WELCOME TO "A LATE SHOW."

歡迎來到 "深夜秀"。

I AM YOUR HOST, STEPHEN COLBERT.

我是你的主播，史蒂芬-科爾伯特。

I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOU, BUT I AM STILL RECOVERING FROM LAST

我不知道你怎麼想的，但我還在從上次的事情中恢復過來。

NIGHT'S AGONIZING PRESIDENTIAL SHOUT-FEST, IN WHICH DONALD

夜晚即將到來的總統大喊大叫活動，其中唐納德?

TRUMP INTERRUPTED JOE BIDEN OVER 70 TIMES WHILE CHRIS WALLACE

特朗普打斷喬-比登超過70次，而克里斯-瓦利斯

TRIED TO STOP HIM LIKE A BABY THROWING PENNIES AT A

試圖阻止他像一個孩子扔硬幣在一個嬰兒

BATTLESHIP.

戰鬥力。

TRUMP WAS OUT OF CONTROL THE ENTIRE EVENING.

特朗普整個晚上都在失控。

THE WHOLE THING GAVE A NEW MEANING TO THE TERM "WHITE

整個事件給 "白人 "一詞賦予了新的含義。

NOISE."

噪聲。"

BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT CHRIS WALLACE WAS SUPPOSED TO DO.

但我不知道克里斯・沃利斯應該做什麼。

AT THE NEXT DEBATE, THEY SHOULD JUST GIVE THE MODERATOR A

在下一次辯論中，他們應該給主持人一個。

BUTTON TO BRING ON THE SLIME.

按鈕帶來的滑板。

I'M NOT THE ONLY ONE WHO DESPISED LAST NIGHT'S DEBATE.

我不是唯一一個討厭昨晚辯論的人。

ACCORDING TO A CBS POLL, OF THE PEOPLE WHO WATCHED IT,

根據哥倫比亞廣播公司的民意調查，看了它的人，

69% FELT ANNOYED.

69%的人感到不安。

ANNOYED.

暫停。

REALLY, EVIDENTLY, "GOUGING OUT MY EYES WITH A GRAPEFRUIT SPOON"

真的，很明顯，"用葡萄柚勺子挖出我的眼睛"

WAS NOT AN OPTION.

不是一個選擇。

SURPRISINGLY, THE VERY SAME POLL FOUND THAT 17% OF DEBATE

令人驚訝的是，同樣的調查發現，17%的辯論者認為，他們的觀點是 "不可能的"。

WATCHERS CAME AWAY FEELING INFORMED.

觀察者們離開後，感覺到了資訊。

REALLY?

真的嗎？

17% FELT INFORMED AFTER WATCHING THAT?

17%的人在看完之後覺得知情？

WHAT DID THEY LEARN?

他們學到了什麼？

I LEARNED THAT WHEN THEY GO LOW, THEY CAN ACTUALLY GO MUCH

我學到了，當他們走低的時候，他們實際上可以走得更遠。

LOWER.

較低：

A CNN POLL ALSO FOUND THAT SIX IN 10 SAY BIDEN WON THE DEBATE.

美國有線電視新聞網的一項民意調查也發現，十分之六的人認為比登贏得了辯論。

WON?

WON？

I TAKE EXCEPTION TO THAT.

我採取例外的方式。

THERE ARE NO WINNERS HERE, EXCEPT FOR ARIS, THE TRICKSTER

這裡沒有贏家，除了詭計多端的阿里斯。

GOD OF CHAOS.

混亂之神。

A WINNER IMPLIES A CONTEST WHERE THE PARTIES FOLLOW AGREED-UPON

贏家意味著各方遵守商定的比賽。

RULES TO REACH A SPECIFIC GOAL.

RULES TO REACH A SPECIFIC GOAL.

THIS WAS MORE LIKE WATCHING A BASKETBALL GAME WHERE THE FINAL

這更像是在看一場籃球比賽，在那裡，最後的決賽。

SCORE WAS "THE BEAUTIFUL FLAMES.

分數是 "美麗的火焰"。

THEY TALK TO ME UPON ONE THING THAT EXPERTS AGREE ON

他們跟我說了一件專家們都同意的事情。

IS DEBATES DON'T REALLY CHANGE ANYTHING.

