Name: Pixel 8 Pro 上的 1000 張照片（？AI、UI......哦？ (1000 photos (?) on the Pixel 8 Pro: AI, UI…Oh?)
Uploaded: 2025-09-11T07:55:57.000Z
Duration: 9 min 5 s

Google is a software company that sometimes makes hardware.

谷歌是一家軟件公司，有時也生產硬件。

And nowhere is that more apparent than in the Pixel 8 Pro's camera system.

這一點在 Pixel 8 Pro 的相機系統中體現得最為明顯。

Where AI editing and video is at the forefront.

人工智能編輯和視頻處於最前沿。

這就是售價 999 美元的 Pixel 8 Pro。

It has a Tensor G3 chipset, a flat 120Hz 6.7-inch screen that has a peak brightness of 2400 nits, and of course a temperature sensor.

它配備了 Tensor G3 芯片組、峰值亮度為 2400 尼特的 120Hz 6.7 英寸平面螢幕，當然還有一個溫度傳感器。

But its biggest updates come to the camera system.

但它最大的更新還是在相機系統上。

The most noticeable change is a redesigned UI.

最明顯的變化是重新設計了用戶界面。

All of the controls have been brought down to the bottom of the screen for easier access, and can be adjusted entirely by the right thumb.

所有控制按鈕都下移到了螢幕底部，方便用戶使用，而且完全可以用右手拇指進行調節。

Even better though, there is always a visible, dedicated photo-video toggle button.

更妙的是，總有一個可見的專用照片-視頻切換按鈕。

Unlike on previous Pixel devices where every shooting mode was on a single scrollable line, now video and photo modes have been put into their own lines that are accessible via this switch.

與以前的 Pixel 設備不同的是，以前每種拍攝模式都在一條可滾動的線上，而現在視頻和照片模式都被放到了各自的線上，通過這個開關就可以訪問。

This has naturally caused me to switch between photo and video and back far more often, and they go hand-in-hand with Google's increased focus on video quality.

這自然使我在照片和視頻之間來回切換的頻率大大增加，這與谷歌更加註重視頻品質是相輔相成的。

The Pixel 8 Pro's 50MP f1.68 main sensor is capable of 4K video at 24, 30, and 60 frames per second.

Pixel 8 Pro 的 5000 萬像素 f1.68 主傳感器能夠以每秒 24、30 和 60 幀的速度拍攝 4K 視頻。

And Google claims that it has two times better optical quality, and that the lens brings in 21% more light.

谷歌聲稱，它的光學品質提高了兩倍，鏡頭的進光量增加了 21%。

While video from this device has pleasing focus falloff and a fair amount of saturation, switching between lenses is met with jarring frame and color changes.

雖然該設備拍攝的視頻具有令人愉悅的焦距落差和相當高的飽和度，但在鏡頭之間切換時，畫面和色彩的變化會令人感到刺眼。

And when compared to the iPhone 15 Pro Max's standard 4K, 24 frames per second video, the Pixel is just less consistent with its color choices.

與 iPhone 15 Pro Max 的標準 4K、每秒 24 幀視頻相比，Pixel 在色彩選擇上就不那麼一致了。

In low light, it adds a magenta hue, and when light quickly shifts, like it does here, the Pixel more obviously is adjusting to balance everything out, where the iPhone's change is more subtle.

在弱光環境下，Pixel 會增加洋紅色調，而當光線快速變化時，就像這裡一樣，Pixel 會更明顯地進行調整以平衡一切，而 iPhone 的變化則更為微妙。

Not to mention, the Pixel is not able to output 4K ProRes lock.

更不用說，Pixel 無法輸出 4K ProRes 鎖定。

However, I do appreciate the amount of contrast the Pixel holds onto.

不過，我很欣賞 Pixel 所保持的對比度。

In its current state, I am not impressed with this camera's low light video performance.

