Name: 日本概況（2025 年更新） (Japanese overview (2025 update))
Uploaded: 2025-06-29T06:22:46.000Z
Duration: 15 min 37 s

Shoutout to Squarespace for sponsoring this video.

In this Civ overview, we're going to be taking a look at the Japanese.

在這篇 Civ 概述中，我們將介紹日本。

The last time we looked at the Civ in depth was in 2016, and Japanese have had a few nice changes since then, with Samurai and Cavalry Archer buffs, making them now arguably better than ever.

我們上一次深入研究 Civ 是在 2016 年，從那時起，日本人有了一些不錯的變化，武士和騎兵弓箭手的 BUFF 使他們現在可以說比以前更好了。

At the same time, stats wise, especially for 1v1 high level Arabia, they're really not doing great, so they're a little out of fashion these days, but in my opinion are still among the most fun civilizations to play, and far from the weakest for the majority of the player base, where their focus on flexibility and infantry are a lot more viable than I think they get credit for.

與此同時，從數據上看，尤其是對於 1v1 的高水平阿拉伯來說，他們的表現並不出色，所以他們現在有點落伍了，但在我看來，他們仍然是最有趣的文明之一，而且對於大多數玩家來說，他們遠非最弱的文明，他們注重靈活性和步兵，這一點比我認為他們的功勞要大得多。

We'll go through their bonuses and techs, and then talk about how I like to approach this civilization, as my most played Civ.

我們將介紹他們的獎勵和技術，然後談談作為我玩得最多的公民，我喜歡如何對待這個文明。

To start with their team bonus, Japanese galleys have 50% more line of sight, keeping in mind despite the name this does not apply to fire galleys.

首先是團隊獎勵，日本大帆船的視線範圍增加了 50%，但請記住，儘管名稱如此，這並不適用於火帆船。

Now 50% is a bigger jump than it sounds, where they see 50% farther, but end up seeing more than twice as much at any one moment.

現在，50% 是一個比聽起來更大的跳躍，他們能看到 50%的距離，但在任何時刻都能看到兩倍多的東西。

This can be nice for map awareness, and having a better idea of other Navy's location and size than they have of yours.

這對地圖感知和更好地瞭解其他海軍的位置和規模很有幫助。

Japanese are actually a very good water and excellent hybrid map Civ, though the team bonus really isn't the reason for that.

日本人實際上是一個非常好的水上和優秀的混合地圖 Civ，雖然團隊獎勵確實不是原因。

To see why they're the number 1 most popular choice on 4 lakes and many hybrid maps, instead we need to look at their Civ bonuses.

想了解為什麼它們是四湖（Four Lakes）和許多混合地圖上最受歡迎的文明選擇，我們應該轉而去看他們的文明加成。

The first is that their fishing ships have double the usual HP, plus 2 pure summer, and work faster, increasing through the ages as you advance.

第一個文明加成是，他們的漁船擁有一般的兩倍生命值，額外 +2 點遠程防禦(Pierce Armor)，並且工作速度更快，隨著時代推進，效率還會進一步提升。

To take the durability aspect first, this increases the shots they take from galleys with fletching from 6 to 14, as well as double the damage taken from fire galleys.

從耐久度來看，這讓他們從戰船那裡能承受的射擊次數從 6 次提升至 14 次，也讓他們能承受來自火戰船的兩倍傷害。

In fact, for a bit of perspective, a fishing ship can complete an entire fishing run in less than the time it takes a galley to bring it down.

事實上，從另一個角度來看，一艘漁船完成整個捕魚流程的時間，比一艘戰船摧毀它所需的時間還要短。

On a map like Nomad, where you maybe aren't sure how strongly you're contesting water, that durability gives you some extra time to read the game's situation and respond if you're caught off guard.

在游牧這樣的地圖上，你可能不確定自己到底有多強力地在爭奪水域，這種耐久度可以讓你多一點時間去觀察局勢，並在被突襲時做出反應。

Assuming your fishing ships aren't attack though, that's even better, as you then benefit from faster collection.

