from a CNN or other news outlets.

你們得要全面改變，才能真正做好新聞工作，無論是從 CNN 還是其他新聞機構。

Otherwise, this is going to keep happening again and again and we're going to talk about it on this network again and again because that's, that's what's going to do it at this point, unfortunately.

否則這種情況會一再發生，我們也會在這個頻道上一次又一次地討論，因為這就是目前的情況，很可惜。

Well, we will be watching to see if there are any changes at CNN in the meantime.

嗯，我們也會繼續關注 CNN 在此期間是否有任何改變。

And click here to subscribe to the Fox News YouTube page to catch our hottest interviews and most compelling analysis.

然後點這裡訂閱 Fox News 的 YouTube 頻道，觀看我們最精彩的專訪和最深入的分析。