是辯論並沒有真正改變任何事情。

SO NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE, AND WE HAVE TO DO THIS TWO MORE

所以什麼都不會改變，我們還得再做兩次。

TIMES!

時代！

YOU KNOW WHAT THEY SAY: THE DEFINITION OF INSANITY IS DOING

你知道他們說什麼嗎：精神錯亂的定義是做。

THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND EXPECTING DONALD TRUMP

同樣的事情一而再再而三地發生，並期待著唐納德-特朗普的到來。

TO SHUT UP.

閉嘴。

IT'S HARD TO WATCH ANY OF THIS AND BELIEVE ANYONE COULD STILL

很難看到這一切，並相信任何人都可以繼續。

BE OUT THERE UNDECIDED, BUT THEY EVIDENTLY ARE.

是出了那裡未定，但他們證據是。

AND LAST NIGHT, THERE WAS A FOCUS GROUP OF THESE MENTALLY

昨晚，有一個焦點小組 這些精神上的。

IMPAIRED UNICORNS ORGANIZED BY REPUBLICAN POLLSTER AND GUY

共和黨民調員和小夥組織的受損害的獨角獸組織

DRUNK DIALING BATMAN, FRANK LUNTZ.

醉酒撥號蝙蝠俠，弗蘭克・倫茨。

LUNTZ-- HI, FRANK!

倫茨... 嗨，弗蘭克！

GATHERED 15 UNDECIDEDS TO RESPOND TO THE DEBATE OVER ZOOM.

召集了15個未決定對關於ZOOM的辯論作出反應的國家。

OH, PLEASE, PLEASE CAN WE DO THE NEXT DEBATE OVER ZOOM?

哦，求求你，求求你，我們可以做下一個辯論 在ZOOM？

( AS MODERATOR ) "MR. PRESIDENT, I'M PUTTING YOU

( 主持人 ) "先生，我想請您談談您的看法。主席，我要把你

ON MUTE.

靜音。

NO, DON'T SHARE YOUR SCREEN!

不，不要分享你的螢幕!

YOUR TABS AREN'T SAFE FOR WORK!" AND LUNTZ ASKED THEM THIS

你的手掌不適合工作！"然後倫茨問他們這個問題

QUESTION: >> MICHELLE, WORD OR PHRASE TO

問題: >> MICHELLE, WORD OR PHRASE TO

DESCRIBE DONALD TRUMP TONIGHT?

描述唐納德-特朗普今晚？

>> HORRID.

>> HORRID.

>> SARAH?

>> SARAH?

>> CHAOTIC.

>> CHAOTIC。

>> ROB?

>> ROB?

>> UNPOLISHED.

>> UNPOLISHED.

>> RUTHY?

>> RUTHY?

>> CRACKHEAD.

>> CRACKHEAD。

>> Stephen: CRACKHEAD.

>> Stephen: 骷髏頭。

HOW DARE YOU MALIGN THE GOOD NAME OF CRACKHEADS.

你怎麼敢給黑客的好名字起名字。

UNLIKE DONALD TRUMP, CRACKHEADS HAVE A CLEAR POLICY: GIVE ME

不像唐納德-特朗普，瘋子有一個明確的政策：給我

SOME CRACK.

一些裂縫。

ONE FOCUS GROUP MEMBER OFFERED THIS:

一個FOCUS GROUP成員提供了這個。

( SCREAMING ) >> Stephen: YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO

（尖叫） >> 斯蒂芬。你應該

USE THE DIAL, MERRILL.

使用錶盤，Merrill。

JUST USE THE DIAL.

只需使用轉盤。

BUT DESPITE THEIR HARSH WORDS ABOUT TRUMP, THE VOTERS STILL

但儘管他們對特朗普言辭嚴厲，但選民們仍然

COULDN'T MAKE UP THEIR MINDS POST-DEBATE, LIKE JENNIFER FROM

不能決定他們的想法辯論後，像珍妮弗從辯論，

PENNSYLVANIA, WHO SAID THIS: >> OH, I AM DEFINITELY

賓夕法尼亞州，誰說的。>> 哦，我肯定是。

UNDECIDED.