如果你的漁船沒有受到攻擊，那就更好了，因為你可以更快地收集漁獲。

With 4 fishing ships, this is usually between an extra 20 to 30 food in Dark Age, and always puts you in a nice position to keep up with villager production, then growing to somewhere between 100 and 150 food ahead of your opponents by Castle Age, with even just 4 fishing ships.

有四艘漁船的話，在黑暗時代通常可以額外獲得大約 20 到 30 的食物，這讓你在村民生產上能持續不斷，然後到了城堡時代時，即使只有四艘漁船，也能比對手多出約 100 到 150 的食物，讓你處於有利位置。

If anything though, it becomes more interesting in Imperial Age, when the bonus jumps to a full plus 20%.

不過呢，這件事到了帝王時代反而變得更有趣了，因為那時候這個加成會跳升到完整的 20%。

At that point, with fish traps, the Japanese bonus slaps, going from the usual 25 food per minute with gillnets to about 30 food per minute.

到了那個階段，配合魚網，日本的文明加成就變得非常強大，從裝有刺網技術時每分鐘 25 單位食物，提高到大約 30 單位食物。

Keep in mind boring old farms max out at 24, while having a worse food to wood ratio, since Japanese lack crop rotation.

記住，那些無聊又老套的農田最多只能產出 24 食物，而且食物對木材的效率更差，因為日本沒有輪耕制度這項科技。

This gives Japanese fishing ships a nice use case on Black Forest or any map with safe lakes, where you can make a lot more food than usual by using fish traps over farms with the same population in a much smaller area.

這就為日本漁船在黑森林或任何有安全湖泊的地圖上提供了一個很好的使用案例，在這些地圖上，您可以在更小的區域內使用捕魚陷阱比使用相同人口的農場獲得比平常多得多的食物。

The flip side of the bonus is on a pure land map, you're effectively playing down one of your major eco bonuses, though you still have one, next up with their camps and mills costing 50% less.

這個加成的另一面是在純陸地地圖上，你等於失去了其中一個主要的經濟加成，雖然你仍然有另一個加成，也就是採集營與磨坊造價減少 50%。

This has the greatest impact early on, saving you 200 wood if you get the standard 2 lumber camps, 1 mill, and a mining camp.

這在初期影響最大，如果你得到標準的 2 個伐木營地、1 個磨坊和 1 個採礦營地，就能節省 200 塊木材。

In terms of total resources, it's one of the best Dark Age bonuses in the game, and what's nice is you don't have to do anything different than usual to benefit.

就總資源來說，這是遊戲中最強的黑暗時代加成之一；而且最棒的是，你不需要做出任何不同於平常的操作就能享受到它的好處。

One common way to maximize the bonus is to move one early villager from wood over to food, helping with a faster uptime to feudal, leading to a strong scout, men at arms, or archer opening.

一種常見的方式來最大化這項加成，是把一名初期伐木的村民移去採集食物，這有助於更快升上封建時代，進而展開強勢的偵察騎兵、裝甲步兵或弓兵開局。

That said, typically by the mid game players use town centers instead of camps to secure additional resources, and wood also becomes quite easy to get past a point, so while it's theoretically still useful in Imperial Age when saturating mines or replacing lumber camps, it's definitely not as impactful after the early game power spike that it gives.

話雖如此，通常到了中期，玩家會改用城鎮中心來確保額外資源，而木材在某個階段後也變得相當容易獲得；所以儘管在帝王時代理論上這個加成仍有用，例如用來填滿礦區或更換伐木場，但在加成帶來的前期爆發力過後，它的影響力確實就沒那麼大了。

That brings us now though to what you can spend those extra resources on with their military bonuses.

現在，我們來看看這些額外的資源可以用在哪些方面。

The first is Japanese Infantry attack 33% faster, starting in Feudal Age.

首先，從封建時代開始，日本步兵的攻擊速度將提高 33%。

Naturally, this makes their men at arms among the most dangerous against enemy scouts, villagers, or at breaking through buildings, which is the main application of the bonus in competitive 1v1.

當然，這也使他們的阿兵哥在對付敵方偵察兵、村民或突破建築物時成為最危險的目標，而這正是該獎勵在 1v1 競技中的主要應用。

That said, it really opens up options throughout the game, with Japanese Longswords being able to trade cost effectively against Knights, and faster attack on Pikemen, making them arguably the most anti-cavalry spear line in the game, as you get their bonus damage applying more often.

