Name: CNN名嘴坦承錯誤！「驚人道歉」畫面曝光！ (WATCH: CNN star APOLOGIZES for false claim)
Uploaded: 2026-03-12T23:04:33.000Z
Duration: 6 min 34 s
Description: 【看影片學英語】數萬部 YouTube 影片，搭配英漢字典即點即查，輕鬆掌握單字發音與用法，長久累積看電影不必再看字幕。

進階形容詞比較級句型

And for more on this, we are joined by Melissa DeRosa, Democratic strategist, as well as Rich Zioli, the host of the Rich Zioli Podcast.

而更多相關消息，我們請到民主黨策略師 Melissa DeRosa，以及 Rich Zioli Podcast 的主持人 Rich Zioli。

So let's take a look at the numbers right here.

AAA came out with the states with the most expensive gas prices.

California is at the top of the list and it's not even close.

加州位居榜首，而且差距非常大。

Average of $5 and about 30 cents per gallon.

平均每加侖 5 美元 30 美分左右。

I'm born and raised in California, lived in LA for like the last nine years before moving to D.C.

我是在加州出生長大的，在搬到 D.C. 之前，過去九年都住在洛杉磯。

california Democrats demonized the oil and gas industry.

加州的民主黨妖魔化了石油和天然氣產業。

They wanted to placate the environmental lobby, the green lobby.

他們想安撫環保遊說團體、綠色遊說團體。

They even put some refineries, even said they'd rather eat the financial loss and just move out of state.

他們甚至關閉了一些煉油廠，甚至說他們寧願承受財務損失，也要搬離這個州。

$1 billion they're going to spend to shut down rather than stay in business in California.

他們要花 10 億美元來關閉，而不是留在加州做生意。

So the political shapeshifter chameleon, who went after the gas and oil industry for years and years and years is now shape shapeshifting into going after Donald Trump for high gas prices when he purposely wanted high gas prices to force people into EVs $0.61 per gallon gas tax.

所以這個政治變色龍，多年來一直針對石油和天然氣產業，現在卻變成了針對川普的高油價，因為他故意想要高油價來迫使人們購買 EVs，每加侖 0.61 美元的汽油稅。

And of course, he also wanted to make it so that you had to have these ridiculous mileage standards that no car could ever reach to get you out of your gas cars.

當然，他也想要設定這些荒謬的里程標準，沒有任何汽車能達到，來讓你放棄汽油車。

Could you imagine that with all this turbulence in the Middle east as they're talking about all this oil being imported into California and how dependent it is on these foreign countries, which is just such a travesty.

你能想像在中東發生所有這些動盪，他們談論所有進口到加州的石油，以及它對這些外國的依賴程度，這真是太糟糕了。

But if we didn't have, I mean, thank God Trump ended the war in energy.

但如果我們沒有，我是說，感謝上帝川普結束了能源戰爭。

Imagine how much worse it would be, right, if we didn't have America's natural gas and oil supply the way it is right now.

想像一下，如果我們沒有美國目前的天然氣和石油供應，情況會糟多少，對吧。

If people like Newsom and the left had their way, we would be so up the river, not to mention the American ingenuity and engineering it took in order to get fracking.

如果像紐森和左派人士得逞，我們就慘了，更不用說美國的聰明才智和工程技術來實現水力壓裂。

I encourage everyone to follow the Oil and Gas association on X.

我鼓勵大家追蹤 X 上的石油天然氣協會。

他們正在讓批評者們無話可說。

It's very funny and very clever and I wish I'd had when I was press secretary.

這真的很有趣也很聰明，真希望我當新聞祕書時有這個。

Melissa, you know, bigger picture on Gavin Newsom.

Melissa，妳知道，關於紐森（Governor Newsom）的大局。

I mean, he might be a frontrunner for the 2028 Democratic nomination, but

我的意思是，他可能是 2028 年民主黨初選的熱門人選，但

he brings with him this huge bunch of baggage from California.

他卻帶著加州這個巨大的包袱。

This is a preview of what's to come across the board.

He wants to complain about gas prices, will explain why California on average has $2 more per gas gallon than any other state in the country.

他想抱怨油價，會解釋為什麼加州每加侖汽油平均比美國其他任何州貴 2 美元。

You want to complain about affordability, explain why you have the highest taxes in the country.

你想抱怨可負擔性，就解釋為什麼你的稅收是全國最高的。

You want to talk about making things livable and good for your residents.

你想談論讓生活宜居、對居民友善。

Well, why does California have the number one out migration?

那麼，為什麼加州是人口遷出率第一名？

So this is the the story that's going to continue following around Gavin Newsom if he does decide to make that leap.

這就是如果紐森決定跨出這一步，將持續跟隨他的故事。

Which is why ultimately, while he may be leading in the polls right now, I think that he's got early front runner status and you're going to see that support erode as he gets a closer look.

這也是為什麼，雖然他目前在民調中領先，但我認為他有早期領跑者的地位，當大家更仔細檢視時，你會看到支持度流失。

We want to ask you guys about the recent attempted terror attack here in New York with these two ISIS inspired individuals.

我們要問大家關於最近在紐約發生的、兩名受 ISIS 啟發的個人所策劃的恐怖攻擊未遂事件。

I'm sure you guys saw the absolutely ridiculous post from cnn.

我相信你們都看到了 CNN 刊登的那個荒謬報導。

If we can pull that up right now, here's how they described it.

如果我們現在可以把它叫出來，他們是這樣描述的。

Quote, Two Pennsylvania teenagers crossed into New York City Saturday morning for what could have been a normal day, enjoying the city during abnormally warm weather.

