unfazed

US /ʌnˈfezd/

・

UK /ʌnˈfeɪzd/

C2 高級

adj.形容詞未受

影片字幕

美女童軍餅乾居然市值 8 億美元？！一探究竟背後的經濟學！(How Girl Scouts’ $800 Million Cookie Empire Works | The Economics Of | WSJ)

06:23

美女童軍餅乾居然市值 8 億美元？！一探究竟背後的經濟學！(How Girl Scouts’ $800 Million Cookie Empire Works | The Economics Of | WSJ)

I think the girls are mostly unfazed because they are quite nimble with working online.
我認為女孩們大多不會受到影響，因為她們在網路上非常活躍。

充滿動力與幸福的生活 (#1 LIFE HACK for Motivation & Happiness | A Gary Vaynerchuk Original)

03:13

充滿動力與幸福的生活 (#1 LIFE HACK for Motivation & Happiness | A Gary Vaynerchuk Original)

Tell me on a piece of crap and I would be 100% unfazed that is some gangster emotional structure
你想要的東西和你的朋友不同

如果被取消的人不在乎： (If The Person getting Canceled Didn’t Care:)

01:34

如果被取消的人不在乎： (If The Person getting Canceled Didn’t Care:)

Dr. Blaine is unfazed by hate comments and hashtags, but this scandal has made it past Twitter.
布萊恩博士對仇恨言論和標籤毫不畏懼，但這起醜聞已經在推特上傳開了。

復活節彩蛋和背景細節：你從未注意過的PLANKTON ?| 海綿寶寶 (Easter Eggs & Background Details You Never Noticed About PLANKTON ? | SpongeBob)

09:03

復活節彩蛋和背景細節：你從未注意過的PLANKTON ?| 海綿寶寶 (Easter Eggs & Background Details You Never Noticed About PLANKTON ? | SpongeBob)

that Squidward is totally unfazed?
章魚哥完全不為所動？

小測試你的愛情風格是什麼？(自我測試） (Quiz: What is your Love Style? (Self test))

07:32

小測試你的愛情風格是什麼？(自我測試） (Quiz: What is your Love Style? (Self test))

Act unfazed but emotionally withdraw.
表現得處變不驚，但情感上卻要退縮。

這隻可愛的海蛞蝓是個狡猾的小賊 | 深度觀察 (This Adorable Sea Slug is a Sneaky Little Thief | Deep Look)

04:11

這隻可愛的海蛞蝓是個狡猾的小賊 | 深度觀察 (This Adorable Sea Slug is a Sneaky Little Thief | Deep Look)

But it's unfazed, they seem to have a taste for spicy food.
但它毫不畏懼，似乎對辛辣食物情有獨鍾。

我交換了勒布朗和斯蒂芬的職業生涯 (I Swapped LeBron and Steph's Careers)

31:42

我交換了勒布朗和斯蒂芬的職業生涯 (I Swapped LeBron and Steph's Careers)

And on top of that, the Warriors still have one more player that'll eventually join the team that could change the entire competition. But before we get to that, Steph would be continuing where he left off in the 2013 season by making it to his fourth straight finals. And in the Warriors case, not only would Klay improve, but they'd also add the services of Draymond Green, who would add defense and intensity to the team. But the main draw of course would be LeBron, who would also improve to the point where he would win his first MVP, resulting in the Warriors also heading back to the finals, Round 2 against the Heat. But unlike last year, it seems as though LeBron would have the upper hand, not only matching but surpassing Steph's production to quickly take a 3-2 lead in the finals. Meaning that Steph is now once again with his back against the wall for the first time since his earlier matchup with Kobe. But going into Game 6 with a chance to 4-7, he would remain unfazed, keeping the Heat's chances alive. But unfortunately for him, LeBron would be just as determined to close this one out before it gets out of hand. So with the two at the peak of their abilities, we would see a tie game with about 18 seconds left. And with the Warriors and LeBron having the ball, it's up to Steph and the Heat to get a stop to keep their season alive.
除此之外，勇士隊還有一名球員將最終加盟球隊，這可能會改變整個競爭格局。但在此之前，斯蒂芬將延續他在 2013 賽季的輝煌，連續第四次打進總決賽。而對於勇士隊來說，不僅克萊會進步，他們還將得到德雷蒙德-格林的加盟，後者將為球隊增加防守和強度。但最吸引人的當然是勒布朗，他也會進步到贏得他的第一個 MVP 的地步，結果勇士隊也會回到總決賽，第二輪對陣熱火隊。但與去年不同的是，勒布朗似乎佔據了上風，他的表現不僅與斯蒂芬不相上下，而且還超過了斯蒂芬，很快就在總決賽中取得了 3-2 的領先優勢。這意味著斯蒂芬自去年與

我在蘇格蘭的一週書香生活 (A Bookish Week in My Life in Scotland)

