Name: 愛潑斯坦檔案解密！10個令人震驚的全新內幕公開！ (10 NEW Shocking Revelations From The Epstein Files Release)
Uploaded: 2026-02-04T17:14:13.000Z
Duration: 17 min 34 s

The files also include a diary from a woman who says she gave birth to Epstein's child around 2002.

這些檔案還包含一名女子寫的日記，她說她大約在2002年生下了Epstein的孩子。

And today we're examining the newest Epstein files release and the uncomfortable questions it raises about accountability.

今天我們要來探討最新的Epstein files釋出，以及它引發的關於問責制的令人不安的問題。

你認為你自己就是魔鬼本人嗎？

Today's release marks the end of a very comprehensive document identification and review process to ensure transparency to the American people.

今天的釋出標誌著一個非常全面的文件識別和審查流程的結束，以確保對美國民眾的透明度。

In a letter to Congress, Blanchard Attorney General Pam Bondi acknowledged approximately 200,000 pages have been redacted or withheld based on various privileges.

在給國會的一封信中，Blanchard檢察總長Pam Bondi承認，大約有二十萬頁的內容因各種特權而被刪除或扣留。

If you thought the Epstein case had already given up its secrets, the January 30, 2026 release proved otherwise.

如果你以為Epstein案已經沒有什麼祕密了，那麼2026年1月30日的公開內容證明瞭事實並非如此。

The Department of Justice published over 3 million responsive pages in a single tranche, bringing the total disclosed under federal transparency law to nearly 3.5 million pages.

司法部一次公開了超過三百萬筆回應頁面，根據聯邦透明度法公開的總數接近三百五十萬頁。

That includes investigative records, internal correspondence, scheduling material, and

這包含了來自多個機構的調查記錄、內部通信、行程安排資料，以及

metadata from multiple agencies, along with more than 2,000 videos and 180,000 images.

中繼資料，還有超過兩千支影片和十八萬張圖片。

These messages from 2013 show Epstein connecting New York Giants co owner Steve Tisch with various women.

這些來自2013年的訊息顯示，Epstein將紐約巨人隊的共同所有人Steve Tisch介紹給了幾位女性。

In one exchange, Tish asked about a woman only identified as M.

在其中一次對話中，Tish詢問了一位只被稱為M的女性。

Writing, curious to know about M Pro or civilian.

寫著，好奇M是專業人士還是普通民眾。

The sheer scale changes how the case is understood.

案件的規模之大，改變了人們對此案的理解方式。

This is no longer just a criminal dossier.

It's a sprawling administrative archive that documents how law enforcement, prosecutors, and institutions interacted with Epstein for decades.

這是一個龐大的行政檔案，記錄了數十年來執法部門、檢察官和各機構與Epstein的互動情況。

Can you assure the American public that President Trump, like every other prominent person whose name came up in relation to the Epstein files, that all documents, photos, and

你能向美國民眾保證，川普總統，就像其他名字出現在Epstein files裡的名人一樣，所有與他有關的、與此案相關的文件、照片，

anything relevant to him connected to the case are being released?

以及任何相關資料都會被公開嗎？

We complied with the statute, we complied with the act, and there is no.

我們遵守了法規，遵守了法案，而且沒有。

We didn't protect or not protect anybody.

我們沒有保護任何人，也沒有不保護任何人。

Legal compliance achieved, but full transparency is still elusive.

法律遵循已達成，但完全的透明度仍難以企及。

There are a small number of documents, as I said on Friday, that we're waiting for a judge to say we can.

如我週五所說，有一小部分文件我們正在等待法官裁定是否可以。

We're allowed to release because of a protective order, but this review is over.

我們被允許公開，因為有保護令，但這次審查已經結束了。

I mean, we reviewed over 6 million pieces of paper, thousands of videos, thousands, tens of thousands of images, and.

我的意思是，我們審查了超過六百萬份紙本文件、數千支影片、數萬張圖片，還有。

Which is what the statute required us to do.

這就是法律規定的我們要做的。

The Justice Department insists it has complied with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

司法部堅持他們已經遵守了 Epstein Files Transparency Act。

But critics argue that legal compliance is not the same thing as meaningful transparency.

但批評者認為，法律上的合規並不等於實質的透明度。

While the documents are technically searchable and downloadable, their volume, inconsistent formatting, and

雖然這些文件技術上是可以搜尋和下載的，但它們的數量龐大、格式不一致，以及

lack of narrative context make real analysis daunting.

