Name: 一個基於遺傳學的社會會不會......好？| 凱瑟琳-佩奇-哈登 (Would a society based on genetics be… good? | Kathryn Paige Harden)
Uploaded: 2022-11-16T18:35:21.000Z
Duration: 3 min 41 s

轉承詞

是以，思考優生學的一個方法是

So, if we think about involuntary sterilization

是以，如果我們考慮非自願絕育的問題

it's on the basis of something "genetic" about them,

他們在非自願的情況下被絕育。

So it's this control of reproduction that's coercive,

是以，正是這種對繁殖的控制是強制性的。

and is based on this idea, this hierarchy of people.

而且是基於這種想法，這種人的等級制度。

The predominant response to the eugenic perspective

一直以來，我稱之為 "基因組盲"。

or talking about, scientifically or politically,

biological or genetic differences between people.

人與人之間的生物或遺傳差異。

將人們納入優生優育的等級體系

或者如果我們堅持的話，它們也不重要。

他們的答案几乎從來不是 "零"。

So if people already think that genes make a difference

是以，如果人們已經認為基因會產生差異

I really worry that too much of the conversation

of legislation and policy at the state-by-state level.

She embedded herself with the LA Police Department

她將自己嵌入到洛杉磯警察部門

他們是如何看待預測性警務的。

對一些社區進行過度治安管理。

When people think about dystopian scenarios,

當人們想到歇斯底里的情景時。

I actually worry less about the overt white nationalists

實際上，我對公開的白人民族主義者的擔心較少

they can make money using genetic information.

So the challenge then is, how do we identify

even genetic differences that might have a relationship

without using them or interpreting them eugenically.

不使用它們或對它們進行優生解釋。

When we think about our own intimate relationships,

當我們想到我們自己的親密關係。

we can separate what makes someone valuable,

我們可以分開什麼使一個人有價值。

值得擁有自由，值得擁有資源。

from what does our capitalist economy currently value.

從我們的資本主義經濟目前的價值。

字幕列表影片播放

一個基於遺傳學的社會會不會......好？| 凱瑟琳-佩奇-哈登 (Would a society based on genetics be… good? | Kathryn Paige Harden)

perspective

sort

mental

matter