Name: 這可能是美國曆史上最大規模的財富轉移 (This Could Be The Greatest Transfer of Wealth in US History)
Uploaded: 2025-08-08T18:23:11.000Z
Duration: 16 min 32 s

情態助動詞 A2

This could be one of the biggest wealth transfers that we will ever see.

這可能是我們有史以來最大的財富轉移之一。

未來簡單式

Donald Trump wants to bring manufacturing back to the United States, and there is a good chance that he will succeed at that, but there is going to be a very hefty price.

唐納德-特朗普希望將製造業帶回美國，他很有可能成功實現這一目標，但要付出非常高昂的代價。

That hefty price will be paid by the most Americans.

大多數美國人將為此付出沉重的代價。

On the other side, corporations will enormously profit out of it, so most Americans will most likely get slightly poorer as a result of that.

另一方面，企業將從中獲得巨大利潤，是以大多數美國人很可能會是以而變得稍微貧窮一些。

However, if you position yourself correctly, you might profit out of it and will make a lot of money.

但是，如果你定位正確，就有可能從中獲利，賺大錢。

So let me explain exactly what's happening and how you can position yourself correctly to profit out of this transaction.

所以，讓我來解釋一下到底發生了什麼，以及你如何正確定位自己，從這筆交易中獲利。

If you are ready, give this video a thumbs up and let's get right into it.

如果您準備好了，請為這段視頻豎起大拇指，讓我們開始吧。

United States was once upon a time the country that produced mostly everything.

曾幾何時，美國是一個什麼都生產的國家。

Back in 1950, United States literally manufactured 50 percent of all the goods in the world, and the United States was a leader in manufacturing.

早在 1950 年，美國製造的商品就佔世界總量的 50%，美國是製造業的領頭羊。

It produced most of the cars, electronics, steel, chemicals, aerospace, and until 1970, it was known as the golden era of manufacturing.

它生產了大部分汽車、電子產品、鋼鐵、化工產品和航空航天產品，直到 1970 年，它一直被稱為製造業的黃金時代。

However, that number began to drop over time, and by 1970, that percentage was already 30.

然而，隨著時間的推移，這一數字開始下降，到 1970 年，這一比例已降至 30%。

隨著時間的推移，它不斷倒下。

By the year 2000, it was 20 percent, and today it's only 16 percent.

到 2000 年，這一比例為 20%，而今天只有 16%。

So if you look at the United States and you compare it to the rest of the world, you will suddenly be shocked that China manufactures twice as much as the United States.

是以，如果你將美國與世界其他國家進行比較，你會突然驚奇地發現，中國的製造業是美國的兩倍。

And it's the only country that outsmarted or outperformed the United States.

它也是唯一一個超過或超越美國的國家。

Other countries such as Japan, Germany, they manufacture much less than the United States.

其他國家，如日本、德國，它們的產量比美國少得多。

Japan about 7 percent, Germany about 5 percent, India 3 percent.

日本約為 7%，德國約為 5%，印度為 3%。

So the United States might not be manufacturing much in the world, but if you compare it to the rest of the world, then 16 percent is actually good.

是以，美國的製造業在世界上可能不算多，但如果與世界其他國家相比，16%的比例其實已經很不錯了。

And you have to understand the difference between 1950 and 2025.

你必須明白 1950 年和 2025 年之間的區別。

This is when the entire world was destroyed.

Japan was destroyed, European Union was destroyed, South Korea was destroyed, everybody was destroyed.

日本被摧毀了，歐盟被摧毀了，韓國被摧毀了，所有人都被摧毀了。

There hasn't been a world war since 1945.

自 1945 年以來，還沒有發生過世界大戰。

However, the nature of the US economy over time has changed.

然而，隨著時間的推移，美國經濟的性質已經發生了變化。

And because the United States is a capitalistic society and the economy is a capitalistic economy, people are profit-driven.

由於美國是一個資本主義社會，經濟也是資本主義經濟，人們都是唯利是圖的。

So most people would go and start a business where they can make most amount of money possible.

是以，大多數人都會去創業，儘可能賺最多的錢。

If steel is no longer profitable, you won't see much people doing business with steel, producing steel.

如果鋼鐵不再有利可圖，你就不會看到很多人與鋼鐵做生意，生產鋼鐵。

For example, it's much more profitable to produce a car instead of a steel, and that's why a lot of business people wouldn't go and start a steel business, but people still produce a lot of cars in the United States.

例如，生產汽車比生產鋼鐵更有利可圖，這就是為什麼很多商人不會去做鋼鐵生意，但美國人仍然生產了很多汽車。

And that's why United States economy changed and evolved over time.

這就是美國經濟隨著時間的推移不斷變化和發展的原因。

For example, United States leads the world in software because that's where you can make most of the money.