缺乏敘事脈絡，讓實際分析變得令人望而生畏。

Lawmakers and watchdog groups have accused the DOJ of creating quote, obfuscation by scale where overwhelming quantity substitutes for clarity.

國會議員和監督團體指控司法部製造了所謂的「規模式混淆」，用壓倒性的數量取代了清晰度。

Leadership on the Hill, Congressman Massie, Senator Schumer, are quick to complain there is no way they have spent any time looking at the materials we produce because I know the materials we produce.

國會的領導者，眾議員 Massie、參議員 Schumer，很快就抱怨說，他們根本不可能花時間看我們提供的資料，因為我知道我們提供的資料。

By Saturday, they're already complaining about what we did.

到了週六，他們已經開始抱怨我們做的事了。

Others point out that millions of pages were deemed responsive, yet not all were released, raising questions about what standards were used and who decided.

其他人指出，數百萬頁的資料被認為是回應的，但並非全部都公開了，這引發了關於使用了什麼標準以及由誰決定的問題。

The result is a disclosure that satisfies the letter of the law while still frustrating the public's demand for straightforward answers.

結果是公開了符合法律規定的內容，但仍然無法滿足大眾對直接答案的期望。

And our doors are open if they want to come and review any of the materials that we produced.

如果他們想來審查我們提供的任何資料，我們的大門隨時敞開。

Redaction Breakdown exposed victims your release on Friday has already received a response from the victims from Jeffrey Epstein's victims.

Redaction Breakdown 揭露了受害者的資訊，你們週五公開的資料已經收到了來自 Jeffrey Epstein 受害者的回應。

It says survivors are having their names and identifying information exposed.

聲明中提到，倖存者的姓名和識別資訊被曝光了。

One of the most damaging aspects of the rollout had nothing to do with powerful names and everything to do with victims.

這次公開中最具破壞性的部分，與權貴姓名無關，而是與受害者有關。

Despite assurances of rigorous review, redaction failures allowed documents to go live containing names, contact information and financial details linked to survivors.

儘管保證會嚴格審查，但刪除不當導致文件上線，其中包含與倖存者相關的姓名、聯絡資訊和財務細節。

The federal agency had to remove the documents from its site yesterday because some reveal the names of victims.

聯邦機構昨天不得不將這些文件從網站上移除，因為其中一些洩露了受害者的姓名。

Attorneys for survivors say the Justice Department failed to redact the identities of at least 31 people who were victimized as children.

倖存者律師表示，司法部未能刪除至少 31 名童年時期受害者的身份。

Some of those victims now say they're being harassed through private messaging.

其中一些受害者現在表示，他們正在透過私人訊息受到騷擾。

The the DOJ was forced to pull thousands of files offline to correct the errors, but

司法部被迫將數千份文件下線以糾正錯誤，但

Victim advocates condemned the mishandling, arguing that transparency should never come at the cost of re traumatizing survivors.

受害者倡導者譴責了這次處理不當，認為透明度絕不應該以重新創傷倖存者為代價。

Beyond the human toll the episode shattered confidence in the release process itself.

除了人員傷亡，這次事件也動搖了人們對釋出流程本身的信心。

The files may have inadvertently included victim identifying information due to various factors including technical or human error.

由於技術或人為錯誤等多種因素，這些文件可能無意中包含了受害者身份資訊。

Multiple survivors calling for the takedown writing the DOJ committed what may be the single most egregious violation of victim privacy in one day in United States history.

多名倖存者呼籲下架，並寫信給司法部，稱其犯下了美國歷史上一天內侵犯受害者隱私最嚴重的行為。

The files are crowded with global power brokers.

I have to acknowledge the elephant in the room at this moment your ex husband Bill is named in the newest tranche of Epstein files and there are a new alleged details about his past behavior.

我必須承認一個很重要的點，那就是你的前夫 Bill 出現在最新的 Epstein files 批次中，並且有關於他過去行為的新指控細節。

And I want to give you the opportunity to respond in whatever way you want to.

我想給你一個機會，讓你隨心所欲地回應。

As soon as researchers and journalists began digging in, one thing became clear.

一旦研究人員和記者開始深入挖掘，有一件事就變得非常清楚。

The files repeatedly reference figures from finance, technology, politics and royalty appearing in emails, calendars, invitations and internal notes.