在目前的狀態下，我對這款相機的弱光視頻性能印象不深。

Although, video on the Pixel will be getting a boost when Night Sight for Video, a software that will offload processing to the cloud to digitally enhance video in low light, launches later this year.

不過，Pixel 上的視頻功能將在今年晚些時候推出的 Night Sight for Video（視頻夜視）軟件中得到提升，該軟件將把處理過程卸載到雲端，以數字方式增強弱光下的視頻效果。

We haven't had a chance to put this to the test, so stay tuned for more on that this winter.

我們還沒有機會對其進行測試，請在今年冬天繼續關注。

There's also a new audio magic eraser that can reduce background noise in video.

還有一個新的音頻魔術消除器，可以減少視頻中的背景噪音。

Google has also finally kicked the overly cool tones, and images don't lean too far into the Samsung oversaturate everything zone either.

谷歌也終於擺脫了過冷的色調，圖片也不會過於偏向三星的誇張風格。

When taking photos, the system is also not as afraid of contrast as it once was, allowing shadows on faces to stay shadows, sometimes even more than the iPhone will.

在拍攝照片時，系統也不再像以前那樣懼怕對比度，可以讓臉部的陰影保持在陰影中，有時甚至比 iPhone 更強。

Although, much like in video, the iPhone consistently gets the colors correct, unlike the Pixel.

不過，與視頻中的情況一樣，iPhone 的色彩始終保持正確，這一點與 Pixel 不同。

The lower aperture also allows for more natural focus falloff.

較小的光圈還能讓焦距落差更自然。

Especially when a subject is closer to the lens.

尤其是當拍攝對象離鏡頭較近時。

And lastly, I already talked about this, but I can't stress it enough, the video-to-photo toggle is huge.

最後，雖然我已經說過了，但我還是要強調，視頻到照片的切換功能非常強大。

Especially when video is finally looking equally as good, if not better, than still images.

尤其是當視頻終於變得和靜態影像一樣好看，甚至更好看的時候。

The experience of using this camera is far more fun with this simple change.

有了這個簡單的改變，使用這款相機的體驗就有趣多了。

The 48 megapixel f1.95 ultrawide camera is seeing a whole centimeter of improvements this year.

今年，這款 4800 萬像素 f1.95 超廣角相機有了整整一釐米的改進。

Because of the larger sensor, wider aperture, and a closer focusing distance of 2cm, as opposed to 3cm on the Pixel 7 Pro and Pixel 8, the largest improvements come to the macro mode in the ultrawide.

由於傳感器更大、光圈更廣、對焦距離更近（2 釐米），而 Pixel 7 Pro 和 Pixel 8 的對焦距離為 3 釐米，是以超廣角微距模式的改進最大。

I get this question a lot, why is the ultrawide lens used for macro photography?

我經常遇到這樣的問題：為什麼超廣角鏡頭要用於微距攝影？

It's because the lens is wider, and the sensor is smaller as compared to the main lens, so you can have a much smaller minimum focus distance.

這是因為與主鏡頭相比，鏡頭更寬，傳感器更小，是以最小對焦距離更小。

Photos taken in macro mode are sharp, and they do have a nice falloff, but I really only use it on flowers, and I don't know, I just struggle to find a need for it.

微距模式下拍攝的照片很清晰，而且有很好的落差，但我真的只用它來拍攝花朵，我也不知道，我只是努力尋找它的必要性。

This mode continues to feel gimmicky to me.

對我來說，這種模式仍然是一種噱頭。

我們會抓住他的，我們會抓住他的。

The 48 megapixel telephoto lens has an improved f2.8 lens that captures more light.

4800 萬像素的長焦鏡頭採用了改進的 f2.8 鏡頭，可捕捉更多光線。

It is still a 5x zoom that equates to around 112mm, and much like the iPhone 15 Pro Max's 5x telephoto, it doesn't hold a candle to the S23 Ultra.