未決定：

I HAVE NO CLUE WHO I'M GOING TO VOTE TO-- FOR.

我不知道我要投給誰... 投給誰

I DON'T KNOW WHO'S GOING TO GET MY VOTE.

我不知道誰會得到我的選票。

I WANT TO SEE ANOTHER DEBATE.

我想再看一場辯論。

>> Stephen: WHAT?

>> Stephen:什麼？

AT THIS POINT, I TRULY DO NOT KNOW WHAT COULD SWAY UNDECIDED

在這一點上，我真的不知道什麼能讓你猶豫不決。

VOTERS.

投票者：

"WELL, THE ONE GUY MAKES ME EMBARRASSED TO LIVE IN MY

"好吧，一個人讓我感到羞愧，住在我的

COUNTRY.

國家：

BUT THE OTHER GUY IS SLEEPY, ACCORDING TO THE FIRST GUY WHO,

但另一個傢伙是睏倦的， 據第一個傢伙誰，

AGAIN, IS A TOTAL PSYCHOPATH.

又是一個十足的精神病人。

SO, IT'S A COIN TOSS."

所以，這是個擲硬幣的遊戲。"

JENNIFER WASN'T ALONE.

JENNIFER不是一個人。

ROB FROM IOWA SAID THIS: >> THAT WAS EMBARRASSING.

來自愛荷華州的ROB這樣說。>> 這是令人尷尬的。

PERSONALLY, IT'S A DARTBOARD FOR ME RIGHT NOW,

就我個人而言，我現在是在玩飛鏢。

WHO'S GONNA WIN IT.

誰將會贏得它。

>> Stephen: REALLY?

>> Stephen:真的嗎？

BECAUSE WATCHING TRUMP, MY REACTION WAS LESS DARTBOARD AND

因為看了特朗普，我的反應是少了飛鏢，少了...

MORE TRANQ DART: >> THE ONLY THING I HAVEN'T DONE

更多的TRANQ DART。>> 我唯一沒有做過的事。

A GOOD JOB, AND IT'S BECAUSE OF THE FAKE NEWS.

一個好工作，這是因為假新聞。

>> IT'S JUST FAKE NEWS.

>> 這只是假新聞。

>> Stephen: IT'S FINE.

>> Stephen:它的罰款。

THEY'RE GOING TO PUT AN EAR TAG ON HIM AND RELEASE HIM BACK INTO

他們要在他身上貼上耳標，然後把他放回原處。

THE WILD.

野外。

HE'S GOT A VERY HIGH THRESHOLD FOR PAIN.

他得到了一個非常高的疼痛的RESHOLD。

ONE FOCUS GROUP MEMBER DID STAND OUT FROM THE REST BY DELIVERING

有一位焦點小組成員通過以下方式從其他人中脫穎而出

A CLEAR, CONCISE OPINION OF THE PRESIDENT.

主席的明確、簡明的意見。

HERE'S LUKE FROM WISCONSIN: >> TRUMP IS ANNOYING.

這裡是來自威斯康星州的盧克： >> 特朗普很討厭。

HE'S UNPRESIDENTIAL.

他是非總統的。

HE'S ANNOYING.

他是令人討厭的。

AND IT'S LIKE NAILS ON A CHALKBOARD.

這就像指甲在黑板上。

>> Stephen: YES, FINALLY!

>> 史蒂芬：是的，終於來了!

THANK YOU, LUKE.

謝謝你，盧克。

YOU'RE LIVING PROOF THAT UNDECIDED VOTERS ARE CAPABLE OF

你是活生生的證據，證明未決定的投票者有能力。

SEEING THE LIGHT AND-- >> BUT HIM ACTING THAT WAY

看到光和 - >> 但他的行為，這種方式

DOESN'T NECESSARILY IMPACT MY BOTTOM LINE.

不一定會影響我的底線。

>> Stephen: UH, MERYL, IF YOU DON'T MIND?

>> 呃，梅里爾，如果你不介意的話？

( SCREAMING ) >> Stephen: THANK YOU.

