Name: 讓台灣全國上下皮皮挫的美國「232 條款」究竟是何方神聖？跟著影片快速了解吧！(Section 232 And The Threat From Cars And Steel)
Uploaded: 2025-08-01T14:53:25.000Z
Duration: 2 min 54 s

第二類條件句型

What if I told you there was a law that allowed a president to put a tax on any product he wants so long as he calls it a threat to national security?

如果我告訴你，有一條法律允許總統對他想要的任何產品徵稅，只要他說這是對國家安全的威脅。

Stay tuned to hear about such a law and what it means for Americans.

請繼續收聽有關此類法律及其對美國人的意義的報導。

Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 has proven to be a threat to workers, companies, and consumers.

事實證明，1962 年《貿易擴張法》第 232 條對工人、公司和消費者都構成了威脅。

Attorney Donald Cameron has argued against the law in court and explained its problems.

律師 Donald Cameron 在法庭上對該法律提出了反對意見，並解釋了其存在的問題。

He found that Section 232 authorizes the president to adjust imports on the basis of national security in a way that runs counter to the principles of limited government and the role of Congress in international trade.

他發現，232 條款授權總統以國家安全為由調整進口，這違背了有限政府的原則和國會在國際貿易中的作用。

He also found the law places no limits on the president in determining what may constitute a threat to national security.

他還發現，法律沒有限制總統決定什麼可能構成對國家安全的威脅。

The metrics used to demonstrate such a threat and the actions to respond to the threat itself.

用於證明這種威脅的衡量標準以及應對威脅本身的行動。

In 2018, the Commerce Department claimed steel imports from friendly nations like Canada and Germany were a threat to national security.

2018 年，美國商務部聲稱從加拿大和德國等友好國家進口鋼鐵對國家安全構成威脅。

Donald Trump then imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum that cost at least 75,000 workers their jobs at manufacturing companies that use steel and aluminum.

川普隨後對鋼鐵和鋁徵收關稅，導致至少 7.5 萬名使用鋼鐵和鋁的製造企業工人失業。

價格上漲損害了消費者的利益。

And two years later, there were only about 2,500 more people employed in the U.S. primary metals industry than when the tariffs were first announced.

而兩年後，美國初級金屬行業的就業人數只比最初宣佈關稅時增加了約 2500 人。

Donald Trump and the Commerce Department also declared that imported cars made by our allies in Europe and Japan were national security threats.

川普和商務部還宣稱，我們在歐洲和日本的盟友生產的進口汽車是對國家安全的威脅。

那些飛機正在向我們投擲汽車。

At a court hearing, a judge asked the Trump administration's attorney a question about Section 232.

在法庭聽證會上，一位法官向川普政府的律師提出了一個有關 232 條款的問題。

Can the president make a national security connection and have some sort of embargo on peanut butter?

總統能把國家安全聯繫起來，對花生醬實行某種禁運嗎？

I declined to answer that question on the grounds it would make the law I'm defending look ridiculous.

我拒絕回答這個問題，因為這會讓我所捍衛的法律顯得荒謬可笑。

Unless judges change how they interpret Section 232, only Congress can save us from the law that costs Americans their money and their jobs.

除非法官改變他們對 232 條款的解釋，否則只有國會才能將我們從這部讓美國人失去金錢和工作的法律中拯救出來。

For more information, go to NFAP.com and check out this space for more videos.

如需瞭解更多資訊，請訪問 NFAP.com，並在本空間查看更多影片。

字幕列表影片播放

讓台灣全國上下皮皮挫的美國「232 條款」究竟是何方神聖？跟著影片快速了解吧！(Section 232 And The Threat From Cars And Steel)

sort

ridiculous

demonstrate

determine