Name: 為什麼 RAT 改變了一切 - 印度航空公司 171 最新情況 (Why the RAT Changes Everything – Air India 171 Update)
Uploaded: 2025-06-15T02:54:57.000Z
Duration: 13 min 14 s

進階形容詞比較級句型

All right, friends, I promised you we'd come back to you as soon as possible, as soon as we got some new information about this tragic accident over in India.

好了，朋友們，我答應過你們，一旦我們得到有關 印度這起悲慘事故的新消息，我們會盡快回到你們身邊。

And some new video has emerged that's changed my analysis of this accident in particular.

一些新的視頻出現，特別改變了我對這起事故的分析。

And let me recap for you where I started on this.

讓我給你們回顧一下我的出發點。

And basically, there's three camps that everybody is still in about, what, 48 hours almost after the original accident.

基本上，在事故發生 48 小時後，每個人仍處於三個陣營。

Theory number one was that there was some sort of dual engine failure.

第一種推測是，雙引擎出現了某種故障。

And then the backup to that was it was either a bird strike or it was some sort of fuel contamination that led to that dual engine failure.

然後，備份情況是，要麼是鳥擊，要麼是某種燃料汙染導致了雙引擎故障。

Theory number two was the pilots didn't have the flaps set properly for takeoff.

第二種說法是飛行員在起飛時沒有正確設置襟翼。

And as they ran down the runway, they got a little bit of air.

當他們跑下跑道時，他們得到了一點空氣。

But eventually, the airplane just kind of waddled down and crashed because the flaps weren't set properly.

但最終，飛機還是蹣跚著墜毀了，因為襟翼沒有調好。

The third theory and the one that I was leaning to the most, and let me just say leaning to, I wasn't firmly in this camp, but I was leaning towards it, was they had the flaps set properly for takeoff.

第三種理論，也是我最傾向於的一種理論，我只是說傾向於，我並沒有堅定地站在這個陣營，但我傾向於它，那就是他們在起飛時正確地設置了襟翼。

When they rotated, everything was normal at the time that the pilot flying would ask for gear up.

當他們輪換時，一切正常，飛行員會要求升檔。

The other pilot mistakenly grabbed the flap handle and prematurely raised the flaps.

另一名飛行員錯誤地抓住了襟翼把手，過早地升起了襟翼。

That was at the time the thing that seemed most evident to me because the landing gear stayed down for the entire duration short as it would be for this flight.

當時，我覺得最明顯的就是這一點，因為起落架在整個飛行過程中都是放下的，就像這次飛行一樣。

And there was no evidence out of the engines that was any sort of failure.

沒有任何證據表明發動機出現了故障。

No fire, no sparks, no smoke coming out of the engines.

發動機沒有起火，沒有火花，也沒有冒煙。

And so I thought maybe it was simply they grabbed the wrong handle and prematurely raised the flaps.

所以我想，也許只是他們抓錯了把手，過早地升起了襟翼。

I was leaning heavily into that department.

I'm going to change my analysis now because of this new video.

因為這段新視頻，我現在要改變我的分析。

And it's based on the original video that all of us watched.

它基於我們所有人都看過的原始視頻。

The one where the airplane was running down the runway and then rotated and took off and you saw it crash in the distance.

那架飛機在跑道上飛馳，然後旋轉起飛，你看到它在遠處墜毀。

The other one was a video that was taken from kind of a rooftop or a window where the airplane came from left to right and then descended down out of the screen.

另一段視頻是從屋頂或窗口拍攝的，飛機從左向右飛來，然後從螢幕上降落下來。

I'm going to show you that video in its original form.

我要給你們看這段視頻的原貌。

The video that we all saw and every major news network on the planet went with was a video of a video, and the quality was extremely poor.

我們都看到的視頻，以及地球上所有主要新聞網都採用的視頻，是視頻的視頻，品質極差。

The original that was presumably taken from an iPhone or some sort of cell phone is much sharper.

估計是用 iPhone 或某種手機拍攝的原版照片要清晰得多。

It's not a terrific video by any means, but it's much sharper than the video of the other video.

這段視頻無論如何都算不上出色，但比另一段視頻清晰得多。

So what happened was some cameraman was in front of a screen watching the video play, and you can see him at the very end of it.

當時有一名攝影師在螢幕前觀看視頻播放，你可以在視頻的最後看到他。

You can actually see his shadow and you can hear people talking in the background.

你真的能看到他的影子，還能聽到背景中人們的談話。

So the audio is not very good and the visual is not very good.

是以，音效和視覺效果都不是很好。

The original is going to show us something that's going to change this whole thing.

原作將向我們展示一些會改變整件事的東西。

Let me run the video that I'm talking about and you take a look at it and then I'll talk about it after it runs.

讓我先播放一下我說的視頻，你們先看看，播放完後我再談談。

You didn't hear the actual crash on the original video.

你在原始視頻中沒有聽到真正的撞擊聲。

You could see it, but you didn't hear it.