（尖叫） >> 斯蒂芬。謝謝你。

BUT THE MOST HORRIFYING MOMENT OF THIS-- OR REALLY ANY DEBATE--

但是，最可怕的時刻 這 - 或真正的任何辯論 -

WAS WHEN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DID NOT CONDEMN

在美國總統沒有譴責的情況下。

WHITE SUPREMACY.

白人至上：

>> ARE YOU WILLING TONIGHT TO CONDEMN WHITE SUPREMACISTS

>> 今晚你願意譴責白人至上主義者嗎？

AND MILITIA GROUPS-- >> SURE.

和民兵組織 -- >> 當然。

I'M WILLING TO DO ANYTHING.

我願意做任何事情。

I WANT TO SEE PEACE-- >> THEN DO IT, SIR.

我想看到和平... ... ->>那就動手吧，先生。

>> DO IT.

>> 做到這一點。

SAY IT.

說出來吧。

>> YOU WANNA CALL THEM?

>> 你想給他們打電話嗎？

WHAT DO YOU WANNA CALL THEM?

你想叫他們什麼？

GIVE ME A NAME.

給我一個名字。

GIE ME A NAME.

給我一個名字。

>> WHITE SUPREMICISTS AND RIGHT WING MILITIA.

>> 白人至上主義者和右翼軍團。

>> PROUD BOYS, STAND BACK AND STAND BY.

>> 驕傲的孩子們，站在後面，站在旁邊。

>> Stephen: THAT'S NOT DENOUNCING.

>> Stephen:這不是DENOUNCING。

THAT'S TROUBLING.

這就是麻煩。

IT'S LIKE WHEN THE DEBATE MODERATOR ASKED NIXON TO

這就像辯論主持人要求尼克松。

DENOUNCE PSYCHOTIC THRILL-KILL CULTS, AND HE SAID:

否認心理變態的驚悚殺人邪教，他說：

MANSON FAMILY, STAND BACK AND STAND BY.

曼松家族，站在後面，站在旁邊。

HAVE YOU SEEN THE LITTLE PIGGIES CRAWLING IN THE DIRT?

你見過小豬在泥地裡爬嗎？

HELTER SKELTER.

HELTER SKELTER.

HELTER SKELTER!" HE SAID THAT.

HELTER SKELTER！"他說：

I LEGALLY COULD NOT MAKE THAT JOKE UNLESS HE ACTUALLY SAID

在法律上，我不能開那個玩笑 除非他真的說了出來

THAT.

那。

IF I'M WRONG, MR. NIXON, CALL ME.

如果我錯了，先生尼克松，打電話給我。

THE PROUD BOYS HEARD TRUMP'S MESSAGE LOUD AND CLEAR, BECAUSE

驕傲的孩子們清楚地聽到了特朗普的資訊，因為... ...

WITHIN MINUTES, GROUP MEMBERS CALLED THE PRESIDENT'S

在幾分鐘內，小組成員請主席發言。

COMMENT A TACIT ENDORSEMENT OF THEIR VIOLENT TACTICS.

評論：默許其暴力手段。

NOW, THAT'S JUST NOT FAIR.

現在，這只是不公平的。

THERE WAS NOTHING TACIT ABOUT IT.

沒有任何的默契。

THAT'S LIKE SAYING CARDI B OFFERED A TACIT ENDORSEMENT OF

這就像說CARDI B提供了一個默認的認可的

NATURAL LUBRICATION.

天然潤滑：

THE PRESIDENT'S CHOICE OF WORDS WAS SO INSPIRING TO THESE RACIST

主席選擇的話語對這些種族主義者來說是如此的鼓舞人心。

NUMBSKULLS THAT TODAY, THE PROUD BOYS STARTED SELLING MERCH WITH

NUMBSKULLS說，今天，驕傲的男孩開始銷售商品與

THEIR NEW CATCHPHRASE.

他們的新口號：

A GOOD INDICATION THAT YOU DIDN'T PROPERLY DENOUNCE SOMEONE

一個很好的跡象表明，你沒有正確地放棄某人。

IS WHEN THEY MAKE YOUR DENOUNCIATION THEIR NEW SLOGAN.

