Name: RSA 深度解析：氣候危機背後的體制潰敗與權力真相（Climate change is a systems failure | RSA Journal Presents）
Uploaded: 2026-03-10T18:18:54.000Z
Duration: 9 min 34 s

I think today everybody knows that the climate crisis is happening, from fires in LA to heat waves across Europe.

我覺得今天大家知道氣候危機正在發生，從洛杉磯的火災到歐洲的熱浪。

But the old ways of talking about it are not stopping it or changing it.

但老套的說法並不能阻止或改變它。

We've never had more information, we've never had clearer science.

我們從來沒有這麼多資訊，從來沒有這麼清晰的科學。

And for a long time the consensus within climate was, well, if people just know what's happening, then we'll be able to galvanize action.

長久以來，氣候領域的共識是，嗯，如果大家知道正在發生什麼事，我們就能促成行動。

Currently the science establishes that we're essentially on track for about 2.6 degrees of global heating by the end of the century.

目前的科學顯示，到本世紀末，我們大概會面臨 2.6 度的全球暖化。

It means, by conservative estimates, you know, a billion people being on the move due to climate change.

這意味著，保守估計，你知道，有十億人會因為氣候變遷而遷徙。

With that being said, we are in a, a better position than where we were before the Paris agreement.

儘管如此，我們現在的處境比巴黎協定之前來得好。

So pre Paris agreement, we were on track for about 3.6 degrees of global heating.

所以在巴黎協定之前，我們大概會面臨 3.6 度的全球暖化。

So we have brought things down and the rate of emissions is slowing and yet it's still on the increase.

所以我們已經讓情況有所改善，排放的速度正在放緩，但仍在增加。

Paris was undoubtedly this massive milestone.

巴黎協定無疑是一個巨大的里程碑。

The fact that the 1.5 degree threshold was established and agreed upon was a tremendous political feat which many people didn't think was possible.

設立並同意 1.5 度的門檻，這是一項巨大的政治成就，很多人認為不可能。

In the wake of Paris, there was this flurry of commitments.

巴黎協定之後，出現了一連串的承諾。

And I think while, you know, governments were scrambling to appease angry citizens, a lot of corporations were also kind of afraid of missing the boat and so adopted a lot of language around climate, set these commitments, even though they were very far off.

我覺得，在政府忙著安撫憤怒的民眾時，許多公司也害怕錯失良機，於是採用了很多關於氣候的說法，設定了這些承諾，即使它們離目標還很遠。

And even, you know, fossil fuel companies, the original architects of climate denial and delay, were suddenly parroting the words that were splashed across our placards.

甚至，你知道，那些最初是氣候否認與延遲的始作俑者，化石燃料公司，也突然鸚鵡學舌地說著我們標語牌上的話。

I think a lot of companies have taken the mask off from a kind of political context.

我認為很多公司在某種政治層面上已經露出了真面目。

A few years ago, climate did feel like a top priority for a lot of politicians because there was that pressure coming from the people that since been superseded by, you know, things like immigration, scapegoating the trans community, a lot of kind of identity politics.

幾年前，氣候確實是許多政治人物的首要考量，因為民眾的壓力，但後來被移民、妖魔化跨性別社群、許多身份政治等議題取代了。

So naturally climate, which is in many ways this kind of abstract, historically slow moving thing, it has slid down the ladder of what people have the capacity to kind of care about.

所以很自然地，氣候在很多方面是一個抽象的、緩慢發展的事物，它已經從人們關心的能力範圍中滑落了。

I think this speaks to the broader challenge that we're up against when it comes to climate.

我認為這說明瞭我們在氣候議題上面臨的更廣泛挑戰。

We've failed to interrogate systems of power, the idea that we can indefinitely grow our economies, and

我們未能審視權力體系，以及我們經濟可以無限增長的觀念，

但我們可以以永續的方式進行。

It doesn't match up with a planet that has finite resources.

這跟一個資源有限的星球是不符的。

The Earth is incredibly resilient and has taken everything that we've been throwing at it for decades, and

地球非常有韌性，承受了我們幾十年來丟給它的所有東西，

yet it's finally losing its capacity to replenish itself.

但它終於失去自我補充的能力了。

And so much of our economic theory is Totally divorced from the material reality that we're living in.

