Name: 為什麼59%的人不能解決這個問題 (Why 59% Of People Can't Solve This)
Uploaded: 2021-06-25T18:30:31.000Z
Duration: 7 min 29 s

請注意，這下面是一個堅實的基礎

we have this flat singular roof light piece.

我們有這個平坦的奇異屋頂燈片。

It's almost like a one-legged table up at the top.

它幾乎就像一張單腿的桌子，在頂部。

And now I'm gonna take this little Lego figure

現在我要把這個小樂高模型拿出來

just underneath the overhang that is not supported.

Now, how would you change this structure,

現在，你將如何改變這種結構。

假設它是真的，這樣我就可以把

a heavy masonry brick on top of this corner,

在這個角落的頂部有一塊沉重的磚石。

without this structure collapsing onto the figure?

而這一結構並沒有坍塌在人物身上？

If you do it successfully, you'll earn $1.

如果你成功做到了，你就能賺到1美元。

But every extra piece you use costs you 10 cents.

但你每多用一塊，就得花10美分。

Now, many suggest putting support blocks here or here.

現在，許多人建議把支持塊放在這裡或這裡。

And I'll tell you why that's really interesting

我將告訴你為什麼這真的很有趣

But first I want you to take a look at this puzzle.

但首先我想讓你看一下這個拼圖。

Your goal is to make it completely symmetrical,

while making as few changes as possible, as fast as you can.

同時儘可能少做改動，以最快的速度。

Let me show you a couple more and I want you to think

讓我再給你看幾個，我想讓你思考一下

儘可能快地將你的決定告訴我。

What would you do to make these symmetrical?

你會怎麼做才能使這些東西對稱呢？

或使這個迷你高爾夫球場變得更好

What's really interesting about all these puzzles

所有這些謎題真正有趣的地方在於

是，當你要求人們做這些事情時。

In the Lego example, people are most likely to add a block

在樂高的例子中，人們最有可能添加一個積木

在這裡或這裡獲得額外的支持。

Around 59% of people choose to add something.

And in the block puzzle, people tend to add green squares

而在積木拼圖中，人們往往會添加綠色的方塊

On the mini golf course, 79% of people choose to add to it

在迷你高爾夫球場上，79%的人選擇了加碼

But the truth is in a lot of these cases,

但事實是在很多這樣的情況下。

subtraction is just as valid of a solution

by simply removing this single piece here--

通過簡單地移除這裡的這一塊 --

This is actually a known phenomenon in humans.

這實際上是人類的一個已知現象。

We tend to find additive solutions to problems,

我們傾向於找到解決問題的加法辦法。

even when subtractive solutions are more advantageous.

即使是在減法解決方案更有利的情況下。

現在，當然，這個視頻的標題。

may have tipped you off and impacted your decision.

可能已經向你提供了線索，並影響了你的決定。

Regardless, studies have shown this pattern exists

不管怎麼說，研究表明這種模式是存在的

Have you ever tried to declutter your home?

你是否曾經嘗試過整理你的家？

You know we all have this drawer where everything goes

你知道我們都有一個抽屜，所有的東西都放在那裡

that you don't know where it goes, no judgment.

你不知道它去了哪裡，沒有判斷。

or getting rid of things you don't need or use anymore.

或處理掉你不需要或不再使用的東西。

When university presidents ask for suggestions

to better serve its students and community,

以更好地服務於其學生和社區。

an existing regulation, practice or program.

一個現有的法規、做法或方案。

And this kind of problem solving is often the cause

而這種解決問題的方式往往是導致

of extra red tape and unnecessary positions

額外的繁文縟節和不必要的職位

new rules being added instead of taken away,

新的規則被增加而不是被取消。

People create New Year's to-do resolutions

人們創建了新年的待辦事項決議

and even watch more YouTube educational videos

instead of further distilling what they already know.

而不是進一步提煉他們已經知道的東西。

But I'm not complaining about that last one,

但我並不是在抱怨最後一個問題。

喜歡，請繼續觀看我們的視頻。

You can distill your knowledge at another time, okay?

你可以在其他時間提煉出你的知識，好嗎？

The most interesting part of these studies

was that they realized it's not that we think

是他們意識到這不是我們認為的

subtractive solutions are not as valuable,

減法的解決方案沒有那麼有價值。

but there's actually a bias in the human mind

但實際上人的思想中存在著一種偏見

where we simply don't think of them as often.

在那裡，我們只是不經常想到他們。

when researchers more specifically prompt people

the percentage of subtractive solutions increases,

meaning humans have a natural bias to ask,

意思是說，人類有一個自然的偏見，就是問。

字幕列表影片播放

為什麼59%的人不能解決這個問題 (Why 59% Of People Can't Solve This)

cognitive

entire

mindset

phenomenon