是當他們讓你的告發成為他們的新SLOGAN。

THAT'S WHY JOE McCARTHY NEVER WORE A T-SHIRT THAT SAID, "AT

這就是為什麼喬-麥卡西從來沒有穿T-shirt，說："在

LONG LAST, SIR, HAVE YOU NO DECENCY?"

最後，先生，你沒有禮貌嗎？"

NOW THIS IS A WEIRD LITTLE DETAIL.

現在這是一個奇怪的小細節。

THE PROUD BOYS NAME IS A REFERENCE TO A SONG FROM THE

驕傲的男孩的名字是指的是一首歌曲，來自於美國。

STAGED MUSICAL VERSION OF THE DISNEY FILM "ALADDIN."

迪斯尼電影 "阿拉丁 "的舞臺音樂版本。

IT'S AN OBSCURE REFERENCE TO BROADWAY.

這是對Broadway的一個模糊的參考。

BUT THAT'S JUST WHAT YOU EXPECT FROM TOXIC RIGHT-WING ALPHA

但這正是你對有毒的右翼分子的期望。

MALES: SHOW TUNES!

表演曲！

"FOSSE, FOSSE, GOOSE STEP, FOSSE, FOSSE, SHOOT."

"FOSSE，FOSSE，鵝步，FOSSE，FOSSE，SHOOT。"

THE GROUP HAS STAUNCH RIGHT-WING BELIEFS, INCLUDING

該集團有堅定的右翼信仰，包括： 1.

"VENERATING THE HOUSEWIFE."

"報復家庭主婦。"

LISTEN, I HOPE THEY HAVE GOOD LAWYERS, BECAUSE THAT'S ALSO THE

聽著，我希望他們有好的律師，因為這也是我的目標。

NAME OF ANDY CONE'S NEW BRAVO SHOW!

安迪-康恩新節目的名字！

MOST ALARMINGLY, THEIR PLATFORM ALSO INCLUDES A PLEDGE TO REFUSE

最令人擔憂的是，他們的平臺還包括了拒絕的承諾。

TO MASTURBATE.

虐殺。

WHICH IS ODD BECAUSE THEIR WHITE POWER HAND GESTURES LOOK LIKE

這很奇怪，因為他們的白手杖看起來很像。

THEY'RE READY TO, LET'S SAY, FLOG THE FUROR AT ANY MOMENT.

他們準備好了，比方說，在任何時候都要把爐火燒掉。

WHERE DID THEY RECRUIT THESE YOUNG MEN?

他們從哪裡招來這些年輕人？

( AS MOM ) ( KNOCKING )

（作為媽媽）（敲）。

"WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN THERE, JOHNNY?"

"你在那裡做什麼，約翰尼？"

( AS TEEN ) "NOTHING.

（作為青少年）"什麼都沒有。

GOD, JUST PLANNING A RACE WAR!" AND WHAT DO THEY MEAN, "REFUSE"?

上帝，只是在策劃一場種族戰爭！"他們說 "拒絕 "是什麼意思？

WHO'S OUT THERE DEMANDING THAT THEY MASTURBATE?

誰在那裡要求他們手淫？

( AS PROUD BOY ) "ALL THESE SOCIALIST FEMINISTS

（作為驕傲的男孩）"所有這些社會主義女權主義者。

WITH THEIR YOGA PANTS AND SPORTS BRAS WANT ME TO HAMMER MY OWN

他們的瑜伽褲和運動胸罩想讓我打我自己的。

SICKLE!

SICKLE！

OOH, THEY WOULD LOVE ME TO SEIZE MY OWN MEANS OF PRODUCTION!

哦，他們會很喜歡我把我自己的生產方式變成現實的!

NOT TODAY, COMRADE!" NO, DOWN, DOWN!

不是今天，COMRADE！"不，下來，下來！

THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER DESCRIBES THE PROUD BOYS AS A

南方貧困法律中心將 "驕傲的男孩 "描述為 "一個人"。

FIGHT CLUB FRATERNITY OF YOUNG WHITE, PRO-TRUMP MEN.