而我們的許多經濟理論，都完全脫離了我們所處的物質現實。

我們也一直沒有真正指出這一點。

Over the past decade, we've seen the largest power grab in history.

在過去十年裡，我們看到了史上最大規模的權力掠奪。

Today we have 26 people who own the same wealth as the poorest, 3.8 billion.

現在有 26 個人擁有的財富，相當於最貧窮的 38 億人的總財富。

And so that's why we've not seen a meaningful increase in the people being pulled out of poverty for over three decades.

這就是為什麼三十多年來，我們沒有看到脫貧人口有顯著增加。

So climate, it's been framed as degrees of heating and carbon and polar bears, which don't mean anything to the average person.

所以氣候議題，一直被塑造成暖化程度、碳排放和北極熊，這些對一般人來說毫無意義。

But we've also failed to talk about equity, talk about social justice, and

但我們也一直沒有真正談論公平、談論社會正義，以及

talk about how in pursuing solutions for climate, we have to be pursuing a more fair and equitable world for everyone.

談論在尋找氣候解決方案的同時，我們必須為每個人追求一個更公平、更公正的世界。

I think the conversation about climate is caught very often in scientific terms that are real, that are important, not disputing the data or the science.

我認為關於氣候的討論，常常被困在一些真實且重要的科學術語裡，並非質疑數據或科學本身。

We know about emissions, we know about carbon, we know all these things.

我們知道排放，我們知道碳，我們知道所有這些事情。

And I consider myself somebody who does care.

而我認為自己是個很關心這件事的人。

The Herds is a participatory public art piece that is questioning our effects on nature.

「The Herds」是一個參與式的公共藝術作品，探討我們對大自然的影響。

It's a 20,000 kilometer journey of a herd of animals that are fleeing their natural habitat.

這是一趟長達兩萬公里的旅程，一群動物正在逃離牠們的自然棲息地。

They're created from cardboard and sustainable materials.

它們是用紙板和永續材料製成的。

They leave the Congo basin and run north.

They go through West Africa, across the Mediterranean, and

牠們會經過西非，跨越地中海，然後

then from South Europe to the edge of Europe to the cliff in Nordkapp, which is the Arctic Circle.

從南歐抵達歐洲邊緣，到達北角，也就是北極圈的懸崖。

They're fleeing natural disaster, they're fleeing the erosion of their world.

牠們正在逃離大自然的災難，牠們正在逃離牠們世界的毀滅。

They're reacting before we do, which is very common in animals.

牠們的反應比我們快，這在動物身上很常見。

We created big public art events in 27 cities in 11 countries.

我們在11個國家的27個城市舉辦了大型公共藝術活動。

And in each city, we worked with hundreds of local participants to co create a very specific show that is right for that community.

在每個城市，我們都與數百名當地參與者合作，共同創造一個非常適合該社區的獨特表演。

And although we worked in many, many different cultures, in many different languages, and

而且，雖然我們在許多不同的文化、許多不同的語言中工作，

each show is unique, what unites all of these shows is it's a story about climate crisis.

而且每個展演都是獨一無二的，但所有這些展演都圍繞著一個主題，那就是氣候危機的故事。

And each of the city is experiencing a different version of climate crisis.

而每個城市都在經歷著不同形式的氣候危機。

From floods in Kinshasa in the Congo, to heat waves in northern Europe.

從剛果金夏沙的洪水，到北歐的熱浪。

My job is to put people in this uncomfortable place where they're asking a question.

我的工作就是讓大家處在一個不舒服的境地，讓他們開始提問。

And if they're running, are they running because of you?

如果牠們在逃跑，是因為你嗎？

We have to acknowledge that we're not going to solve the climate crisis with the Same types of thinking that created it.

我們必須承認，我們無法用造成氣候危機的思維來解決它。

And so we need to remember who the enemy is.

所以我們需要記住，敵人是誰。

Who benefits from this polarization, from us hating one another, from us being in these political silos and echo chambers where we're incapable of having a conversation with someone who maybe we disagree with.

誰從這種兩極分化中獲利，從我們互相仇恨中獲利，從我們處於這些政治孤島和迴聲室中，無法與意見不同的人交談中獲利？

There's a piece of research that came out this year which found that 89% of people globally want their governments to take stronger action on the climate crisis.