儘管如此，它確實為整個遊戲提供了更多的選擇，日本長劍能以更低的成本與騎士進行交易，對長矛手的攻擊速度更快，可以說是遊戲中最能抵禦騎兵的矛系，因為你可以更頻繁地使用它們的額外傷害。

In Imperial Age, especially team games, their champions and halberdiers can then also shine, and while your infantry can lose in a vacuum to the goth strong discount or Slav Druzhina, on the list of classic blunders, going head to head with Japanese Infantry is number 4, purely because of this bonus.

在帝國時代，尤其是團隊遊戲中，他們的冠軍和戟兵也能大放異彩，雖然你的步兵可能會在真空狀態下輸給哥特強折或斯拉夫德魯日娜，但在經典失誤排行榜上，與日本步兵正面交鋒排在第四位，純粹是因為這個獎勵。

It's no surprise a lot of Japanese best matchups feature civilizations that have a higher likelihood of using infantry, like Goths or Aztecs.

毫不奇怪，日本的許多最佳對陣都以使用步兵可能性較高的文明為特色，如哥特人或阿茲臺克人。

Their other military bonus is a relatively new one, giving their cavalry archers plus 2 attack against archers, though not including skirmishers.

他們的另一個軍事獎勵是一個相對較新的獎勵，即騎兵弓箭手對弓箭手的攻擊加 2，但不包括小兵。

Cavalry archers are a very on meta unit these days, and especially with this bonus are now a great option to shoot for in late castle age depending on the civ matchup.

騎兵弓箭手是現在非常流行的組織、部門，尤其是有了這個獎勵後，在城堡時代後期，根據民間對局的不同，騎兵弓箭手也是一個不錯的選擇。

Unfortunately, they still have the same weakness to skirmisher units as usual, but it helps in many other situations.

遺憾的是，它們對小兵組織、部門的弱點仍然和以前一樣，但在許多其他情況下都有幫助。

First they hold up very well against other cavalry archers, who count as archers in this case beating other top tier ones head to head, which is very nice in, as I said, a cavalry archer heavy meta.

首先，他們在與其他騎兵弓箭手的對抗中表現出色，在這種情況下，他們可以算作弓箭手，與其他頂級弓箭手正面交鋒，這在我說過的騎兵弓箭手佔優勢的情況下非常不錯。

The definition here of archer is then very broad, applying to not just archer and cavalry archer variants, but even things like the wrath in melee mode, camel archers, hand cannons, and slingers for example.

是以，這裡的弓箭手定義非常寬泛，不僅適用於弓箭手和騎兵弓箭手變體，甚至還包括近戰模式下的憤怒、駱駝弓箭手、手炮和擲彈兵等。

Probably the most important matchup though is they do a third more damage against the crossbow line, translating to one fewer attack needed against those.

但最重要的搭配可能是它們對弩車的傷害要高出三分之一，這意味著對弩車的攻擊需要減少一次。

On one level you could argue they at least soft counter crossbows in castle age, though admittedly are much harder to get going because of all the important upgrades, one less range, slower creation time, higher cost, and a longer attack delay, which hurts your micro.

從某種程度上講，你可以說它們至少能與城堡時代的弩軟性對抗，但不得不承認的是，由於所有重要的升級，它們更難上手，射程更短、創建時間更慢、成本更高、攻擊延遲更長，這都會損害你的微操作。

I wouldn't say this new bonus makes Japanese an anti-archer pick or forces you to go into cavalry archers, but does make the transition from early castle age crossbows into cavalry archers easier against a civ like Mayans or Britons, and given the number of units it applies to, it's a bonus that comes up even if you don't go out of your way to use it.

我不會說這一新獎勵會讓日本人成為反弓箭手的選擇，也不會強迫你去選擇騎兵弓箭手，但確實會讓你從早期城堡時代的弓弩手過渡到騎兵弓箭手，從而更容易對付瑪雅人或不列顛人這樣的國家。

So those are their bonuses, hitting on water maps, early eco, infantry, and cavalry archers.