搏擊俱樂部的年輕白人，親特朗普的男人們。

MIGHT SEEM LIKE AN ODD COMPARISON, BUT REMEMBER THIS

可能看起來像一個奇怪的比較，但要記住這一點。

SCENE FROM THE MOVIE: >> THE FIRST RULE OF

電影中的場景：>>《第一條規則》。

FIGHT CLUB IS DON'T MASTURBATE!

搏擊俱樂部是不要手淫!

THE SECOND RULE OF FIGHT CLUB IS DON'T MASTURBATE!

搏擊俱樂部的第二條規則是不要手淫!

>> Stephen: SPEAKING OF WANKERS; DONALD TRUMP.

>> 史蒂芬：說到廢物，唐納德-特朗普。

THE PRESIDENT APPARENTLY DIDN'T GET HIS FILL OF SCREAMING INTO A

主席顯然沒有把他的滿腔怒火都發洩出來。

CAMERA LAST NIGHT, SO HE HELPED HIMSELF TO SOME LEFTOVER

攝影機昨晚，所以他幫助自己到一些左手。

RAGE IN TONIGHT'S EDITION OF: >> CHOPPER TALK!

憤怒在今晚的版本： >> CHOPPER TALK!

>> Stephen: WELL, IT SEEMS LIKE SOMEBODY IN THE WHITE HOUSE

>> 史蒂芬: 好吧，看來白宮裡的一些人是這樣想的

STARTED LOOKING AT THE NUMBERS AND REALIZED THAT "SIDING WITH A

開始看數字，意識到 "站在一個人這邊"。

VIOLENT HATE GROUP" DOESN'T POLL WELL WITH SUBURBAN WOMEN,

暴力仇恨團體 "在郊區婦女中並不受歡迎。

BECAUSE TODAY, TRUMP SAID THIS: >> I DON'T KNOW WHO THE PROUD

因為今天，特朗普說了這樣的話。>> 我不知道誰的驕傲

BOYS ARE.

男孩是。

I MEAN, YOU'LL HAVE TO GIVE ME A DEFINITION, BECAUSE I REALLY

我是說，你得給我一個定義，因為我真的...

DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE.

不知道他們是誰。

>> Stephen: (AS TRUMP) "I DON'T KNOW ANY PROUD BOYS.

>> 斯蒂芬：（作為特朗普）"我不認識任何驕傲的男孩。

MY BOYS ERIC AND DON JUNIOR ARE ASHAMED BOYS.

我的孩子埃裡克和唐少年 是羞愧的男孩。

AND THEY SHOULD BE.

他們應該是。

IF THEY WERE JUST BORN GIRLS, I COULD HAVE HAD TWO MORE

如果他們只是生了女孩，我可以有兩個以上的。

IVANKAS!" NOW, HE CONTINUED BY SAYING THE

IVANKAS！"現在，他繼續說著。

PEOPLE WHO HE DOESN'T KNOW SHOULD STOP DOING ANY OF THE

他不知道的人應該停止做任何的。

THINGS HE DOESN'T KNOW ABOUT ANY OF THEM DOING.

他不知道他們做的事情。

>> AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW WHO PROUD BOYS ARE.

>> 再一次，我不知道誰是驕傲的男孩。

BUT WHOEVER THEY ARE, THEY HAVE TO STAND DOWN, LET LAW

但無論他們是誰，他們都必須退下，讓法律來處理。

ENFORCEMENT DO THEIR WORK.

執法部門做他們的工作。

>> Stephen: NOTICE HE DIDN'T ACTUALLY DENOUNCE THE PROUD

>> 斯蒂芬：注意到他實際上並沒有否認驕傲的

BOYS.

男生：

SO HIS WALK-BACK STILL HAD A HINT OF GOOSE STEP.

所以他的迴旋還帶著一絲鵝步。

WHILE TRUMP RAMBLED ABOUT NEW YORK, ONE REPORTER GAVE HIM ONE

當特朗普在紐約大談特談的時候，有一個記者給了他一個。

MORE CHANCE TO CLEARLY AND DEFINITIVELY DENOUNCE WHITE

更多的機會明確和肯定地消除白種人。

SUPREMACY.

