Name: 【中文字幕】精彩必看！伊隆-馬斯克焚烤BBC，將記錄者智商直接逼到零。 (【中文字幕】精彩必看！伊隆·马斯克燒烤BBC，將記者智商直接逼到零。| 新視野 20230414)
Uploaded: 2025-02-16T13:44:39.000Z
Duration: 4 min 36 s

程度副詞

I mean, I would only just add that, you know, we have spoken to people who have been sacked that used to be in content moderation, and we've spoken to people very recently who were involved in moderation, and they just say there's not enough people to police this stuff, particularly around hate speech in the company.

我的意思是，我只想補充一點，你知道，我們已經和那些被解僱的曾經負責內容審核的人談過，我們最近也和那些參與審核的人談過，他們只是說沒有足夠的人來管理這些東西，尤其是公司裡的仇恨言論。

Personally, for you, I would say I get more of that kind of content, yeah, personally.

就你個人而言，我想說我得到的更多是這類內容，是的，就我個人而言。

But I'm not going to talk for the rest of Twitter.

但我不會在 Twitter 的其餘部分說話。

I would say I would see more hateful content in that.

我想說，我會在其中看到更多仇恨的內容。

I mean, you know, just content that will solicit a reaction, something that may include something that is slightly racist or slightly sexist, those kinds of things.

我的意思是，你知道，只要是能引起反應的內容，可能包括一些略帶種族主義或性別歧視的內容，諸如此類。

So you think if something is slightly sexist, it should be banned?

所以，你認為如果某些東西略帶性別歧視，就應該被禁止？

I'm saying...  I'm trying to understand what you mean by hateful content, and I'm asking for specific Does that mean that it should be banned?

我是說......  我試圖理解你所說的仇恨內容是什麼意思，我想知道具體是什麼意思 這是否意味著應予以禁止？

Well, you've asked me whether my feed, whether it's got less or more.

你問我的飼料是少了還是多了。

I'll tell you why, because I don't actually use that feed anymore, because I just don't particularly like it.

我來告訴你為什麼，因為我實際上已經不再使用那個 feed 了，因為我並不特別喜歡它。

You said you've seen more hateful content, but you can't name a single example, not even one.

你說你看到了更多的仇恨內容，但你卻說不出一個例子，甚至一個都沒有。

I'm not sure I've used that feed for the last three or four weeks.

在過去的三四個星期裡，我都沒有用過這種飼料。

Well, then how did you see the hateful content?

那麼，你是如何看到那些充滿仇恨的內容的？

Because I've been using Twitter since you've taken it over for the last six months.

因為自從你接管 Twitter 後，我已經用了六個月了。

Okay, so you must have at some point seen for you hateful content.

好吧，你一定在某些時候看到過令人憎惡的內容。

Then I say so that you don't know what you're talking about.

那我就說，你根本不知道自己在說什麼。

Yes, because you can't give a single example of hateful content, not even one tweet, and yet you claimed that the hateful content was high.

是的，因為你舉不出任何一個仇恨內容的例子，甚至連一條推文都沒有，卻聲稱仇恨內容很多。

No, what I claim...  No, what I claim was there are many organizations that say that that kind of information is on the rise.

不，我所說的...  不，我說的是有很多組織說這類資訊正在增加。

Now, whether it has on my feed or not...  I mean...  And if it's something like the Strategic Dialogue Institute in the UK, they will say that.

現在，它是否已經在我的飼料或沒有...  我是說...  如果是英國的戰略對話研究所 他們會這麼說的

Look, people will say all sorts of nonsense.

聽著，人們會說各種無稽之談。

I'm literally asking for a single example, and you can't name one.

我只要求你舉出一個例子，而你卻說不出一個。

And as I already said, I don't use that feed, but let's...

正如我已經說過的，我不使用該飼料，但讓我們......

You literally said you experienced more hateful content and then couldn't name a single example.  And as I said, I haven't...  I haven't actually looked at that feed.

你只說你經歷了更多的仇恨內容，卻說不出一個例子。  正如我所說，我沒有...  我還沒真正看過那個 feed。

Then how would you know if it's hateful content?

那你怎麼知道這是不是仇恨內容？

Because I'm saying that's what I saw a few weeks ago.

因為我說的是幾周前我看到的情況。

Has BBC changed its COVID misinformation?

英國廣播公司（BBC）是否改變了其 COVID 的錯誤信息？

英國廣播公司不制定 Twitter 上的規則。

No, I'm talking about the BBC's misinformation about COVID.

不，我說的是 BBC 關於 COVID 的錯誤信息。

You changed the labels, the COVID misinformation labels.

你改變了標籤，COVID 錯誤信息標籤。

There used to be a policy, and then it disappeared.

以前有一項政策，後來就消失了。

Does the BBC hold itself at all responsible for misinformation regarding masking and side effects of vaccinations?

英國廣播公司（BBC）對有關疫苗接種的掩蓋和副作用的錯誤信息是否負有任何責任？

And what about the fact that the BBC was put under pressure by the British government to change the editorial policy?

英國廣播公司在英國政府的壓力下改變了編輯政策，這又是怎麼回事呢？

I see now why you've done Twitter spaces.

我現在明白你為什麼要建 Twitter 空間了。

I am not a representative of the BBC's editorial policy.

Alright, let's talk about something else.