是以，這些就是他們的優勢，在水上地圖、早期生態、步兵和騎兵弓箭手上都有優勢。

If it's not obvious yet, Japanese have a bit of a jack of all trades vibe going on.

如果還不太明顯的話，日本人有點萬事通的感覺。

Next we'll take a look at their unique unit, the Samurai.

接下來我們來看看他們的獨特部隊--武士。

As always, I recently looked at this unit in extra depth as it's own video, but for summary overview purposes, they're not that far off the swordsman line in terms of stats, with a notably faster attack and movement.

與以往一樣，我最近在自己的視頻中對這一組織、部門進行了更深入的研究，但就概述而言，它們的屬性與劍士系列相差不大，攻擊和移動速度明顯更快。

On the flip side, they're more expensive in terms of gold and even food after supplies than the longsword, and have one less pure summer after gambesons, so there are some tradeoffs.

反過來說，它們在補給後的金幣甚至食物方面都比長劍昂貴，而且在賭徒之後還少了一個純粹的夏天，是以要有所取捨。

In terms of bonuses, they deal plus 10 going to plus 12 against unique units, which includes any made from a castle, dock, or is a standalone unit, like Kano-Tiero, Slinger, or Genitour, which don't upgrade something already existing in the tech tree.

在加成方面，它們對獨特組織、部門的加成從 10 到 12 不等，其中包括任何由城堡、船塢或獨立組織、部門（如卡諾-鐵羅、吊索或 Genitour）製造的組織、部門，這些組織、部門不能升級科技樹中已有的東西。

Even outside that specialty, Samurai are generally solid in melee situations, particularly when countering melee unique units, but can even take a fight against knights cost effectively.

即使不侷限於這一特長，武士在近戰情況下，尤其是在對抗近戰特殊組織、部門時，一般也很穩健，甚至還能在與騎士的戰鬥中節省成本。

They also work as an anti-trash generalist well enough, even if the Japanese champion line is a bit more gold efficient in that role, and they're also very effective at defending castles against ramps given their just 9 second creation time.

它們還能很好地起到反垃圾的作用，儘管日本冠軍系列在這方面的金幣效率更高一些，而且它們的創建時間僅為 9 秒，在防禦斜坡城堡方面也非常有效。

On the other hand, like most infantry, they're weak to ranged units, even ranged unique units, while having a relatively high gold cost for infantry.

另一方面，與大多數步兵一樣，他們對遠程組織、部門的攻擊力很弱，即使是獨特的遠程組織、部門也是如此，同時，他們的金幣成本相對步兵也較高。

Overall they're situational, but they can be a faster tech switch than the champion line, are surprisingly fast at raising buildings, and are a great tool for countering bots, though by no means are a default unit choice for Japanese in 1v1s.

整體來說，這些兵種是「看情況使用」的，但它們比劍士線（Champion line）轉科技的速度更快、在摧毀建築物方面出奇地迅速，而且是對付電腦（AI機器人）非常有效的單位。不過，在1對1對戰中，它們絕對不是日本人常規的單位選擇。

Stick to using them in the right situations against melee units or buildings, and they'll treat you well.

堅持在適當的情況下使用它們來對付近戰組織、部門或建築物，它們會給你帶來不錯的效果。

Staying at the castle, next let's take a look at their unique techs.

在城堡裡，接下來讓我們看看他們的獨特技術。

The first is Yasuma, which adds 2 extra arrows to all of your towers, and while Japanese lack bombard tower, this can make your keeps maybe even better than those anyway.

第一個是 "安間"，它能為您的所有防禦塔增加 2 支額外的箭，雖然日語中沒有轟擊塔，但無論如何，這都能讓您的防禦塔變得更好。

Depending on a target's armor, you can get about half the damage of a castle, and 2 thirds the attack of a bombard tower over time, though considering the high rate of fire and less overkill, I personally think there are situations they work better than bombard towers, while also not costing gold, and being much less stone than castles for the same map coverage.

雖然考慮到高射速和較少的過度殺傷，我個人認為在某些情況下它們比轟塔更好用，同時也不需要花費金幣，而且在相同的地圖覆蓋範圍內，石頭比城堡少得多。

Most typically they're used defensively to deter enemy raiding, but can also be used offensively to entrench a slow push, especially on team games.