最高權力：

AND HE CLEARLY AND DEFINITIVELY TOOK A PASS.

他明確地和明確地採取了傳球。

>> THEY SHOULD STOP DEFUNDING POLICE LIKE THEY HAVE DONE IN

>> 他們應該停止像過去那樣為警察提供資金。

NEW YORK-- >> BUT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WHITE

紐約 -- >> 但我們說的是白人。

SUPREMACISTS, SIR.

上校，先生。

>> --LIKE THEY'VE DONE IN NEW YORK.

>> 就像他們在紐約做的那樣。

I JUST TOLD YOU.

我只是告訴你。

>> BUT DO YOU DENOUNCE THEM?

>> 但是，你否認他們嗎？

DO YOU DENOUNCE-- >> I'VE ALWAYS DENOUNCED ANY

你否認... ... -> 我一直否認任何

FORM-- >> --OF WHITE SUPREMACY?

形式-->>--白人至上？

>> ANY FORM-- ANY FORM OF ANY OF THAT, YOU HAVE TO DENOUNCE.

>> 任何形式的... 任何形式的，你都要放棄。

>> Stephen: DIDN'T SAY IT AGAIN!

>> Stephen:我又沒說!

( AS LADY ) "DONALD, DO YOU LOVE ME?"

（作為夫人） "唐納德，你愛我嗎？"

( AS TRUMP ) "YOU GOTTA LOVE-- AND LOVE IS--

"你得愛... 愛是...

YOU GOTTA DO IT.

你一定要做到這一點。

I'VE ALWAYS SAID I LOVE LOVING, IN ANY FORM."

我一直說我喜歡愛，以任何形式。"

BUT AGAIN, HE TRIED A VARIATION ON THE VERY FINE PEOPLE ON BOTH

但他又一次在兩邊非常優秀的人身上試了一次變異。

SIDES THING.

側面的東西。

>> BUT I ALSO-- JOE BIDEN HAS TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT ANTIFA.

>> 但我也... 喬・比登必須對反恐怖組織說點什麼。

IT'S NOT A PHILOSOPHY.

這不是一種哲學。

THESE ARE PEOPLE THAT HIT PEOPLE OVER THE HEAD.

這些人都是打人的人的頭。

>> Stephen: (AS TRUMP) "THESE PEOPLE ARE HEAD BOPPERS,

>> Stephen:(如特魯姆普) "這些人都是腦袋爆炸的人。

LITTLE BUNNY ANTI-FOO RUNNING THROUGH THE FOREST, PICKIN'

小兔子抗糞便在森林中奔跑，採摘。

UP THE PROUD BOYS, AND BOPPIN' 'EM ON THE HEAD."

驕傲的孩子們，和BOPPIN'他們的頭。"

WITH TUNA CANS.

與TUNA罐。

STILL, TRUMP FEELS GOOD ABOUT LAST NIGHT'S DEBATE, BECAUSE,

但是，特朗普對昨晚的辯論感到高興，因為：

UH, RATINGS?

呃，評級？

>> I THOUGHT THE DEBATE LAST NIGHT WAS GREAT.

>> 我覺得昨晚的辯論很精彩。

WE'VE GOTTEN TREMENDOUS REVIEWS ON IT.

我們已經得到了TREMENDOUS評論上。

I THOUGHT IT WAS A GREAT EVENING.

我覺得這是一個很棒的夜晚。

IT WAS AN EXCITING EVENING, I SEE THE RATINGS WERE VERY

這是一個激動人心的夜晚，我看到的評分非常高。

HIGH.

高。

>> Stephen: JUST BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE WATCH SOMETHING

>> 斯蒂芬: 只是因為很多人都在看一些東西。

DOESN'T MEAN SOMETHING IS GOOD.

並不意味著什麼是好的。

I HEAR PUBLIC EXECUTIONS WERE QUITE POPULAR IN THEIR DAY.

我聽說，在那個時代，公決是很受歡迎的。

THAT DOESN'T MEAN WE SHOULD HAVE A TV SHOW CALLED "SO YOU THINK

但這並不意味著我們應該有一個電視節目叫 "你覺得呢？