例如，美國的軟件業在世界上遙遙領先，因為那裡能賺到最多的錢。

If you pull out the S&P 500 today, you will see that the world's largest companies that literally make a third of the S&P 500 are literally the top 10 technological companies in the US.

如果你今天拿出標準普爾 500 指數，你就會發現，佔標準普爾 500 指數三分之一的全球最大公司，就是美國排名前十的科技公司。

And nobody in the world has such companies.

世界上還沒有人擁有這樣的公司。

Let me ask you, how many software companies do you know from the European Union?

我問你，你知道多少家來自歐盟的軟件公司？

我懷疑你們大多數人都能指出一個。

How many software companies do you know from Japan or the United Kingdom?

你知道多少家來自日本或英國的軟件公司？

You can point some from China, of course, but that's pretty much about it.

當然，你可以從中國進口一些，但也僅此而已。

Companies such as Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have a complete monopoly.

谷歌、微軟和亞馬遜等公司完全壟斷了市場。

I don't think anybody could even come close and compete with the United States.

我認為沒有任何人能與美國相提並論。

You have to go and you have to spend so much money, pay a lot of money to people to work in those steel industries, and your profit margins are going to be very, very tiny.

你必須去，你必須花很多錢，付很多錢給在這些鋼鐵行業工作的人，而你的利潤率會非常非常小。

Cloud computing, it's much easier business, and your profit margins probably going to be like 50 to 80%.

雲計算的業務要簡單得多，你的利潤率可能會達到 50% 到 80%。

A lot of companies today moving into AI because you could make a lot of money.

如今，很多公司都在進軍人工智能領域，因為你可以賺很多錢。

Tell me, how many AI companies can you name from the European Union?

告訴我，你能說出多少家來自歐盟的人工智能公司？

Yes, you can name from China, but again, that's pretty much about it.

是的，你可以從中國取名，但也僅此而已。

In the US, we have Chad GPT, we have Vogue, and I think the number of AI companies right now are literally exponentially growing day by day.

在美國，我們有 Chad GPT，我們有 Vogue，我認為現在人工智能公司的數量每天都在呈指數級增長。

I don't have to tell you how the United States controls the global finance.

不用我多說，你們也知道美國是如何控制全球金融的。

So US banks, US financial companies have a strong grip over the global economy, and they control more than 50% of that industry.

是以，美國銀行、美國金融公司對全球經濟有著強大的控制力，它們控制著該行業 50% 以上的份額。

Do you think people around the globe watch German movies, or French movies, or Chinese movies, or South Korean movies?

你認為全球的人都會看德國電影、法國電影、中國電影或韓國電影嗎？

But making movies is much more profitable than making steel, and that's why the nature of the US economy over time has evolved, and these are the industries, for example, that the United States completely dominates, and not a single country around the world would even come close to the United States.

但拍電影比鍊鋼賺錢多了，這就是為什麼美國經濟的性質會隨著時間的推移而發生變化，比如這些行業，美國完全佔據了主導地位，全世界沒有一個國家能與美國相提並論。

There is simply one Hollywood around the world, and the rest of the world watches American movies.

全世界只有一個好萊塢，其他國家都看美國電影。

There are very few people who would watch South Korean movies, or Chinese movies, or French movies.

很少有人會看韓國電影、中國電影或法國電影。

But how about manufacturing, that's the main question.

但製造如何，這才是主要問題。

Bringing manufacturing back to the United States is a very difficult thing to do.

將製造業帶回美國是一件非常困難的事情。

But what if I told you that there is still a lot of manufacturing in the United States, and the United States is literally a manufacturing powerhouse even today, even though a lot of people don't believe that.

但是，如果我告訴你，美國仍然有大量的製造業，而且即使在今天，美國也是名副其實的製造業強國，儘管很多人並不相信這一點。

United States produces 40% of aerospace manufacturing around the globe.

美國生產了全球 40% 的航空航天產品。

A lot of companies such as Boeing, Lockheed Martin, they produce planes, they produce fighter jets, F-15s or F-16s, and a lot of other engines for planes.

許多公司，如波音公司、洛克希德-馬丁公司，都生產飛機、戰鬥機、F-15 或 F-16 戰鬥機，以及許多其他飛機發動機。

How many companies or how many countries across the globe can produce planes?

全球有多少家公司或多少個國家能夠生產飛機？

And when you're flying a plane, it's either going to be a Boeing or an Airbus.

當你駕駛飛機時，要麼是波音，要麼是空中客車。

When it comes to pharmaceutical products, United States manufactures in the US 30% of all the manufacturing pharmas across the globe.

在醫藥產品方面，美國製造的藥品佔全球製造藥品總量的 30%。

Companies such as Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson, they have manufacturing plants all across the United States.