它仍然是 5 倍變焦，相當於約 112 毫米，就像 iPhone 15 Pro Max 的 5 倍長焦一樣，它無法與 S23 Ultra 相提並論。

Samsung's 10x, 230mm telephoto lens is obviously more zoomed in, but also just plain sharper in good light.

三星的 10 倍、230 毫米長焦鏡頭顯然更加放大，但在光線充足的情況下也更加清晰。

Compared to the iPhone 15 Pro Max though, the Pixel more consistently identifies objects and separates them from the background.

不過，與 iPhone 15 Pro Max 相比，Pixel 能更穩定地識別物體，並將它們從背景中分離出來。

Though in perfect light, and without a subject in the immediate foreground, photos from these devices' telephoto lenses are hard to differentiate.

雖然在光線完美的情況下，在前景沒有主體的情況下，這些設備的長焦鏡頭拍攝的照片很難區分。

The problem with the 8 Pro's telephoto lens is its stabilization.

8 Pro 遠攝鏡頭的問題在於防抖。

By default, in video mode, the Pixel 8 Pro has standard stabilization enabled, this is great for folks who won't dare step into deeper camera settings, but in an attempt to provide a stable image, the camera creates frustration.

默認情況下，在視頻模式下，Pixel 8 Pro 會啟用標準防抖功能，這對於不敢進入更深相機設置的用戶來說是件好事，但為了提供穩定的影像，相機會產生挫敗感。

I often felt like I was fighting the camera to pan or tilt slightly in order to achieve the framing I wanted.

我經常感覺自己在和攝影機較勁，為了達到我想要的取景效果，我不得不稍微搖鏡頭或傾斜鏡頭。

And even with stabilization turned off, there's a sort of sway to the image that can be difficult to work with.

即使關閉了防抖功能，影像也會有一種搖擺感，很難處理。

While these settings ultimately make for a sharper image, I can't get over how frustrating it feels when I use this lens, and it all just made me less likely to play with it at all.

雖然這些設置最終會讓影像更清晰，但我無法忘記使用這支鏡頭時的挫敗感，這一切讓我根本不願意使用它。

But specs aside, this system is so much more about the tools it provides to edit these photos and videos.

但撇開規格不談，這個系統更重要的是它提供的編輯這些照片和視頻的工具。

說不是這樣的，我們有手動控制。

When you take a photo on most modern smartphones, data from the scene is analyzed and carried down a controlled path to the best outcome, or most objectively quote-unquote good photo.

當你用大多數現代智能手機拍照時，來自場景的數據會被分析，並通過受控路徑獲得最佳結果，或者說最客觀的好照片。

Throwing user-generated turns into this path, turns that may or likely may not result in these good photos, is challenging for the system.

將用戶生成的轉彎添加到這條路徑中，而這些轉彎可能會也可能不會產生這些好照片，這對系統來說具有挑戰性。

But look at Google doing what Samsung has done for years, including some manual controls in the native camera app.

但看看谷歌的做法，就像三星多年來所做的那樣，在原生相機應用中加入一些手動控制功能。

There is now access to white balance, focus, shutter speed, and ISO settings, along with the ability to quickly switch between 12 megapixel and 50 megapixel photos, RAW or JPEGs, and even override the camera's choice to automatically switch lenses.

現在可以訪問白平衡、對焦、快門速度和 ISO 設置，還可以在 1200 萬像素和 5000 萬像素照片、RAW 或 JPEG 之間快速切換，甚至可以覆蓋相機自動切換鏡頭的選擇。

You can overexpose at your heart's desire, underexpose the way God intended, and even pretend that this sensor is large enough to actually have a large focus range.

你可以隨心所欲地曝光過度，也可以按照上帝的旨意曝光不足，甚至可以假裝這個傳感器足夠大，以至於實際上有很大的對焦範圍。

Okay, so for someone who just ragged on the iPhone 15 Pro Max for not having these features, I am being a bit harsh.

