Name: FBI檔案出現FBI紀錄！與川普指控者相關的紀錄，竟從愛普斯坦檔案中消失？！ (FBI records tied to Trump accuser missing from Epstein files)
Uploaded: 2026-02-26T23:04:47.000Z
Duration: 9 min 33 s

There are growing questions this hour about dozens of records that appear to be missing from the Epstein files.

這一個小時，大家對 Epstein files 中似乎遺失的幾十份文件越來越感到疑惑。

According to a CNN review, those records in question are FBI witness interviews.

根據 CNN 的一份審查，這些有疑慮的文件是 FBI 的證人訪談。

基礎被動語態

And three of the missing interviews are related to a woman who accused both Jeffrey Epstein and President Trump of sexually assaulting her decades ago.

而其中三份遺失的訪談，是關於一位多年前指控 Jeffrey Epstein 和川普總統性侵她的女性。

The top Democrat on the Oversight Committee is among those expressing concern.

監督委員會的首席民主黨員也表達了擔憂。

I went to the DOJ file search room yesterday to look for these documents that are in the manifest document, and

我昨天去了 DOJ 的文件搜尋室，想找那些在 manifest document 裡的文件，

they should be in there, and they're not there.

照理說應該在那裡，但卻不在。

These documents relate to a survivor that has made serious allegations about the president.

這些文件跟一位對總統提出嚴重指控的倖存者有關。

What's important now is that the DOJ explained to us why were those documents removed.

現在重要的是，DOJ 要向我們解釋為什麼那些文件被移除了。

CNN 的 Kara Skinnell 現在加入我們。

So, Kara, what more do we know about the specifics of these documents?

Kara，我們對這些文件的細節還知道多少？

Well, Erica, the CNN investigative team have taken a look into these records, and

好的，Erica，CNN 的調查團隊已經檢視了這些記錄，

they found that there are dozens of files that are missing.

他們發現有數十份文件遺失了。

And the way that they were able to do this is they looked at the serial numbers on an evidence log provided to Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, and

他們之所以能這樣做，是因為他們查看了提供給 Epstein 的同夥 Ghislaine Maxwell 的一份證據記錄上的序號，

looking at those serial numbers, discovered that there were dozens of them missing.

透過查看這些序號，發現有數十個序號遺失了。

That's the FBI form for witness interviews.

那是 FBI 記錄證人訪談的表格。

And there are 325 included on that list, but there are 90 of them missing.

名單上總共有 325 份，但有 90 份遺失了。

And within those 90 that are missing includes three from a woman who said that she was sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein going back to when she was as young as 13 years old.

在這 90 份遺失的文件中，包含了三份是一位女士的訪談記錄，她說她從 13 歲起就遭到 Jeffrey Epstein 性侵。

And she also made an allegation that she was sexually assaulted by Donald Trump in the 1980s.

她也指控在 1980 年代遭到唐納·川普性侵。

Now, we went to the White House with this.

現在，我們帶著這個消息去了白宮。

They said that these are false allegations and it's just sensationalist.

他們說這些都是不實指控，只是聳人聽聞。

The Justice Department said that they have not deleted any documents and that they said that if there are documents that are not on the public website, that's either because they were duplicates, privileged, or part of an ongoing investigation.

司法部表示，他們沒有刪除任何文件，並說如果有些文件不在公開網站上，那可能是因為它們是複本、有特權，或是正在進行的調查的一部分。

We have seen with the release of these records on the public website that sometimes documents are there, they're taken down, then they're put back up.

我們從公開網站上釋出的這些記錄中看到，有時候文件會出現，然後被移除，之後又被放回去。

It's unclear if there is any process that is underway related to these specific documents and these allegations against Donald Trump.

目前還不清楚是否有任何與這些特定文件以及對唐納·川普的這些指控相關的流程正在進行。

Donald Trump, though, has not been accused of any wrongdoing.

不過，唐納·川普並未被指控任何不當行為。

He's not been investigated for any wrongdoing.

他也沒有因為任何不當行為而受到調查。

And it's unclear what happened to these specific allegations by this woman who spoke with investigators in 2019.

而且，這位在 2019 年與調查人員談過的女士提出的這些具體指控到底發生了什麼事，目前還不清楚。

There was another record in the files, a summary from the FBI about a number of these salacious allegations.

檔案中還有另一份記錄，是 FBI 關於這些聳人聽聞的指控的總結。

And it said that one person claimed abuse by Trump but refuse to cooperate.

記錄中提到，有一人聲稱遭到川普虐待，但拒絕合作。

So if that is that same person, it could be that they just reached a dead end.

所以，如果那是同一個人，那可能是因為他們遇到了死衚衕。

But of course, Democrats are calling foul, as they have repeatedly, about the Justice Department's process of publicizing the records that are required under the law and redactions that they have taken.