檔案中反覆提到金融、科技、政治和皇室的名人，出現在電子郵件、行事曆、邀請函和內部筆記中。

Importantly, in inclusion does not equal guilt.

重要的是，名字出現不代表有罪。

The doj has been explicit that many names appear incidentally or through third party claims.

司法部已經明確表示，許多名字是偶然出現，或是透過第三方聲稱。

Another person that has come out in these new documents is Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

在這些新文件中出現的另一位人物是商務部長 Howard Lutnick。

He and his family, it looks like, spent time on the island with Epstein.

牠們一家人，看起來，曾在島上與 Epstein 度過時光。

Also, he appears to have had a lunch with Epstein.

另外，他似乎和 Epstein 吃過午餐。

Someone wrote back on the behalf of Epstein and said it was nice to see him.

有人代表 Epstein 回覆說，很高興見到他。

To Howard Letnick, Lutnick's response was, I spent zero time with him.

對 Howard Letnick 來說，Lutnick 的回應是，我沒跟他花任何時間。

Still, the density of influential figures paints a disturbing picture of access.

不過，這些有影響力人物的密集出現，描繪出一幅令人不安的權力接觸畫面。

He was circulating through elite networks with ease.

他能輕鬆地在權貴圈子裡活動。

即使是在他 2008 年被定罪之後。

The real shock isn't that powerful names appear.

真正令人震驚的不是有權勢的名字出現。

It's how normalized Epstein's presence seemed to be in rooms where influence is exercised.

而是 Epstein 在權力運作的場閤中，他的出現似乎是多麼的正常。

And what's striking about all of this is once again, we have seen over and over very high profile, powerful men who, who have continued to say that they had no relationship, no connection to Jeffrey Epstein.

而所有這些令人驚訝的是，我們一次又一次地看到，許多非常高調、有權勢的男人，他們一直說自己和 Jeffrey Epstein 沒有任何關係、沒有任何連結。

But clearly with these millions of files that we continue to see released, they tell a very, very different story.

但顯然，隨著這些陸續公開的數百萬份文件，它們講述了一個截然不同的故事。

Epstein actively courted access to top political power players.

Epstein 積極爭取與頂尖政治權力人物接觸的機會。

The DOJ also posted, then temporarily removed, without explanation, a spreadsheet of complaints made to the FBI, including unverified allegations about both President Trump and former President Bill Clinton.

司法部也發布了，隨後又在沒有解釋的情況下暫時移除了一份關於向 FBI 提出的抱怨的試算表，其中包含關於川普總統和前總統比爾·柯林頓的未經證實的指控。

Per the document, the FBI determined some of those claims were found to be not credible.

根據文件，FBI 判定其中一些指控並不可信。

The documents reinforce a long suspected pattern.

這些文件證實了一個長期以來被懷疑的模式。

Epstein actively pursued proximity to political power.

Epstein 積極尋求接近政治權力。

Emails and scheduling records show repeated efforts to arrange introductions, maintain relationships, and

電子郵件和行程記錄顯示，他一再努力安排介紹、維持關係，並

present himself as useful to decision makers.

The files also show that Epstein repeatedly took the fifth during a 2016 deposition.

這些檔案也顯示 Epstein 在 2016 年的庭詢中，曾多次行使第五修正案的權利。

When asked more than a dozen questions about former President Clinton.

當被問到關於前總統柯林頓的十幾個問題時。

Among them several about whether Mr. Clinton visited Epstein's private island and flew in his private plane.

其中包含好幾個關於柯林頓先生是否曾造訪 Epstein 的私人島嶼，以及搭乘他的私人飛機。

Epstein cultivated the appearance of relevance, positioning himself as a connector, donor, or source of insight.

Epstein 營造出一種重要的形象，將自己定位為連結者、捐助者或洞見的來源。

When someone appears adjacent to presidents, ministers, or senior officials, often enough institutions begin to treat them cautiously, sometimes deferentially.

當一個人似乎與總統、部長或高級官員有所牽連時，機構往往會開始謹慎對待他們，有時甚至是恭敬地。

The the files don't prove a single political conspiracy.

這些檔案並未證明有任何單一的政治陰謀。

What they do show is how sustained access can discourage scrutiny.

它們確實顯示了持續的接觸如何能阻止審查。

Epstein's greatest shield wasn't secrecy.

Epstein 最大的保護傘不是祕密。

It was the assumption that someone so connected must already be vetted when they go ahead.

而是那種認為如此有關係的人，在行動時一定已經受到審查的假設。