引述，兩名賓州的青少年週六早上穿越到紐約市，原本可能只是尋常的一天，在異常溫暖的天氣中享受這座城市。

But in less than an hour, their lives would drastically change.

但在不到一小時的時間內，他們的生活將會劇烈改變。

The pair would be arrested for throwing homemade bombs during an anti mus protest outside of Mayor Mamdani's home.

這兩人因為在曼丹尼市長家外反穆斯林抗議活動中，投擲自製炸彈而被逮捕。

到目前為止，我們知道的資訊是這樣。

So obviously they got all sorts of blowback.

所以很明顯地，他們受到了各種批評。

Honestly, I didn't even think it was real when I first saw it.

說真的，我一開始看到的時候，根本不覺得是真的。

And I clicked on it and I saw the check mark, I said, wow.

然後我點進去看，看到那個打勾的符號，我說，哇。

They had to put out a correction that says in part, quote, a post regarding the two individuals arrested for throwing homemade bombs outside of New York City.

他們不得不發布更正聲明，其中一部分寫著：「關於兩名在紐約市外投擲自製炸彈被捕的個人，」

Mayor Zoran Mamdani's home failed to reflect the gravity of the incident, thereby breaching the editorial standards we require for all of our reporting.

曼丹尼市長的家，這篇報導未能反映事件的嚴重性，是以違反了我們對所有報導的要求的編輯標準。

是以，這篇報導已經被刪除了。

Rich, we'll give you the first bite here.

Rich，這個問題就先請你來回答。

It's like, yeah, a couple guys on a beautiful day, spoiled rich brats from PA Go to New York.

就像，嗯，有兩個年輕人，在一個美好的日子裡，從賓州來到紐約，是那種有錢的小屁孩。

They catch a show, they get some pretzels, got a little food poisoning from New York City street hot dog.

他們去看秀，買了點椒鹽脆餅，還吃了紐約街頭的熱狗，結果食物中毒了。

這種事都發生過在我們身上，對吧？

How out of freaking touch can you be if you're CNN to write it like that?

如果 CNN 寫成那樣，他們到底有多脫節啊？

Like it just, it just happened upon them.

好像就只是，剛好就發生在他們身上一樣。

Like they weren't, you know, they just happened to throw bombs.

好像他們不是，你知道的，剛好就去丟炸彈。

They're doing this to make these guys seem like heroes.

他們這樣做是想讓這些傢伙看起來像英雄。

They wanted to Say that they came across a white supremacist rally and they decided to take action.

他們想說他們偶然遇到一個白人至上主義者集會，然後決定採取行動。

And I know we're hiding behind the fact that it's so tone deaf, but

我知道我們躲在「太不合時宜」這個事實後面，但是

really, when you think about it, some Gen Z or Millennial or somebody wrote that thinking that these guys were on the side of right.

說真的，仔細想想，某些 Gen Z 或千禧世代，或是其他人寫這段話，以為這些人是站在正義這邊。

And then Abby Phillips, later on that night, she had this tease on her show, watch Muslims don't belong here after an attempted terror attack against New York's Mayor Zoran Mamdani.

接著那天晚上晚些時候，Abby Phillips 在她的節目上預告，在紐約市長 Zoran Mamdani 遭受恐怖攻擊未遂後，她說「穆斯林不屬於這裡」。

And the House Speaker, Mike Johnson, says nothing really to condemn those comments.

而眾議院議長 Mike Johnson 對這些評論卻什麼都沒說。

Okay, so this was not an attack on Mamdani.

好的，所以這不是針對 Mamdani 的攻擊。

She said, I want to correct something I said last night.

她說，我想更正我昨晚說的話。

That the bombs thrown in New York City over the weekend by ISIS inspired attackers was thrown into a crowd of anti Muslim protestors and not specifically targeted at Mayor Mamdani.

週末在紐約市，ISIS 啟發的攻擊者投擲的炸彈，是投向一群反穆斯林抗議者，並非特別針對 Mamdani 市長。

The wording was inaccurate and I didn't catch it ahead of time.

用詞不精確，我事先沒有注意到。

I give a lot of grace for people doing that.

我對做直播的人給予很多寬容。

But as those words are leaving your mouth, do you not think, oh, my gosh, what is happening?

但當那些話說出口時，你難道不會想，哦，天啊，發生了什麼事嗎？

also, it was on top of the earlier CNN screw up, which that's generous to call it a screw up, because to your point, was it intentional?

而且，這又發生在先前 CNN 的失誤之上，說它是失誤已經很寬容了，因為就像你說的，那是有意為之嗎？

It's almost as if the media covering this entire thing has devolved into parody.

這幾乎就像是媒體在報導這整件事時，已經退化成一種模仿秀了。

You had to read five paragraphs into the New York Times story over the weekend to figure out what which side threw the bomb.

你得讀完紐約時報週末那篇報導的五段之後，才能搞清楚是哪一方丟了炸彈。

You had Zoram Hamdami going out and going aggressively against the white supremacists who were doing the initial protests and barely got to the people who were throwing the bombs.

你看到 Zoram Hamdami 出來，強烈譴責那些發起最初抗議的白人至上主義者，但幾乎沒提到那些丟炸彈的人。

And still, I don't think, has called it terrorism.

而且到現在，我認為還沒有人稱之為恐怖主義。

So across the board, from the media and from the mayor of the city of New York, you're seeing a really troubling pattern in how this is being covered and the bias underneath it.

所以，從媒體到紐約市長，你看到的是一個非常令人擔憂的模式，關於這件事是如何被報導的，以及其背後的偏見。

And so I think it all needs to be called out.

所以，我認為這一切都需要被點名出來。