Most of their tech is not open source and not open to the public.

他們的大多數技術都不是開源的，也不對公眾開放。

In fact, to use their AI, the only thing that opens is your wallet.

事實上，要使用他們的 AI，唯一能打開的就是你的錢包。

I don't think Elon Musk would disagree when I say there's nothing wrong with making money.

我想伊隆·馬斯克可能不會反對我說賺錢沒有什麼錯的觀點。

But when he formed OpenAI with Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and others back in 2015, it wasn't supposed to be this way.

但早在 2015 年，當他與 Sam Altman、Greg Brockman 等人組建 OpenAI 時，事情本不該是這樣的。

Its mission as a nonprofit was to make AI freely available for the benefit of humanity.

作為一家非營利機構，它的使命是免費提供 AI，造福人類。

But according to Elon and his lawyers, their partnership with Microsoft is mad sus and straight up whack.

但根據伊隆和他的律師的說法，他們與微軟的合作是瘋狂的，也是完全錯誤的。

They ain't even cap it when they say OpenAI is giving out some straight up "nope vibes" and filed a bombshell lawsuit yesterday, alleging that this ain't it fam.

如果他們說OpenAI正在散發出一些「不行的氛圍」，並且昨天提起了一場轟動的訴訟，聲稱這不是他們想要的，那麼他們一點也不在誇張。

It is March 2nd, 2024, and you're watching the Code Report.

現在是 2024 年 3 月 2 日，你正在收看 Code Report。

You might know Elon Musk as the second richest man in the world and the guy behind the second fastest production car in the world.

你可能知道伊隆·馬斯克是世界上第二富有的人，也是全球生產第二快的汽車背後的人物。

But Elon was also a founding member of OpenAI when the charter stated that resulting technology will benefit the public and the corporation is not organized for the private gain of any person.

但伊隆·馬斯克也是OpenAI的創始成員之一，當時的憲章聲明該技術的結果將使公眾受益，該公司不是為任何個人的私人利益而組織的。

But in 2019, after they realized how much motherfucking money they could make from this thing, they tweaked the corporate structure of it.

但到了 2019 年，當他們意識到能從這件事上賺到多少錢之後，他們對其公司結構進行了調整。

OpenAI, Inc is still a nonprofit, but it wholly owns and controls an LLC.

OpenAI 公司仍是一家非營利組織，但它完全擁有和控制一家有限責任公司(LLC)。

That LLC controls a holding company which is a majority owner in OpenAI global LLC, a capped profit company.

該有限責任公司(LLC)控制著一家持有公司，該持有公司是OpenAI Global LLC的主要所有者，OpenAI Global LLC是一家有限獲利公司。

And that entity has received a massive investment from Microsoft and all this is overseen by a highly diverse board which currently has three members, Brett Taylor from Salesforce, Adam Dangelo from Facebook and Larry Summers from Washington.

而這個實體已經獲得了來自微軟的大額投資，所有這些都由一個高度多元化的董事會監督，目前有三名成員，分別是來自Salesforce的Brett Taylor、來自Facebook的Adam Dangelo和來自華盛頓的Larry Summers。

It may not diverse in color or gender identity but people from Facebook, Salesforce and the US government tend to be extremely trustworthy, said no one ever.

這可能在膚色或性別認同上不夠多元，但來自Facebook、Salesforce和美國政府的人通常都非常值得信賴，才沒有。

But the structure change was effective.

但這種結構的改變是有效的。

Now in 2024, OpenAI is the world's most valuable AI startup with a valuation that currently sits at 86 billion.

截至2024年，OpenAI是全球估值最高的AI新創公司，當前估值為860億美元。

It seems like Sam Altman and Elon Musk are friends like Sam recently shamed Tesla haters.

看起來Sam Altman和Elon Musk是朋友，像是Sam最近譏諷了特斯拉的酸民。

So why is Elon doing them dirty like this?

為什麼伊隆這樣對待他們呢？

It's almost as bad as what Lil Rod's doing to Diddy right now.

這幾乎和Lil Rod現在對Diddy所做的一樣糟糕。

It's unfortunate this isn't a hip-hop channel because the stuff in that lawsuit is off the charts insane.