Because there was people talking in the background.

Now you're looking at it going, well, I've seen that a bunch of times.

現在你看著它說，好吧，我已經看過很多次了。

You haven't seen it this clearly a bunch of times.

你還沒這麼清楚地看過幾次呢。

Now I want to run it again and I want you.

現在我想再跑一次，而且我想要你。

We're going to zoom in on something and I'm going to show you something and explain it, because this is a total game changer.

我們要放大一些東西，我要給你們看一些東西，然後解釋一下，因為這完全改變了遊戲規則。

Right there, my friends, take a look, we've circled it for you.

就在那裡，朋友們，看一看，我們已經為你們圈好了。

Now, a lot of people have been talking about the theory that the rat had deployed.

現在，很多人都在談論老鼠已經部署好的理論。

It deploys on many airplanes have it. 787 has it, 777 has it.

許多飛機上都有這種裝置。787 有，777 也有。

The rat is basically just behind the wing on the right side of the airplane.

老鼠基本上就在飛機右側機翼的後面。

And it looks like a little Evinrude motor.

它看起來就像一個小的 Evinrude 發動機。

And the purpose of the ram air turbine is to provide electrical and hydraulic pressure for the aircraft in an extreme emergency.

而衝壓空氣渦輪的目的是在極端緊急情況下為飛機提供電力和液壓。

On the 787 in particular, there's three things that will deploy the rat and it deploys automatically a massive electrical failure, a massive hydraulic failure or a dual engine failure.

特別是在 787 飛機上，有三種情況會自動部署 "老鼠"：大規模電力故障、大規模液壓故障或雙引擎故障。

So any one of those three things will cause that rat to deploy.

是以，這三件事中的任何一件都會導致老鼠的部署。

So up to this point, all of the theories that we've had were based on maybe one bit of solid evidence, but not two or maybe one and a half.

是以，到目前為止，我們所有的理論都是建立在一點確鑿證據的基礎上，而不是兩點或者一點半。

But, you know, it's hard to go with a theory when you've only got like one thing to go on.

但是，你知道，當你只有一件事的時候，是很難有理論依據的。

I'm going to give you three or more for why I think the rat deployed and why I think this was a dual engine failure.

我將給你三個或更多的理由來解釋為什麼我認為 "老鼠 "展開了，為什麼我認為這是雙引擎故障。

我現在已經堅定地站在這個陣營裡了。

Take a look at your screen in the middle of the circle.

You see kind of it looks like a protrusion on the on the belly of the aircraft.

你會看到飛機腹部有一個突出物。

And I'm not trying to be salacious with this.

我並不是想在這上面譁眾取寵。

It looks like a nipple at the bottom of the airplane.

它看起來像飛機底部的一個乳頭。

Just underneath that, you see a little gray dot.

就在下面，你會看到一個小灰點。

It almost looks like an artifact on the screen.

它在螢幕上看起來幾乎就像一件工藝品。

This is visual confirmation that the rat deployed.

What is that that protrusion underneath the airplane?

飛機下面的那個突出物是什麼？

That's the door that opened to allow the rat to come down.

那扇門打開後，老鼠就下來了。

You can see it very vividly on this screen.

你可以在這個螢幕上非常生動地看到它。

It's at least one bit of the puzzle here.

Now, evidence number two is with our ears.

現在，第二個證據就是我們的耳朵。

Because a rat makes a very distinctive sound.

因為老鼠會發出非常獨特的聲音。

And in that original video, the audio was so bad you couldn't really catch it.

在最初的視頻中，音頻非常糟糕，你根本聽不清。

But in this or the one that they were showing to us, the original one, it's much more clear.

但在這幅畫或他們給我們看的那幅畫裡，也就是最初的那幅畫裡，情況要清楚得多。

And it sounds like a prop airplane going by or a real high pitch squeal because it's a two bladed prop.

因為是雙葉螺旋槳，所以聽起來就像螺旋槳飛機經過時發出的聲音，或者是真正的高音尖叫。

And it's basically spinning at the speed of sound to produce the the energy, the electrical and the hydraulic that it needs to.

它基本上是以音速旋轉，以產生所需的能量、電力和液壓。

I think we're going to listen to it three times.

Listen for that that high pitched prop sound.

它不是道具，因為它已經過去了。

OK, it sounded like if you weren't looking at it, it sounded like a single engine prop airplane just flew by.

好吧，如果你不去看，聽起來就像是一架單引擎螺旋槳飛機剛剛飛過。

You might look up and expect to see a little Cessna going by.

抬起頭，你可能會看到一架小型塞斯納飛機飛過。

And in fact, it is a little bitty Cessna.

事實上，這是一架小小的塞斯納飛機。

字幕列表影片播放

為什麼 RAT 改變了一切 - 印度航空公司 171 最新情況 (Why the RAT Changes Everything – Air India 171 Update)

literally

sort

massive

bunch