輝瑞和強生等公司在全美各地都有生產工廠。

So those pharma products being manufactured in the US and being shipped to the rest of the world.

是以，這些在美國生產的製藥產品被運往世界其他地方。

And because when you do the research and development and you produce those drugs, you are going to have a very high profit margin.

因為當你進行研發並生產這些藥物時，你的利潤率會非常高。

Even if you sell them at a lower price to other countries, you are still going to end up with a very big margin.

即使你以較低的價格賣給其他國家，你最終仍然會獲得很大的利潤。

Now compare that to Nike that sells shoes.

現在把它與賣鞋的耐克公司相比。

If Nike will bring shoes manufacturing to the United States, their profit margins would go to zero.

如果耐克將製鞋業轉移到美國，他們的利潤率將為零。

They will be making a loss on every single shoe that they will sell.

他們賣出的每一雙鞋都會虧本。

And that's why Nike shoes are being manufactured somewhere there in Asia, god knows where, I have no idea to be honest.

這就是耐克鞋在亞洲某處生產的原因，天知道在哪裡，說實話我也不知道。

But Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson can manufacture their drugs in the United States.

但輝瑞公司和強生公司可以在美國生產藥品。

The US produces 45% of all medical devices that is being exported in the world.

美國生產的醫療器械佔全球出口總量的 45%。

Because those sophisticated technologies that you see when you go to a hospital, now when you go to a very fancy hospital and you see those huge machines, most of them, almost half of them are being manufactured in the United States by the US companies.

因為當你去醫院看病時，你會看到那些先進的技術，現在，當你去一家非常高級的醫院看病時，你會看到那些巨大的機器，其中大部分，幾乎有一半是由美國公司在美國製造的。

And the profit margins on them are extremely huge.

And because US economy is such an advanced economy, people would rather go and do this business instead of producing, for example, steel, because it's much more profitable, because you don't have much competition, because not many people or not many businesses or not many countries can replicate that and compete with you.

由於美國經濟如此發達，人們寧願去做這一行，而不是生產鋼鐵等產品，因為這更有利可圖，因為你沒有太多的競爭，因為沒有多少人、沒有多少企業或沒有多少國家可以複製這一點並與你競爭。

好吧，這是一個不費吹灰之力的問題。

Everybody knows that US military is the best military in the world.

眾所周知，美國軍隊是世界上最好的軍隊。

And the United States literally, like the US is responsible for 40% of global military exports.

就像美國佔全球軍品出口的 40% 一樣。

It's not France, it's not Germany, it's not South Korea, it's not Russia, it's not the UK.

它不是法國，不是德國，不是韓國，不是俄羅斯，也不是英國。

And most of that is being manufactured right in the United States.

其中大部分都是在美國製造的。

Semiconductors. 55% of all semiconductors are being designed by the US companies.

半導體。55% 的半導體都是由美國公司設計的。

Now, US can't theoretically bring that manufacturing back to the United States like they are doing right now.

現在，美國理論上無法像現在這樣將製造業帶回美國。

Even before Donald Trump, I think with Biden's inflation reduction act, they provided subsidies to companies such as TSMC to shift all of that manufacturing of semiconductors from Taiwan to the United States.

甚至在唐納德-特朗普之前，我認為拜登的降低通脹法案就為臺積電等公司提供了補貼，將所有半導體制造從臺灣轉移到美國。

The US could have done it a long time ago, but it wasn't simply a priority.

美國早就可以這樣做了，但這並不是一個優先事項。

Because back in the day, those semiconductors wouldn't be as advanced as they are today.

因為在過去，這些半導體不會像今天這樣先進。

But now it has turned into a very, very high technology thing.

但現在，它已經變成了一個非常、非常高科技的東西。

Because Nvidia, for example, their semiconductors and GPUs are powering the entire AI.

因為以 Nvidia 為例，他們的半導體和 GPU 正在為整個人工智能提供動力。

So the United States clearly has a very strong manufacturing base anyways.

是以，無論如何，美國顯然擁有非常強大的製造業基礎。

And these are just a few examples that I gave you just to illustrate the point.

我舉這幾個例子只是為了說明問題。

Now what I want you to understand is that this is Donald Trump's plan and how it's going to change the dynamic of the market.

現在我想讓你們明白的是，這是唐納德-特朗普的計劃，它將如何改變市場的動態。

See, when you have a currency, that currency could be strong or that currency could be weak and the way we measure it is in relation to other countries.

你看，當你擁有一種貨幣時，這種貨幣可能是強勢貨幣，也可能是弱勢貨幣，而我們衡量這種貨幣的方式就是與其他國家進行比較。

字幕列表影片播放

這可能是美國曆史上最大規模的財富轉移 (This Could Be The Greatest Transfer of Wealth in US History)

literally

strategy

evolve

position