不過，民主黨人當然會像他們一再做的那樣，對司法部依法公開記錄和進行的塗改提出異議。

Hours after this story broke today, the Justice Department responded to questions of where these documents are, saying as with all documents flagged by the public, the department is currently reviewing files within that category of production.

今天這則新聞爆發的數小時後，司法部就對這些文件在哪裡的問題做出了回應，表示與所有被大眾標記的文件一樣，司法部目前正在審查該類別的生產文件。

Should any document be found to have been improperly tagged in the review process and is responsive to the act, meaning the law that forced them to publish all of this, the department will, of course, publish it consistent with that law.

如果在審查過程中發現任何文件被不當標記，並且符合該法案的要求，也就是迫使他們公開這一切的法律，司法部當然會依法公開。

My source tonight is California Congressman Dave Minn, who is a Democrat on the House Oversight Committee.

我今晚的消息來源是加州眾議員 Dave Minn，他是眾議院監督委員會的民主黨籍成員。

When you hear that response from the Justice Department, do you believe that's sufficient?

聽到司法部這樣的說法，你認為足夠嗎？

And at this point, I think it appears clearer and clearer every day that they are knowingly violating and willfully violating the law that we passed that Donald Trump signed into law requiring them to turn over every responsive document.

我認為，現在一天比一天清楚，他們是在故意且蓄意地違反我們通過、唐納·川普簽署成為法律，要求他們交出所有相關文件的法律。

And I want to be clear, just to clarify two things that I think you alluded to.

我想釐清兩件事，我覺得你剛剛有提到。

One, Donald Trump is accused of sexually assaulting a child in those memos that you mentioned.

第一，唐納·川普在那些你提到的備忘錄中，被指控性侵一名兒童。

Two, that it's not just a few dozen documents that are not being turned over.

第二，這不只是幾十份文件沒有被交出來。

Fully half of the documents that we're aware of, some 3 million documents, have not been turned over by the DOJ.

我們知道的、大約有三百萬份文件，其中一半都沒有被 DOJ 交出來。

They claim they fully responded and yet we found over and over again.

他們聲稱已經完全回應了，但我們一次又一次地發現。

And I can tell you that oversight Democratic staff have confirmed what you have found, that these documents are missing.

我可以告訴你，監督民主黨的工作人員已經證實了你的發現，這些文件確實遺失了。

They were not turned over, even though they were very clearly responsive to the questions that we asked.

即使這些文件非常明顯地回應了我們提出的問題，它們也沒有被交出來。

And this appears to be part of a very broad cover up.

這似乎是一場非常廣泛的掩蓋行動的一部分。

And you may remember back to last May when Pam Bondi reportedly told Donald Trump he was in the Epstein files.

你可能還記得去年五月，據報導 Pam Bondi 告訴唐納·川普，他在 Epstein files 裡。

After that, there were a lot of reports that DOJ attorneys were being asked to go redact documents, to hide documents, to remove documents from the files, and

在那之後，有很多報導指出 DOJ 的律師被要求去刪改文件、隱藏文件、從檔案中移除文件，而且

So we're definitely continuing to look at this, but

it appears that the DOJ is willfully violating the law.

And of course, an interview or a witness statement, it doesn't mean that it happened.

當然，訪談或證人陳述，並不代表事情就真的發生了。

I mean, there's, you can read through these documents.

我的意思是，你可以讀讀這些文件。

But in terms of what should be published in accordance with the law that you passed.

但就你通過的法律規定應該公開的部分而言。

I mean, do you believe that this is they're intentionally breaking that law or do you think it's because which is what we've heard from doj, they had so much to publish, such a compressed time frame.

我的意思是，你認為他們是故意違法，還是因為，就像我們從司法部聽到的那樣，他們要發布的內容太多，時間又很緊迫？

And so just to give you a quick heads up on my background, I was a federal enforcement attorney.

所以簡單跟你說一下我的背景，我曾是聯邦執法人員。

To start my career at the sec, I have spent many, many hours doing this type of document review and management and looking things through.

剛開始在證券交易委員會（SEC）工作時，我花了很多很多時間做這類文件審查和管理，以及深入研究。

And at this point, I do not believe that this is just a delay in turning the documents over.

而且我認為，現在已經不是單純延遲交出文件了。

The fact that so many Donald Trump related documents have not been turned over, that his name's been repeatedly redacted matches a lot of the reports that we heard that they were trying to cover this up.

這麼多與唐納·川普相關的文件都沒有交出來，他的名字一再被塗抹，這跟我們聽到的許多試圖掩蓋真相的報導吻合。

And at this point, I think, look, everybody's entitled to their day in court, whether that's Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Les Wexner, anybody else.