很不幸這不是一個嘻哈頻道，因為那場訴訟中的內容真是瘋狂到難以置信的地步。

In Elon's lawsuit, though, it talks about how OpenAI has been transformed into a closed-source subsidiary of Microsoft and says the new board is refining an AGI to maximize profits from Microsoft, not the benefit of humanity.

在伊隆的訴訟中，它談到了OpenAI如何轉變成了微軟的封閉源代碼子公司，並表示新董事會正在改進一個通用人工智能（AGI），以最大化來自微軟的利潤，而不是造福人類。

It says, "This was a stark betrayal of the founding agreement."

它表示：「這明顯背叛了創始協議。」

And to be honest, he's got a pretty good point there.

老實說，他說得很有道理。

Elon left the board back in 2018 and he was actually offered a stake in the for-profit arm and to his credit, he refused to accept it.

伊隆於2018年離開了董事會，事實上，他當時被提供了股權參與營利部門，而值得稱讚的是，他拒絕接受了這一提議。

And this actually sets him up for a very nice hero art in this iteration of the simulation.

這實際上為他在這個模擬中的形象塑造了一個非常好的英雄形象。

Elon has donated over $44 million to OpenAI since 2016.

伊隆自2016年以來已經捐贈了超過4400萬美元給OpenAI。

And because they broke the sacred oath, he now has a valid reason to file this lawsuit and seek out some kind of remedy.

由於他們違背了神聖的誓言，他現在有正當理由提起訴訟，尋求某種補救。

The idea that OpenAI and Microsoft are one and the same requires some really strong copium to deny.

認為OpenAI和Microsoft是一體的觀點需要相當強大的否認心理來支撐。

Saudi Nutella (Satya Nadella), CEO of Microsoft, recently said this, "If OpenAI disappeared tomorrow, we have all the IP rights and all the capability.

最近，微軟的CEO 薩蒂亞·納德拉表示：「如果OpenAI明天消失了，我們擁有所有的知識產權和所有的能力。

We have the people, we have the compute, we have the data, we have everything. We are below them, above them around them."

我們擁有人才，我們擁有計算資源，我們擁有數據，我們擁有一切。我們在他們之下，在他們之上，在他們周圍。」

Even though Microsoft technically doesn't control OpenAI, they clearly have an overwhelming amount of influence.

儘管從技術上講，微軟並不掌控OpenAI，但他們顯然擁有壓倒性的影響力。

Now, another interesting thing in Elon's lawsuit is that it says models like GPT-4 constitute Artificial General Intelligence and says OpenAI is developing something called Q star that has an even stronger claim to AGI.

現在，伊隆的訴訟中另一個有趣的事情是，它表示像GPT-4這樣的模型構成了通用人工智能（AGI），並表示OpenAI正在開發一種名為 Q star 的東西，它對AGI的要求甚至更強。

Elon is known for making wild predictions about space and technology that are almost always wrong.

伊隆以對太空和技術做出的大膽預測而聞名，這些預測幾乎總是不準確。

But one thing's for sure, the discovery in this lawsuit will be epic.

但有一點可以肯定，這場訴訟的證據調查將是史詩級的。

Ultimately, a lawsuit like this could be a great thing for humanity but realistically and I'm no lawyer, its probability of actually working seems extremely low.

最終，這樣的訴訟對人類可能是一件好事，但從現實角度來看，我並非律師，它實際上成功的可能性似乎極低。

As some random guy on the internet, I base that legal opinion on absolutely nothing but Musk has taken some pretty big legal L's recently, like when Delaware took away his $55 billion pay package.

作為網絡上的一個普通人，我對這個法律意見基本上毫無根據，但馬斯克最近在法律上確實遭遇了一些相當大的挫折，比如特拉華州取消了他的550億美元薪酬計劃。

But Elon is right. OpenAI should be open and Microsoft the world's most valuable company by a wide margin now doesn't need any more power.

但伊隆是對的。OpenAI應該是公開的，而微軟作為現今全球最有價值的公司之一，已經擁有足夠的權力。

But as the great Jon Bon Jovi once said, "The more things change, the more they stay the same."

正如偉大的瓊·邦·喬飛曾經說過的那樣：「變化越多，事物越保持不變。」

This has been the Code Report.

以上是這集 Code Report.。

Thanks for watching and I will see you in the next one.

感謝觀看，我們下期再見。