它們通常用於防禦，以阻止敵人的突襲，但也可用於進攻，以鞏固緩慢的推進，尤其是在團隊遊戲中。

Maybe the one downside is it comes at the stone cost of potential castles, and building too many towers can then make it harder to produce trebuchets.

也許這樣做的一個不利因素是要以潛在城堡的石料為代價，而建造過多的大廈又會增加生產高射炮的難度。

Why would you be so concerned about that?

Well, Japanese have the most fun trebuchets in the game of course.

當然，日本人擁有遊戲中最有趣的高射炮。

Their next unique tech, Katapuruto, lets their trebuchets pack in a quarter the usual time, and fire a third faster.

他們的下一個獨特技術--卡塔普魯託（Katapuruto）--可以讓他們的高射炮在四分之一的時間內裝填完畢，發射速度快三分之一。

It's not that expensive, but takes a full minute to research, so maybe it won't be the first tech you grab in Imperial, but if you've used these, you know how fun they are, adding some surprising mobility to your army.

它並不昂貴，但需要花上整整一分鐘來研究，所以也許它不會是你在帝國中搶到的第一個技術，但如果你用過這些技術，你就會知道它們有多有趣，能為你的軍隊增添一些驚人的機動性。

In mass, they can be used as a relatively effective area attack, especially against onagers and bombard cannons, then being able to quickly pack up and retreat, but even without the mobility aspect, they still take down castles, enemy trevs, and buildings a third faster.

在大規模使用時，它們可以作為一種相對有效的區域攻擊手段，尤其是在對付鬼怪和轟擊炮時，然後可以迅速收拾東西撤退，但即使沒有機動性，它們攻下城堡、敵軍戰車和建築的速度也要快三分之一。

這就是他們獨特的部隊和技術。

Part of why I love the Civ is first the bonuses include Navy and Cavalry Archers, the unique unit is Infantry, and the unique techs then push towers and siege.

我喜歡公民的部分原因是，首先獎勵包括海軍和騎兵弓箭手，獨特的組織、部門是步兵，獨特的技術是推塔和攻城。

Someone might say the Civ feels a bit all over the place, whereas I see it as endless possibilities, and admittedly you either like that aspect of them, or you don't.

有人可能會說，Civ 感覺有點雜亂無章，而我卻認為它有無限的可能性。

They still have a few surprise strengths left in store though, which we'll find in the tech tree, starting with the Archers.

不過，他們還有一些令人驚喜的優勢，我們將在技術樹中找到，首先是弓箭手。

Here you have basically everything, including the extra wood savings early, bonus damage for their fully upgraded Cavalry Archers, and you even get Hand Cannoneers as an option late.

在這裡，你基本上擁有了一切，包括前期節省的額外木材、完全升級的騎兵弓箭手的額外傷害，甚至還可以在後期選擇手炮手。

The only issue is just that you don't have a direct bonus for the crossbow line, so very strong crossbow Civs can outcompete Japanese head to head, but with this kind of tech tree it's still a very solid A-.

唯一的問題是，你沒有直接的弩系獎勵，是以非常強大的弩系公民可以與日本人正面競爭，但有了這樣的技術樹，它仍然是一個非常穩定的 A-。

Next up for Infantry, it's again a broad tech tree, and in addition to the faster attack rate bonus applying from Feudal Age onward, you also have the Samurai as an augment in some situations.

接下來是步兵，這又是一棵寬廣的技術樹，除了從封建時代開始適用的更快的攻擊速度獎勵外，在某些情況下還可以使用武士作為增強。

I'm going to save the A-level for Goths, and stick with just an A, but Japanese are definitely up there with other top tier Infantry, and their Halberdiers are a go-to late game unit.

我打算把 A 級留給哥特人，只給他們 A 級，但日本人絕對可以與其他頂級步兵相媲美，他們的戟兵是遊戲後期的首選部隊。

Moving on to Cavalry, I feel like it gets a worse wrap than it deserves.