而且我認為，大家都有權利獲得公平審判，無論是唐納·川普、伊隆·馬斯克、萊斯·韋克斯納，還是其他人。

But the fact is that everything here looks like the DOJ is again under the direction of Pam Bondi, the AG willfully trying to hide a lot of what's happening right now.

但事實是，這裡的一切都顯示 DOJ 在 Pam Bondi 的訓示下，再次惡意地試圖隱藏目前發生的許多事情。

Starting us off, Republican member of the House Oversight Committee, Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna.

首先登場的是眾議院監督委員會的共和黨成員，國會議員 Anna Paulina Luna。

Congressman, thank you for joining me this evening.

議員，謝謝您今晚加入我的節目。

I mean, you have heard likely the Department of Justice saying that they are looking into whether the files mentioning President Trump were improperly removed.

我想，您可能聽說過司法部表示他們正在調查提及川普總統的文件是否被不當移除。

Do you trust them to be transparent in that inquiry?

您相信他們會在這次調查中保持透明嗎？

I have followed up on a number of occasions similar, and they have been very forthcoming.

我曾多次跟進類似的事件，他們都非常配合。

I've actually talked directly to Todd Blanche.

我實際上和 Todd Blanche 直接談過了。

And so I will personally be ensuring that that's followed through on.

所以我個人會確保這件事會被徹底追查。

But I would like to also state that I think that the files that we have currently under this administration are likely not the full files.

但我也想說，我認為我們目前在這個政府底下拿到的文件，可能不是全部的文件。

I do believe that some were destroyed previously.

我確實相信有些文件之前被銷毀了。

And I say that because in January of last year, when I was the only member of Congress that was pushing for the release of these files, we actually had a whistleblower come forward.

我之所以這麼說，是因為去年一月，當時我是國會唯一推動釋出這些文件的成員，我們確實有一名吹哨者出面。

I actually introduced legislation because of that.

I even forwarded this finding to the FBI for investigation that there was destruction of evidence.

我甚至將這個發現轉交給 FBI 進行調查，因為有證據被銷毀。

And so it'll probably require a longer segment, but

所以這可能需要比較長的篇幅，但是

I will say that there have been redactions that we've come across.

我要說的是，我們確實發現了一些被塗改的地方。

I've been, and I've looked at the files for a number of hours.

我已經花了幾個小時在看這些檔案。

Whenever we flag those files, they are immediately then unredacted.

每當我們標記出那些檔案，它們就會立刻被取消塗改。

it does seem to be kind of an internal war going on, even at the Department of Justice, where they have the order, and

司法部內部似乎正在進行一場內戰，他們有命令，

then you have some of the attorneys that have been in charge of the redactions.

然後你又看到一些負責塗改的律師。

And so we're doing everything that we can to deliver on transparency.

所以我們正盡一切努力來實現透明化。

But as you can see, Epstein and his involved network is quite extensive and involves a lot of people.

但正如你所見，Epstein 和他所牽涉的網絡相當廣泛，牽涉到很多人。

Well, Congresswoman, that does not really inspire confidence.

嗯，國會議員，這真的讓人無法放心。

If you believe files have been destroyed, that transparency is not complete, if it's not been thorough.

如果各位認為檔案被銷毀了，透明度不夠，不夠徹底。

How can the American public, who are not privy to what you say you've seen, who do not have access to the files, how can they be confident that the Attorney General Bondi, leading this charge, or others who are in charge of providing documents, that they really will do so in the interest of justice?

那麼美國民眾，他們無法得知你們說看到了什麼，也無法取得檔案，他們要如何相信，由邦迪檢察長領導，或是其他負責提供文件的人，真的會為了司法公正而這麼做？

Well, I think that for starters, you have a bipartisan, bipartisan oversight committee actually working to cover, not cover up, but

嗯，我認為首先，你們有一個跨黨派的、跨黨派的監督委員會，正在努力去處理，不是掩蓋，而是

We're interviewing the Clintons tomorrow.

But to be clear, I mean, the destruction of evidence occurred under previous administrations.

但說清楚點，我的意思是，證據銷毀發生在前幾任政府底下。

And that in itself, if you look at the network that was involved with Jeffrey Epstein, I mean, to think that there aren't shady things happening in your government, I think would just be a lie to the American people.

而且，看看傑弗瑞·愛潑斯坦所牽涉的網絡，我認為認為你們政府裡沒有發生什麼可疑的事情，這根本是在欺騙美國民眾。

The fact is, is that we did have someone come forward.

事實是，我們確實有人站了出來。

They did say that there was destruction of evidence under the former deputy director of the FBI.

他們確實說，在前FBI副局長的任內，有證據被銷毀。