今年有一項研究發現，全球有 89% 的人希望他們的政府在氣候危機上採取更強力的行動。

Most people want action, most people believe in the science, and

大多數人都想要行動，大多數人都相信科學，而且

yet that majority believe that they're the minority.

然而，這個大多數人卻認為自己是少數。

And that's where community and finding like minded people is such a powerful and important act of resistance and such a critical way to sustain your activism as well.

這就是為什麼社群和尋找志同道合的人，是如此強大且重要的抵抗行為，也是維持你行動主義的關鍵方法。

Because while anxiety or fear or anger might be the emotions that catalyze you, they're very difficult feelings to kind of sustain long term.

因為焦慮、恐懼或憤怒或許能激勵你，但這些情緒很難長期維持。

So you can touch on those emotions and dip into them.

所以你可以觸碰並體驗這些情緒。

But ultimately it's the feeling of connection and joy that you get from doing something that has purpose, doing something that feels meaningful and getting to do it with people you love and respect.

但最終，讓你持續前進的，是從有意義、有目標的行動中獲得的連結感和喜悅，以及能與你所愛和尊敬的人一起行動。

That's what's going to sustain us through these movements, especially when it gets difficult.

這將支撐我們度過這些運動，尤其是在困難的時候。

that journey collected hundreds, thousands, hundreds of thousands of people into collective action.

這趟旅程匯集了數百、數千、數十萬人投入集體行動。

And it ends very dramatically and poetically at a cliff.

旅程的終點以非常戲劇化且詩意的方式，來到懸崖邊。

And the cliff is a metaphor, but the cliff is real.

而這懸崖是個隱喻，但懸崖是真實存在的。

With the journey ending there starts a very interesting question of what is the next phase?

隨著旅程在那裡結束，一個非常有趣的問題開始浮現：下一階段是什麼？

And that's also why it's so important that this conversation is intersectional, so that we're not just talking about, okay, how do we protect nature, we have to talk about class struggle, we have to talk about racial injustice, we have to talk about how do we actually make the society better for everyone.

這也是為什麼這個對話如此重要，必須是跨領域的，我們不只討論如何保護大自然，還得談論階級鬥爭、種族不公，以及我們如何真正讓社會變得更好，造福所有人。

That's why I get really excited about climate solutions.

這也是為什麼我對氣候解決方案感到非常興奮。

Because when you go to real solutions that have the power to change our societies, they're not just offering to deliver benefits 20 or 30 years down the line.

因為當我們探討那些有力量改變社會的真正解決方案時，它們不只是承諾在二、三十年後才帶來益處。

When we focus on things like moving to renewables in this country, that is a mechanism to lower people's energy bills.

當我們專注於像在這個國家轉向再生能源時，這就是降低民眾電費的機制。

When we talk about growing more food in the UK and having a more resilient agricultural system, that's also how do we create more jobs in this country?

當我們談論要在英國種植更多食物，建立更具韌性的農業系統時，這同時也是如何在國內創造更多工作機會？

So we have to be able to ground it in the things that people are scared about and worried about for their kids and their features and their families, but

所以我們必須能夠將它紮根於人們對孩子、未來和家人的恐懼與擔憂，

also the things that are going to meaningfully make people's lives better in the short term.

但也同時是那些能在短期內真正改善人們生活的事情。

My role as an artist is not to make sure people take actions.

我身為藝術家的角色，不是確保人們採取行動。

And what they do then with the feeling, I hope they go back to their community and go, let's think differently.

而他們接著會如何處理這種感受，我希望他們能回到自己的社群，然後說，讓我們換個方式思考。

At the end of the day, it's not a zoology study.

說到底，這不是一個動物學的研究。

And I hope the cliff, the image of the cliff, the metaphor of the cliff makes us think, understand that we will have to jump off that cliff.

我希望懸崖的意象，懸崖的比喻，能讓我們思考，理解我們將不得不跳下那懸崖。

How do we mitigate the fact that there is no way back?

我們要如何減緩我們已無路可退的事實？

字幕列表影片播放

RSA 深度解析：氣候危機背後的體制潰敗與權力真相（Climate change is a systems failure | RSA Journal Presents）

journey

term

crisis

pursue