說到 "騎兵"，我覺得它得到的包裝比它應得的更糟糕。

You have a great Scout Rush with 150-200 wood in savings, with then fully upgraded Castle Age Knights.

你有一個很好的 "童子軍衝鋒隊"，可以節省 150-200 木頭，再加上完全升級的城堡時代騎士團。

A stable in late Feudal or on the way up to Castle Age is not a bad plan with Japanese, particularly if you're up against a lot of Skirmishers, which either Scouts or even better 1 or 2 Knights can help clean up.

在封建時代後期或城堡時代的途中，使用日軍來保持穩定並不是一個糟糕的計劃，尤其是當你面對大量的小兵時，偵察兵或更好的 1 或 2 名騎士可以幫助你清理掉這些小兵。

Late game they fall off hard though, lacking the final armor, and their light Cavalry raids really aren't that great.

但在遊戲後期，他們的戰鬥力會大打折扣，因為缺乏最後的護甲，而且他們的輕騎兵突襲能力也確實不怎麼樣。

Overall I'd say it's a B, acknowledging Imperial Age is a notable weakness here.

總的來說，我認為這是一個 B 級，但《帝國時代》是一個明顯的弱點。

Next up for Siege, you have the basics, but lack Siege Ram and Bombard Cannon, leaving the Workshop feeling below average, though if you add in their Trebuchets I think it brings them back up to a reasonable B-.

接下來是 "攻城戰"，雖然有了基礎，但缺少了 "攻城衝撞炮 "和 "投彈加農炮"，這讓 "工坊 "感覺低於平均水平。

Catapulto doesn't come in as often as I'd like in 1v1s, but if you can get there it's a lot of fun.

在 1v1 對戰中，卡塔普爾託並不像我希望的那樣經常出現，但如果你能到達那裡，那會非常有趣。

Moving on to the Navy, you get out to a fantastic start with the wood savings on Camps, plus the Fishing Ships have more durability and faster collection rate.

轉到海軍，您可以通過節省營地的木材獲得一個夢幻般的開端，而且漁船的耐久性更高，收集速度更快。

I don't put a lot of stock into the team bonus, but overall think it's an A when opening on water or on hybrid maps.

我不太看重團隊獎勵，但總的來說，我認為在水上或混合地圖上開啟時，團隊獎勵是 A。

Late game you're missing the heavy Demo Ship, but the real issue is just that you don't have an impactful bonus.

在遊戲後期，你缺少了重型 Demo Ship，但真正的問題只是你沒有有影響力的獎勵。

Despite an open tech tree, I actually think they drop down to a B- on water weight, propped up a bit by excellent Fish Traps, for an A- on water overall.

儘管技術樹是開放的，但實際上我認為他們的水重下降到了 B-，只是因為出色的捕魚陷阱而略有提高，總體水重為 A-。

As for the Monks, it's again a really good tech tree, and this is an aspect of the Civ that hasn't come up yet.

至於僧侶，這又是一個非常好的技術樹，而這也是 Civ 尚未出現的一個方面。

There's no direct bonus, but Japanese have very solid Monks, featuring the combo of Redemption and Block Printing, helping you snag enemy Siege from long range.

雖然沒有直接的獎勵，但日本的僧侶非常強大，他們擁有救贖和塊印的組合，可以幫助你從遠距離搶奪敵人的圍攻。

Next up for defenses, you're missing a few things at the University, though I think that's more than made up for by the unique tech Yasuma, which I see as making their keeps a legitimate replacement for Bombard Towers at a cheaper cost.

接下來是防禦，你們在大學裡缺少了一些東西，但我認為 Yasuma 的獨特技術可以彌補這一點，我認為這使得他們的防禦可以以更低的成本取代 Bombard Towers。

While in the early game you don't have anything to help defensively outside of more Fishing Ship HP, I'd still say it's an A- overall.

雖然在遊戲初期，除了更多的 "捕魚船 "HP 外，你沒有任何東西可以幫助防禦，但我仍然認為它的整體表現是 A-。

A well set up Japanese player Turtling can be very hard to push at times without Bombard Cannons.

如果沒有投彈加農炮，精心佈置的日本玩家 Turtling 有時會很難推進。

And finally for their Trash Units, the Halberdiers are an A+, and the Skirmishers are a B, but the Light Cavalry are a C.