43:00

我在蘇格蘭的一週書香生活 (A Bookish Week in My Life in Scotland)

I was surprised at how unfazed they were by us as well.
我很驚訝，他們對我們也毫不畏懼。

如何從痛苦中成長，聽聽戰爭倖存者的心路歷程 (How to Grow From Your Pain)

04:32

如何從痛苦中成長，聽聽戰爭倖存者的心路歷程 (How to Grow From Your Pain)

After the war, they felt more confident, more sure of themselves, more grateful, and unfazed by life's trivialities and petty annoyances.
戰後，他們更加自信，更加肯定自己，更加懂得感恩，不再為生活中的瑣事和小煩惱所困擾。

受傷的人如何尋求進一步的懲罰 (How Wounded People Seek Out further Punishment)

05:32

受傷的人如何尋求進一步的懲罰 (How Wounded People Seek Out further Punishment)

It's just that for us, home was a place of grief and persecution. It's easy enough to see why children put up with poor treatment. They're born radically powerless. They can't run away. They are utterly at the mercy of others. They can't even think especially straight. What they must do, above all else, is adapt. Which in practice means learning to put up with poor treatment. They have to develop an advanced skill at not noticing quite how awful things are, an expertise at being unfazed by cruelty and neglect. Children in deprived circumstances tend to be geniuses at looking away, disassociating and making light of things. Of course, it might not be perfect that their father screams at them constantly, but there are some interesting shows on television and there's a really fascinating bit of the garden to explore in the morning. You can climb up the big tree and imagine it's a little house. And of course, ideally their mother wouldn't be so mocking and disloyal. But that's just the way things are, neither more or less sad than the fact it's often raining and there's a lot of homework to do. In any case, the bad treatment almost certainly has to do with something that they, the child, have done wrong. Badly treated children tend to take a compulsively generous view of those who injure them. Obviously, they aren't nasty on purpose. That would make no sense. Clearly, their ostensible brutality has sound explanations. It must be because they, the child, is in the wrong. That's why they're being neglected. That's why they've been declared fools. That's why they're being bullied. It's a great deal easier to believe that the parent is tough, yet fundamentally right, rather than gratuitously callous and unjustifiably hostile. In other words, what a bad childhood trains us to do, above all else, is to indulge meanness. The muscle that normally functions to repel attacks has had to be starved and has atrophied. In order to survive, we had to lose the ability to work out what was good and bad for us, lest we discover that we spent 18 years in the company of fiends. What this means for our futures is that we will be extremely poor at discerning when the partners we let into our lives cross the border into selfishness and malevolence. We'll continue under a narcoleptic command not to notice that we're being robbed and deceived. We'll be as blind to the blows now as we were then. For a long time, it simply won't occur to us to wonder why we've ended up paying for everything for the partner, or why they're unreliable in their promises, or constantly prioritise their friends over us, or are angrily defensive whenever we raise a complaint. We will simply, as we had to early on, fall into line and invent elaborate explanations for their behaviour. They're good, but they're tired. They're durable, but under pressure at work. They're fierce, but compensating for their childhood traumas, for which we have a lot of sympathy. Anything other than the more straightforward conclusion, we've fallen in with unconcerned egoists. We shouldn't compound our disloyalty towards ourselves by feeling, on top of everything else, ashamed for our tolerance. It isn't weakness, it's a survival strategy from childhood that served a very sensible purpose then but is liable to be ruining our lives now. To wake ourselves up, we need to consider our choices as if someone else had made them. We might wonder what we would advise a friend to do if they were in our situation. And through such a lens, we might start to perceive that the treatment we're facing isn't, as we've long thought, a sign of our partner's depth or complexity, but in the end, something much more humble, evidence that we need to get away. But this will be only a momentary liberation until we can understand the more fundamental issue, that the muscle most people use to eject poison has withered because of a distinctive history. We need to reverse the direction of our psychological fate. Our early suffering should not condemn us to yet more pain. It is what gives us an especially powerful claim on original sources of kindness, tenderness and calm.
只是對我們來說，家是一個充滿悲傷和迫害的地方。很容易理解為什麼孩子們要忍受惡劣的待遇。他們生來就毫無力量他們無法逃避。他們完全任由他人擺佈。他們甚至連思考的能力都沒有他們必須做的，最重要的，就是適應。在實踐中，這意味著要學會忍受惡劣的待遇。他們必須發展出一種高級技能，即不去注意事情有多糟糕，擅長對殘忍和忽視不為所動。生活在貧困環境中的孩子往往是睜一隻眼閉一隻眼、脫離現實和輕描淡寫的天才。當然，他們的父親經常對他們大吼大叫，這可能並不完美，但電視上有一些有趣的節目，而且早上可以去花園裡探索一個非常迷人的地方