posits
US
・UK
C1 高級
v.t.及物動詞安置；放置；斷定；假定
He posits that genius tends to run in families
影片字幕
【TED】要快樂地達成目標 (Reach your goals with Happiness | Shawn Achor)
02:46
- what positive psychology posits, is that if we study what is merely average, we will remain
正向心理學所斷定的是，如果僅僅研究平均值，那我們將會
萬達視訊可以與MCU連接的十大方式 (Top 10 Ways WandaVision Could Connect to the MCU)
11:50
- One fan theory posits Ultron could still be hiding somewhere in visions.
有一個粉絲理論認為奧創可能還藏在某個幻象中。
邏輯謬誤 (Logical Fallacies)
03:35
- Rebecca posits that either Ethan answers the door or he isn't home.
麗貝卡提出，要麼是伊森應門，要麼是他不在家。
(Mia Stands Up for Elena | Little Fires Everywhere | #StreamingOnlyOnHulu)
04:23
- Hey, hey, hey, hey, listen, I think that we should all go around the circle and each answer one of the questions that this book posits.
嘿，嘿，嘿，嘿，聽著，我覺得我們應該繞著圈子，各自回答這本書提出的一個問題。
十大最瘋狂的影迷理論，都是錯的。 (Top 10 Craziest Movie Fan Theories That Were Wrong)
12:10
- The rumored original source was supposedly the late Joe Ranched, Once head of story for Pixar, it posits that Andy, the boy who owns Woody and the rest of the toys, was not Woody's first owner.
傳聞中的原始消息來源應該是已故的喬-蘭奇，曾經是皮克斯的故事主管，它認為擁有伍迪和其他玩具的男孩安迪並不是伍迪的第一任主人。
機器人雞取笑迪士尼的10大時代 (Top 10 Times Robot Chicken Made Fun of Disney)
11:51
- Number 10, where the dirty people are being a mermaid aerials fascination with human, sees her collect all kinds of things we consider trash, and this sketch posits what would happen if she visited New York City's dumping ground.
第10號，骯髒的人是被美人魚航拍迷住的人類，看到她收集各種我們認為是垃圾的東西，這幅素描作品提出瞭如果她參觀紐約市的垃圾場會發生什麼。
居住在傳統的日本町屋：京町屋 (Living in Traditional Japanese Townhouses: Kyo-machiya)
19:10
- Another theory posits that land plots were divided up into smaller units to bring in as many merchants as possible to help make the city thrive.
另一種理論認為，將地塊劃分為較小的組織、部門，是為了吸引儘可能多的商人來幫助城市繁榮發展。
聖經是邪惡的 | 為什麼辯解者忽視這些經文？ (The Bible is EVIL | Why apologists IGNORE these verses)
25:59
- Apologists sometimes turn to the argument of limited historical application. This approach posits that the command for conquest, slavery, and genocide in Deuteronomy were specific directives given to the ancient Israelites for a particular time and place. To support this view, proponents cite factors such as 1. The perceived wickedness of the Canaanite cultures, who God warns will teach the Israelites to sin against him if they are not utterly destroyed. 2. The need to establish a pure monotheistic society, and 3. The fulfilment of divine promises regarding the land. To especially laypeople, this defence can seem more palatable than the previous ones – after all, it doesn't require us to accept that genocide is morally good, nor does it suggest that God's objective moral standards have changed. Instead, it attempts to quarantine these troubling commands to a specific historical context. However, the most glaring objection to the limited historical application defence is that it simply fails to address the core ethical issue at hand.
辯解者有時會轉向有限歷史應用的論點。這種觀點認為，《申命記》中關於征服、奴役和種族滅絕的命令是在特定的時間和地點給古代以色列人的特定指令。為了支持這一觀點，支持者列舉了以下因素：1.迦南文化被認為是邪惡的，上帝警告說，如果不徹底消滅他們，他們就會教唆以色列人背叛上帝。2.建立一個純粹的一神論社會的需要，以及 3.實現神對土地的應許。對於普通人來說，這種辯護似乎比前幾種更容易接受--畢竟，它並不要求我們接受種族滅絕在道德上是好的，也不表明上帝的客觀道德標準已經改變。相反，它試圖將這些令人不安的命令隔離在特定