最後是他們的垃圾組織、部門，戟兵是 A+，小兵是 B，但輕騎兵是 C。

The lack of a strong Raiding Unit can be a pretty big disadvantage, to the point I've seen players roll with Halberdiers as their Raiding Unit in a pinch.

缺乏強大的突襲部隊可能是一個相當大的劣勢，以至於我看到有玩家在緊要關頭使用戟兵作為突襲部隊。

Still, the American Civs can get by with worse, and I'll say it's a B- for Trash.

儘管如此，《美國公民》還能以更差的成績過關，所以我認為《垃圾》的成績是 B-。

But to close with some final thoughts on strategy, the beauty of their large wood savings early is you have a lot of choice in how to open, with nothing in the early tech tree leading into a dead end.

最後，我想說說策略方面的一些想法，他們在前期節省大量木材的好處在於，你在如何開局方面有很多選擇，前期技術樹中沒有任何東西是通向死衚衕的。

Man-at-Arms is a less common opening these days in general, but Japanese still do it well, either paired with Towers or followed up with Archers.

如今，"人海戰術 "已不再是一種常見的開局方式，但日本人仍能很好地運用它，或與大廈搭配，或與弓箭手跟進。

Given the predictability of that though, it's not uncommon for Japanese players to try mixing things up and open with Scouts, and moving a Villager from wood to food early can help a lot with competitive Feudal time.

不過，考慮到這一點的可預測性，日本玩家嘗試混合使用偵察兵開局的做法並不罕見，而將村民從木材提前轉移到食物，對封建時代的競爭有很大幫助。

You also see just a straight Archery range opening as well, commonly with a stable follow up at some point to counter the predictable Skirmisher mass your opponent will often try to counter with.

你也會看到直接的射程開局，通常會在某個點上有穩定的跟進，以應對對手經常試圖反擊的可預測的天兵群。

Generally, those quick decisive games are the high point for Japanese, after which they can definitely struggle, though not for lack of options.

一般來說，這些快速決定性的比賽是日本人的制高點，之後他們肯定會陷入困境，儘管並非沒有選擇。

In the mid game, upgrading Surviving Archers and a Crossbows, later transitioning into Cavalry Archer is the most straightforward default plan if you're playing into the meta and looking to benefit from their newer bonus, but Scouts into Knights, and even their good Monks as we saw can be mixed in as well.

在遊戲中期，升級生存弓箭手和弩車，之後過渡到騎兵弓箭手是最直接的默認方案，如果你想融入遊戲並從他們的新獎勵中獲益的話，但也可以將斥候升級為騎士，甚至是我們看到的他們的優秀僧侶。

Alternately, you can just embrace Longsword and Siege, which in mid elo I think is written off more than it should be.

或者，你也可以直接使用長劍和圍攻，我認為在 Elo 中期，長劍和圍攻的作用被忽略了。

I'm not saying to do all of these compositions in the same game of course, but a lot of the Japanese strength is in playing off multiple types of units and transitions.

當然，我並不是說要在同一場比賽中完成所有這些構圖，但日本的很多優勢都在於利用多種類型的組織、部門和過渡。

Moving into Imperial Age, fully upgraded Cavalry Archers are always a popular choice, but Infantry paired with any ranged unit in Siege tends to be well rounded.

進入帝國時代後，全面升級的騎兵弓箭手總是最受歡迎的選擇，但在攻城戰中，步兵與任何遠程組織、部門搭配往往都很全面。

While especially in team games, Towers can also be a unique way to contribute, and help with map control.

特別是在團隊遊戲中，大廈也是一種獨特的貢獻方式，有助於控制地圖。

As for good maps, while they're okay-ish on Arabia, for understandable reasons they tend to be more popular and have greater success on 4 Lakes, or similar maps with Fishing make them also a solid pick on Nomad.

至於好地圖，雖然它們在阿拉伯半島上還算不錯，但出於可以理解的原因，它們往往在 4 湖上更受歡迎，成功率更高。

字幕列表影片播放

日本概況（2025 年更新） (Japanese overview (2025 update))

content

aspect

solid

unique