好吧，對於一個剛剛責備 iPhone 15 Pro Max 沒有這些功能的人來說，我有點苛刻了。

And although you can only get the Pro controls on the Pixel 8 Pro, Google has never claimed that the system is for professionals with a capital P.

雖然您只能在 Pixel 8 Pro 上獲得專業控制功能，但谷歌從未宣稱該系統是為專業人士設計的。

Instead, it's just another really fun tool to play with.

相反，它只是另一種非常有趣的遊戲工具。

And when I feel like fine-tuning my image, I can just pop in and do that.

當我想對自己的形象進行微調時，我就可以跳進去做這件事。

So yeah, it's a nice feature to have and I'm stoked that it's here.

是的，這是一個很好的功能，我很高興它的出現。

This camera takes photos well, but it can manipulate them even better.

這款相機的拍照效果很好，但處理照片的能力更強。

Google's Magic Editor now not only allows for erasing objects or people, but you can also fully move things within the frame, or change the expression on folks' faces.

現在，谷歌的 "魔術編輯器 "不僅可以擦除物體或人物，還可以完全移動畫面中的物體，或改變人物的表情。

These AI editing tools are fun and making them accessible to everyone is great, but it also accelerates the creation of false narratives or realities, especially when you can do this to any photo you upload to Google Photos.

這些人工智能編輯工具很有趣，讓每個人都能使用它們也很好，但它也加速了虛假敘事或現實的產生，尤其是當你可以對上傳到谷歌照片上的任何照片進行編輯時。

And yes, many folks have pointed out that these photo editing tools are available in many other places, including apps you can install on your phone.

是的，很多人都指出，這些照片編輯工具在很多其他地方都可以找到，包括你可以安裝在手機上的應用程序。

Google is just the first phone maker to bake them in.

谷歌只是第一家將其內置其中的手機制造商。

And I don't think they're wrong for doing so, but with that approach comes great responsibility, and it is this lack of recognition that these tools could be used for bad that is the problem for me.

我認為他們這樣做並沒有錯，但這樣做的同時也要承擔很大的責任，對我來說，問題就在於沒有認識到這些工具可能會被用來做壞事。

Google explained to me that ITPC metadata is embedded into images that go through Magic Editor, meaning that if and when, and that is a very big if and when, other companies start adhering to the standard, anyone will be able to see that an image has been manipulated using the software.

谷歌向我解釋說，ITPC 元數據被嵌入到通過 Magic Editor 處理的影像中，這意味著，如果其他公司也開始遵守這一標準，那麼任何人都能看出影像是用該軟件處理過的。

But we aren't there yet, and these tools, they exist now.

但我們還沒到那一步，而這些工具現在已經存在。

And when anyone can just erase or move real things, it sets everybody up for more uncertainty.

而當任何人都可以隨意刪除或移動真實的東西時，就會給每個人帶來更多的不確定性。

The Pixel 8 Pro's camera still struggles with an old weakness, which is color consistency.

Pixel 8 Pro 的攝像頭仍然存在一個老問題，那就是色彩一致性。

And it will come as a surprise to no one that the software and the UI were the most tuned and best part of the experience.

軟件和用戶界面是體驗中調整得最好、最出色的部分，這一點大家都不會感到意外。

So at the end of the day, Google remains a software company that sometimes makes hardware.

是以，歸根結底，谷歌仍然是一家有時會生產硬件的軟件公司。

And for every misstep it takes on the hardware side, there are two AI editing tools ready to make it right or make it up entirely.

硬件方面的每一個失誤，都會有兩個人工智能編輯工具來糾正或彌補。

Okay, I finally reached that point in my YouTube career where I can say I have a dbrand skin.

好了，我的 YouTube 事業終於到了我可以說自己有一張 dbrand 皮膚的時候了。

And in fact, they have two, two dbrand skins.

事實上，他們有兩款 Dbrand 皮膚。

總之，下面有這些東西的鏈接。